ykoi (@supakoii) header
ykoi (@supakoii) profile picture

( -‿-) °o ( ✨ )

Joined March 2022
Photo by ykoi (@supakoii)Photo by ykoi (@supakoii)Photo by ykoi (@supakoii)Photo by ykoi (@supakoii)Photo by ykoi (@supakoii)Photo by ykoi (@supakoii)Photo by ykoi (@supakoii)Photo by ykoi (@supakoii)Photo by ykoi (@supakoii)Photo by ykoi (@supakoii)
agree with this exactly. i see all the beauty in the world, nature, and the human experience, then immediately disregard all cynical belief systems who push separation ideas
do people actually believe God would allow this? so you'd believe God created billions then decided to be a cunt to majority? this is a mockery of religion and God
1
23
the main ones coming to my mind are any extremist beliefs, zionism, atheism
5
这位法国兄弟,我想你混淆了批评和情绪发泄。我们认为批评是有益的,但情绪发泄只会煽动对立、撕裂和仇恨。 中国历史上政府犯过的错,不只中国民众在批评,连共产党本身都在自我批评。对中共历史错误的批判,是写进教科书的。 而对现任政府的批评,每天都在互联网上发生。中国不是你们想象中噤若寒蝉、道路以目的社会。 但我们认为,批评的目的是敦促政府改善治理,而不是煽动仇恨。仇恨并不能解决问题,它只能让局面失控,并迎来糟糕的后果,就像你们法国刚刚发生的事情。 如果你的批评是为了让现行体制更加完善,是促进社会良性发展与社会公正,那么你的批评是受欢迎的。如果你是披着批评的外衣散布仇恨,那你是被反对的。 我们认为,政府及其政策有Bug,修复它的成本远远小于推翻重来。我们并不喜欢你们那种每五年就推翻重来一次的制度,因为那样只会在一次次的秩序重构中消耗社会的能量、打乱发展的节奏、拖慢发展的步伐。 我们是一个接受延迟满足的民族。我们不会用短浅的目光去审视眼前的得失,而是会用较长的周期去检验一个政策的远期效果。而这套方法,在过去几十年的发展中,其效果得到了证实,因此它成了绝大多数人的共识。 但你们享受过太久的好日子,以至于你们已经忘记了团结和奋斗。 你们忘了,你们的好日子,是由你们的祖先通过殖民掠夺、工业革命、剪刀差贸易积累下来的财富和优势。你们不知道,躺在祖先的遗产上,是会坐吃山空的。 但你们把过去的好日子当成理所当然,因此你们不断要求政府发福利,以至于你们的财政难以为继,对教育、基建、科技的投入严重不足,这让你们的优势渐渐丧失。 而你们愚蠢的政府,原谅我这么说,他们却还将纳税人的钱拿去投入战争,切断俄罗斯的能源供应,并将自己的安全寄托于美国的庇护,以至于国家失去独立自主,发展政策处处受制于美国意志。 你们有如此愚蠢的政府,才会让你们认为发泄对政府的仇恨非常合理且必须。但中国没有这样的问题。我们不喜欢战争,我们只喜欢建设。我们修建大桥、发展科技、改善民生、美化环境。 如果我们的政府做得不好,我们批评,他们改正。事情远不必演变成像你们那样的骚乱,就已经被解决了。 你们有一群非理性的国民,有一个长期被非理性民意挟持的政府,以及一系列愚蠢至极的国家政策。在这样的国家,你们的怨气可以理解,但你们并不无辜。 你们仇恨政府,然后换一个,继续仇恨。
Mes chers amis chinois, sachez qu’en France on peut tout à fait critiquer les gouvernements passés et présents. Cela fait aussi l’objet d’analyses, de livres et de films. Il n’y a pas d’interdits. C’est la liberté d´expression même si cela en froisse certain. Et c’est documenté
267
778
178
7,759
710,184
我很愿意认真回答这位德国朋友的疑问。 你的第一个问,其实是在说,由于中国是一个威权政府,因此人民在政治上不受认真对待。 这个命题本身就是错误的。威权政府,并不意味着人民不受认真对待。民主政府,也不意味着人民就受到认真对待。 新加坡是威权国家,菲律宾是民主国家,难道新加坡人的处境,不如菲律宾人吗?中国是威权国家,印度是民主国家,难道中国人的处境,不如印度人吗? 你的第二个问,你的发问本身并不严谨。不能笼统地说,中国人没有政治自由。这个问题要分两个维度来讲。 1、政治参与自由。 从这个维度讲,中国任何人有参与政治的自由。中国人都有权利申请入党、考公务员。筛选规则与民主制度不同,但不等于中国人没有参与政治的自由。 中国制度与民主制度的区别在于: 民主制度下,一个人只要有钱,可以在任何时候参与政治。就像川普一辈子没有从政,老了突然想要竞选总统,他就可以参选,而且成功了。 但在中国,任何官员都必须从基层公务员做起。一个人无法因为有钱,就能一步登天当上高官。 这种制度的好处有: A、公平性。 中国有大量的高层领导人出身平民家庭,如胡锦涛、温家宝、汪洋、李强,等等。像习近平这种红二代,反而是个意外。 B、专业性。 任何一个高层领导人,都必须经过几十年不同级别岗位的历练,他对国家各个层面的情况的了解,以及他的治理经验,不是一个企业家、一个明星,或者一个未治理过一个城市的议员,所能相提并论的。 C、远见性。 由于领导人不受制于短期的、非理性的民意,因此可以规划长远的发展战略,并以唯一执政党确保该战略的长期、有效的实施。 D、政策不受资本干涉。 你选择从政,就不能从商。你选择从商,就不能从政。这样一来,资本的归资本,政治的归政治,资本无法干涉政治。 2、政治权利自由。 当然,中国制度有其“表面上”的代价。为什么只是“表面上”的,后面再说。先说这种代价。 代价就是中国人不拥有谩骂政府、抨击政策的自由。我们可以批评政府,但必须在一种就事论事的理性语境中。我们不能喊“习近平下台”或者“共产党下台”。 我们也不拥有全民选举的自由,建立政党的自由。 这些“代价”为什么只是表面上的,可以从一则寓言说起: 一农场主临死前问儿子;猪抱怨饲料太差,牛报怨活太重,鸡报怨窝太脏,怎么办? 