@slothanalyst

taking notes on PDE as a outmoded subject, thought criminal

 Zembla
Joined July 2021
  • Tweets1.5K
  • Following149
  • Followers105
84Media
Is there a way to make this "request" mathematical? If I have a forced blow up to Navier Stokes I can just define f_E like this and then one can claim this secretly comes from Euler. Do I get some part of the million for this?
https://philpapers.org/archive/NIETOA-2.pdf

ALT https://philpapers.org/archive/NIETOA-2.pdf

Jenny Lorraine Nielsen ⭐🐯
@QualiaQuantaOct 26
Replying to @slothanalyst @ZoharKo @Frances01896069
I have a good understanding of the Navier Stokes proof by Open AI. It's not a proof of Navier Stokes. It's a rehashing of the Euler blowup published by a human mathematician in August 2026
1
59
@QualiaQuanta any comment
7
sloth12 retweeted
big brane boi@bcubeddd20h
It's also notable that the coterie of mathematicians that OpenAI courted doesn't seem to be involved. Instead there is one relevant scientist (Jaffe) and Gross (?) Nekrasov (?) Douglas (???)
2
1
18
736
Bitter lesson 2: AI is better than humans at AI alignment research. (See attached AI-generated proof.)
3
3
1
133
7,774
It would greatly surprise me if my identity could not be easily discerned by anyone with a browser
3
122
lmfaoooooooooooo
goodalexander
@goodalexanderOct 23
Heard of a top law firm completely cutting off Harvey and all API calls to Claude/OpenAI after they saw what openAI did with navier strokes Now hosting everything locally with GPUs they own, running Kimi and deepseek Think you’ll see a lot more of this going forward
2
3
1
70
5,510
The humiliation ritual continues tuesday...
sloth12@slothanalystOct 21
My NSF GFRP statement: Ever since I was young I have dreamed of taking government money to do something a machine could do much better than me…
1
4
212
My NSF GFRP statement: Ever since I was young I have dreamed of taking government money to do something a machine could do much better than me…
1
1
6
399
Yeah that was the first tip off that he was weird for sure
Julian Gamboa@JulianGumboOct 20
Seeing Billy call it X in You Can See Everything
129
The dynamics of gasses involve a massive of particles number of particles interacting with each other. There is no way for a human to compute or understand such complicated motion due to its sheer complexity, therefor only a computer can understand gas dynamics.
Sabine Hossenfelder
@skdhOct 19
If we want to continue progress in science, we must be prepared to acknowledge that the correct description of nature will eventually simply be too complicated for humans to understand. I do not think it is wise to make human understanding a requirement. AI is the way forward.
1
54
Gross underestimate from my experience
alz
@alz_zyd_Oct 19
Most students are spending like 2 hours a week on each class (not counting 3 hours not paying attention in lecture) so 20 hours in a quarter. So yeah most ugrad subjects can be learned halfway decently in a week
4
267
Showed up to cancelled seminar bc I am a chud undergrad not on the mailing list
4
217
Very awkward situation where I go to the local taco stand each week and pretend that my second cousin once removed who I’ve talked to once isn’t 10 feet away selling some bullshit granola
1
6
329
Please let my system close on the boundary. It’s all I’ve ever wanted. If there is a bulk term I am genuinely going to crash out
1
2
243
It doesn’t…not even defined well lol
1
60
Not getting enough dopamine bedrotting so we’re going to get a rare bedroom work session
1
84
This is like level 1 fem drink enthusiast stuff. I have tequila sodas now bc of the calorie count
5 ☆@theylovefrannOct 10
THE NIGGAS ARE ORDERING LYCHEE MARTINIS AND LEMON DROPS WHOS GONNA BE THE MEN????
3
292
Larp larp larp larp
Zach Weinersmith@ZachWeinerOct 10
There's a much better timeline where Grothendieck is still alive, gone mad, eating dandelions and wearing robes in a forgotten French village. Tao finds him, convinces him they have to get Perelman. It's the only way to defeat the machines.
5
167
Today I learned that I have never seen a proof of the Riemann mapping or Roses Representation theorems. Not exactly what I recalled but I listen to my betters
1
7
408
*Riesz
54
Load more