Thinkronicity ™

Chat, we're cooked. Today I decided to review the malware collection. How much malware have I collected over the past 7.5 years? I've collected 42.13 TB WHAT AM I DOING WITH ALL THIS GOOP

Department of Homeland Security been REALLLLLLL quiet ever since they took down that anime streaming website. What are you hiding?

I've praised a few malwares for various reasons. However, this particular malware is very interesting. - Initially masquerading malware, designed to target very specific audience - Written in multiple programming languages. However, the first stage is written in an uncommon programming language (Delphi) and compiled using an uncommon compiler (Embarcadero), specifically Delphi GUI TForm from Embarcadero (Vcl?) - Obfuscated, in a very natural way. The binary at first glance appears semi-legitimate, it hides itself well - The first stage (stager, or packer) contains multiple layers of decoy data. It makes reverse engineering challenging, not due to difficulty but time exhaustion - Secondary stage (where I'm currently at) is loaded into memory discretely, it flows naturally with the GUI application. When decompiled, the stager has over 15,000 functions. It makes finding the in-memory loaded secondary stage tricky - The secondary stage has some form of interprocess communication, it relies on the first stage to load it. If the first stage is not present, it does not work. - The second stage works (in a currently unknown capacity) to load a third stage payload. However, the secondary stage with the first stage work (in a currently unknown way) to decrypt the third (and potentially final) stage a/k/a the actual payload - The second stage uses deterministic probability to alert the first stage if the machine executing the first stage is a virtual machine and/or anti malware environment. - The second stage has multiple integrity checks, it ensures it has not been tampered with to force the binary to pull the third and final stage. This malware is pretty tricky. It definitely hasn't been written by a noob. This is definitely a very skilled Threat Actor who is using AI to supercharge their code base. Based on my conversations with my colleague, and information he can share, this code base has been rapidly evolving over the past couple of months in a uncharacteristic manner. While this Threat Actor has always shown evolution and improvement, it is now much faster, precise, and flexible. Overall, based on what I've seen so far, they've put in a lot of work to make this as painful as possible. In order to successfully reverse engineer this binary, it require outside the box thinking and/or building a custom solution to successfully trick the secondary stager to give up the goop (the third stage)... or a custom extractor to pull the third stage statically. No solution is ideal. This is good malware. If it's not state-sponsored, it's someone who has been doing this a long time and knows ball.