Stuart retweeted
This is a poisonous move on the part of the City of London. "If you won't let us run it in an unlawful way, we'll destroy it."
Replying to @tribunaltweets
must change it is likely that the Ponds will become fully mixed, and the LP will cease to exist. The Cs have said they don't have a preference but not true, look at letter before action. It says 'confirm the policy withdrawn', 'statement on line, will comply with FWS and operate
My son was uninvited to a fucking student Halloween party today.
The person who uninvited him said he was doing it because 5 people had said they wouldn't go if a Zionist was going, so instead of telling them to fucking grow up, he told my son not to come.
Where will this end?
Stuart retweeted
There are so many reasons why the draft Conversion Practices Bill must never become law. @Jebadoo2 and @HJoyceGender explained many of them in parliament yesterday.
1. It places parents who are putting their child’s interests first in real danger of prosecution. If a girl is so furious and distressed by her parents’ refusal to buy binders or testosterone that she feels their behaviour is abusive and is ruining her life, the parents could have their child taken from them and/or be prosecuted.
2. It is an attack on gay and lesbian teens, who are most likely (along with those on the autism spectrum) to be persuaded by peers or online influencers that they need to change their bodies. That is the actual gay conversion therapy that is going on right now. This Bill would make it worse.
3. It would allow activist individuals and organizations to bring private prosecutions against gender-critical individual organizations. LGB Alliance has already had to defend its existence in court once. This Bill would make all gender-critical organizations vulnerable to vexatious litigation. This would not only be a gross infringement of freedom of expression but would likely be exacerbated by gagging orders in the many months before such malicious prosecutions come to court.
4. The Bill seeks to introduce into law the concept of “gender identity” — a subjective feeling that is not defined and that has been shown to be subject to frequent change. At present “transgender identity” only appears in the Sentencing Act as an aggravating factor in the case of an existing offence. This draft Bill is entirely different. It is transparently a renewed attempt to bring “gender self-ID” into law, earlier attempts having failed.
5. It would introduce a chilling effect into therapy, discouraging therapists from taking on teens with gender-related issues for fear of being falsely accused of “conversion therapy.” This has already happened to the well-known psychiatrist Az Hakeem, who has immense experience with these patients but has now decided with regret that he can no longer see them. Experiences with jurisdictions such as Victoria, Australia, which have such bills, demonstrate this chilling effect.
6. As a result of the chilling effect mentioned above, the Bill would effectively mandate so-called “gender-affirming care” — an unconscionable restriction on medical practitioners seeking to act in their patients’ best interests.
7. The provisions of the Bill interfere with freedom of expression and family life in ways that are likely to be judged incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights and the Human Rights Act.
8. Detransitioners have vital information to convey on why this Bill would cause grave harm. So far, their lived experience has been ignored.
I am sure I have not listed all the problems with this Bill here. It was obvious yesterday, listening to the Bill’s supporters, that it was shoddily drafted without any thought of the many damaging consequences it would have. The Bill’s supporters are ideologues who are intent on getting gender identity into legislation in any way they can.
There is nothing good about this Bill. Please urge your MP to reject it.
Stuart retweeted
If you support Palestine and keep screaming “genocide” after watching this video, there’s no fixing your level of hate and idiocy.
Stuart retweeted
Hamas attacked on Oct 7.
You danced in the streets.
You threw candy.
You kissed the ground.
You thanked your God.
You celebrated.
You rejoiced.
You spat on the bodies of the victims.
You ridiculed and humiliated the hostages as they were brought into Gaza.
You celebrated a massacre.
You celebrated the deaths of over 1200 human beings.
You celebrated the vicious sexual violence against men and women.
You celebrated the kidnapping of babies, children, women, men and elderly.
You celebrated as rockets continued to be shot into Israel.
You celebrated deaths of IDF soldiers as they defended their country and attempted to rescue the hostages.
You celebrated the deaths of children in a soccer field – until you learned they weren’t Jewish.
You celebrated death and violence against Israelis. Against Jews.
And then.
Israel responds.
You claim you’re innocent – yet you celebrated what Hamas did – you blame Israel.
