Contumacious 🇬🇧 (@wollybottom) header
Contumacious 🇬🇧 (@wollybottom) profile picture

British and proud. Retired. Just want to enjoy my country along with anyone else who respects MY values and MY culture. Restore Britain 🇬🇧

United Kingdom
Joined December 2010
Photo by Contumacious 🇬🇧 (@wollybottom)Photo by Contumacious 🇬🇧 (@wollybottom)Photo by Contumacious 🇬🇧 (@wollybottom)Photo by Contumacious 🇬🇧 (@wollybottom)Photo by Contumacious 🇬🇧 (@wollybottom)Photo by Contumacious 🇬🇧 (@wollybottom)Photo by Contumacious 🇬🇧 (@wollybottom)Photo by Contumacious 🇬🇧 (@wollybottom)Photo by Contumacious 🇬🇧 (@wollybottom)Photo by Contumacious 🇬🇧 (@wollybottom)
Contumacious 🇬🇧 retweeted
Żyjemy w jakimś cholernym globalnym Ministerstwie Prawdy. Minister polskiego rządu Marcin Kierwiński @MKierwinski podaje mediom obrzydliwego fejka o prawicowym ekstremiście. Podają to dalej wielkie media na całym świecie, europarlamentarzyści i amerykańscy politycy jako fakt. Internauci prowadzą własne śledztwo i udowadniają, że sprawca był skrajnie lewicowy: flagi LGBT, malowanie paznokci, wyśmiewanie papieża. Natychmiast znikają jego profile i wszelkie dowody z internetu, zachowują się tylko screeny. Ministerstwo Cyfryzacji grozi, że będzie wyciągać konsekwencje za rozpowszechnianie dezinformacji w tej sprawie. Politycy obozu rządzącego sugerują cenzurę prawicowych mediów. Tymczasem Kierwiński nawet nie prostuje swojej wypowiedzi a na świecie ludzie dostali fałszywy przekaz, w który wierzą. Co się do cholery dzieje?
257
2,033
66
8,416
93,676
Contumacious 🇬🇧 retweeted
🚨BREAKING: It has been revealed that Josh Babarinde, the MP demanding he be recognised as English previously referred to himself as NIGERIAN in a Black History Month debate on 24th October 2024 Josh knows he is not English
🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 I am English @SuellaBraverman, you said “people don’t want to talk about this.” I do. I’ve tabled the St. George’s Bill (aka English Ethnicity Bill) in Parliament on Tuesday to settle this. Will you come and debate me? @timothy_stanley @CamillaTominey @DailyTPodcast @TomSwarbrick1 @OliDugmore
64
690
24
4,844
38,094
The horrific Poland Kraków attack was perpetuated Michał Oksiński, a radical left-wing activist. This information was sourced from his Facebook account, which has since been mysteriously deleted. We can only assume it’s because it goes against the attempted anti right wing propaganda. The rumour is Donald Tusk has already attempted to blame the “far-right”. For that reason, share this information around. Do not let them change the narrative. Michał was an antifascist and an anarcho-communist who mocked Christianity. Typical profile of a radical leftist. The most mentally ill and violent group on earth.
44
163
19
451
11,159
Contumacious 🇬🇧 retweeted
always remember. the police handcuffed a stab victim and watched him die. they then asked his parents what his political views were to try and justify their actions.
165
4,149
40
32,441
192,071
Contumacious 🇬🇧 retweeted
A lovely tradition today that all the previous Prime Ministers pay respects to those who they underfunded, prosecuted and sent to die in pointless wars.
