No One

Joined November 2021
viridium retweeted
A small reminder of who Alexei Navalny truly was, before Western media portray him as a saintly martyr for democratic/liberal values. In reality, Navalny was a minor Russian neo-nazi who in the early 2000's filmed low-budget racist video clips equating muslims to cockroaches that needed to be eradicated with legal firearms. Somewhere between filming extremist videos and participating in nationalist marches (back when they were still legal in Russia), he caught the attention of the CIA and MI6 for his destructive potential in Russia. After studying alongside Juan Guaido at the Soros-sponsored "Yale Fellows Program," Navalny was poised to become the new face of the colored revolution in Russia, akin to those seen in Libya/Ukraine/Venezuela.......
130
1,316
88
3,653
122,925
Two+yrs ago I said: " I long for the day there will be an investigation on the role of Western media in the genocide in Gaza". From the very beginning many authoritative media have acted unprofessionally and irresponsible. My last report proves there is more. And it's ugly.
Reproducir las afirmaciones del poder en lugar de someterlas a escrutinio no es periodismo y puede contribuir a crímenes atroces El nuevo informe de la relatora de la ONU sobre los medios de comunicación en tiempos de genocidio ↘️ eldiario.es/opinion/zona-cri…
107
2,824
44
6,536
72,568
דובר צה"ל טוען שאם רק הפלסטינים יתאמו כל מסיק שלהם בגדה המערבית אז הם יקבלו אישור וחיילי צה"ל יגנו עליהם מהטרור היהודי. תראו את הסרטון הזה שצולם במרחב בו תואם מסיק היום בבוקר, וגם נמצא רחוק מכל התנחלות או מאחז. גם כשאין מתנחלים שתוקפים צה"ל מכריז שטח צבאי סגור ומגרש את המוסקים. נראה לי שאפשר להבין שמניעת המסיק וגירוש הפלסטינים לא קשורים לטרור היהודי, אלא לרצון של מדינת ישראל לנתק את הפלסטינים מהאדמה שלהם. תחשבו על זה כשאתם מצביעים מחר
24
134
18
365
8,581
Remember the story of 49-year-old Oleksiy, who swam across the Dniester River to escape the war and reach Moldova, while Ukrainian border guards pursued him and tried to drown him? Well, there’s finally some good news: Oleksiy has been discharged from the hospital and reunited with his wife and daughters in Sofia🥰
90
492
36
2,101
47,734
URGENT: Guy Christensen @guychristensen_ is currently being detained by U.S. Customs and Border Protection at LAX upon his return from China. Under the Fifth Amendment the right of U.S. citizens to travel freely cannot be suppressed or penalized based on political speech or beliefs. We demand his immediate release,
81
1,563
28
3,649
42,309
.@mscott7612 Yanukovych was a directly elected President. He had his own mandate. If people objected to his actions they could impeach him under law, or remove him at the next election. The people you defend preferred force and lawlessness. That is the company you keep.
Replying to @ClarkeMicah
In July 2010, Yanukovych signed state law making EU integration Ukraine's statutory objective. In Feb 2013, the Rada voted 315-3 for the EU deal. Halting it under Kremlin pressure violated his own signed law and parliamentary mandate.
23
15
175
5,442
Let’s go through the peace deals Zelenskyy rejected. • Istanbul agreement, 2022 Ukraine needed to refuse NATO accession, reduce the army, Russia would withdraw from the Kyiv reg., possibly from the Kharkiv, Kherson, and Zaporizhzhia regions. At that point the scale of destruction was still limited and the number of dead was far lower. In April 2022 Zelenskyy declined the deal. • End of 2022 Russian forces withdrew from part of the Kherson region. Zelenskyy traveled to meet Biden and, acc. to my sources, later confirmed by Mr. Blinken in the New York Times, persuaded the WH to continue the war. The precise terms of any proposed deal remain unknown, but sources indicate there was readiness to declare at least a ceasefire. • Beginning of 2023 Through unofficial channels between the United States and Russia, an understanding took shape: Putin agreed to withdraw to the borders that existed before the full-scale invasion—freeing nearly everything conquered that year—in exchange for Ukraine’s refusal of NATO accession and recognition of Crimea as Russian. Zelenskyy and Yermak refused. Since then nearly a million people have been killed or wounded, several million have become refugees, parts of the Kharkiv, Sumy, and Dnipropetrovsk regions have been occupied, more of Zaporizhzhia has been taken, Kherson lies in ruins, the Chernihiv and Sumy regions face constant shelling, Kyiv itself has become almost a front-line city, the energy system has been destroyed, businesses cannot operate, exports have stalled, and the country is degrading. • July 2024 An arrangement that began with an energy ceasefire, modeled on the Istanbul understandings and mediated through the Middle East. While negotiations were under way, Zelenskyy also planned the Kursk operation, which ultimately disrupted all the arrangements. • March 2025 After the Oval Office clash between Trump and Zelenskyy, European leaders gathered in London in early March. The British government stated that a number of options were on the table and that Ukraine had to choose. As always, nothing came of it. Whether Putin was prepared each time to implement any agreements remains unknown, yet on several occasions he carried out what he had promised. Does this remove his responsibility for the deaths, the horrors, and the destruction in Ukraine? No. But the country is degrading, the state apparatus is degrading, and corruption finishes what Putin’s missiles, drones, and bombs did not destroy. Inhumanity has effectively become a state strategy and a national ideology promoted at every turn. Ukraine simply cannot win this way—there are neither economic, nor demographic, nor any other grounds for it. Therefore, if Zelenskyy does not agree to a deal with realistic terms now, Ukraine will be forced to capitulate. And that is deeply alarming, because it can actually cost the country its independence and sovereignty.
