correct, to an extent. when the trading activity slows down, so does yield generation. this is true for most of these models. one of the interesting designs with the @quotrons404 model was the ability to arbitrage between secondary market NFT sales (both hardwired and dark terminals with token backings) and the liquid token market. this provided an added layer for generating yield (especially since i direct the majority of fees from secondary market sales, aka Royalties, and from v4 trading fees back to the NFT holders) but that doesn’t entirely remove the scenario of when activity dwindles, so do their earnings and that’s why we decided to bootstrap and pioneer building xStocks liquidity rails on @inkonchain and use this as an added avenue for generating distribution of tokenized equities for our NFT holders from xStocks trading fees on Ink although not everything moves at the pace we often desire in web3, i can confidently say that we are nearing a point where our quotrons owned pools and the broader chain-wide liquidity around @xStocksFi and other majors is soon to be ready to set the stage for the next phase(s) on top of all of this, i’ve added a layer of financial incentives around the quotrons builder ecosystem, trading, and hodling hardwired Quotron NFTs. tl;dr “there is a storm coming, and not a one of you is prepared for it”