67
502
15
3,525
40,460
Contumacious 🇬🇧 retweeted
Stop 🛑 dezinformacji i manipulacji międzynarodowymi mediami przez polski Rząd. Skierowałem właśnie do ministra @MSWiA_GOV_PL @MKierwinski interpelację o następującej treści: Szanowny Panie Ministrze, Podczas konferencji prasowej która odbyła się dnia 7.11.2026 stwierdził Pan, że zamachowiec który dokonał masakry w Krakowie był „zafascynowany ideologiami skrajnie prawicowymi”. Pana słowa następnie były cytowane oraz parafrazowane przez wszystkie czołowe media na świecie: tezę o tym, że zamachowcem była osoba o skrajnie prawicowych poglądach powieliły m.in. BBC, CNN, Reuters, Bloomberg, The Washington Post, Guardian, The Telegraph oraz AFP. Wykorzystana została również ona przez @BMeinl Beate Meinl-Reisinger, austriacką Minister Spraw Zagranicznych. Napływające z wielu źródeł doniesienia świadczą o tym, że poglądy zamachowca były skrajnie odmienne od poglądów uznawanych za prawicowe oraz że angażował się on m.in. w proaborcyjne protesty środowisk feministycznych. Świadczy to o tym, że w tak newralgicznym dla Polski momencie, rozsiewał Pan dezinformację w celu uzyskania korzyści przez reprezentowane przez Pana środowisko polityczne. W związku z powyższym, zwracam się do Pana o odpowiedź na następujące pytania: 1. Czy tezę o fascynacji prawicowymi ideologiami przez zamachowca przedstawił pan na polecenie lub sugestię Premiera Donalda Tuska? 2. Na bazie jakich konkretnie informacji którymi pan dysponował, publicznie zaprezentował pan tę tezę? Kto panu przekazał te informacje? Proszę o wskazanie konkretnej instytucji oraz osoby jej reprezentującej. 3. W jaki sposób zamierza Pan sprostować przekazane przez Pana fałszywe informacje? Czy wyda Pan oficjalne oświadczenie oraz skieruje prośbę o sprostowanie podanej przez Pana dezinformacji bezpośrednio do wymienionych wyżej mediow?
397
4,943
368
14,058
241,457
Contumacious 🇬🇧 retweeted
A picture paints a thousand words.
165
4,267
59
21,499
252,009
Contumacious 🇬🇧 retweeted
Myślenie niektórych ludzi po prostu mnie rozpierdala. Naprawdę nie potraficie połączyć kilku prostych faktów? Przypomnijmy sobie chronologię wydarzeń. 2–7 listopada – Tusk mówi o zagrożeniu sabotażem. W tym samym czasie prewencja zostaje skierowana do pilnowania TK, a AT na granicę. GROM twierdzi, że ćwiczenia odbywają się przy granicy. 6 listopada – Tusk w Sejmie rzuca złowieszcze: „Zobaczycie za kilka dni albo kilkadziesiąt godzin”. XD 7 listopada – na krakowskim Rynku dochodzi do ataku. Napastnik strzela do przypadkowych ludzi. Sprawca zostaje ostatecznie zatrzymany w okolicach skrzyżowania Dietla i Stradomskiej. Samochody Straży Miejskiej dowożą policjantów na Rynek. I teraz najciekawsze. Na końcu wychodzi Kierwiński i ogłasza, że policja zareagowała natychmiast, a jej funkcjonariusze wykazali się heroiczną postawą. Do tego pojawiają się sugestie dotyczące prawicowych sympatii sprawcy. I tutaj mam pytanie: skąd Kierwiński nagle tyle wie? XD Zanim śledztwo wyjaśni wszystkie okoliczności, motywy i tło ataku, już pojawiają się gotowe narracje. Skąd ta pewność? Kto to ustalił i na jakiej podstawie? Przez lata żyliście w bańce mydlanej, opowiadając wszystkim dookoła, jak to w Polsce jest bezpiecznie, jak nie ma zamachów i jak bardzo jesteśmy odporni na takie zagrożenia. Dzisiaj jeden człowiek pokazał, że rzeczywistość może wyglądać zupełnie inaczej. I nie piszcie mi, że policja zareagowała, bo ostatecznie sprawca został zatrzymany. To, że doszło do zatrzymania w okolicach Dietla i Stradomskiej, nie oznacza, że od samego początku sytuacja na Rynku była pod kontrolą. Mogło dojść do znacznie większej tragedii. A teraz czekam na jutro. Wyjdzie Tusk i powie, że w ramach dbania o nasze bezpieczeństwo przypadkowo wojsko niemieckie pomoże w patrolowaniu ulic podczas obchodów 11 listopada 2026. A przy okazji może jeszcze usłyszymy, że warto ograniczyć dostęp do X w Polsce, bo przecież tam informacje między zwykłymi użytkownikami rozchodzą się szybciej niż komunikaty w siedzibach służb. Ludzie sami publikują nagrania, wymieniają się informacjami, konfrontują oficjalne komunikaty z rzeczywistością i zadają niewygodne pytania. A to najwyraźniej nie pasuje do narracji, w której obywatel ma czekać, aż ktoś z góry wyjaśni mu, co właśnie zobaczył. Oczywiście to ironiczny scenariusz. Ale w obecnej atmosferze coraz więcej osób zaczyna zadawać pytania o granice bezpieczeństwa, kontroli informacji i prawa obywateli do niezależnego informowania się. XD Zamiast zaklinać rzeczywistość, zacznijcie zadawać pytania. Czy służby były odpowiednio przygotowane? Czy zabezpieczenie było wystarczające? Czy ktoś właściwie ocenił zagrożenie? Bo bezpieczeństwo obywateli to nie propaganda, konferencje prasowe i opowiadanie, że wszystko jest pod kontrolą. BEZPIECZEŃSTWO WERYFIKUJE RZECZYWISTOŚĆ, A NIE RZĄDOWE OPOWIEŚCI.