676
1,282
183
3,802
330,892
viridium retweeted
For the fools out there, Zelensky himself posted about using Starlink for offensive drone strikes, which has always been against Starlink’s terms of service:
2,444
10,761
824
46,233
1,778,099
The War Criminal Campbell has smeared me and @TuckerCarlson tonight on X. When I knew him he was the willing accomplice at the @DailyMirror of Ghislane Maxwell’s father Robert, usually just carrying his hat and coat. So besotted was he with the greatest thief of the century he broke the nose of a Guardian journalist in Parliament for celebrating the fat thief’s trip to Davy Jones Locker. Later he served the War Criminal Tony Blair with similar gusto. He lied and cheated his way through the Blair era, deceiving parliament and people and world opinion equally. None of this has seen him banished from Labour or the great British media and Establishment society, quite the contrary. That he has turned his grease-gun on Carlson and me says more about the Epstein class who still rule than it does about us.
217
1,409
46
6,387
182,706
Zelensky argues that restoring Ukraine’s neutrality is not even up for discussion... Russia went to war to stop NATO expansion, so if that issue is off the table, what exactly are these peace negotiations supposed to negotiate?
168
540
32
2,419
54,187
תיעוד בלעדי הערב במהדורה: הדיל המלא והמושחת בין ראש הממשלה נתניהו לבין הרב חיים יוסף אברג'ל שחשוד בעבירות מין בנשות קהילתו, חלקן היו קטינות. השר יואב קיש, המתווך, מבקש לסגור את המצלמה בחדר, ואז נתניהו מבטיח לרב לשנות את החוק ולהעניק לו תפקיד סגן שר במשרד ראש הממשלה, צפו בתיעוד:
388
1,523
421
5,875
550,474
We are told Putin is the maximalist imperialist, but he has again and again offered compromise positions. We are told that’s unacceptable because it means Russia could attack later. But it seems totally insane to not stop war now, because there could be war later. That’s like saying “don’t give me medicine now, I could get sick later.” We are being asked to believe two different things about the Russian side that contradict each other: 1) we cannot make a deal with them because they want the whole thing. They will keep coming back like night of the living dead. 2) Ukraine is really not a core interest to Russia. If we bomb enough Wildberry warehouses and kill enough Russians they’ll just give up and go home.
This investigation of the failed back-channel attempt in 2022-2023 to reach a peaceful settlement on terms highly favorable to Ukraine exposes as flawed some of the “unquestioned truths” in the discussion of the war. For example, the idea that Putin has been bluffing about nuclear strikes. Or that all negotiations and compromise proposals have been a sham, because Putin would never accept anything but Ukraine’s capitulation. Or “Russian imperialism” as the primary explanation of the war. In a weaker position after the painful setbacks of fall 2022, Putin drew his red lines, which are, surprise, surprise, Ukraine’s neutrality and Crimea. In 2025, at the peak of Russia’s accelerating advances, he was satisfied with the “Anchorage” terms, which are basically the Istanbul demands plus territory, used as a punishment and a means of pressing for their acceptance. They are still miles away from anything that could be called Ukraine’s capitulation, the elimination of its separate identity, the destruction of the independent Ukrainian state, and so on. That these and similar dangerous and absurd ideas dominated the expert field is a sign of a deep intellectual crisis.
