Quality Schools for Every Child retweeted
Must read from SF Chronicle on the war on accelerated math in Palo Alto and how it's playing out in school board race. Brian Conrad spot-on again. archive.ph/S2bqp#selection-1…
Quality Schools for Every Child retweeted
Coming up on 25 years in education and still unable to understand why so many people think making a teacher’s job difficult, unsatisfying, and frustrating equals “empowering” them.
Quality Schools for Every Child retweeted
"Too much hope and pray school reform in education."
Quality Schools for Every Child retweeted
Palo Alto ‘math wars’ reflect a raging nationwide debate sfchronicle.com/bayarea/arti…
Quality Schools for Every Child retweeted
The College-in-3 trend is accelerating. Early movers experimenting with a 3 year bachelor’s degree were less selective schools like Merrimack or Weber State. Then states like OH, OK, and KS told their flagship universities to pilot the 90 credit degree. Now even NYU is doing it.
Quality Schools for Every Child retweeted
Why aren't more states following the Southern Surge leaders?
@MichaelPetrilli and I just published pieces on the same day, reflecting on that hard reality.
Mike wants states to "Just do things." Amen.
I've concluded that they probably aren't going to. Certainly not at an acceptable pace, given our troubling national outcomes.
I've decided to start building solutions, instead.
Quality Schools for Every Child retweeted
BREAKING: The Superintendent of Seattle Public Schools announced in his weekly email: "The conversation around school mergers begins."
He wrote, "In 1964, Seattle Public Schools had an enrollment over 94,000 students. Today, our student count sits under 50,000. Over the last half century, there have been years of growth and decades of decline."
"Some of the decline was out of the district’s control, but some was self-inflicted: a lack of clarity of vision and purpose, a revolving door of disparate and problematic leadership, fits and starts of numerous programs and policies, each seemingly in contrast with the previous iteration. But through it all, there seemed to be a district that did not privilege students and their families."
"Decisions seemed to be made in direct opposition to the expressed needs of our community. When parents asked for rigor, we thought of cutting advanced programming. When families asked for clarity, they got obfuscation. When we hear about the desire for more arts, music, and dual language programs, we seem to cut those first. When community members want to donate, volunteer, or support the district, we create roadblock after roadblock."
He then spoke about his visits to all the schools: "Some students were in beautiful buildings with bright, airy, light-filled classrooms, while others spent their days in buildings without interior walls, traipsing through poorly lit hallways and hearing the scurry of much smaller beings in the rafters."
"I saw robust learning communities with teachers who could share within their grades amongst colleagues and schools with just one second grade teacher who had to fend for themselves. I saw schools that got itinerant music teachers once a week or even once every two weeks, while others had full-time teachers firmly part of the school community. And what I saw over and over again was forced split classes. Room after room of second and third graders trying to learn together. Fourth and fifth graders struggling because of the inherent difficulty of teaching “up” or “down” or two grades at once."
"I also saw a K-8 school with less than 50 students, where multi-grade classes are the norm. I saw a K-5 school with less than 120 kids trying to contort and contrive as best it could to serve our students. But no matter how great the staff is, this is an extra burden to bear."
"I hear communities with very low enrollment say, “But Ben, just give us a year, give us two years, we will get students to come. Give us a PR budget and we will draw tens if not hundreds of students. Just redraw district lines and force students into our school.” I appreciate that all, but each idea takes time and would either cannibalize other schools or be based on wishful thinking. In times like these I often think of the Dr. Martin Luther King quote, 'We are now faced with the fact that tomorrow is today. We are confronted with the fierce urgency of now. This is the time for vigorous and positive action.'"
"I don’t want students to spend one more year in a building where bookcases serve as walls, if we don’t have to. I don’t want students to spend one more year in a sixth-seventh-eighth grade split if we don’t have to. I don’t want teachers to be the only teacher in the grade if we don’t have to. I don’t want to accept large class sizes if we don’t have to. So, the conversation around school mergers begins."
The timeline is as follows:
Senior Leadership meetings – First two weeks in September
Principal meetings – September and October
Staff meetings – October and November
Family meetings – November and December
Community meetings/public hearings – January and February
Board possible action – Late February or early March
Quality Schools for Every Child retweeted
NYT: “This, like so many laments about what things cost in America, is a housing story. Student housing — even in university-owned residences — can cost more than tuition and related fees.”
Quality Schools for Every Child retweeted
NYC spends $107,033 per student at a single middle school. Why?
Let's examine how school spending has gotten out of control at MS371 and why small schools in the city need to merge or close to provide better resources to everyone, including those attending these schools. 🧵
Quality Schools for Every Child retweeted
I’m hard-pressed to find the wildest detail in this thread.
But… 67% chronic absenteeism???
With this kind of staff-to-student ratio??
