Pinned Tweet
Asseb 🤔 📍📍📍The Truth !!!
In 1950, the United Nations wrote down something about Ethiopia that many people today want the world to forget.
On 2 December 1950, the UN General Assembly passed Resolution 390 A (V). In its preamble, the world body took into account Ethiopia's "legitimate need for adequate access to the sea."
Read that again. Not a wish. Not a threat. A legitimate need, recognised by the United Nations itself.
And it was not one voice. In 1949–50, while the UN debated Eritrea's future:
📍 Ethiopia argued, "in particular, its need for adequate access to the sea."
📍The Soviet Union proposed a trusteeship "with territorial concessions to Ethiopia to provide access to the Red Sea through the port of Assab."
📍The Italo-Eritrean Association proposed "free harbour zones at Massawa and Assab."
Different countries, different politics, one shared idea. Ethiopia should not be shut off from the sea.
76 years later, Ethiopia has more than 135 million people and no port of its own. The need the UN saw in 1950 did not disappear. It grew.
Ethiopians are not asking for anything new. We are asking the region to remember what the world already accepted, and to talk about it at the table, in peace.
A fair deal on the Red Sea is not a crime. The UN called it legitimate.
#Ethiopia #RedSea #Assab #Eritrea
#Breaking or #Mocking 😁
A landlocked country can't have a navy? Check the record before the punchline.
• #Ethiopia founded its navy in 1955, with its base and naval college at Massawa.
• Bolivia, landlocked, has run the Armada Boliviana since 1963: about 5,000 personnel on Lake Titicaca and its rivers (WIRED).
• Switzerland, landlocked, had 49 ocean-going ships under its flag in 2016 (swissinfo). Ethiopia's own shipping line runs 10 today (Capital).
• UNCLOS Art. 90 "Every State, whether coastal or land-locked, has the right to sail ships flying its flag on the high seas." Art. 125 gives landlocked states the right of access to and from the sea.
The Addis workshop on the banner is run by the IMO's Djibouti Code of Conduct Secretariat under an EU-funded project. Ethiopia is a signatory to the Jeddah Amendment. It is about sharing maritime-security information, because most of Ethiopia's trade travels by sea through Djibouti (UN News).
Mocking a country of 130 million for needing a sea is not analysis. My view: the answer is a fair deal on the Red Sea, a port and a naval base agreed at a table. #Ethiopia
#BREAKING: ⚓Landlocked Ethiopia’s Navy Hosts Four-Day Maritime Summit
ETHIOPIA ― A landlocked country with no coastline, no access to the sea, and apparently no shortage of imagination is hosting a four-day "regional" naval commanders’ forum in Addis Ababa.
Naval commanders from #Yemen, #Oman, #Djibouti, Somalia's self-governing regions of #Somaliland, and #Puntland have traveled to Addis Ababa to discuss maritime security with a navy whose biggest maritime operation so far might be navigating a couple of speed boats on Lake Tana.
Imagine being a naval commander, traveling to a landlocked capital, sitting through four days of discussions about the ocean, and then returning home without seeing a single wave.
When you can’t bring the navy to the sea, you bring the sea to your imagination.🫣
(More story ... addisstandard.com/brief/n-60…)
Talking about hitting a dam that holds 74 billion cubic metres of water, close to Sudan's own border, is not a warning. It is a threat against the people living downstream, and most of them are Sudanese.
So let's look at what we actually know about today.
1. Drones hit five power stations in Sudan this morning. AFP quotes a Sudanese government official blaming the RSF. Sudan's own electricity company listed the stations and the damage. Neither named Ethiopia.
2. The "launched from Ethiopia" line comes from one anonymous army source quoted by Al Arabiya. No evidence has been shown. In May, the same kind of claim was made about the Khartoum airport strike. Ethiopia called it baseless, and Reuters said it could not verify it.
3. Ethiopia sends power to Sudan. A 230 kV line from Shehedi, near Metema, has fed Gedaref since 2013, and Ethiopian Electric Power says it still supplies Sudan. Gedaref was one of the states that went dark today. Ethiopia gains nothing from Sudan in the dark.
