WP, Audioteka & Pilot WP, TV & Video, ab-in-den-Urlaub; książki, debiasing, wrongthink. Zdyscyplinowany agent chaosu. Bullish bear.

Poland, Warsaw
Joined March 2007
raised by the internet and raised by the algorithm and raised by chatgpt are three completely different things
raised by the internet and raised by the algorithm are two completely different things
1
2
1
32
29,549
Brański 𝔯𝔞𝔯𝔢 𝔥𝔲𝔪𝔞𝔫 retweeted
🔴 Dr Gładyś wyszedł na spacer do Parku Młocińskiego i zniknął bez śladu. WP ustaliła, że dzień wcześniej zeznawał w CBA ws. mafii reprywatyzacyjnej i słynnego "czyściciela kamienic" Marka M. 🔴 Przesłuchanie w CBA dotyczyło przede wszystkim pełnomocnictw, których dr Gładyś miał udzielić ws. roszczeń do nieruchomości przy ul. Pańskiej 80 i 82 w Warszawie. 🔴Okazało się, że roszczenia do Pańskiej przechodziły przez serię podejrzanych transakcji. Część z nich trafiła do "czyściciela kamienic" Marka M. W 2015 r. złożono wniosek o odszkodowanie za Pańską 80, oparty na umowach dotyczących tych roszczeń. 🔴Wątpliwości dotyczą m.in. pełnomocnictwa, na podstawie którego miały zostać sprzedane udziały dr. Gładysia do Pańskiej. Wiele wskazuje na to, że mogło ono zostać sfałszowane. 🔴Prokuratura poinformowała nas jednak, że badanie przez biegłego podpisu dr. Gładysia w spornym pełnomocnictwie „nie było konieczne". 🔴Policja od początku skłaniała się ku wersji o samobójstwie. Bliscy naukowca mówią nam jednak, że nie wierzą w ten scenariusz. 🔴 Śledztwo dotyczące roszczeń do Pańskiej trwa, a zaginięcia nadal nie wyjaśniono. Prokuratura nie widzi związku między tymi sprawami (!) wiadomosci.wp.pl/tajemnicze-…
🤖 Made with AI
6
88
6
251
10,397
Brański 𝔯𝔞𝔯𝔢 𝔥𝔲𝔪𝔞𝔫 retweeted
🔴Tajemnicze zaginięcie, kolekcjoner kamienic i mafia reprywatyzacyjna. Co się stało z doktorem Gładysiem? Wieloletni wykładowca Politechniki Warszawskiej dr Sylwester Gładyś wyszedł na spacer do Parku Młocińskiego i zniknął bez śladu. Wirtualna Polska ustaliła, że dzień wcześniej zeznawał w CBA w związku ze śledztwem dotyczącym mafii reprywatyzacyjnej. Prokuratura nie łączy tych dwóch zdarzeń. Policja skłania się ku wersji o samobójstwie. Osoby z otoczenia zaginionego naukowca mówią wprost: "nie wierzymy, że odebrał sobie życie". 🖊️@matbaczynski wiadomosci.wp.pl/tajemnicze-…
39
195
29
768
60,653
Brański 𝔯𝔞𝔯𝔢 𝔥𝔲𝔪𝔞𝔫 retweeted
YOU'RE BORN. YOU SEE PANTS STYLES GO FROM BAGGY TO SKINNY BACK TO BAGGY EVERY 10 YEARS FOR THE REST OF YOUR LIFE. YOU DIE. THE END
310
24,682
540
300,332
3,851,565
Brański 𝔯𝔞𝔯𝔢 𝔥𝔲𝔪𝔞𝔫 retweeted
Nikt nie zna jego twarzy. Pierwszy taki wywiad z polskim miliarderem. W niedzielę o 17:00 W niedzielę o 17:00 na money.pl i wp.pl po raz pierwszy gościem "Biznes Klasy" będzie miliarder, który konsekwentnie chroni swój wizerunek. Marek Piechocki, współtwórca LPP, zbudował gigantyczną firmę, a mimo to pozostaje anonimowy. Zobacz zapowiedź rozmowy.
5
4
54
15,590
"JPM estimates only 55–65% of industrial hardware is patchable at all."