330
1,863
64
9,283
535,683
Contumacious 🇬🇧 retweeted
SpaceX has officially announced that it is currently targeting November 13th at 5:45 PM ET for Starship's 15th flight. Flight info: "This flight is planned to be the first to return both Starship and Super Heavy to the launch site for catch. If successful, this will mark the first full recovery of an orbital launch system and a breakthrough moment in making Starship a reliable, rapidly reusable rocket." • Flight will last more than 22 hours, completing approximately 14 orbits around Earth. • Starship will orbit at an altitude of approximately 275 km (171 miles). • First attempt to recover both Super Heavy and Starship at the launch site during the same mission. • First return-to-launch-site and catch attempt for a Super Heavy V3 booster. • Super Heavy will execute launch, ascent, stage separation, boostback burn, and return to Starbase for a tower catch. • Starship will deploy 26 Starlink V3 satellites into orbit before attempting its first return to Starbase and tower catch. • The 26 satellites will provide capacity equivalent to approximately 10 Falcon 9 launches carrying Starlink V2 Mini satellites. • Satellites will deploy antennas and solar arrays, establish radio and laser communications, and raise their orbits using onboard thrusters. • Satellites could begin serving customers within weeks of launch following successful on-orbit checkouts. • Three Starlink V3 satellites will carry cameras to inspect Starship's heatshield and transmit imagery to ground operators. • Starship's heatshield will feature improved tile retention, additional protection against plasma intrusion, and expanded use of curved tiles to reduce heating between tiles. • Starship will only attempt its return and catch if critical reentry, landing burn, and tower approach systems are confirmed healthy. • Multiple predetermined ocean deorbit locations and a passively safe suborbital trajectory provide contingency options. • A successful mission would mark the first complete recovery of an orbital launch system, a major milestone toward rapid reusability. More info: spacex.com/launches/starship…
218
786
71
6,168
436,584
Contumacious 🇬🇧 retweeted
Listen. @EvaVlaar has not been blocked from the UK for her views It’s because she is such a cutie & her hair is thicker than a beautiful thatch in the sunshine Lefties cannot stand hotties. They are all ugly bastards. See Ginger Growler / Louise Haigh / Shabanana
247
1,060
30
9,909
144,095
CCHQ made Nigel kick Rupert out and attempt to get him jailed, apparently. They're also behind Reform running literal Boriswave immigrants and Reform taking in the Boriswave Tory ministers. They also forced Farage and Tice to condemn "that lot" over and over. Remarkable.
Alex Phillips latest crazy conspiracy about Restore Britain is it was created and is ran by the Conservative Party 🤣 @ThatAlexWoman You do know Rupert offered Nigel a pact to work together? And Nigel's response was Rupert needs to kick out the real co-founder of Restore Britain, @cfdownes_ , a man who calls the Tories traitors and says many of the Conservative hierarchy should be arrested for treason If Restore are secretly Tories, why would you demand they kick out an incredibly anti-Tory founder? None of this makes sense It's all BS Reform are getting increasingly desperate
43
127
5
1,251
28,954
Contumacious 🇬🇧 retweeted
Says a woman who's part of a government that blatantly ignored the 7 pillars of safeguarding after the 7 year long Alexis Jay Inquiry, costing £186,6 million in tax payer funding, involving hundreds of hours of heartbreaking testimony from survivors at the hand of Pakistani led children rape gangs. A decades old phenomenon that Labour are too weak to challenge Is this in case you lose voters? This is pathetic grandstanding about one white man.