4. Dams are protected under Article 56 of Additional Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions. Sudan joined it in 2006. "Three kamikaze drones on GERD" is not strategy talk. It is talk about a war crime.
5. Ethiopia hosts Sudanese refugees and keeps saying the same thing: this war ends through a ceasefire and talks among Sudanese.
On 13 October Sudan's foreign minister said Khartoum is open to dialogue with Addis Ababa. Good. Then let's have it, with any evidence on the table from both sides, not drones and dam threats on X.
Peace in Sudan is good for Ethiopia. And the power from GERD reaches Gedaref too.
#Ethiopia #Sudan #GERD
Kamikaze drones reportedly launched from Ethiopia targeted critical infrastructure facilities in Sudan today, including those most heavily relied upon by civilians.
Does Ethiopia really believe that Sudan lacks the capability to target its multibillion-dollar Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam with just three kamikaze drones in the coming days? What is Ethiopia counting on?
Yonas Ethio 🇪🇹 retweeted
Lebensraum? That word deserves more care. 🤔
Lebensraum was Hitler's plan to seize other people's land and push them out. Millions died for it.
#Ethiopia is asking for the opposite: a seat at a table, not someone else's land.
Look at what was actually said this week:
👉 PM Abiy at Tana Forum (Oct 24) sea access is existential for 135M+ people, and it should come through dialogue and mutual benefit. ena.et/web/eng/w/eng_9807843
👉 Field Marshal Birhanu Jula today (ENA, Oct 25): Ethiopia seeks peaceful relations, brotherhood and good-neighbourliness. ena.et/web/eng/w/eng_9812616
- In 2023 Addis even offered stakes in GERD, Ethiopian Airlines or Ethio Telecom in return for a port. Conquerors don't offer shares.
Almost all our trade passes through one neighbour's port. Asking for a fair, negotiated deal on the Red Sea is what landlocked countries do everywhere. In my opinion, that is not expansion.
@_hudsonc , you know the Horn well. Putting a 130M nation's request to negotiate next to Hitler's wars doesn't help peace. It makes the table harder to reach.
#Ethiopia #RedSea
Cant help but think that Abiy calling port access on the Red Sea an existential issue has a definite ring of the German concept of Lebensraum... ftlsomalia.com/abiy-ahmed-ca…
Yonas Ethio 🇪🇹 retweeted
A country of 130+ million people wants a negotiated port AND a navy on the Red Sea. Why is that treated as unusual, when this sea already runs on agreements with foreign navies?
Facts, with sources:
• Djibouti, a country of under a million people, hosts bases of the US, France, Japan, China and Italy, all by agreement: aljazeera.com/news/2026/4/8/…
• Roughly 12% of world maritime trade passes Bab al-Mandeb (same Al Jazeera report). The EU extended its Aspides naval mission to Feb 2027: consilium.europa.eu/en/press…
• Turkey opened its largest overseas military training base in Mogadishu in 2017: voanews.com/a/turkey-opens-l…
• AP reported that Assab in Eritrea served as a UAE base during the Yemen war (2015-2021): voanews.com/a/africa_uae-dis…
• Al Jazeera lists Egypt among the first countries signing up to a new Saudi-led Red Sea coalition, alongside Pakistan, Türkiye and Bangladesh: aljazeera.com/news/2026/8/14…
So navies are already on this coast, by agreement. The real question is why Ethiopia should be the one left out of a sea that more than 130 million Ethiopians depend on for trade.
The 4 Oct El Alamein declaration (clause 4d) says Red Sea governance is "the exclusive responsibility of the littoral states": presidency.eg/en/%D9%82%D8%B…
In my opinion, that sits awkwardly with the facts above.
The law points to the table, not to exclusion. UNCLOS Art. 125: landlocked states have a right of access to the sea, with terms agreed through bilateral, subregional or regional agreements. Art. 90: every state, coastal or landlocked, may sail ships under its flag. un.org/depts/los/convention_…
Ethiopia had a navy from 1955 until the 1990s and has been rebuilding it since 2018, with naval cooperation steps with France (2019) and Russia (2025). In my opinion, a navy is a normal part of sea access for a country this size. It protects ships, crews and trade. It belongs inside the deal, not added on afterwards.
