The Science Research Mole (@science_mole) header
The Science Research Mole (@science_mole) profile picture

Disclosing the inner secrets of medical research industry, but for fear of retribution I must hide my identity. One part parody, one part brutal truth.

Melbourne
Joined August 2021
Photo by The Science Research Mole (@science_mole)Photo by The Science Research Mole (@science_mole)Photo by The Science Research Mole (@science_mole)Photo by The Science Research Mole (@science_mole)Photo by The Science Research Mole (@science_mole)Photo by The Science Research Mole (@science_mole)Photo by The Science Research Mole (@science_mole)Photo by The Science Research Mole (@science_mole)Photo by The Science Research Mole (@science_mole)Photo by The Science Research Mole (@science_mole)
What really shits me are the people who are ascribing the Bondi Junction stabbing to whatever groups they dislike or wish to deflect blame to. So far I've seen people blaming Jews, Muslims, Christians, racism from white people, males, video games, Marxism, mental illness, drugs..
6
1,181
Craig Venter? ...
Please complete: Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of ____________________
316
This is true ... It simply wouldn't have been possible to make an influenza vaccine before we could even grow the virus in the lab.
Good lord- RFK Jr. claimed on Rogan’s podcast that there is good evidence that the flu vaccine caused the 1918 Spanish Flu epidemic. Slight problem with that claim: influenza had not even been identified until the 1930s and a flu vaccine wasn’t available to the public until 1945.
312
A 7.4% increase in #ARC funding ... At least it's gone up with inflation ... @arc_gov_au
123
Looks like a 3% increase in the #NHMRC budget!!!!!!
1
458
A 2.9% success rate for ECRs ... How can I honestly tell a prospective PhD student that there's any career path in medical research at this point?
2.9% success rate = 9 grants awarded from 307 applicants! *For the stream specifically identified for ECRs* And no assessor feedback! This is a complete failure of policy, funding & leadership "The MRFF aims to transform health and medical research" - yeah right ...
1
265
How do you account for jobs where unpaid work is part of the package? For example, I read a research paper almost every night before bed, which contributes to my work knowledge base. Should I get paid extra for that?
1
1
96
As a lecturer, you would have also done many 1000 of hours of unpaid extra work to be competitive enough to get the position. Who should pay for that? Who gains from that?
74
The Science Research Mole retweeted
13yr old: Why are you stressed me: im applying for grants 13yro: do you like applying for grants me: absolutely not, it's stressful 13yro: then why are you doing it me: so I can run a lab & do research 13yro: But if you keep doing research dont you just have to write more grants?
13
15
1
578
89,226
The Science Research Mole retweeted
It’s very hard to get a professor to understand something when his grants depend on not understanding it.
7
10
2
107
9,269
Or everyone who has ever been on a grant view panel ...
This Post is from an account that no longer exists. Learn more
2
98
The Science Research Mole retweeted
The academic career ladder
32
323
53
2,838
The Science Research Mole retweeted
Sussan Ley could have gone high and wished Anthony Albanese a speedy recovery. She chose to go low. What a pathetic individual she is. #Matthew
102
235
11
2,620
I think Dan will win today. There's a feeling you get before governments are thrown out. I just don't get that feeling today. I could be in a left wing echo chamber more than usual.
Looks like changing the government hasn't done anything positive for research funding #nhmrc #budget
The Science Research Mole retweeted
The next UK PM will last .... -200 days Courtesy @Sansom_Rob
The goal of backyard hydrology is to send water towards your neighbours yard ...
This is a good point. No one is going to say this on their personal account, but the reality is almost zero people are going to read your entire paper, let alone read it in the formatted order. Scientists simply don't have the time to read everything in full detail.
A well-written scientific paper does not build up suspense, it blasts the main results in at least 7 ways, starting with the title. The main results are also stated in the abstract, the introduction, the results section, the discussion, the conclusions, and of course the figures.
1
Unless the paper is the GOAT in that field ...
Why is it that every dickhead worries about wind turbines hitting birds, yet somehow doesn't care about the birds habitat ripped up by coal mining. Or birds killed by cats ... or cars.