Solidarity with every woman who bravely reported, endured the long wait for trial, and gave evidence in court against Russell Brand. Especially those who did not receive justice today. Everyone with a basic understanding of the criminal justice system knows that just because the verdict was "not guilty", it doesn’t mean it didn’t happen. All we know is that the jury could not be certain “beyond all reasonable doubt”. I want to say directly to the victims: thank you and I believe you. Millions of us do.
28
620
4
1,971
12,384
Contumacious 🇬🇧 retweeted
“What have I said that’s wrong”? @piersmorgan Kim Jung Un could have listed a similar slew of convictions to demonize Otto Warmbier. “He was a convicted criminal that tried to steal state property!” Half of the “convictions” you listed against Tommy Robinson are North Korea-esque convictions. Contempt for recording the Muslim rape, gang criminals outside of court? Arrested and sentenced to 13 months in prison within five hours? Convicted of “criminal harassment” of journalists for doing exactly to the journalists with the journalist did to him? That is what you hold against Tommy Robinson? You are a booticker tyrant-apologist who benefits from all the greatness and freedoms that America has to offer to apologize for and minimize the most insane acts of UK tyranny. Tommy is one of the few people with the courage to stay in the UK to fight. And you are a bootlicking coward who defends UK tyranny from the freedom of America.
“They put a pump in the anus of a 12 year old girl to expand it so multiple men could rape her and your country covered that up and then told me Tommy was the bad guy.” Tim Pool pushes back on Piers Morgan demonizing Elon Musk’s defense of Tommy Robinson for exposing the UK police’s grooming gang coverup.
41
245
5
1,372
36,404
Contumacious 🇬🇧 retweeted
Increasing the prison sentence for Digwa, Henry Nowak’s killer, is not enough. The Police Race Action Plan which promotes anti-white policing (believing the lying Digwa’s allegation of racism and betraying poor dying Henry) must be scrapped. The ultra-woke College of Policing, fount of all the pernicious critical race theory bs, must be closed. Chief Constable of Hampshire must resign and the officers who disgracefully handcuffed Henry, when he posed no threat, should be prosecuted.
Henry Nowak’s family were told there were 'no concerns' with officer conduct by the police watchdog, the IOPC. In an exclusive interview with ITV News UK Editor @PaulBrandITV, the family says they were unaware of the contents of officers’ bodycam footage from the scene of the crime, which detailed the 'horrific' final moments of their son's life. Speaking publicly for the first time, Henry's father, Mark and stepmother, Katie, said they only saw the video on the first day of the trial of their son's killer. Watch 'Dear Henry: Our Fight for Justice' on November 5th, 9pm, on ITV1, ITVX or stream on YouTube via the link in our bio. #henrynowak
132
1,442
31
4,736
55,685
Contumacious 🇬🇧 retweeted
Our latest Restore Britain prospective parliamentary candidate announcement - Charlie Downes in Sittingbourne and Sheppey. I look forward to visiting Kent again to help get Charlie into Parliament. We can win this seat, and many others in the county.
614
1,624
175
11,466
357,982
Contumacious 🇬🇧 retweeted
Surely not again‼️ How thick do you have to be to speak like this on national television? Seriously? Imagine calling people cowards and traitors because they won’t fight in a completely avoidable war of choice, to benefit central banking elites and the military industrial complex, for a Government that cares nothing for representative democracy in the UK, the welfare of its citizens, or its borders and sovereignty.
234
134
16
581
15,225
Contumacious 🇬🇧 retweeted
It's absolutely incredible that armed police are hunting a man reportedly seen carrying a large blade near a school in Gloucester this morning, yet no description of him appears to have been released. A child has been injured. Armed officers are searching the area. But the public haven't been told what this man looks like, how tall he is or what he's wearing. How are people supposed to protect themselves or help police identify him? If officers have a reliable description, the public should be given it.
860
2,599
116
9,405
269,948
Contumacious 🇬🇧 retweeted
Over 60 Muslim men raped Scarlett West from the age of 14. None have been convicted. Her father stood as Restore Britain’s candidate for Greater Manchester mayor. There was no national outrage, no wave of arrests, and no accountability. Russell Brand, by contrast, is facing the full force of the justice system over an allegation involving touching a woman’s breast 15 years ago. If the evidence shows he is a predator, he should be punished. That is how a functioning system works. The same system has produced nothing for Scarlett. The men who systematically raped and trafficked her as a child remain free. This is not an isolated failure. It is a pattern in which certain offenders are pursued relentlessly while others walk amongst us. Where are the 60 Muslim men who raped a child? Disgraceful.