What I support negotiated sea access. A fair deal on the Red Sea. A port and a naval base agreed at a table, with clear terms, transparency and respect for every neighbour's sovereignty. Peaceful means only.
That is also the stated Ethiopian position. PM Abiy, 24 Oct, Tana Forum: "We will continue to persuade through dialogue and mutual benefit."
ena.et/web/eng/w/eng_9807843
Fair points, and I agree with most of them.
390 A (V) does not name Assab, and I never said it did. It also doesn't say what it didn't say: it federated Eritrea "under the sovereignty of the Ethiopian Crown" and listed "Ethiopia's legitimate need for adequate access to the sea." docs.un.org/en/A/RES/390(V)
Eritrea has been an independent UN member since 1993. I accept that, and so does Ethiopia. docs.un.org/en/A/RES/47/230
And yes: access means agreed access, not owning anyone's port. That's exactly my point. In my opinion, a fair deal on the Red Sea is negotiated by two sovereign states, with terms both can live with.
Russia has offered a table in Moscow on 28–29 Oct. Would you support both sides sitting down?
en.sputniknews.africa/202610…
Replying to @yonast98
390 A (V) never gave you Assab, it federated Eritrea as autonomous, it didn't cede sovereignty. That federation died in 1962, and in 1993 Eritrea voted 99.8% for independence, a vote Ethiopia and the UN accepted. "Access to the sea" means trade, not owning another nation's port.
A country of 130+ million people wants a negotiated port AND a navy on the Red Sea. Why is that treated as unusual, when this sea already runs on agreements with foreign navies?
Facts, with sources:
• Djibouti, a country of under a million people, hosts bases of the US, France, Japan, China and Italy, all by agreement: aljazeera.com/news/2026/4/8/…
• Roughly 12% of world maritime trade passes Bab al-Mandeb (same Al Jazeera report). The EU extended its Aspides naval mission to Feb 2027: consilium.europa.eu/en/press…
• Turkey opened its largest overseas military training base in Mogadishu in 2017: voanews.com/a/turkey-opens-l…
• AP reported that Assab in Eritrea served as a UAE base during the Yemen war (2015-2021): voanews.com/a/africa_uae-dis…
• Al Jazeera lists Egypt among the first countries signing up to a new Saudi-led Red Sea coalition, alongside Pakistan, Türkiye and Bangladesh: aljazeera.com/news/2026/8/14…
So navies are already on this coast, by agreement. The real question is why Ethiopia should be the one left out of a sea that more than 130 million Ethiopians depend on for trade.
The 4 Oct El Alamein declaration (clause 4d) says Red Sea governance is "the exclusive responsibility of the littoral states": presidency.eg/en/%D9%82%D8%B…
In my opinion, that sits awkwardly with the facts above.
The law points to the table, not to exclusion. UNCLOS Art. 125: landlocked states have a right of access to the sea, with terms agreed through bilateral, subregional or regional agreements. Art. 90: every state, coastal or landlocked, may sail ships under its flag. un.org/depts/los/convention_…
Ethiopia had a navy from 1955 until the 1990s and has been rebuilding it since 2018, with naval cooperation steps with France (2019) and Russia (2025). In my opinion, a navy is a normal part of sea access for a country this size. It protects ships, crews and trade. It belongs inside the deal, not added on afterwards.
What I support negotiated sea access. A fair deal on the Red Sea. A port and a naval base agreed at a table, with clear terms, transparency and respect for every neighbour's sovereignty. Peaceful means only.
