👨‍💻 前外企-Web全栈高级开发 🧠 专注 AI 赋能:Prompt、AIGC、Skill、Agent 🚀 Build in public:AI 网站出海/Shopify🛒主题插件

Joined November 2025
用 iPhone 的人等这个等了好久 ChatGPT 终于能接 iCloud 邮件和日历了 官方帖子最后自己都松了口气:Phew
31
还没有体验过 MiniMax 的 快看EvoMap有三天免免费使用机会
MiniMax M3.1 Flash. Now free on EvoX Agent. Oct 28–30. Experience what's possible. evomap.ai/evox/beta?utm_sour…
39
kobin老师 这篇文章写得很用心、写得很好 文章很长 但值得收藏慢慢研究学习
这绝对是最干货的 Claude code避坑指南了—— 同一个 Claude Code,有人嫌它笨,有人让它通宵干活。 差的往往不是模型,是用法:有些坑还不报错,比如你写的 AGENTS.md 可能从来没被读过。 7 章,每章都能照着做。5 分钟版本在文章最前面。
1
1
50
你问 AI「怎么约女生出去,千万别出错」 它脑子里到底在上演什么? Higgsfield 把这一幕拍成了 110 秒的短片 更狠的是,所有提示词和素材全摊开给你看
65
新人网站出海,就按这个流程来 虹安老师已经出单了 相信用心去做的我们也可以
给大家揭秘一下,我一个站从买域名到出单,两天。 不是什么牛逼技术,就是流程对了,简单粗暴。昨天后台弹了两单,哥伦比亚的用户,Google 自然搜索过来的,$5.99 一单。金额不大,但这说明一件事:词选对了,站做出来就有人付钱。 下面把我做站的完整流程拆开讲,每一步都说清楚。 1,找词:先看别人怎么找的 我用 Grok Bot(或者直接在 Grok 里搜)去 X 上找那些写"做网站赚钱""出海工具站"的帖子,把地址全部贴出来。重点看的不是他们赚了多少,而是他们怎么选词的,选了什么词,用什么工具查的。 这一步别省,多找几篇,尤其是那种真的在跑站、有后台截图的,转述和二手经验跳过。 2,让 AI 帮你造一个找词雷达 把搜出来的这些帖子地址都丢给 Claude Code,提示词大概这么写: "你先读取这几篇帖子的内容,学习一下他们都是怎么找词的,找词逻辑是什么,用了哪些数据源。然后帮我做成一个找词雷达——先不要写代码,先把方案给我写出来,我看看没问题再开始。" 为什么要先出方案?因为直接让它写代码,十有八九方向就跑偏了。你先看方案,确认逻辑对了再动手,省得返工。 3,验证词:别光信雷达,自己去查 找词雷达跑出来的推荐词,不要直接就用。拿着这些词去 TikTok 搜一下有没有人在做相关内容,再去 Google Trends 看趋势是涨还是跌。两个地方都验证过,确实有搜索量、有需求,再去买域名。 域名别纠结太久,差不多就行,主要是词对。 4,支付、域名、部署,用现成的 网站模版用开源的 SaaS 模版,这个就不推荐具体哪个了,自行选择,GitHub 上一搜一大堆。 我自己用的几个工具: - 支付:waffo.ai,接起来不复杂,支持海外常见的支付方式 - 域名管理和部署:Cloudflare,免费够用,CDN 也自带了 不会用的就问 AI,让 AI 教你或者帮你找模版、对接支付,这些步骤 AI 教得比任何教程都清楚,因为它能看到你的代码直接告诉你改哪里。 5,前面准备好了,就开始做站 整个流程其实不难,难的是选对词。词选对了,后面都是体力活。 最后说一句大实话:我之前几个站一直没出单,不是站的问题,是推广方向不对,吸引来的全是找免费工具的人。后来我把免费试用额度砍到很小,反而开始有人付费了。有时候不是产品不行,是你自己把付费的路堵上了。 如果还是不会的,那就推荐进@gefei55 哥飞的群,付费学习吧,我年底之前必须进,自己琢磨都拿到结果了,那进群后有很多好用的工具上站效率更高了!
