Protestants are incapable of defending the inerrancy of scripture. As soon as I get him to question why he believes what he believes, it’s a block.
It’s all reductive reasoning from an already held conclusion, like Mormons and Muslims.
We have to be better than that.
Way to preach the gospel. That’s what you’d say to one who is inquiring on the truth of the Faith? Shame on you!
Fortunately Christ is my Lord and I believe in the Bible and His Church, or you may be responsible for my damnation.
4
The first Psychiatric Hospital was founded by a Friar and authorized by Papal Bull. It was called “Hospital of the Innocents”. The insane were the “innocents”.
Even secular society recognized this in insane asylums and insanity pleas.
This is a blatantly false standard. If this were true, we would have a vested interest in locking up anyone with a mental illness of any kind and keeping them away from society, as they cannot be held accountable for their own crimes.
26
shadowfax retweeted
Obviously Democrats are currently more extreme on the abortion issue than Republicans but Republicans are not the "pro life party" by any means, and they also facilitate the deaths of millions of innocent children. The evil that they have done far outweighs the good and they will only continue to get worse and run the country into the ground if they aren't taught a lesson. Remaining complacent with them isn't going to fix anything.
What are the odds that Trump “Nixons”, Vance becomes president, Trump then moves to Israel with his ill-gotten billions to become their new Prime Minister, and uses Vance as a puppet?
1
1
58
Just baffling that a sola scriptura adherent can say full of vim that while the scripture is clear, interpreters will obviously fail to interpret it correctly… and still hold that the bible is our only infallible authority.
Christians hold to both the words of the prophets, apostles, and of Christ in the Bible—AND the Church He founded.
Any other religion, like whatever this guy follows, is a chaotic self-defeating religion. He admits, and everyone else can see, that there is no objective truth in his religion. Anyone can look at the truth and fail to interpret it, and that becomes the mainstream view with no actual truth in it.
How anyone could admit this and still hold to it is insanity.
One of the doctors of your church disagrees. Just because people misinterpret or misunderstand scripture doesn't mean the scriptures are not clear. He charges the person with the error, not the ambiguity of the scripture.
"Nor can a passage be called ambiguous merely because heretics do not agree in explaining it. For that ambiguity does not arise from the nature of the matter, but from their stubbornness in defending their errors. Otherwise the Fathers would not agree either, if the passage were truly ambiguous; and if all passages in which some do not agree were to be called ambiguous, nothing could be proved from the Scriptures."
Robert Bellarmine, On Baptism, bk. 1, ch. 22.
1
39
“Justification before men” is exactly what Jesus accused the Pharisees of doing. Using this to explain James 2 only began after the Deformation, so of course it makes sense to a gnostic like this guy.
Giving alms to be seen as justified is condemned, explicitly, numerous times.
Dickhead, if you don't believe in justification before men then Romans 4:2 doesn't make any sense then...
Do you even read it? if he wasn't justified to God by his works and wasn't justified to men then who was he justified to? Satan? The tooth fairy? Ffs
2
2
84
Some poster on 4chan has been posting about the same prophesied figure for like 6 years what is happening
2
134