That is also the stated Ethiopian position. PM Abiy, 24 Oct, Tana Forum: "We will continue to persuade through dialogue and mutual benefit."
ena.et/web/eng/w/eng_9807843
Yonas Ethio 🇪🇹 retweeted
የምድር ጌጥ ኢትዮጵያ
የሐመረ ብርሃን እጅግ ድንቅ ዐውደ ርእይ
የኢትዮጵያ ኦርቶዶክስ ተዋሕዶ ቤ/ክ የ3000 ዓመት ታሪክ የገለጡበት መንገድ አስገራሚ ነው።
@Hamereberhan
Yonas Ethio 🇪🇹 retweeted
Mr. Hany Ibrahim, humanitarian concern demands honesty. Exploiting the suffering of Ethiopians for political advantage while posing as a concerned benefactor warrants a firm and unequivocal response. The victims need protection, not crocodile tears.
#VirtueSignalers GTHOOH!
Moyale: The Suffering of Ethiopians Must Not Become a Geopolitical Weapon.
Mr. Hany Ibrahim, humanitarian concern demands honesty. Exploiting the suffering of Ethiopians for political advantage while posing as a concerned benefactor warrants a firm and unequivocal response. The victims need protection, not crocodile tears. Ethiopia has the capacity to manage the situation and address its underlying causes.
I have received information from a trusted intelligence source that individuals identified as TPLF agents arrived in Moyale a few weeks before the violence began. The pattern is unmistakable: wherever conflict erupts, there is always TPLF involvement; wherever the TPLF is involved, Egyptian security operatives are close behind.
Conflict between Oromo and Somali communities is a destructive legacy of political manipulation along the Oromia–Somali regional boundary, particularly during Abdi Illey’s administration under TPLF leadership. Local grievances must never become weapons through which political actors turn neighbouring communities against one another. At that time, TPLF used Abdi Illey and invaded its neighboring Region of Oromia and shed blood between two brotherly people. That is where Borena-Garri conflict started by the will of the then government.
I know the Borana as a people with a deeply rooted culture of peace, dignity, and community responsibility. I also know of instances in which Borana communities protected their Garri neighbours against threats from other communities. That tradition of protection and coexistence was first shattered by TPLF security agents. Mercenaries deployed by Egypt are now seeking to perpetuate that instability and divert the government’s attention from the north to the south. That is the reality.
Mr. Ibrahim, millions are suffering before your eyes in Gaza, Libya, and Sudan. Yet we have not seen a single expression of sympathy from Egyptian leaders for these people. It is an extraordinary display of hypocrisy for those who instigate conflict and violence to shed crocodile tears over the consequences and then appeal for humanitarian assistance.
Humanitarian assistance must never become political camouflage. Borana and Garri families deserve peace, protection, and dignity. Those who organize or exploit their suffering must be held accountable.
Lebensraum? That word deserves more care. 🤔
Lebensraum was Hitler's plan to seize other people's land and push them out. Millions died for it.
#Ethiopia is asking for the opposite: a seat at a table, not someone else's land.
Look at what was actually said this week:
👉 PM Abiy at Tana Forum (Oct 24) sea access is existential for 135M+ people, and it should come through dialogue and mutual benefit. ena.et/web/eng/w/eng_9807843
👉 Field Marshal Birhanu Jula today (ENA, Oct 25): Ethiopia seeks peaceful relations, brotherhood and good-neighbourliness. ena.et/web/eng/w/eng_9812616
- In 2023 Addis even offered stakes in GERD, Ethiopian Airlines or Ethio Telecom in return for a port. Conquerors don't offer shares.
Almost all our trade passes through one neighbour's port. Asking for a fair, negotiated deal on the Red Sea is what landlocked countries do everywhere. In my opinion, that is not expansion.
@_hudsonc , you know the Horn well. Putting a 130M nation's request to negotiate next to Hitler's wars doesn't help peace. It makes the table harder to reach.
#Ethiopia #RedSea
Cant help but think that Abiy calling port access on the Red Sea an existential issue has a definite ring of the German concept of Lebensraum... ftlsomalia.com/abiy-ahmed-ca…
Yonas Ethio 🇪🇹 retweeted
#ASSAB_PORT: The Untold History & Its Historical Ties to #Ethiopia
🎬 PART ONE | Coming Soon on YouTube
🌍 A journey through history, facts and historical perspectives.