儿子说:“喂好饲料,干轻活,清理鸡窝。” 农场主摇摇头说:你啥都别做,给他们选票,让它们选择你或者你媳妇管它们,让它们以为这个家是它们做主。 这个寓言让我们思考,作为人民,我们要的是什么?我们要的其实是更好的生活,而不是选票以及骂政府的自由。 回到开头那个举例,新加坡缺少很多民主国家所具备的政治自由,但没有人会认为新加坡人受到压迫。 这就涉及到自由的定义,自由到底是什么? 按照罗斯福的定义,自由包括:言论自由、信仰自由、免于匮乏、免于恐惧。 在我们计算一个社会的自由度时,我们计算的是自由的总量,而不是单项自由的含量。 举个例子,很多非洲国家拥有选票和骂政府的自由,但人民生活贫困,出行只能靠双脚。我在中国,生活富足、商品丰富、服务便捷、社区安全,我坐3个小时的高铁可以抵达一座大城市,我也有经济条件时不时出国旅游。 你认为非洲人自由,还是我自由? 诚然,中国还有很多人口,在物质生活上并不自由,但这是经济发展不充分导致的,不是政治压迫导致的。一个贫穷地区,无会因为给你民众选票和骂政府的自由,他们就变富裕了。 因此,当你谈自由的时候,你要计算自由的总量,不能单看一项自由的有无和多寡。你也不能将经济问题,归咎于某一项政治自由的问题。 坦率讲,我觉得你们的民主制度,已经病入膏肓了,中国人并不羡慕你们那种制度。
Liebe Chinesen, wie kann man ein solches politisches System einfach hinnehmen und gleichzeitig erwarten, dass man politisch ernst genommen wird? Ist es nicht widersprüchlich, sich mit einem System abzufinden, in dem die eigene politische Freiheit so stark eingeschränkt ist?
1,272
4,808
1,174
35,430
3,206,601
ISRAEL ELECTIONS 2026 BAAL 26% MOLOCH 16% SATAN 21% BELCEBU 14%
364
10,131
281
85,665
965,496
Let's be honest, the West hates Mao because he liberated Chinese people, united the country, and made it impossible to be a Western puppet. Moreover, he inspired more Asian, African, and Latin American people's anti-colonial and anti-imperialist movements. The West slanders any leader who refuses to obey them. Mao was a great strategist, revolutionist, thinker, writer and leader. Long live the great unity of the people of the world!💪
To us Chinese, Mao Zedong is our hero. Mao uplifted farmers and the working class in China, united the Chinese people, led us to defeat foreign invaders, and founded an independent country so we could all live with dignity. Mao supported the heroic struggle of the African people against imperialism and colonialism. He was one of the greatest leaders in world history, and one of the most demonized by the West.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Mao's Great Leap Forward lead to ~15-55 million deaths. It is the largest famine and non-war mass death in history. Mao's role against Japan was to hold back while Chiang Kai-shek's Nationalist did the most fighting. China was independent before this, not founded by Mao. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Lea… ebsco.com/research-start… en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Si…
932
950
114
5,681
301,963
.. it’s not only inaccurate about china, but also gullible to think the west would treat them well, even with a perfect image
Liebe Chinesen, Nur damit ihr es wisst: Der Westen würde Euch als Großmacht akzeptieren, wenn ihr keine totalitäre Diktatur wäret und aufhören würdet Ansprüche auf eure Nachbarn zu erheben.
1
123
Due to inflation I'm downgrading from ADHD to AD720p with ads
1,043
41,946
1,622
244,648
4,777,305
Lula no venció a Bolsonaro, él era solo un títere, le ganó a Trump, a Meta, a los algoritmos, a la tremenda ola de derecha que pretende apoderarse de Latinoamérica, a la iglesia evangélica, a las élites. La victoria de hoy pasa a la historia. Lula un grande.