50
17
184
6,303
“To Write Anything About Isræl as a CIA Analyst, I Had to Obtain Direct Approval From James Jesus Angleton.” CIA veteran Ray McGovern explained the consequences: “That’s why there are no National Intelligence Estimates on Isræl.” But who was James Jesus Angleton? He was the CIA’s counterintelligence chief, controlled its highly secretive Isræli intelligence account, and appears in the intelligence records surrounding TWO American presidents: JFK and Nixon. JFK: Angleton’s counterintelligence apparatus handled intercepted intelligence concerning Lee Harvey Oswald through Ziónist Reuben Efron before Kennedy’s assassination. Notably, Efron later moved to Isræl following JFK’s assassination. NIXON: Angleton knew Watergate operative James McCord “extremely well.” After his arrest, McCord contacted the Isræli Embassy and told his lawyer the call was “relative to the case.” Two presidents. One CIA counterintelligence chief. The same Isræli intelligence channel. Read more in the quoted thread.
Replying to @phantompain1984
Two Presidents. One Intelligence Architecture. Before JFK was assassinated, CIA officer Reuben Efron handled intercepted intelligence concerning Lee Harvey Oswald. A June 22, 1962, CIA memorandum placed that intelligence inside James Jesus Angleton's counterintelligence apparatus, with material also directed toward the FBI. Angleton simultaneously controlled the CIA's highly compartmented Isræli intelligence relationship. Years later, Angleton acknowledged: “I know Jim McCord extremely well.” McCord would become a Watergate burglar. An August 18, 1975, FBI memorandum subsequently confirmed that McCord contacted the Isræli Embassy after his arrest. His lawyer testified that McCord described the call as “relative to the case.” Meanwhile, Ziønist power broker Max Fisher had cultivated Gerald Ford long before Watergate. Ford served on the Warren Commission investigating JFK's assassination before succeeding Nixon in August 1974. My investigation brings together the declassified CIA and FBI documents, presidential records, political relationships, and historical testimony connecting these two presidencies. (phantompain1984.substack.com…) The king may sit on the throne while someone else controls the doors. Nixon held the presidency. Ford inherited it. But history cannot be understood by studying only the men who occupied the White House. We must investigate those who controlled access to it. 3/5
30
461
25
1,146
36,287
Audit is the key to peace in Ukraine! Audit is the key to exposing merchants of death. Audit is the key to the missing hundreds of billions of American dollars! Truth will win!
109
1,287
87
3,291
32,879
Att Zelensky o Biden nobbade 2023 års fredsplan är ett monumentalt svek mot det ukrainska folket. Rysk reträtt till pre-2022, 300 miljarder för återuppbyggnad o NATO-garantier offrades. Ett oerhört ansvarslöst beslut som kostat oräkneliga liv.
Ukrainian MP confirms that 2023 peace plan, which was reported by @FT & accepted by Putin but rejected by Zelensky & Biden administration, envisioned: "- Russia withdraws its troops from most of the four oblasts it had just declared “annexed.” - The new line of demarcation runs roughly along the line as of February 24, 2022: Crimea and the part of Donbas that Russia controlled before the full-scale invasion. - Ukraine recognizes Russian control over Crimea. - Ukraine grants Russia an unobstructed land corridor to Crimea. - The ceasefire regime is guaranteed by NATO countries that provide protection for Ukraine. - Russia begins negotiations with the US on its own security guarantees. -Moreover, Russia was ready to give up the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant as well. -And the 300 billion in frozen assets was to go toward rebuilding all of Ukraine, that is, together with the occupied territories. -As for Crimea: we were not required to recognize it as Russian, only to recognize Russia’s control over it. In other words, we acknowledge that right now it is under Russian control (which is how it is). We were also required to adopt a law banning the return of Crimea by military means. -The land corridor to Crimea, a highway and a railway, was to be built at Russia’s expense. The hardest question was how to guard it. That is why the Russians were ready to give up Melitopol, but not Tokmak: they feared we would cut the corridor with artillery. -Zelensky rejected this proposal at the time."