Israel warns you to evacuate – Hamas makes you stay – you blame Israel.
Israel delivers aid – Hamas steals it and sells it at exorbitant prices – you blame Israel
Hamas rockets misfire, killing Gazans – you blame Israel.
Hamas uses schools and hospitals to launch its attacks from – Israel disables those capabilities – you blame Israel.
You don’t like the results of the war that Hamas started, and that you celebrated – you blame Israel.
Hamas refuses to negotiate, refuses to demilitarize, so the war continues – you blame Israel.
No matter what Israel does – you blame Israel.
No matter what Hamas does – you blame Israel.
If Israel ever were to be gone (which it won’t be), and you wake up and realize you still have all of your same problems, who will you blame?
Stuart retweeted
There was a situation at my daughter’s school last week which left her in tears. I went in to the school the day after to let them know we were removing her with immediate effect. The head teacher tried to explain but I had no interest in her excuses or reasons.
The school had a play and an open evening for next year’s new pupils, and my daughter’s class were asked to take the potential new pupils and their parents for a tour of the school and classes.
My daughter is the most softly spoken, polite and friendly child you’d probably ever meet. She’s one of just 40 Jewish pupils at the school out of over a thousand children. My wife wanted her to go to a non Jewish school because she felt concerned about the security threats at Jewish schools, and I don’t have much say in the matter as I’m just the dad. Our youngest goes to a Jewish school and the security simply isn’t anywhere good enough. This would be both their last year at school in this country because we’d already made the decision to leave the country before their next school year.
My oldest wears a tiny discreet Star of David pendant. It’s so inoffensive to anybody but allows her to express her Jewish faith in a small way.
When it was her turn in line to greet the family she would show around, the family was a Muslim family. My daughter has no personal issue with anybody and is friendly with two Muslim girls in her class who aren’t bothered by her being Jewish. But this family clearly were. In front of everyone, the father refused to be shown around by “a Jew”. He apparently, according to several parents and a teacher, raised his voice at her, and demanded that another child show them around. Instead of the head teacher condemning his behavior and telling him to leave, she asked my daughter to step aside and asked another pupil to show them around. Nobody except other parents, non Jewish parents, came to my daughter to ask if she was even ok. She was in a flood of tears, frightened and confused.
My wife got a phone call from another parent and insisted she would go fetch our daughter because she already knew what I would do had I gone there myself. But this is what we live in now. This is the new normal.
For reasons of what will come next, I won’t name the school. But this is going to escalate, a lot.
Stuart retweeted
After the Green Party's "Zionism is Racism" vote, the Leader of Haringey Council, which is controlled by the Greens, wrote to various Synagogues in the borough to "reassure" them.
I want to show you Highgate Synagogue's reply. I believe it is worth reading in its entirety.
Synagogue rejects Green council leader’s attempt to ‘reassure’ them after “Zionism is Racism” vote
jewishnews.co.uk/synagogue-r…
Stuart retweeted
This is simply false. There was no documented “day one” offer by Hamas to release all the hostages “unconditionally.”
Contemporary reporting describes negotiations over exchanges: Israeli women and children for Palestinian terrorists, and later broader releases in return for pauses, additional terrorist prisoners and other concessions. Nothing was unconditional.
I say this as a hostage family member who served as an international envoy for the hostage families and was privy to some of the discourse behind closed doors with relevant stakeholders. Those conversations concerned negotiations, conditions, categories of hostages and concessions, not the simplistic narrative you now declare “well established and proven.”
Hamas did not even treat many civilian men as civilians. My brother-in-law, Omri Miran, was a civilian father kidnapped from his home in Kibbutz Nahal Oz, in front of his wife and two little girls. He was held for 738 days, physically tortured, deprived of food and water, and psychologically abused.
Hamas used Omri and other beautiful human beings as bargaining chips: women, children, the elderly, civilian men, soldiers, Israelis and foreigners. Taking civilians hostage is a war crime, and captured soldiers cannot lawfully be held as hostages to coerce concessions either.