1
188
Brański 𝔯𝔞𝔯𝔢 𝔥𝔲𝔪𝔞𝔫 retweeted
$META head count is falling off a cliff -> Down 15% since last year -> Lowest level since 2020
23
31
12
533
128,331
Brański 𝔯𝔞𝔯𝔢 𝔥𝔲𝔪𝔞𝔫 retweeted
My unfiltered thoughts on personal agents. Grokbot has the best UI and it’s arguably the best overall. In a lot of ways they’re ahead. Their desktop app feels the best, and their multi-bot coordination is great: you can set a team lead and it passes tasks to the other bots. Grokbot also has the best “webhook” feature, which means you can easily turn outside events into triggers that start your agents. That speeds up background workflows like watching your email, Slack and more. It also has Cursor integration, so for bigger tasks Grokbot can spin up a Cursor cloud session with any model (until OpenAI cuts SpaceX off from their models, which I think will happen soon). Unfortunately, running frontier models through Cursor costs more than Claude or Codex. Still, they’re the only ones embracing a team of agents. It’s a really cool idea, but the more bots you have, the more time you spend managing and maintaining them. I’m starting to think one bot with different threads/channels is the right answer, which I’ll get to with Claude Duet. dots by OpenAI is rough around the edges right now, but it’s probably the most powerful if you use Codex, which I do. dots can spin up Codex sessions in the cloud or locally on your computer. So if you have coding or video editing workflows that need your local files, this is very useful. Codex computer use is also the best in the world: your dot can spin up a local Codex session that fully controls your computer, as long as it’s on. Their real-time voice is incredible. If you have your email and work tools connected, try this: go on a walk with headphones in, ask the agent to summarize your emails, have it draft replies and read them back to you, then send them off. If I remember right, this is close to a workflow you (Tim) used to have with your VAs before AI. It’s my favorite use case for personal agents. The one downside is that you have to call your agent, and it’s an awful experience. It literally rings, and it’s annoying. Muse by Meta is a toy. I’ve talked to a bunch of finance people I play poker with who all tried it and set up automations, and they all said it doesn’t reliably do what they want. It’s fast, and its user numbers will probably keep growing. But it’s basically free: you get a TON of usage without paying a dime. That’s NOT a trade I’m willing to make. An agent doing high-leverage tasks should be running at the Opus 5.5 or GPT 6.1 Sol level. Claude Duet - is in early access, so unfortunately not everyone can use it yet. First things first, it runs on Opus 5.5, the best model in the world. I’ve only had access for 72 hours, but Duet feels different from the others. It’s not a personified agent like Grokbot, dot or Muse, which gives it a more professional vibe that I like. When you ask your Duet agent to do something, it spins up a task, which is a new chat thread. All your threads show up in a Tasks tab, so it’s easy to see everything Duet is working on or has finished. And instead of creating more agents (like Grokbot), you create channels, just like Slack (I can tell @anthropic is Slack-pilled). I have a content channel, a finances channel, etc., which keeps different kinds of tasks separate. The only other app I’ve seen do this is Buzz by @jack, and it’s a good experience. Their strong point is documents (artifacts). If you want decks, high-quality docs or design mockups, Opus just wins. Period. It’s not close right now. Their weak point is real-time voice. It’s the worst of the bunch and borderline unusable, though I think they only added it a few days ago. Instinct lives in iMessage, has no app, and doesn’t do anything notable besides show you product suggestions you didn’t ask for. (Not ads, according to their team.) My hot take: The VM is overrated. SpaceX, OpenAI and Meta all talk about the VM your agent can use and feature it in their marketing. It’s not as useful as you’d think, because more and more websites block bots that visit their site on the cloud VM. All of these companies promise their agents can make payments, but most payments either take forever or get blocked altogether. SpaceX has a cool workaround with Grokbot that routes traffic through your computer so it uses your IP address. But I’d much rather the agent just USE my computer for the task, like dot does by handing it off to Codex. Also, i don't think normal people care about the virtual computer. If anything they get offended they have to "stream a computer". The problem with personal agents: by the time you read this, pick one, and test it for 7 days, every one of them will have released 10 new features and the whole landscape will have changed. It’s nearly impossible to keep up.
If you’ve used a personal AI assistant (@bot, @Muse, dots from @OpenAI, @Claudeai Duet, @Instinct, etc), which was your favorite and why? What are the biggest differences?
223
60
24
1,630
140,875
Brański 𝔯𝔞𝔯𝔢 𝔥𝔲𝔪𝔞𝔫 retweeted
Palmer Luckey warns China won’t stop at Taiwan… and believes Beijing is already building a historical narrative to justify territorial claims over Okinawa, the Philippines, and other Pacific territories. 🇺🇸🇨🇳🇹🇼🇯🇵 “This is my crazy theory, and people can disagree with me. But nobody in history has ever built a gigantic amphibious landing force, used it once, and then dismantled it—except for the United States. If China takes Taiwan, I think they’re immediately going to hop over to Okinawa, parts of the Philippines, and maybe parts of Vietnam as well. Xi Jinping has been talking about the Ryukyu Islands, where Okinawa is located, and historical tributary relationships with China. They’re not bringing up ancient history just because they love wandering through national archives looking at obscure tributary states. They’re constructing a national narrative that would allow them to convince their people to start with Taiwan—and then go after more of America’s Pacific allies.”
130
401
56
2,136
146,481
Brański 𝔯𝔞𝔯𝔢 𝔥𝔲𝔪𝔞𝔫 retweeted
Want one chart that explains most of Netflix’s recent moves? Here you go.
27
50
11
519
133,025