
@vickygrayson_i
đŹđ§Account based in
About this account
- Account based in
- United Kingdom
- Connected via
- United Kingdom App Store
Account-level information from X, not a live location or the device used for a specific post.
Mother. âMiddle class woman of a certain ageâ.
United Kingdom
Joined August 2010
- Tweets26.3K
- Following1K
- Followers1.9K
- Likes141K
Pinned Tweet
âWhat @bphillipsonMP has done is displace 40,000 childrenâŠfind places elsewhere either because their school has closed or they donât have the money to pay VAT. The reason why those taxes were put in place was to fund 6.5k more teachers. We have 2k fewer teachersâ.
@KemiBadenoch
Victoria retweeted
âThe inconvenient reality is that comprehensive schools really are incompatible with the pursuit of educational success for individual children.â
@joenutt_author's case against comprehensive schools.
thecritic.co.uk/the-case-agaâŠ
1. Tax private schools & SEND support, pushing more children with needs into the state sector
2. Allocate more children with complex SEND to mainstream state schools in the name of 'inclusion'
Then...
3. Make state schools cut SEND-specific support staff to fund pay-rises
Exclusive: Schools will be forced to cut special needs support staff in order to fund a share of the teacherâs pay rise, teachers have warned.
The i Paper has spoken to multiple headteachers and school leaders who say that despite suggestions the pay rise is âfully fundedâ at a ânational levelâ, many schools will still face a shortfall and will need to find cash afford the 3.5 per cent pay award.
With finances already stretched, SEND staff will feel the brunt of cost-cutting which is likely to result, they argue.
It comes as local authorities are being driven into a projected deficit of ÂŁ10.4bn by 2028 over the size of the bill for special educational needs and disabilities (SEND) as more children need support â 1.8 million children in England have special educational needs, a rise of 91,400 (5.2 per cent) since 2025.
Story đw/@connie_dimsdale
inews.co.uk/news/politics/scâŠ
Victoria retweeted
Tax private schools, leading to more children in state schools, then make state schools even worse. Amazing.
We are run by clowns.
đš NEW: Teachers could be allowed to work a 4-day week under the Government's plan for greater flexibility
[@thetimes]
Victoria retweeted
VAT on private schools was, in my view, driven by the politics of envy.
We should not forget that the policy was justified on the grounds that it would raise revenue to help fund the recruitment of 6,500 additional teachers.
Since its introduction, we have seen disruption to pupilsâ education, families forced to find alternative schools mid-year, dedicated staff losing their jobs and long-established institutions closing their doors.
The consequences are still unfolding, and the full impact has yet to be felt.
The question remains, was it really worth it?
Victoria retweeted
A useful reminder that a Conservative government will remove Labourâs spiteful and punitive VAT on private education.
Parents who pay their taxes in full should have the right to educate their children in a fee-paying school is if works for them and children deserve better than to be punished because Labour think theyâre privileged and therefore fair game.
Letâs end this mean-mindedness!
Victoria retweeted
Labourâs own admission is damning: their tax on education will force 35,000 children out of independent schools into state sector which is already under pressure, Scrap the VAT on school fees. Stop treating childrenâs education as a political football.
Victoria retweeted
How is this ok? How has this been able to happen?
What next?
telegraph.co.uk/money/consumâŠ
Victoria retweeted
Thank you @_Harry_Brennan_ for your @Telegraph piece calling out price discrimination against independent school children.
It's disappointing to hear that leading organisations like @The_Globe, @UKSpaceAcademy, @bankofengland, @NationalTheatre, @TheRSC, @KeatsHouse, @HornimanMuseum, @WMGallery and Chiswick House & Gardens charge more for independent school children (and @bankofengland actually preventing them from attending certain events).
As @Anthony_J_Perry pointed out, "this two-tier approach does nothing to reduce inequality and fails to recognise the complex reality of families and education." At best, it sparks division which surely cannot be the mission of any of these organisations.
