Sick of being told what to think.

England
Joined September 2020
shocklegger retweeted
No big headline for this 👇 Labour fined £14,250. Reform fined £2,187. Guess which one the left-wing press shouted about? In 2023 Labour was fined £14,250 by the Electoral Commission for failing to declare donations properly. 20 separate breaches. Big money, real reporting failures. No big headlines on The London Economic. No pile-on. This week Reform was fined £1,750 for missing small print on three social media pages and an advert. Paid it a month late so it went to £2,187. That's it. Admin. But that one is everywhere. Screenshots, outrage, "Reform in trouble." Same regulator. Same type of mistake. One fine seven times bigger than the other. Only one gets turned into a scandal - and it's the one for Farage. Tell you everything you need to know about the left-wing press. 🤦
106
1,714
35
4,362
46,629
shocklegger retweeted
Why were Jonathan Powell, Peter Mandelson and Lord Hermer appointed without vetting? The answer is that Chagos was a deal Starmer couldn't refuse to make. Here's a timeline of the key stages of the Chagos treachery. In 1982, after it became known that the Chagos seabed may contain vast mineral wealth, Mauritius set up a select committee to examine the matter. However, sea-mining technology was in its infancy, and it was too expensive to be commercially viable at that time. In 2003, as underwater mining technologies advanced and the value of minerals and rare earth elements soared, mining the Chagos seabed became an exciting possibility again; Mauritius appointed the eminent international barrister Sir Ian Brownlie as advisor for the Chagos Archipelago. A former member of the Communist Party of Great Britain, Brownlie was a good friend of Sir Satcam Boolell, a former Labour deputy prime minister of Mauritius, and High Commissioner in London. In 2009, Brownlie led the first Mauritius delegation to the Foreign Office in London seeking a Chagos deal. Among the delegation was Sir Satcam Boolell's son Satyajit, who became Mauritius Director of Public Prosecutions the same year. In 2010, after Brownlie died in a motor accident in Egypt, Sir Keir Starmer’s “great mate”, Philippe Sands, a leading human-rights lawyer who has publicly boasted of humiliating the UK in international courts, took over as counsel to Mauritius for Chagos. In 2013, Satyajit Boolell invited Keir Starmer, whom he had become friendly with during Starmer's time as the UK's DPP, to a legal conference at the 5-star Balaclava resort in Mauritius. During the trip, Starmer discussed the future of the Chagos Archipelago with then Mauritius prime minister Navin Ramgoolam. After Starmer’s 2013 visit, Ramgoolam wrote that he and Starmer were aligned over Chagos. In 2015, Ramgoolam was arrested on money-laundering charges when large sums of cash in foreign currencies, suitcases full of brand-new luxury watches, and blank British visas were found in his home. Also in 2015, Starmer was elected to the British Parliament. In 2019, Philippe Sands, after a campaign of lobbying the UN, obtained an International Court of Justice ruling (advisory opinion only, and non-binding) that the Chagos islands should be given to Mauritius. Sands used the ICJ ruling as leverage in the following years in his efforts to persuade the Conservative government to give Chagos to Mauritius. In 2020, Starmer became leader of the Labour Party. In 2021, Sands received Mauritius' top honour, The Most Distinguished Order of the Star and Key of the Indian Ocean. In 2022, Sands made an unauthorized entry into the Chagos Archipelago for a flag-raising ceremony. Sands tweets at the time, “It’s morning on Chagos, where the flag of Mauritius flies." In 2023, Sands became a Mauritius citizen, but retains his British and French citizenships. 🧧In November 2023, David Cameron replaced James Cleverly as Foreign Secretary and, with the support of other senior Tories, stopped a Chagos deal saying, it’s not in the national interest, as reported in Hansard. In July 2024, Starmer became UK Prime Minister and just ten weeks after entering Downing Street, he agreed a deal with Mauritius, despite there having been no mention of Chagos during the election campaign, and the Labour manifesto pledging to protect the BOT. in November of 2024, Ramgoolam was elected Mauritius prime minister again after a snap general election, and took over from the incumbent PM, Pravind Jugnauth, to lead the Chagos negotiations with the UK. In December 2024, after 14 years in the role, Philippe Sands steps down as Mauritius counsel for Chagos. In January 2025, Attorney General Lord Hermer recused himself from signing off on the Chagos deal, and declined to say why. In February 2025, Jugnauth was arrested on money-laundering charges after large sums of cash in foreign currencies and suitcases full of brand-new luxury watches were found in his home. In May 2025, twelve years after discussing the future of Chagos in Mauritius, Starmer and Ramgoolam sat down in London to sign the treaty that transfers the archipelago's sovereignty to Mauritius. The Fall Out. The Chagos