There is plenty to criticise about the Israeli government’s conduct, including decisions made during negotiations, even if those were ultimately decisions for a democratically elected government to make. Hostage families have hardly been silent about them, and many of us still demand accountability and the establishment of a national commission of inquiry.
But none of that transfers responsibility from the perpetrators: Hamas and its accomplices, and the state actors that funded and sponsored their activities.
That is what makes your rhetoric so repulsive. You erase Hamas’s agency, recast conditional negotiations as an unconditional “offer to release them on day one,” and shift responsibility from the hostage-takers to the society they attacked.
Hamas kidnapped these people, categorised them according to their value, demanded concessions for them, abused them and held people like Omri for years.
Turning that into “Israel refused to save them because it wanted vengeance” is not an established fact. It is an inversion of perpetrator and victim that sanitises Hamas’s responsibility for one of its most grotesque crimes, a distortion you have pushed in bad faith since the war Hamas launched on October 7.
Replying to @Aizenberg55
Hamas offered to release them on day one, as now know, and Israel refused because they wanted war and vengeance over saving the hostages. This is now well established and proven, despite the lies from shills like you over the past three years
Stuart retweeted
Replying to @amnesty
@amnesty: said that the jurisprudence would preclude a finding of genocide
@hrw: did not assess the elements at all for genocide
@btselem: said that they had to use a "broader analytical framework"
@MSF: did not assess the elements at all for genocide
IAGS: misrepresented the law and elements of the crime of genocide (I'm a member and over 500 experts called this out)
@alhaq_org: did not assess the elements at all for genocide
@UNHumanRights: did not say this (you're citing the Commission of Inquiry which was led by a South African judge and did not establish the elements, even ignored the legal tests)
@UN_HRC: ibid.
@pchrgaza: did not assess the elements at all for genocide
@AlMezanCenter: did not assess the elements at all for genocide
@WarOnWant: did not assess the elements at all for genocide
@PHRIsrael: did not assess the elements at all for genocide
@fidh_en: did not assess the elements at all for genocide
@LemkinInstitute: argued that intent is not an element of genocide (it is, it's the hallmark of the definition and what makes it what it is)
@theCCR: did not assess the elements at all for genocide
@ECCHRBerlin: did not assess the elements at all for genocide
@unitedforrights: did not assess the elements at all for genocide
@JURDIasso: did not assess the elements at all for genocide
@TheElders: did not assess the elements at all for genocide
@Oxfam: did not assess the elements at all for genocide
Your appeal to authority and gish galloping fallacies are failing, @_ZachFoster.
it's genocide (@amnesty )
it's genocide ( @hrw )
it's genocide ( @btselem )
it's genocide ( @MSF )
it's genocide (IAGS)
it's genocide ( @alhaq_org )
it's genocide ( @UNHumanRights )
it's genocide ( @UN_HRC )
it's genocide ( @pchrgaza )
it's genocide ( @AlMezanCenter )
it's genocide ( @WarOnWant )
it's genocide ( @PHRIsrael )
it's genocide ( @fidh_en )
it's genocide (PHROC)
it's genocide ( @LemkinInstitute )
it's genocide ( @theCCR )
it's genocide ( @ECCHRBerlin )
it's genocide ( @unitedforrights )
it's genocide ( @JURDIasso )
it's genocide ( @TheElders )
it's genocide ( @Oxfam )
"As a Jew, it's not genocide because it doesn't fit the definition of genocide I literally just made up right now" - Scott Galloway
Stuart retweeted
Who helped shape Labour’s new Islamophobia definition?
Ministers refused to answer. Then they said the records had been deleted, despite rules requiring them to be retained.
Angela Rayner must come clean: who helped write it, and what are they hiding?
Stuart retweeted
Terms & Conditions
A quick petition to help Hamas free Palestine. Everyone was in, until we read them the terms: every non-Muslim slaughtered, homosexuality punished by death, Sharia law, a group that beheads babies replacing the only democracy in the Middle East.
Stuart retweeted
The lovely people at Fabulous Films have given me one of these to give away.
You will get it a couple of weeks before it's released.
All you have to do is retweet this tweet & I will select a winner at random.
