Style Factory (@stylefactory) header
Style Factory (@stylefactory) profile picture

Style Factory is a leading business apps review site — we cover all the software you need to build and grow an online business.

London
Joined July 2009
Photo by Style Factory (@stylefactory)Photo by Style Factory (@stylefactory)Photo by Style Factory (@stylefactory)Photo by Style Factory (@stylefactory)Photo by Style Factory (@stylefactory)Photo by Style Factory (@stylefactory)
Style Factory retweeted
In this video @AntoniaTootill walks us through the relative pros and cons of Ahrefs vs Semrush. Which is better for your #ecommerce business? youtube.com/watch?v=TvTZDcz8… #ecommercetrix #semrush
1
1
2
199
1
1
107
How to Create a Newsletter — Simple Checklist (Updated 2025) | @stylefactory ow.ly/9muE50Mvpxe “Even with the huge range of other marketing and advertising options now available, email marketing can be a fantastically effective way to generate revenue.” #WritingCommunity
6
2
126
Style Factory retweeted
Let me be very clear about the Helpful Content Update. When Google announced this update, THEY were the ones who went on record claiming that recovery is possible, and that sites could begin to regain traffic after making changes and improvements that would lift the classifier that suppressed sites’ traffic. In fact, there is even a recording of Google originally stating that recovery was possible “within in a few weeks.” Of course, that language gradually changed to “a few months” and eventually, even more ambiguous timelines, leading up to now - where Google has said at multiple Creator Summits - including one a couple weeks ago - that “we are still working on this and are taking it seriously; it’s not an overnight fix.” Site owners hung on Google’s every word and waited for months and months - while investing in outside support and overhauling their sites - for any semblance of a change that would help them recover. It’s been almost 2 years, and very few HCU sites have seen any meaningful recovery, despite making dramatic changes and improvements. This is not the case for websites affected by other algorithm updates outside of the HCU. I’ve personally worked on dozens of recoveries over the years, and there are countless examples of websites who have been able to get back in Google’s good graces after being hit by updates or penalties. This is not true of the HCU. I’ve been saying since it happened - it feels like HCU sites were “put in jail.” I’ve also done everything in my power to bring visibility to how unfair this is for these site owners, and how these outcomes directly contradicted the guidance Google gave us at the start of the update. My team and I worked on various HCU-affected sites, with a few great recovery case studies, but many sites were unable to see substantial recoveries. We provided these clients same guidance we provide for all clients impacted by algorithm updates - tried and true methods that have worked for years. These recommendations are always rooted in actually improving websites and making them better for users. I also spent dozens of hours, including weekends, providing free advice to affected site owners simply because I knew how much it was hurting their business, and I wanted to help. We would have never serviced HCU clients if Google had just been honest from the start - most websites affected by the HCU are going to find it nearly impossible to recover within 2 years, despite making dramatic changes. Again, this is distinct behavior from other Google algorithm updates. In my opinion, we need to be asking why Google’s communications around this update have changed so much over time, and why these sites seem to have received unfair treatment compared to all other Google updates. I’m a big fan of the work @natejhake has been doing to get to the bottom of these questions. (Although the answers are quite disheartening.) The entire experience has been devastating for so many site owners, and the inconsistency between what Google said and what Google actually did is something that has forever changed my perspective about the company.
59
87
18
468
32,979
Please read this. It's literally been 8 years in the writing. The first wave of tech disruption of democracy 2016-2024 is over. What starts now is something much, much worse: the age of information chaos. 1/ theguardian.com/commentisfre…
1,782
16,051
1,330
36,027
5,632,992
How to Create a Newsletter — Simple Checklist (Updated 2024) | @stylefactory ow.ly/9muE50Mvpxe “Even with the huge range of other marketing and advertising options now available, email marketing can be a fantastically effective way to generate revenue.” #WritingCommunity
4
5
214
Style Factory retweeted
I’m still not over smallPersonalSite.
31
8
2
280
41,755
In 2017 I lost my mum and in 2018 I decided to take on the man that made her last years more difficult. Our loss hurt so much in 2019, but I’m back again, this time with my tiny baby. This is personal for me 1263 votes Let’s beat Iain Duncan Smith #GE2024 faizashaheen.co.uk/join-the-…
252
908
116
6,335
1,025,709
I'm sure @JohnMu / @googlesearchc / @googlesearchc have heard a lot of similar complaints (sorry to bother you guys) but I can't stress enough how poorly researched the Forbes reviews are (and how bad their high profile make the SERPs). Will the reputation abuse algo tackle this?
1
3
84
Style Factory retweeted
Super strange experience today. In two different work meetings, “normies” who know nothing about SEO complained about Google Search. One woman said that everything essentially above the fold on her phone now seems to be an ad. The other person said that if they wanted to go find answers on Reddit, they would go there and search. I mentioned to the person who talked about Reddit to just add “-reddit.com” to their searches. They sent me a message on Teams later and thanked me saying they added a keyboard macro to add “-reddit.com” to every search now. Again, these are people who just work in technology, had no idea that I know anything about SEO, and just tossed out their displeasure with Google in random meetings without prompting. The first person who mentioned ads, someone in the meeting said they are using DuckDuckGo and Bing now. Displeasure in Google is entering the zeitgeist. That’s a bad sign for them.
30
27
14
243
53,480
The quality of Forbes content that now ranks no.1 for SO many product reviews in so many niches is *shockingly* bad. Genuinely interested to know Google's take on this as the situation is hurting both publishers & users. @JohnMu @searchliaison would love your thoughts.
1
1
3
268
A deep dive into the Liam Gallagher - John Squire mashup. fivegrandstereomusic.com/blo…
3
1
7
893