deal does🟥NOT secure the joint UK/US military base on Diego Garcia. The deal operationally hobbles the base, and increases the dangers to the British and American military personnel, and the civilians who work there, and in the wider Central Indian Ocean region. Diego Garcia's remoteness made it easy to defend in the past. This deal leaves the base horribly vulnerable to the growing threats posed by the new longer-range missiles, and more sophisticated and lethal drones. When Keir Starmer, Lord Hermer and Vijay Rangarajan, the Director General at the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office, made the deal it was fully understood that the outer islands of the Chagos Archipelago were by far the best locations to deploy early warning, and air-defense systems, to protect the main base from missile and drone attacks. Yet they still decided to lease only Diego Garcia. Andy Burnham, Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband, and Defense Minister Wes Streeting, know the deal increases the dangers to the lives of British service personnel, and our NATO allies personnel, in the strategically important Central Indian Ocean region. To double down and push the deal with that knowledge is a shameful act of betrayal. While the deal leaves Diego Garcia vulnerable to attack, it also renders the base itself ineffective and operationally hobbled. Mauritius is a signatory of the Pelindaba African Weapon-Free Zone Treaty which bans all nuclear weapons from treaty members' territory. Pelindaba gives each of the more the 40 countries who have signed it the right to inspect the facilities on Diego Garcia if they suspect nuclear arms are being stored there. The UK's nuclear-armed Trident submarines will no longer be able to enter Chagos waters, or visit Diego Garcia which is the only island in the region which has suitable anchorage and facilities for maintenance and restocking provisions, etc. The US's nuclear-armed submarines, ships, and planes will also be banned from Diego Garcia and the Chagos Archipelago's waters. Mauritius gets complete sovereignty over everything, including control of the airspace above the Chagos Archipelago, which at 250,000 square miles is the same size as France. The implications of controlling such a vast area of airspace in a strategically vital region are huge. Mauritius has shown it will ban planes entering its current airspace when China asks. The Chagos Deal does not ‘secure the base’. It methodically destroys every element required for operations. The text and annexes state it will: ❌Constrain future Ops and use of the base ❌Prevent the placing of sensors and other maritime installations ❌Require us to sight our foes on defence planning ❌Mean we’re unable to use our preferred contractors ❌See us lose of control over electromagnetic spectrum.
21
238
26
483
10,252
shocklegger retweeted
Why is it that no one says India is not diverse enough? or China? Or Singapore? Or Mali? Or Mexico etc? But Ireland, America, France, Italy, Canada & so on, all these majority white countries have to be diverse or there is something fundamentally wrong with them? So diversity is only needed if a society if majority white?
1,237
6,704
284
27,820
361,417
shocklegger retweeted
The Burnhams of this world think you're as thick as pig muck. Half the EU is already buckling under mass migration. Anyone who tells you free movement wouldn't drag that problem straight across the Channel is talking out of their backside. Every migrant handed a passport in Paris, Berlin or Stockholm gets a free ticket to Britain. And that's the real game. Sign up to free movement, then shrug and say "sorry, Brussels won't let us control our borders." It's cowardice, pure and simple. Technocracy over democracy. Brussels over Britain.
94
413
8
2,017
15,767
shocklegger retweeted
An illegal migrant held an 83-year-old woman at gunpoint. She was having lunch at home with her husband in a quiet Lanarkshire village when they were alerted to a break-in. In their bedroom, they found Chirag Solanki with a firearm, a five-inch knife, cable ties, duct tape and a balaclava. Solanki ‘held a firearm against her temple with his right hand and a knife to her throat with his left hand’. He was in our country illegally. Yet he was left to roam free and terrorise British citizens. Every crime committed by such people is the result of Tory and Labour failure to uphold immigration law. Reform will end this madness. We will take our country back.
115
1,869
29
7,838
99,500
shocklegger retweeted
Women in hijab shouting in Arabic. Palestinian flags everywhere, also Lebanese. People with keffiyeh and signs in Arabic. They are shouting for Islamic intifada. This is not the Middle East. This is Germany. Europeans must wake up—now or never.
199
1,437
58
3,819
42,544
shocklegger retweeted
Very soon, we will have a Parliament controlled by a plethora of immigrant MP's each with their own agenda and that wont include promoting their constituencies needs but interfering in other countries problems. No sane country permits migrants to dominate their Parliament, this country does...