915
13,439
377
42,231
435,614
Contumacious 🇬🇧 retweeted
If senior people don’t feel they need to resign over the appalling, heartless police mistreatment of Henry Nowak as the eighteen-year-old student lay dying, then how bad would something have to be before senior people resigned? Time was when honour demanded that conduct with heinous consequences led to the people ultimately responsible taking responsibility. I am so sick of the Nothing to see here culture.
351
2,247
40
10,196
84,266
Contumacious 🇬🇧 retweeted
I want to address an allegation directly, because Reform politicians seem determined to spread the idea that I am somehow working in coordination with the Conservative Party and Kemi Badenoch. Yes, I was a member of the Conservative Party. In 1993. My children have since been born and grown up. It was more than thirty years ago. Literally, a lifetime ago. Many of the Reform leadership certainly can’t say the same. Yes, I've met Kemi Badenoch. I speak to her occasionally. I like her personally. We have worked together in Parliament. She spoke positively about our rape gang inquiry, and I thanked her for it. Numerous Conservative MPs have supported my parliamentary work, including our inquiry. Esther McVey. Nick Timothy. Jack Rankin. Peter Bedford. I could go on. I am not going to apologise for that. I will work with anyone in Parliament who is prepared to help deliver meaningful change. We have achieved results by doing precisely that. Does that mean I forgive the Conservatives for what they did to Britain between 2010 and 2024? Absolutely not. It was a betrayal. I have literally established a national political party to fight them at the ballot box. I am delighted when we beat them, which is a growing amount. All that should be a fairly substantial clue… But opposing a political party does not require you to behave like a petulant child towards every single person associated with it. Conservative MPs believed I would do a good job on the Public Accounts Committee. I accepted the opportunity to scrutinise government spending and fight for British taxpayers. Again, absolutely no apologies. I think we have delivered results. Now let's compare that with Reform. Reform tried to have me imprisoned over false allegations. I would be in prison today if they had their way. Despite everything, I have repeatedly attempted to work with Reform MPs in Parliament. I have invited them to support initiatives, collaborate on important issues and help deliver results. Time and again, those invitations have been ignored. My emails don’t even get a reply. I happily sign their motions and support their efforts, I did earlier this week. The feeling is not mutual. They complain. They moan. They attack. They endlessly manufacture personal grievances. But ask them to put their animosities aside and actually achieve something together? Suddenly, it's total silence. I've received more constructive support in Parliament from Labour MPs than from Reform. Think about that. It is grievance politics at its most pathetic. Negative, unproductive and deeply unprofessional. My position is incredibly straightforward. At elections, we are opponents. In Parliament, we have a responsibility to get things done. I believe that is what our constituents want us to do. Maybe I’m wrong, but I think not. Reform claim we stand in more local council Reform seats than anyone else. Yes, because so many more Reform councillors resign in disgrace than any other party. We are moving towards standing in 100% of local council by-elections. We’ve stood in Reform seats, Labour seats, Tory seats. Everywhere and anywhere. I intend to fight both Reform and the Conservatives for every vote. I want Restore Britain to win over millions of people who previously voted for those parties. But that does not mean I have to insult everyone I disagree with, refuse to speak to political opponents or sabotage decent initiatives because somebody else might receive a little credit. I was elected to represent my constituents, not to participate in an endless Westminster playground feud. Do I like Kemi Badenoch and some other Conservative MPs personally? Yes. Will I work with them when it benefits the British people? Yes. Do I fundamentally oppose the Conservative Party's record and want Restore Britain to defeat them electorally? Yes. Their 14 years of power was an utter betrayal, and is largely responsible for the social, economic and demographic vandalism we have endured. All three things can be true. Any serious adult should be capable of understanding that. It is not difficult to comprehend. I will work with Conservatives. I will work with Labour. I will work with Reform, if they ever decide to behave constructively. Reform's increasingly nasty, brash and personally unpleasant approach to politics says far more about them than it does about me. It’s just downright rude. They seem to believe that refusing to work with anyone is a demonstration of strength. In my view, it’s a weakness that erodes our politics and fails our constituents. I have said it again and again. I will work with anyone in parliament to deliver for the British people. And I make no apologies for doing so.
1,266
3,190
326
21,173
657,921