518
29,466
325
134,276
921,686
The Israeli Society for Sexual Trauma Treatment and Prevention states unequivocally that institutionalized, ritual sexual abuse of children is rampant throughout Israeli society. It goes way beyond Shoshana Strook. These are elaborate rape CEREMONIES. shomrim.news/eng/breaking-th…
53
1,051
133
2,743
190,034
before HDMI cords we had to match the colors to the tv like u were defusing a bomb
315
15,882
416
193,009
2,795,131
The world is on fire, but my neighbor has a massive cat named Maximus, a regular sized cat named Mediumus, and a little kitten named Minimus.
168
15,634
268
191,553
1,600,712
ykoi retweeted
Replying to @RabbiJeffx
Palestinian
376
7,695
386
58,960
1,819,908
to be fair, the cars on the last picture were illegally parked
1
6
174
ykoi retweeted
Ouch.
615
36,690
906
325,439
2,602,519
Everybody LOVES French history until the French start history-ing
154
28,151
242
204,956
1,370,509
such a precious moment
1,624
54,132
4,185
615,061
71,146,900
china healing the world in mysterious ways
2
48
Anti-Chinaism is the easiest grift in the world you don't even need to know anything about the country as so admitted by this retard.
A China Hawk's Case for Studying in China Ten years into my own career, I consider my lack of formal China studies education to be both a blessing and a curse. A blessing because—as Jackie suggests—I was able to piece together a great deal of knowledge about the Middle Kingdom free from bias by the entrenched China hands. Having to figure everything out on my own (with tutoring from some colleagues at @CSETGeorgetown) forced me to learn more, and more deeply, about CCP policy—and to move beyond words-on-paper to consider how China “really works.” If you read my work, you’ll notice I tend to elide commentary on the traditional, politically symbolic policy pronouncements taught in Asian studies programs (who cares?) in favor of brass-tacks calculations of U.S. and Chinese power. But, speaking personally—as rewarding as it’s been to chart my own path and come to my own conclusions, I feel my lack of in-country experience has been a real detriment to my analysis. Looking only at the digital exhaust left behind by the CCP, I came to learn a great deal about China’s policies and the predilections of the ruling Party—and relatively little about China itself. I now teach a class on open-source research methods, and was lucky to spend a few years practicing diplomacy directly with Chinese diplomats. The gulf between what you can observe remotely and what you get face-to-face is massive. Each of these is an indispensable source of knowledge, but believe me when I say they are not substitutable. Ten years on, I have still never lived in China. It is probably one of my life's great regrets. I feel I can credibly claim expertise in U.S.-China relations and segments of China’s technology industry. Yet I still have huge blind spots when it comes to the lived experience, social pressure, cultural references, and general worldview of many Chinese people—blind spots that undoubtedly weaken my analysis of the Asian security environment. This deficiency is common in Washington, and it is getting worse. At a recent conference attended by ~200 undergraduates, I polled the room and was shocked to discover that not one was studying China. And while China once dominated IR masters programs, many of my @GeorgetownCSS students are now refocusing on Russia or Iran. I routinely attend dinners for China policy specialists in Washington where almost nobody besides me has set foot in the country in the past decade. The resulting assessments and policy recommendations are often badly miscalibrated. In my own field notes from last year, I wrote that “there’s a texture to a country that can’t be captured through policy documents or sardonic social media posts—unguarded glimpses of how a society actually feels about itself, which can only be witnessed with one’s own eyes and ears.” I still believe this is true. My advice to most American undergrads contemplating study in China: Go. Take the security risks seriously. Document your contacts, keep your ordinary digital life off any device you bring, and assume you are being monitored. Resist recruitment pitches and report suspicious approaches. Do not endanger Chinese friends or sources merely to satisfy your curiosity. Recognize that some research topics, personal circumstances, or the political calendar may still make your travel inadvisable—and if you're seeking a security clearance, you may have to explain your decision later down the line. But for most students, calculated exposure to risk is not the same thing as naïveté. In many respects, college is the best—and perhaps the last—window in which to immerse yourself in China without carrying the full professional and security liabilities that would accompany such an opportunity later in your career. The opportunity cost of going, and the scrutiny you receive from both U.S. and Chinese security services, will generally only increase as you age. So go, learn the language. Eat the food, hike the Wuyue, learn to negotiate with the waijiaobu. Make friends with princelings, dissidents, nationalists, strivers, cynics, and people who care nothing about politics. My own decision to live and study in Russia before the war was one of the best decisions of my life, and (I believe) has made me a better analyst of life inside of authoritarian systems. Go with eyes wide open. Enjoy being a stranger in an even stranger land. You'll learn so much—about things you would otherwise never know you never knew. Not all of you will enter government. But some of you might. I'm counting on it: America needs China hawks who know China.
3
9
1
182
4,141