9
67
278
1,345
🚨🇬🇧 In the UK Crates of Weapons are supplied to Migrant Hotels & HMO where 99% Military Aged Male Migrants are being housed There are also multiple reports of Guns being stored This doesn’t end well
🚨🇬🇧 Meanwhile in the UK This is truly terrifying if true… Hotel Owner turned Whistleblower paid by the Government to house Hundreds of illegals receives a large shipment & further parcel. He then decides to open them.
77
1,029
51
2,155
64,615
shocklegger retweeted
🚨🇬🇧 THERE YOU HAVE IT. THE FIGURES ARE NOW IN BLACK AND WHITE. The Economist has published an analysis of sexual-offence conviction rates by nationality in England and Wales, using Ministry of Justice data obtained through Freedom of Information requests. And the findings raise serious questions. 📊 SEXUAL-OFFENCE CONVICTION RATES — 2020–2022 Compared with British nationals, after adjusting for age and sex: 🇦🇫 Afghanistan: 7 TIMES HIGHER 🌍 Middle East & North Africa: ~3.5 TIMES HIGHER 🌍 Sub-Saharan Africa: ~2.5 TIMES HIGHER 🌍 Other Europe: ~1.7 TIMES HIGHER 🌏 South Asia: ~1.4 TIMES HIGHER 🌎 Americas & Caribbean: ~1.1 times 🇬🇧 British nationals: 1× (baseline) 🇪🇺 European Union: ~0.8 times 🌏 East Asia & Oceania: ~0.6 times The regional figures are approximate readings from The Economist's chart. 💷 NOW LOOK AT THE UNDERLYING DATA. The Ministry of Justice records examined cover 2010–2024: ▪️ Approximately 8 MILLION recorded cautions and convictions across offence categories. ▪️ Approximately 106,000 sexual-offence records. ▪️ 409 attributed to Afghan nationals — 0.39% of the sexual-offence records over those 15 years. ▪️ Around 80% attributed to British nationals. ▪️ The Economist estimates the Afghan-national population increased from approximately 21,400 in the 2021 Census to 45,000 by the end of 2022. Despite accounting for population changes and adjusting for age and sex, its estimated Afghan-national sexual-offence conviction rate remained approximately SEVEN TIMES the British rate in 2020–2022. ⚠️ These are recorded conviction-rate estimates, NOT the rate at which every crime occurs. The exact multipliers remain uncertain, and nationality does not establish immigration status. But that doesn't make the disparities disappear. ❓ SO HERE ARE MY QUESTIONS FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 1️⃣ Why aren't comprehensive nationality and immigration-status conviction statistics routinely published? 2️⃣ How many convicted foreign nationals are deported after completing their sentences? 3️⃣ How many remain in Britain following conviction? 4️⃣ What preventative action is being taken in response to identified risks? 5️⃣ Why should the public have to rely on FOI requests and journalists to examine these figures? This is about evidence, public safety, victims and government accountability. Not blaming entire communities for the offences of individuals. The British public deserves complete, transparent statistics and policies informed by evidence. 📚 SOURCES: The Economist, 26 October 2026 (republished): hindustantimes.com/world-new… Oxford University Migration Observatory, Migrants and Crime in the UK, August 2026: migrationobservatory.ox.ac.u… 📊 Chart: The Economist / Ministry of Justice / ONS. 🔁 SHARE THE EVIDENCE. DEMAND TRANSPARENCY. #PublicAudit #UKPolitics #CrimeStatistics #Immigration #Accountability
5
59
2
111
2,191
shocklegger retweeted
Afghan man has 70 kids despite being unable to feed and take care of them. “I cannot remember all their names.” 12 of his children have died and he has blamed their deaths on the mothers being ‘young’ and unable to “breastfeed them or look after them.”
1,287
3,152
665
11,653
2,550,667
shocklegger retweeted
Oooof So there is no such thing as moderate, only enablers?
3
17
1
60
1,248
shocklegger retweeted
Paris, France: 5 police officers surrounded by 200 rioters. This isn't a protest anymore. The social pact is dead. This is France in 2026.
155
1,498
52
4,023
55,150
shocklegger retweeted
Car crash interview. £874 million to get about 4,000 people off the street. That’s £190,000 each. Buy them a house. Instead it’s contracts, outreach teams and councils deciding where the cash goes. Rough sleeping rose under Burnham in Manchester. Now we’re nationalising the failure.