Quality Schools for Every Child retweeted
I need to repost this as Anita Archer's keynote yesterday at ResearchEd Toronto discussed the convergence of the three sciences.
This is seriously my favorite book I've read in my 26-year professional career. I read this book in one day, taking copious notes throughout. The author, Paige Pullen contends that effective literacy instruction requires insights from three complementary knowledge bases:
Literacy science
Learning science
Instructional science
This book is pure brilliance. I honestly hope it sells a million copies. This should be a core academic book in every school of education AND one that should be read by every single educator out there. It really is that good!
Quality Schools for Every Child retweeted
Students who walk in with the background knowledge to benefit from the class and do well at it. That’s what I imagine.
Quality Schools for Every Child retweeted
We were told in our teacher education courses not to grade with red ink because its association with being wrong could cause the students to feel stigmatized.
When I say there is no idea so stupid that someone with a PhD in education won’t advocate for it, I mean it.
Replying to @0Beanie05923291 @rodjnaquin
I remember in teacher training reading a moronic paper that ended with teachers lining up to a garbage can to theatrically throw away the red pens they used to correct student writing. Unhelpful.
Quality Schools for Every Child retweeted
I have a ton of respect for Bethany, and I appreciate this thread.
It reminds me that traditional schools (public, charter, private) are not being transparent enough about the EdTech takeover of classrooms.
Because @Alphaschool students spend less time than most kids on screens.
Really.
Quality Schools for Every Child retweeted
Sobering article. Teachers feel they must limit writing assignments to classroom time, to combat AI cheating.
The downstream cost: students aren't being asked to do longer-form writing anywhere.
"Now she limits essay writing to the classroom, by hand, where students have little opportunity to develop longer, more complex arguments. The result, she admits, is that they may be unprepared for college-level writing.
Even her best students’ “eyes would fall out of their head,” she said, if she asked them to write an eight-page paper.
Her solution ensures that kids do their own work, but it may come at a cost. They lose the long, messy practice of learning how to compose at length and, some argue, how to think."
Quality Schools for Every Child retweeted
Nothing creates a stronger appetite for school choice than politicizing curriculum and culture war battles waged over public education. Oddly, choice opponents seem unaware of this.
Quality Schools for Every Child retweeted
I've always thought highly of the Rocket Math Fact Fluency program. I've had students that were completing less than 10 multiplication facts correctly in two minutes at the beginning of the year. Most are above 30, some above 40 now with 6 weeks of practice. Yesterday, I asked them if they really liked doing fact practice in school and for homework. Only a couple raised their hands. I followed up with a particular student. She has improved significantly. She doesn't love doing it, but she said (with a smile) that it has really improved her fact fluency - practice has. This is a good learning experience for kids. Deliberate practice might not be fun, but in many instances is necessary in life. Within the first six weeks my math students completed just over 10,000 facts in the four operations (just over 2,500 facts for each operation). I'm moving to fraction fluency practice on Monday.
Quality Schools for Every Child retweeted
The second season of ‘Sold a Story,’ a podcast about education, opens in 1966 in an Illinois classroom. The teacher is a former Chicago marketing executive named Siegfried Engelmann. Before him sit seven Black children. He calls out arithmetic questions and they answer together, as is the norm in direct instruction, the teaching method Engelmann pioneered. The lesson moves on to algebra. The children keep pace. Then the creator and host of the podcast, Emily Hanford, cuts in. The children, she notes, are in preschool.
Sixty years later, we have UC Berkeley math teaching professor Zvezdelina Stankova complaining, in a San Francisco ‘Standard’ op-ed that went viral this summer, that students at the University of California’s flagship campus were struggling with “fractions and basic algebra you would expect students to learn in middle school.” What happened?
A year after Engelmann showed off his method in a recorded half-hour lesson, President Lyndon B. Johnson instructed education officials in his administration to evaluate the best way to teach poor children. They landed on Engelmann’s direct instruction — but it was never implemented nationwide. The reason was Engelmann’s “militaristic” approach to education, as the education writer Alfie Kohn explained in his criticism of direct instruction, which he said is today favored by “right-wing activists” who “wanted to make sure that learning itself is conceived as a fundamentally passive process.” Engelmann’s supporters’ politics were off, which meant his ideas were bad. And since Kohn gave this assessment in 2022, it seems that little has changed.
Read more about how we’ve forgotten the art of teaching kids math, from the second season of ‘Sold a Story’: nymag.visitlink.me/1BaDzx
Quality Schools for Every Child retweeted
This is what teachers are being taught. Lots of teachers know it's not right. Lots of teachers try to avoid these methods. But when the curriculum, PD and teacher training is consistently like this, it takes hold.






