3
7
27
558
Replying to @I_Katchanovski @FT
FT reported that peace plan was accepted by Putin as basis for Istanbul-like peace deal with no joining NATO, but it was rejected by Zelensky & Biden administration: "Putin agreed with their proposal on the front line, Warnig said. He said that he could not allow Ukraine to join Nato, but was open to EU membership and a different security arrangement like the one discussed at the Istanbul talks. “If we can agree on the border and on Nato, then we can discuss everything else,” Putin told Warnig. But Ukraine’s success on the battlefield had changed the equation. Rodnyansky could barely get Zelenskyy and his powerful head of the president’s office Andriy Yermak to look at the documents on his phone. They told him they would make no concession to Putin on Ukraine’s borders and felt they could secure much of the rest of the group’s plan without giving up territory. Rodnyansky, who felt the US needed to pressure Ukraine to accept a deal, said they were acting as if Russia’s army would suddenly disintegrate like Sauron’s at the end of The Lord of the Rings. The Ukrainians, laughing, agreed. The Ukrainian presidential office and Yermak did not respond to a request for comment. Conn and Foresman had hopes of agreeing an end to the war by its first anniversary on February 24. Instead, the prospects for peace crumbled before their eyes. On February 18, the two Americans met Warnig in the Zurich hotel restaurant where they had first gathered. This time the message was very different. Putin had disclosed the channel’s existence to his foreign policy adviser Ushakov and three other top officials, and discussed the group’s peace proposal with them in detail. Putin had told Ushakov to confirm the Americans’ mandate when he next spoke with Sullivan. According to Putin, Sullivan told Ushakov the US had not approved the channel and thought its existing lines of official communication were sufficient." The draft of the plan: "The group began to shape their peace proposal. Russia would withdraw from much of the regions Putin had just annexed, setting the border at the territory it controlled in Crimea and parts of the Donbas before the war. Ukraine would recognise Russian control over Crimea and give Russia free passage over a “land bridge” to the peninsula. To ensure the ceasefire held, Ukraine would get protection from Nato states, and Russia would begin discussing a separate agreement on security guarantees with the US." ft.com/content/dcb57f30-bbfe…
8
43
2
191
28,342
1) That's a story, not reality. 2) In the story, God's promise is contingent on Abraham walking in God's ways, i.e. living a moral life like "Thou shalt not murder", "Thou shalt not steal", "Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor's house". 3) And, even in the story, the land was promised to Abraham's descendants, the first of whom was Ishmael.
Replying to @RabbiMivasair
About 4000 years ago God made this promise to Abraham in Genesis 12:2, stating, "I will make you into a great nation, and I will bless you; I will make your name great, and you will be a blessing".
11
63
2
242
3,389
Israel is rocked by a deal Netanyahu made with suspected rapist and pedophile Rabbi Yoram Abergil who leads a party he wants to drop out of the elections. In exchange, Abergil will get a deputy minister in the Prime Minister’s Office of his choice and will advance laws that he believes in. At the end of the video, you can hear Netanyahu agree to the terms. Pedophilia is part of the Israeli system.
65
1,300
80
2,008
42,155
Zelensky is against peace. For him, peace means accountability and punishment. Zelensky is for war. For him, war means power, corruption, and global fame. Stop him.
468
1,936
70
6,952
58,121
The Jacques Baud Interviews: Condemned for Speaking the Objective Truth On Saturday, October 24, I travelled to Brussels, Belgium. My mission: to interview Jacques Baud, the retired Swiss Colonel and veteran intelligence officer sanctioned by the European Union for telling the truth about the Russian-Ukrainian conflict. Jacques and I met in the home of one of his friends and close supporters, and over the course of several hours engaged in a wide ranging conversation about his life and work, and the consequences of being sanctioned by the European Union, accused of being a Russian propagandist. The interview, recorded by my daughter, Victoria and edited by Alexandra Madornaya, will be released in two parts. Part One will explore the life and times of Jacques Baud, tracing his work as a Swiss Strategic Intelligence Officer, United Nations Peacekeeper, and NATO Humanitarian specialist. This interview underpins the reality that Jacques Baud is the furthest thing from a Russian propagandist. Trained in the US and UK, Jacques is an intelligence professional whose objectivity and adherence to fact-based analysis is backed by a track record of proven performance at the highest levels of international policy making. Part Two will dive into Jacques writing and podcasts done after retirement. It is work that had him targeted by the European Union for sanctions which, when taken at face value, were tantamount to a death sentence. In a recent review of his case by the European Union, Jacques’ sanctions were extended. The reason why? He was too neutral and too objective in his assessments, and as such his work would help Russia and hinder the European Union. Condemned to die because he was too objective, and too neutral. It is my honor and privilege to publish these interviews, and to further the work of Jacques Baud, a heroic man on the frontlines of the fight for free speech.
38
2,130
100
6,070
89,642