204
676
56
2,293
116,032
HORRIFIC: What happened in Paris yesterday was horrific. A man is dead. Others are fighting for their lives. A 12-year-old girl was shot eight times. And before the blood was even dry, Macron was on camera declaring it a “racist terrorist attack.” Declaring that victims were selected for the colour of their skin and their religion. He called it a “turning point.” Then he said this: “It is the first time we have had a terrorist act that was planned to kill our compatriots, our children, based on the colour of their skin or their religion.” The FIRST time. Let that sink in. The first time? That single sentence should make every French citizen furious. So Toulouse wasn’t a turning point? When Mohamed Merah walked into a Jewish school and executed a rabbi and three small children point-blank, one of them just three years old? Charlie Hebdo wasn’t a turning point? When Islamists massacred journalists for drawing cartoons? Hyper Cacher wasn’t a turning point? When four Jews were murdered simply for being Jews while shopping for Shabbat? The Bataclan wasn’t a turning point? When 90 young people were slaughtered like animals inside a concert hall? Nice wasn’t a turning point? When a truck was driven through families and 86 people were crushed to death, children included? Father Jacques Hamel wasn’t a turning point? When his throat was slit at the altar of his own church? Samuel Paty wasn’t a turning point? When a teacher was beheaded in the street for showing his class free speech? Dominique Bernard wasn’t a turning point? How many corpses did France have to bury before it counted? How many Jewish children, journalists, shoppers, concertgoers, priests and teachers had to die? And let’s be clear about something else: the investigation into yesterday’s horror is still establishing motive. The facts are still being gathered. Yet Macron already has the narrative, the motive, the moral, and the political lesson ready to go. If the evidence proves racist intent, then condemn it to the fullest extent of the law. Call it what it is. No one will defend it. But do not rewrite French history to do it. Do not insult the memory of the dead to serve today’s narrative. France changed long ago. The French people know it because they lived it. They bled through it. They remember the little girl in Toulouse. They remember the editors slumped over their desks. They remember the hostages in the kosher store. They remember the bodies on the floor of the Bataclan. They remember the strollers shattered on the promenade in Nice. They remember the priest. They remember the teacher. You can try to push those atrocities into the background because they are inconvenient to your politics. But you cannot make a nation forget what it saw with its own eyes. Politicians can rewrite the narrative. They will never rewrite people’s memories. And they will never make France forget its dead
620
3,706
214
10,968
340,826
shocklegger retweeted
Imagine you are a 7 year old little girl, waiting for your mum at a hostel in Acton, west London. A man offers you an apple. You say no five times. He pulls you into his room and sexually assaults you. You manage to run away and tell your mum what happened immediately. Afsar Safi entered the UK by small boat in 2021. He claimed that he was associated with the Taliban since he was a child himself. His application for asylum had been refused but he was appealing this when the assault took place. His reason for assaulting a 7 year old was that it was culturally normal to kiss children where he was from. He initially received 2.5 years for kidnap and sexual assault. That is an appalling sentence. On Friday, the Court of Appeal found it to be far too lenient and increased it….to 4 years. He is likely to serve just half of that in prison and almost certainly will not be deported for “human rights” reasons.
56
236
21
462
6,889
shocklegger retweeted
This video is very important for Europe. It shows that those who loot, destroy cars, set fires and cause chaos speak Arabic. And if they speak Arabic, they are not Europeans. Let's assume many people won't want this video to spread, because it tells too much truth.
889
15,760
618
29,139
378,840
It’s seems like “they” got their way and made sure “they” ruined our way of life …
14
67
4
231
3,964
Bill Gates is currently on trial! Gates & his cohorts tried to BAN the video below from the internet. The video where Gates ADMITS his plan. Some of us KEPT COPIES! But did you know that Gates also has a passion for Folic Acid too? He has been working on this mass medication for a long time.
13
112
5
131
1,494
shocklegger retweeted
French women speaking the truth. Video by: @brookerteejones
107
1,054
54
3,660
140,295
shocklegger retweeted
The BBC does not just need defunding, it seriously needs to be closed down for what it is. A cess pit of deviance, leftism, and anti semitism. "The BBC has agreed a £400,000 payout to a Jewish documentary-maker who says she was the victim of anti-Semitism and was bullied out of the broadcaster. Lucie Kon, whose work for the BBC won awards including an Oscar and an Emmy, says she was victimised in the wake of the Oct 7 terrorist attacks in Israel by colleagues who said Zionists such as her were “evil”. Ms Kon, who has family in Israel, claims she was told that “if you want to call Hamas terrorists then you have to call Israel terrorists, too” and that she should “think about what drove Hamas to do what they did”. When she made a formal complaint about her treatment, the BBC told Ms Kon to stay at home for months, sidelined her and eventually put her out of work." telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/10…
1
15
2
39
821