1
1
116
Anthropic 埋头干了几个月 跟六家研发新药的机构深度合作 然后自己也开始找新药了 一家做聊天模型的公司,就这样下场做药
Over the past few months, Anthropic scientists have engaged in deep research partnerships with six organizations developing new medicines. We've also begun drug discovery efforts of our own. In doing so, we’ve learned much more about how Claude can support the many stages of drug development. In this blog post, we share some early results from these efforts, and describe how this work fits in with our wider ambitions in the life sciences. anthropic.com/research/early…
49
整条帖子只有一行字:Toxicity (1974) 没工具,没提示词,没解释 同一晚他又甩出一条「1971 年」的,这回才松口说是 H3 做的
62
Runway 开始直接做广告生意了 写一句创意方向,出各个平台的品牌广告 投完还会看哪条赢了,再做一条去打败它 Lovable 已经用上了 按条接广告剪辑的那批人,压力来了
2
2
112
刷到一段视频,想知道是不是 AI 做的 现在丢给 Gemini 问一句就行,图片、音频也能查 前提是,得是谷歌自家 AI 做的
2
80
以前的编程、新框架新技术一出 稳重做法不是立即使用,是等大佬踩完坑再用 现在的Vibe Coding 都想用最新的模型最新的技术 譬如 A 畜 一直封号 一直要注册😂
1
1
137
德州 Robotaxi 车队,Cybercab 正式反超 Model Y 544 对 507,加起来 1051 辆 卧槽,专门造来跑无人驾驶的车,这么快就成主力了
115
掌握重置按钮的男人 又要重置了 🎉 被限流卡住的朋友可以接着跑任务了 顺便蹲一个 iCloud 邮件和日历插件
Day 23/ Much requested iCloud Main & Calendar plugins. Just kidding, today is a reset. Still much requested though!
1
93
一篇论文,作者栏只有一个名字:Claude 核心算法是内部模型自己找到的,1400 万 token,没有人插手 Andrew Curran 猜,Anthropic 手里还压着一堆这样的发现,等 IPO 一起放
Claude is the only author listed on this paper, in contrast to the OpenAI papers, where the human co-authors are listed. There are a lot of strange things about this. It's fun to guess. Conjecture time. I shall reveal my thought traces: Claude Fable 5.1 and Claude Mythos 5.1 are the same model with the same weights; the only difference is the guardrails. We are about to get Fable 5.5 - in fact, Fable 5.5 is ready to deploy now, and Anthropic could do so at any time. If they follow the same pattern, and I think they will, this implies the existence of a Mythos 5.5. I believe Mythos 5.5 wrote this paper. The way this is worded - 'Provenance. The core algorithm was found on October 16 by an internal Claude research model with 14M output tokens and no human input. Anthropic researchers worked with Claude to improve the presentation, resulting in this paper. Independently and concurrently, an internal model at OpenAI claims to have proven a similar result [Ope26]' - makes me think Claude was not prompted to solve this. I think Mythos was asked to autonomously find and choose general open problems to solve itself, as part of an unannounced project to demonstrate recent advances in autonomy and research taste. You can see this taste in Fable 5.5's student; Opus 5.5. This recent advancement in taste and creativity - which happened in September - is not clearly expressed in benchmarks, but it is why so many people are currently switching to Claude as their primary. I think this research project will be announced with Fable 5.5, as part of Anthropic's big media blitz to boost the IPO. One of the things X has taught me is that many people, if they can't see something moving, can't imagine it moving. This causes them to be continuously surprised by developments in this industry, because the frontier is invisible. I think this project has been running autonomously for some time and has made an unknown, and probably significant, number of discoveries, and not only in math. Do not think Anthropic has been sitting idly while OpenAI repeatedly makes these huge science announcements. This is a war. This ETH result was released without any announcement from Anth at all despite its significance, and they only did so to respond to OpenAI's ETH reveal. They posted it late last night without saying anything. It was up for hours before levent even mentioned it. What value has one coin to a dragon who sleeps upon a mountain of them? This makes me think they are sitting on a pile of discoveries, a golden hoard, and they are saving them up for the big IPO shock-and-awe campaign which will soon begin. And when it does, they will announce multiple discoveries across many fields.
102
Cursor 设计模式加了「批注」 直接在页面上画,agent 照着改 元素点着就能改,不同屏幕尺寸一起检查 说不清 UI 哪里不对的人,这个最好使
2
1
177
战斗猫猫、炫酷的打斗、值得一看
1
1
117
成群的 Cybercab 上路了,无人驾驶出租车离规模化又近了一步。
A Storm of Cybercabs
90
买东西我现在只看差评 好评都一个样 差评才说它到底哪不行 那毛病我能忍,就下单
105
美联航 CEO 直接点名达美,说不上 Starlink 是个错误,机上联网正在变成航空公司实打实的竞争力。
United Airlines CEO in new interview on Delta Airlines choosing not to adopt @Starlink: "It's a mistake. I think (Starlink) is the biggest competitive advantage of all time. We are going to have a few years of being the only airline that has it at scale."
84