ውድ #Ethiopians በጣም ብዙ የውጭ ዜጎች ቪድዮ እንድሰራ ስለጠየቁኝ ስራ ላይ ነኝ ውድ ወገኖቼ የኢትዮጵያ ወዳጆች ኢትዮጵያ የ130 ሚሊዮን ህዝብ ነዋሪ ወደብ ያስፈልጋታል ምንም ጥርጥር የለውም ለምሰራው ቪድዮ ይጠቅምሻል ብላችሁ የምታስቡትን ቪድዮዎች ካሉ ሊንኩን በ DM ላኩልኝ Thank you 🙏🤩
Yonas Ethio 🇪🇹 retweeted
Asseb 🤔 📍📍📍The Truth !!!
In 1950, the United Nations wrote down something about Ethiopia that many people today want the world to forget.
On 2 December 1950, the UN General Assembly passed Resolution 390 A (V). In its preamble, the world body took into account Ethiopia's "legitimate need for adequate access to the sea."
Read that again. Not a wish. Not a threat. A legitimate need, recognised by the United Nations itself.
And it was not one voice. In 1949–50, while the UN debated Eritrea's future:
📍 Ethiopia argued, "in particular, its need for adequate access to the sea."
📍The Soviet Union proposed a trusteeship "with territorial concessions to Ethiopia to provide access to the Red Sea through the port of Assab."
📍The Italo-Eritrean Association proposed "free harbour zones at Massawa and Assab."
Different countries, different politics, one shared idea. Ethiopia should not be shut off from the sea.
76 years later, Ethiopia has more than 135 million people and no port of its own. The need the UN saw in 1950 did not disappear. It grew.
Ethiopians are not asking for anything new. We are asking the region to remember what the world already accepted, and to talk about it at the table, in peace.
A fair deal on the Red Sea is not a crime. The UN called it legitimate.
#Ethiopia #RedSea #Assab #Eritrea
I read the whole thing. I'll answer only what is about the sea, because Ethiopia's internal matters are for #Ethiopians to settle among ourselves.
So, the sea....
"Unprovoked war of aggression"? On 1 October #Ethiopians statement still committed to "peaceful resolution of disputes." On 5 October the Prime Minister said this is about "give and take… outlet to the sea." Those are the words of someone asking for talks, not a war.
"Naval power in #Eritrea's territorial waters"? Nobody asked for Eritrean waters. Ethiopia asks for sea access agreed at a table, which is exactly what UNCLOS Article 125 gives landlocked states.
"Somalia"? Somalia's own president said port access could be agreed with Somalia. Agreement, not conquest.
And "obsession"? In 1950 the UN General Assembly (Resolution 390 A) itself recognised Ethiopia's "legitimate need for adequate access to the sea." That was 76 years ago. We were around 20 million then. Today we are over 135 million.
Behind that number are farmers who wait weeks for fertiliser, truck drivers stuck at one border, and families who pay more for everything because one road carries it all. They are not a "pipedream."
To the Eritrean people: we are your neighbours, your cousins, your customers. We don't want a fight with you. We want a fair deal on the Red Sea, agreed at a table.
The offer is open. #EthiopiaPrevails
docs.un.org/
Potemkin Party Officials (speech at 12th Tana Forum by Director of NSA) are invoking "increasing Red Sea militarization... and its consequences on maritime security" to argue for a "seat on the table for its stabilization".
The unhealthy obsession/irony is too palpable to merit elaboration.
This regime has been embroiled in, and has become the principal incubator, of the multiple and perennial internal conflicts that have gripped Ethiopia (Tigray, Amhara, Somali Regions etc.) for most of its relatively short incumbency.
It continues to host a military base in the Beni-Shangul Gumuz Region in western Ethiopia for UAE sponsored military training camp; main conduit for mercenaries; and for launching Drone attacks against the Sudan.
For more than three years now, it has declared an unprovoked war of aggression against Eritrea under the mantra of "sovereign access to the sea" and projection of "naval power" in the sovereign territorial waters of its neighbour.
Its destabilizing act against Somalia is another dimension of its delusional pursuit of "regional grandeur" and insatiable appetite for the status of a "surrogate mini-hegemon" under the beck and call of other regional hegemons.
