Cheerleading is barely-clothed pole dancing.
If you cheer your daughter's "cheering" you need to rethink things.
You don't need 225 million dollars to spread the Gospel.
You do need 225 million dollars to build the Josh Howerton Empire.
Did we learn nothing from the narcism of Mark Driscoll?
How many Boomers will hand Josh Howerton their children's inheritance, thinking they are serving God?
youtube.com/watch?v=X8dUzmOi…
This is manipulative and evil.
I hate what he's doing here, with a white-hot hatred.
Howerton is a viper.
I hope the folks at Lakepointe know they shouldn’t feel guilty for not wanting to sell their home or liquidate their savings, investments, or other valuable assets to fund Josh Howerton’s Into the Breach campaign.
You shouldn’t have to justify keeping your home by turning it into a ministry opportunity. Making people feel guilty for not surrendering their personal assets is manipulation, not discipleship.
The lack of a blunt “sell your house and write the check” is what makes Howerton's manipulative technique effective.
A direct demand can be refused; however framing this in Christian lingo, as he has here, is harder to reject, because saying no would feel like resisting God rather than his fundraising pitch.
How it works:
1. A loaded starting question.
Listeners are told to review what they own and ask, “Am I honoring you with this resource?” That is not a neutral inventory. It treats ordinary ownership of a home, savings, or investments as potentially *dis*honoring to God, so private assets are now judged through the Howerton’s lens.
Raising your family in your home honors Him. Reading a book to your granddaughter in your home honors Him, but these do not meet Howerton's extra-biblical standard of using your home for "ministry".
2. The “don’t sell” line still points toward giving.
Howerton says not to sell a home already used for "ministry". Immediately after, he describes the other possibility the Spirit “may reveal”: a resource that has become pride, selfishness, or personal accomplishment.
This false dichotomy is the lie — the manipulation.
The options are to redeem it for ministry use or “release a resource by faith.” In a process built to fund a pre-set $225 million campaign, “release” has a clear practical destination—the church’s fund.
The listener is not asked whether the campaign is wise; they are asked whether the Spirit wants them to liquidate for it.
3. Keeping the asset is labeled spiritual failure.
Pride, selfishness, and accomplishment are terms attached to resources that are not released or repurposed. Those labels sit in the background so someone who simply wants to keep their savings or house feels they are choosing the lesser path. The pressure is internal: “Am I holding back on God?”
The plan is never presented as “Here is what we decided; would you like to help fund it?”
It is presented as the individual discovering what God is asking of their stored resources. Once framed that way, declining looks like ignoring the Spirit rather than declining a particular church budget.
Sexual deviance is corrosive like acid. It rots out every container you might try to keep it in.
You cannot say you want this much of it, and no more.
As a gay man, I'll say what a lot of us are thinking.
We fought to be left alone. To marry the man we love, keep our jobs, and live a quiet life.
We won.
Then woke activists took our letters, stapled on a dozen causes we never signed up for, and started calling us bigots for saying sex is real.
That isn't our movement anymore.
Final Day of Reformation Month
“Rome, when placing the anathema on sola fide, placed the anathema of God upon themselves.”
— R.C. Sproul
Reformation Month: Day 30
A dog barks when his master is attacked. I would be a coward if I saw that God's truth is attacked and yet would remain silent.
— John Calvin
If your case can’t be made without quoting the church fathers, it’s not biblical.
And if your case can be made biblically without the church fathers, they are not necessary.










