Crypto Art (@valuespreading) header
Crypto Art (@valuespreading) profile picture

Pi, Bitcoin & crypto, explained simply. New here? Visit a reputable exchange and see how it moves ๐Ÿ‘‡

Online
Joined May 2020
Photo by Crypto Art (@valuespreading)Photo by Crypto Art (@valuespreading)Photo by Crypto Art (@valuespreading)Photo by Crypto Art (@valuespreading)Photo by Crypto Art (@valuespreading)Photo by Crypto Art (@valuespreading)Photo by Crypto Art (@valuespreading)Photo by Crypto Art (@valuespreading)Photo by Crypto Art (@valuespreading)
BRUSH UP ON: โ€œA purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cash would allow online payments to be sent directly from one party to another without going through a financial institution.โ€ Where is this sentence from? #CryptoArt
8
12
95
6,377
Replying to @pete_rizzo_
Can I have their names. All of them.
59
Replying to @Quan1M
You make sense. But It's still true at some point.
4
The crash is not a bug. It is the transfer of coins from weak hands to patient ones.
1
1
64
Replying to @BANTRADER1
Happy weekend bro.
1
2
109
Replying to @BANTRADER1
๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿค๐Ÿ‘๐ŸŽ‰
8
Replying to @michelleo_21mil
Good time to stack more BTC.
1
41
Replying to @PopCrave
No one can replace him
102
Replying to @DocumentingBTC
So who does understand Bitcoin?
1
28
Replying to @CryptoCon_T
It's a nonsense movement
10
In August 2010, Bitcoin accidentally created 184 billion coins in a single transaction. Yes, billion. The hard cap is 21 million. A bug in the code allowed an integer overflow. Someone sent a transaction with two outputs of roughly 92 billion BTC each, and the software accepted it as valid. It sits in block 74,638. Within hours, developers released a patch. Node operators upgraded, rejected the invalid chain, and the network moved on with a corrected version. The 184 billion BTC vanished as if it never existed. Here is why this matters: The 21 million cap is not written in stone. It is enforced by thousands of nodes that agree to reject any block that breaks the rule. If the nodes had accepted that block, the cap would have been meaningless. Bitcoin's scarcity does not come from code alone. It comes from people running that code and refusing to accept a different supply. That is also why "just fork it and change the cap" has never worked. Anyone can change the code. Nobody can force the network to follow. Most people think Bitcoin is secure because the math is unbreakable. In reality, it survived because enough people chose to enforce the rules when it counted.
1
2
145
Will talk about the paranoid GCV later. But for those who hearing it for the first time, the so called "GCV" is Global Consensus Value" which is $314,159 per Pi coin. Three hundred fourteen thousand, one hundred fifty nine dollar, US Dollar.
1
3
259
Replying to @vani_mymy
Not really thin
22
Hi newbie pioneer
1
1
41
That's why we need to speak up.
1
1
43
That's their quote.
20
I do hope this summit will significantly change the whole thing. But It lesses my expectation since their "final planned V27 protocol upgrade". They didnt keep their words.
1
22