seeking work as a principal AI / research engineer for regenerative finance and collective intelligence

What "innovation" has there been in social systems at all over the last century? What even is a commune or socialism? They're not even a meaningful set of technology for coordinating. They're just agreements that we should use the existing systems towards different goals which isn't a system at all. Like... the people should "own" the means of production. That doesn't fucking mean anything. HOW would they coordinate and make decisions? These "systems" leave out the most important part which is to actually develop a new system of coordination. All they've done is create a learned helplessness in people that we can't create new actual systems of coordination and cling to the notion that the only thing that "scales" is capitalism and money. And honestly capitalism and money do not scale that well.

the problem is that the intellectual masturbators are most often right but they don't take action

just create your own religion so whatever bullshit you want to do you can justify for "religious purposes" #lifeHacks

we will never distribute knowledge at scale because monks have to hand copy books and that's very slow! hierarchy will always be more efficient than collective organization because of information bottlenecks!

there's this weird class of prople who cuck to power and hierarchy and their best explanation is that in the past collective oriented organization has failed and that it can't scale like hierarchy. like no fucking shit. the PAST. we're like 20 years into having any of the technology that *could* enable anything different it's like the saddest most pathetic regression to the mean things happening in the past happened because of the circumstances of the time. invention materially changes those circumstances. technology for communication and coordination is rapidly changing. things don't just continue to go the same regardless of invention 10 years ago people told me that generative AI would never do what it does now. To the point they got angry at me for suggesting otherwise. They had never seen it so OF COURSE it couldn't possibly exist Now these people try to claim knowledge over this domain despite their clear error on record. Good luck with that. Try backpropagating your error buddy.

suffering is a RLGF technique (reinforcement learning from god feedback)

Which century do you think people suffered the most on average? Which century do you think people suffered the least?

almost every human being who has ever existed has experienced suffering regardless of context

I wouldn't be surprised if this is a training algorithm for a higher order reality

"the next buddha will be a sangha" is a prediction.

their distractions are getting more and more transparent

ommmmmmm

you're safe it's just a dream

everyone is building the same thing and there's no guarantee it's useful