This charade has to stop before it entails further regional chaos and turmoil!
Time to tell the aspirant "mini-hegemon" to shed these hollow pipedreams and grapple with its intractable domestic agendas. Time to openly pronounce - as the saying goes - that "the Emperor has no clothes".
UN Day speech. Let's read it against the UN's own record.
The Foreign Minister says a "rules-based" order must not "indulge double standards." Agreed. So:
1. "Irredentist"? Ethiopia accepted the 2002 boundary ruling in 2018. A country that accepts a border ruling is not claiming territory.
2. "Unprovoked aggression"? The UN Security Council has already ruled on who broke the peace: Resolution 1862 (2009) demanded Eritrea withdraw from Djibouti, and Resolution 1907 (2009) sanctioned Eritrea. The Claims Commission in 2005 found that Eritrea broke international law in 1998.
3. "Borders threatened by external aggression"? On 14 October Reuters reported witnesses and a conflict monitor saying Eritrean troops crossed into Zalambessa, inside Ethiopia. Eritrea denies it. Then invite AU or UN monitors and let them check.
4. "Peace"? UN Charter Article 33 tells states to settle disputes "by negotiation." Ethiopia asks for a negotiated sea access, a port and a naval base agreed at a table, and offers the table. Eritrea answers with speeches.
Quote the Charter in New York. Then come to the table.
#EthiopiaPrevails #Eritrea #Redsea
United Nations Day: Address by Foreign Minister Osman Saleh
*"...As we reflect on the founding ideals of the United Nations, peace, human dignity, sovereign equality among nations, and international cooperation, we do so against a backdrop of a complex and shifting global landscape".
*"...Eritrea recognizes the vital importance of constructive, principled international engagement. Through frameworks like the UN Sustainable Development Cooperation Framework, our nation continues to collaborate with United Nations agencies and international partners in areas that align with our national development goals".
*"...We have made progress in public health, preventive medicine, immunization, sanitation, and community-based services despite considerable resource constraints. The United Nations’ 2025 results report for Eritrea recorded routine immunization coverage above 95 percent, skilled birth attendance rising to 85 percent, and approximately 250,000 people benefiting from more reliable solar-powered water systems".
*"...Against this backdrop, the promise of peace and collective security enshrined in the UN Charter is severely tested today. We meet at a critical juncture where the peace and stability of our region are being actively imperiled by ongoing escalations and unprovoked acts of aggression against our sovereignty and territorial integrity".
*"...As Eritrea has made clear to the United Nations Security Council, our nation faces hostile provocations and aggressive posturing that flagrantly violate the UN Charter, international law, and the fundamental principles of good neighborliness. True multilateralism and the credibility of the international system are measured precisely by how it responds when the sovereign borders of a member state are threatened by external aggression. A 'rules-based' global order cannot remain in complicit silent, nor can it indulge double standards, when regional stability is systematically undermined by bellicose actions of a habitual irredentist neighbor".
shabait.com/2026/10/24/unite…
Yonas Ethio 🇪🇹 retweeted
With a capacity of 185 million cubic meters, the dam will irrigate over 17,000 hectares, directly benefiting tens of thousands of local farmers. Beyond supplying reliable, clean drinking water to Gondar and nearby towns, it stimulates a broader economic growth. #Ethiopia #Megech
Today, we officially inaugurated the Megech Irrigation Dam Project, a major milestone for historic Gondar and its surrounding community. Though delayed for years, we resolved execution challenges through the Medemer philosophy to realize this vital project.
With a capacity of 185 million cubic meters, the dam will irrigate over 17,000 hectares, directly benefiting tens of thousands of local farmers. Beyond supplying reliable, clean drinking water to Gondar and nearby towns, it stimulates a broader economic growth. The artificial lake will foster urban agriculture, large-scale fisheries, and tourism resorts, creating massive job opportunities for local youth.
While this success stems from rigorous monitoring, Gondar still deserves much more development. I urge the public to actively participate in its development. We remain dedicated to ensuring Ethiopia’s progress is inclusive, benefiting all regions and citizens.