Good Luck!!
fabulousfilms.com/products/m…
Stuart retweeted
Imagine for 1 second that you have it wrong and Jews are telling the truth. That the genocide libel is bs. That Hamas are terrorists. That you are being manipulated to desire the removal of Jews from society.
Do you understand if we’re right, that makes you the millions of European and African and Asian friends and neighbors who wiped millions of us off 3 continents just a few decades ago?
What’s more likely - that we, the tiny minority who have been libeled and blamed and persecuted by every society in which we’ve ever lived for centuries, are the bad guys? Or that you, the non-Jewish masses who have hounded and defamed and slaughtered us all over the world over and over and over again, have once again been suckered in by propaganda you unquestioningly latch onto because it gives you a scapegoat to blame for your own problems and sins?
“History repeats itself… except this time! I’m different!” Is essentially what every Jew hater tells themselves. No. You are no different than the Iraqi or Soviet or German or Algerian who turned on their Jewish neighbors the second they got the societal green light. Never in the history of the world has the group persecuting Jews been “on the right side of history.” Not once.
Courage isn’t going with the crowd to hate on us some more. That’s easy. Courage is looking in the mirror, in a history book, at what is happening to Jews in our society, and saying stop this train, I’m getting off.
Stuart retweeted
Genevieve has broken countless stories the MSM refuses to touch. Please help out if you can, she's being targeted with the usual vexatious legal action
I've never done this before, but I'm struggling at the moment, and in the thick of it. There are reasons I can't talk about it, some are legal, but personally I know there are crazy people who want to see me suffer.
If you think that the writing I've done for the past four years - especially all of my exclusives about the prison system and the history of gender identity ideology has been valuable, or helped you in some way, it would be very much appreciated if you can spare just $5.
Everything I've written since 2022, building up the body of writing and evidence I have - which has been used in court cases, by Attorney Generals in lawsuits, and especially in a Supreme Court case - I've just been doing on the basis of donations.
I don't make much money for the work I do because I consider my writing to be a public service and I would feel ashamed otherwise.
I've never used a paywall. But, because of that, I'm not making very much at all, despite having dedicated years of my life - and, if I can be bold, important contributions - to this conversation.
I have worked hard, written hundreds of articles over the past four years, many of them exclusives, and I'm not funded by any think tank, just by readers who appreciate having more information.
If you're able to just give a few dollars right now, it goes towards my cost of living and some of the lawsuits I'm engaged in that I can't talk about yet.
buy.stripe.com/28o5llf4b47sc…
Stuart retweeted
I've never done this before, but I'm struggling at the moment, and in the thick of it. There are reasons I can't talk about it, some are legal, but personally I know there are crazy people who want to see me suffer.
If you think that the writing I've done for the past four years - especially all of my exclusives about the prison system and the history of gender identity ideology has been valuable, or helped you in some way, it would be very much appreciated if you can spare just $5.
Everything I've written since 2022, building up the body of writing and evidence I have - which has been used in court cases, by Attorney Generals in lawsuits, and especially in a Supreme Court case - I've just been doing on the basis of donations.
I don't make much money for the work I do because I consider my writing to be a public service and I would feel ashamed otherwise.
I've never used a paywall. But, because of that, I'm not making very much at all, despite having dedicated years of my life - and, if I can be bold, important contributions - to this conversation.
I have worked hard, written hundreds of articles over the past four years, many of them exclusives, and I'm not funded by any think tank, just by readers who appreciate having more information.
If you're able to just give a few dollars right now, it goes towards my cost of living and some of the lawsuits I'm engaged in that I can't talk about yet.
buy.stripe.com/28o5llf4b47sc…
Stuart retweeted
The truth about Jason Arday
How the woke left exploited the disgraced Cambridge professor
Tom Slater on the myth of Saint Jason – and why the media need to stick up for themselves
Watch 👇
Stuart retweeted
“Don’t you get tired of talking about trans?”
This latest piece I wrote for @spikedonline is very dear to me- the trans issue might involve a small number of people but the fallout is an indictment of the entire western world
spiked-online.com/2026/08/06…





