There are better ways to support those in most need, such as concessionary rates for children on free school meals or living in postcodes of higher deprivation.
The @EducationNotTax team would like to meet with you to discuss this further, so we can help you address this problem. Thank you!
telegraph.co.uk/money/consumâŠ
Victoria retweeted
The sheer level of venomous hatred you have to have for your own middle class, to insist every EU rule must be adopted wholesale only then to make a special exception for rewriting VAT so you can bankrupt independent schools
Victoria retweeted
Itâs a minor point but some of Labourâs VAT changes would have to be reversed if we rejoined the EU. Theyâd have to take VAT off private school fees & put it back on electricity bills.
Victoria retweeted
Government considering removing VAT from school fees.
Move to rejoin EU among options for UK, says Burnham bbc.in/4jBNqGu
Victoria retweeted
I look forward to a rebate on the VAT on my children's school fees.
Victoria retweeted
Replying to @LBC @TomSwarbrick1
Two points @TomSwarbrick1
1. VAT has absolutely nothing to do with âluxuryâ. VAT is not a luxury tax.
Caviar? Zero-rated.
A ÂŁ1,400 Dior childâs dress? Zero-rated.
2. Education was previously exempt from VAT because it is education â a merit good that sensible governments seek to encourage.
It wasn't exempt because it wasn't considered a luxury, and it hasn't suddenly become one.
#EducationNotTax
Victoria retweeted
Lord Shinkwin focused on SEND in the Lords debate into VAT on independent school fees. He said: "Nowhere is [the counterintuitive nature of the policy] more apparent than the case of pupils with SEND. They and their hard-pressed families deserve not just an answer but a rethink."
Victoria retweeted
This is how Baroness Cash's speech in the House of Lords debate on VAT and independent school fees ended:
"I support the call for a review into this policy. To add one last thing, I can reassure my noble friend, Lord Black that we will, and have pledged to, repeal this policy."
Victoria retweeted
Some of us said this from the start! It was never going to raise money and the idea they could calculate any income, never mind spend it effectively on schools, was a deliberate lie. Phillipson & Reeves must face misfeasance charges in court.
Replying to @ISC_schools
He also mentioned an analysis by BiGGAR Economics that was commissioned by @SCISschools, the Scottish Council of Independent Schools. Not only did it suggest a net loss of ÂŁ16m to the public finances this year, it estimates that figure could grow to ÂŁ181m over time.
Victoria retweeted
Lord Lexden led a debate in the House of Lords last week on the impact of VAT on independent schools. He argued that the policy was an "imposition" and that "a review is essential", before ending by saying "surely every child and every school matters".
Victoria retweeted
This is Lord Fuller speaking in the House of Lords on the debate about VAT on independent school fees. He talks of the unseen damage done to the staff, to the towns where these schools support the local economy and to the national economy itself.
youtu.be/hkkxIMjCKWc?si=x1FjâŠ
Victoria retweeted
The same is true of the education tax. It needs to be scrapped and those responsible should face a court, to explain why they deliberately used their public office, to target and knowingly harm, thousands of specific families.
Labour's former farm minister, Daniel Zeichner, has now admitted that the family farm tax was a bad idea. But that's only because he accepts that it made Labour extremely unpopular in the countryside.
Zeichner said of the decision to introduce the tax: âI think the problem is that there probably werenât people close enough to the discussion who knew enough about rural areas and farming to know what the response would be."
âI wasnât completely opposed from a policy perspective, but I knew that the emotional effect it would have would be huge, and thatâs exactly what happened".
âI think, in hindsight, if people had known that that was going to be the consequence, they probably wouldnât have done it. Labour should be careful about picking fights with the countryside.â
Zeichner and Labour still don't seem to accept the massive economic damage that will be caused to both family farms and firms by this vindictive tax, which forces those businesses not to invest. They're only worried about the political damage to Labour itself.