Read your own source to the end. It tells a different story. 👇👇👇
Yes, in 1997 Ethiopia warned Assab in writing that it would stop using the port. That line is in the IRIN report from June 2000.
But the same report explains why:
- Ethiopia paid "several hundred million US dollars per year" in commissions, even with "special access"
- Ethiopia complained Eritrea was inflating fuel prices from the Assab refinery
- The fees were not reinvested, and the port was "becoming decrepit"
And a letter did not end Assab. The war did.
UNCTAD says Ethiopian cargo was 90% of Assab's imports in 1995, and the Assab–Addis corridor closed when fighting broke out in May 1998. Djibouti's traffic jumped from 1.7 million tonnes in 1997 to 3.1 million in 1998.
So Ethiopia did not "choose" to leave the sea. A partner overcharged, then a war shut the road.
On ownership, we agree on the words: access is not ownership. Ethiopia accepted the 2002 boundary ruling in 2018.
What we ask is simple: a fair deal on the Red Sea, signed at a table, so more than 120 million people are not held hostage by one neighbour's price.
The way back to the sea is a signature, not a soldier.
Sources: IRIN/ReliefWeb, 5 June 2000 · UNCTAD, "Improvement of Transit Systems in the Horn of Africa"
#EthiopiaPrevails
Debunking the myth: #Ethiopia did not lose access to the #RedSea simply because #Eritrea became independent in 1993. Ethiopia chose to use Djibouti ports instead.
In 1997, Ethiopia warned Assab authorities in writing that it would stop using the port over unfavorable business conditions. It then shifted trade towards Djibouti. It should be noted here that the accusation of "unfavorable business conditions" was tied to Eritrea delinking its fiscal and monetary policies from Ethiopia by issuing its own currency, the Eritrean Nakfa.
There is a fundamental difference between being landlocked, having access to maritime trade, and possessing sovereign ownership of a coastline. The history of Eritrea and Ethiopia illustrates why this distinction matters.
Access is not ownership. Choosing to stop using a port does not confer a right to own another country's coastline.
🇪🇷 Eritrean sovereignty is not negotiable.
Source: reliefweb.int/report/eritrea…
The UNIDO number is real: "more than 300 factories by the end of 1945."
But you skipped the next 80 years.
World Bank data: Eritrea's manufacturing fell from 9.6% of GDP in 1997 to 5.5% in 2009, and the economy shrank 11.9% in 2000 after the border war. Since then, almost no public data at all.
So the real question is not what #Eritrea had in 1945. It is what Eritreans have today, and why young people keep leaving.
History won't feed anyone. Peace, open borders and negotiated sea access for both peoples would. #Ethiopia #RedSea
Eritrea’s industrial history cannot be erased by calling it a “ghost house.”
Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed’s reference to Eritrea’s former factories tells only half the story. According to UNIDO, Eritrea had more than 300 factories operating by the end of 1945. What happened to that industrial base afterward?
First, British military administration (1941–1952): Numerous industrial facilities and infrastructure were dismantled, sold, or destroyed. The IMF’s historical account documents the closure of industries and the sale or destruction of industrial and infrastructure assets.
Second, federation and annexation under Haile Selassie: Eritrea’s industrial base continued to deteriorate. Factories were closed or dismantled, and some industries became Ethiopian government monopolies. The IMF also records that many Eritreans moved to Ethiopia seeking employment.
These are not merely talking points; they are documented aspects of Eritrea’s economic history. So, before describing Eritrea as a “ghost house,” the question is: Who dismantled its industrial capacity, what assets were removed, and what happened to the skilled Eritrean workforce? You cannot fairly judge a nation’s industrial present without confronting its historical record.
History matters. Facts matter. Eritrea’s story deserves the whole truth.
Sources: UNIDO’s Eritrea: Industrial Development Review Series; IMF, Eritrea—Recent Economic Developments (1995).
downloads.unido.org/ot/48/08…

























