youtube.com/post/UgkxxAK9OMa…
Why is FKR and the blogger crashing out over this 90-second trailer? Because they know the drunk woman with the broken taillight, who threw her vehicle into reverse at 24 mph and 75% throttle the exact moment John’s phone went silent, is about to be exposed! Get your popcorn ready!
The recent 3-part Attorney Files YouTube videos done by @forensicroom are brilliant, check them out! Defense attorneys should fight hard for their clients, but those who knowingly attack innocent witnesses or cross ethical lines aren’t zealous advocates; they’re just dirty.
Whenever a parrot claims that 2 juries found Karen Read NG, point them to this clip of a juror interview in M. William Phelps’s 34 FV RD podcast. 9 of 12 jurors found her guilty of vehicular manslaughter, and none bought the hilarious taillight-planting theory.
What’s funny about reopening a wound and mocking a fallen officer’s memory, especially when it’s coming from the very people responsible for his death, or who attacked the witnesses who loved him and tried to help him that night?
I keep seeing FKR say, “ARCCA proved John wasn’t hit by a Karen Read's Lexus.” If you still believe that myth, then go and rewatch Dr. Daniel Rentschler’s testimony and listen to how he described the scope of the testing:
“We were constrained [by] what the client [Karen Read] wanted to know. And so we tailored the test to do that…”
On cross, Rentschler acknowledged that he didn’t factor in the Apple Health, iPhone, or Toyota Techstream data. He didn’t examine the distribution of taillight fragments or the microscopic fragments recovered from John’s clothing. His analysis didn’t account for where John’s hat and shoe were found or how the broken cocktail drinking glass, the shards of glass in the street, and the microscopic taillight fragments embedded in John's clothing fit together.
Rentschler called the location of John’s hat “immaterial” to his biomechanical analysis. When asked whether he examined the microscopic fragments from John’s clothing, he answered: “No, I did not.”
Then there’s the double standard on arm position.
Rentschler strongly criticized Dr. Welcher’s blue-paint demonstration because nobody knew exactly how John held his arm. When Brennan pressed him on whether Welcher had ever claimed to be recreating the collision exactly, frame by frame, Rentschler conceded, “He did not state that. That’s correct.” Welcher was checking whether John’s arm COULD have lined up with the damaged portion of the taillight.
New flash: ARCCA didn’t know John’s arm position either. It tested with the dummy’s arm in only one position -- held straight out. If uncertainty about John’s posture limits what Welcher’s demonstration can establish, then that same uncertainty limits what ARCCA’s test can rule out.
If you submitted the “we tested the dummy with its arm straight out, therefore the Lexus couldn’t have clipped John” theory to a peer-reviewed journal, a reviewer would spot the leap in a New York minute.
So when someone says “ARCCA proved it,” ask one question: How does a test with the dummy’s arm held in one position rule out contact when nobody knows where John’s arm position actually was?
mabbe8.substack.com/p/arcca-…
Katherine always NAILS IT!
Pay the bogwitch $100K to disappear, or spend another $350K proving her claim is frivolous? I wasn’t a math major, but even I can do that math.
You’re gaslighting again, Kristin!
Now you’re saying you don’t “think” there was a collision, even though you recently said you “know” John wasn’t hit by a car. Amazingly, you’re saying this while also claiming you have no idea what happened to John, and admitting there’s ZERO evidence that anyone in that house had anything to do with his death. That’s the very definition of disingenuous!
Replying to @zonaeagle @realjustsully
Was there any investigation conducted outside of a collision?
If not, how am I expected to respond when I don’t think there was a collision?
In July 2019, videos went viral of people dumping buckets of water on NYPD officers as they responded to open hydrants and neighborhood gatherings during a heat wave. It was a shocking display of blatant disregard for law and order. In my opinion, it sent a message that attacking the people who safeguard our basic human rights was acceptable. Now, police officers are routinely abused, physically and verbally, often in public spectacles staged for clicks and views. This is an excerpt from an article published that day in 2019.
Today we have defense attorneys openly lying on the courthouse steps and fabricating photos during pretrial hearings, all without consequence. Yesterday, we saw a defense attorney launch a blatant verbal attack on a judge, seemingly to create a viral moment for his followers. The same pervasive behavior we saw on the streets of New York more than six years ago is now bleeding into our courtrooms. At what point do we return to being a civilized society, one that treats those sworn to protect us with respect and dignity? Young people across the country take their cues from how adults handle situations like this. It’s maddening to see the kind of society we’re becoming when we tolerate such blatant disrespect for authority.
There isn’t a single person on this platform other than you, @TweetyChick1971 who would make such an asinine comment, that @DramaKitties has more decency than Earl. That’s laughable! My wife and I had the privilege of meeting Earl in Dedham, and she’s an absolute gem: soft-spoken, compassionate, humble, kind, and full of grace.
When I think of decency, I don’t think of people like you or Drama Kitty, who can’t go a day without a profanity-filled tirade. News flash: f-bombs don’t reinforce your point. They only reveal your inability to have a calm, rational discussion, a trait commonly seen on the FKR side.
Your “friend” still refers to all of us as “antis.” One quick trip down her timeline shows she’s as much FKR as she’s always been. Still, nobody attacked her. You’re gaslighting. People simply didn’t want a blatant FKR to distract from what was a fantastic fundraiser full of laughs and tears that raised $5,000 for the witnesses.
unavailable
Only ONE group of people gathered tonight who were truly committed to justice for John O’Keefe and the innocent witnesses who tried to save his life that night. Those amazing people raised $5,000 to fight the evil in this world, much of which gathered in a Boston theater tonight.
I hadn’t noticed this until now. Watch closely again: her jacket catches on either the exposed wires Karen later mentioned or the jagged piece of metal Kerry later described. That’s a LOT more than just a crack!
Throwback Thursday #TBT. Karen Read intentionally tries to knock pieces out of her broken taillight in Johns driveway to support her claim that she "cracked" it there at 5:05am 😬
Data is unassailable.
Data doesn’t have an agenda.
Data isn’t biased.
Data doesn’t require recollection.
Why are literally all of the FKR content creators unable or afraid to speak about the data?
A Killer and a Conman has a better ring to it.
This is what you’re left with when no publishing companies or studios want anything to do with you and your bullshit conspiracy theories!
🚨 KAREN READ & ALAN JACKSON ARE TEAMING UP AGAIN — THIS TIME FOR A TRUE-CRIME PODCAST
According to The Hollywood Reporter, Karen Read and her former defense attorney, Alan Jackson, are launching a weekly true-crime video podcast.
I have independently just reached out to PAVE studios to confirm. Will post any responses I receive.
Here’s what we know:
🎙️ Title: Read Between the Lines
📺 Format: Weekly video podcast
🎬 Production: PAVE Studios / Crime House
⚖️ Focus: High-profile criminal cases, investigations, evidence, and the justice system
📅 Expected premiere: Early 2027
Karen Read told THR:
“Alan isn’t simply analyzing these cases from the sideline.”
Read also emphasized Jackson’s experience handling high-profile cases that unfolded differently from their initial public narratives.
PAVE Studios CEO Max Cutler says the pair will examine a different criminal case each week.
The agreement was brokered by UTA Creators.
Curious what everyone thinks about Karen Read and Alan Jackson entering the true-crime podcast space.
📰 Source: The Hollywood Reporter | October 29, 2026














