sandyf

A Message to Del Boy (Also Known as Anthony Fowler) For a start, money is money. It doesn't buy brains, personality, class, style or credibility. Calling me a “bitter jealous woman” because I asked questions about the products you promote demonstrated none of them. Whatever else you claim CBD can do, it clearly doesn't give you brains. You chose to throw a personal insult rather than answer questions about the origin of your "peptides" or what “manufactured in-house” actually means. You then introduced Supreme CBD as evidence that people should trust you: “People buy from me because they can trust me. I made Supreme CBD a multi million pound company because I sell the best.” Since you've chosen to use Supreme CBD as proof of your credibility, let’s dive into that statement. In February 2024, the ASA upheld complaints involving Supreme CBD, Anthony Fowler, John Hartson and Matt Le Tissier. The ads weren't properly identified as advertising and included prohibited claims that CBD could help with anxiety, depression and insomnia. In November 2024, the ASA upheld another complaint concerning a post on Anthony’s personal X account claiming that CBD would “work for everyone” and provide health benefits. Anthony argued that these were simply his personal opinions. The ASA found that because he owned Supreme CBD and was promoting its products, the post was an advertisement. It also noted that there were no authorised health claims for CBD on the GB Register. In October 2025, the ASA upheld two further issues concerning a Supreme CBD video posted on Anthony’s Instagram account. It found that the ad implied CBD could treat chronic anxiety and depression and was more effective than prescribed antidepressants. It also found that the content discouraged essential medical treatment by recommending that people come off antidepressants and use CBD instead. By June 2026, Supreme CBD had been placed on the ASA’s non-compliant advertisers list. The ASA said prohibited claims had continued across the company’s website, social-media accounts and affiliate promotions despite repeated requests for them to be removed or amended. That is the company you chose to cite as proof that people can trust you. You could well “sell the best.” The question is: the best of what? The best of the worst? A multimillion-pound company just proves that people bought from you, not that they should have trusted you. Three upheld ASA rulings and a place on its non-compliant advertisers list make Supreme CBD a rather strange exhibit for credibility. Now what's there for me to be jealous about?