LeVosgien LVHLS retweeted
đš BREAKING NEWS! đš
Takaichi's government has officially signed the deal with Bangladesh which will see 100K Bangladeshis move to Japan every year for the next five years.
By 2030 Japan there will be 500K Bangladeshis living in Japan which will double the current Muslim population.
A complete betrayal
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Bangladesh's government says it plans to send 100,000 workers a year, but a plan is not a Japanese quota. The Oct. 17 bilateral memorandum covers skills and worker protections; its reported terms specify no such quota.
bangladesh2japan.probashi.gov.bd
en.prothomalo.com/bangladesh/im5âŠ
LeVosgien LVHLS retweeted
Bangladesh: When confessing, the moment that mullah said "I wanted to kiss her", the dad can be seen slapping while saying "What kiss huh?"
This dialogue has become viral in the country.
Big guy enrolled his daughter in a madrasa in Bangladesh. The teacher allegedly tried to kiss her and, when she resisted, threatened to kill her if she told her parents.
She eventually told her family after refusing to go back. In the aftermath, the teacher openly admitted his desire to kiss her in front of the father and then this happened.
The father is now the talk of the country: most of the population supports him for standing his ground, while the orthodox/clerical community defends the teacher..wow why am I not surprised!
LeVosgien LVHLS retweeted
âYoung girls were cleaning the semen off Epsteinâs clothes, is that wrong?â
âYeah so gross đ€źâ
âActually thatâs the story of Muhammad, do you think itâs wrong?â
LeVosgien LVHLS retweeted
đš EU-VIGIL EST OFFICIELLEMENT EN LIGNE !eu-vigil.com
Il y a un an, lâAgence europĂ©enne des mĂ©dicaments (EMA) nous demandait dâeffacer nos donnĂ©es et nos recherches sur les vaccins Covid-19.
âšNous nâavons pas cĂ©dĂ©.
Cette plateforme est notre réponse.
LeVosgien LVHLS retweeted
On n'a pas Ă chercher trĂšs loin, il suffit juste de te relire đ
LeVosgien LVHLS retweeted
đŽ Canon Français : dĂ©fendons la libertĂ© de rĂ©union face aux menaces de lâultragauche !
Le 28 novembre prochain, le Canon Français organisera un banquet Ă Biarritz. Alors que des militants dâultragauche menacent de perturber cet Ă©vĂ©nement, les autoritĂ©s ont prĂ©vu un dispositif de maintien de lâordre et demandĂ© Ă lâorganisateur dâen supporter le coĂ»t.
Cette situation soulĂšve une question de principe : la protection de lâordre public relĂšve de la responsabilitĂ© de lâĂtat. Les menaces de violence ne sauraient, Ă elles seules, justifier de faire peser sur les organisateurs dâun rassemblement pacifique le coĂ»t des mesures destinĂ©es Ă prĂ©venir ces troubles.
Face à cette situation, la Ligue des Libertés, aux cÎtés de Me Caroline Brézet, apporte son soutien juridique au Canon Français afin de contester cette demande et défendre sa liberté de réunion.
La libertĂ© de rĂ©union est un droit fondamental. Son exercice ne doit pas ĂȘtre entravĂ© par les menaces de ceux qui cherchent Ă lâempĂȘcher.
đ Soutenez nos actions, faites un don : helloasso.com/associations/lâŠ
LeVosgien LVHLS retweeted
đŻđ”đ«đ· Dear France: we know who is behind this. We know you don't hate us Japanese. We know exactly who is pretending to be French.
They're trying to ruin Japan just like they ruined France.
Est-ce que le magasin de chocolat Trogneux a payé pour les 6 camions de CRS qui ont assuré sa protection samedi dernier ?
đš MONSIEUR MACRON, LA RĂPUBLIQUE NâEST PAS VOTRE PROPRIĂTĂ PRIVĂE ! đ«đ·
Pendant que des commerces sont pillĂ©s, que des policiers sont blessĂ©s et que les effectifs manquent partoutâŠ
đŽ UNE DEMI-COMPAGNIE SIGNALĂE DEVANT LA CHOCOLATERIE DE LA FAMILLE TROGNEUX !
â RAPPELEZ-NOUS, MONSIEUR LE PRĂSIDENT : LES FRANĂAIS ONT-ILS TOUS DROIT Ă LA MĂME PROTECTION ?
Nos collĂšgues ne sont ni des figurants ni une rĂ©serve dâeffectifs Ă la disposition des puissants !
â QUI A DONNĂ LES ORDRES ?
â POUR QUELLE MISSION ?
â AU DĂTRIMENT DE QUELS BESOINS OPĂRATIONNELS ?
đ«đ· LES CRS SERVENT LA RĂPUBLIQUE, PAS LES PRIVILĂGES !
â ALLIANCE POLICE NATIONALE EXIGE DES EXPLICATIONS !
đ”âȘđŽ AGIR POUR NE PAS SUBIR !
LeVosgien LVHLS retweeted
I'm a Board Certified anesthesiologist and have been in practice for 24 years. I just learned that the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia where I trained has launched a program to increase flu vaccine uptake among children by vaccinating them while under anesthesia.
The program is called "Close your Eyes. We'll Immunize"
This is stunningly irresponsible. Here's why:
Anesthetists are extremely risk avoidant and endeavor to minimize patient exposure to anything which carries potential side effects. This is particularly true of pediatric patients who very often have never been exposed to anesthetic medications. We simply cannot know how an individual child will respond to these drugs for the first time.
Every single medication we administer during an operation can potentially trigger untoward or allergic responses. When this occurs our primary responsibility is to stabilize the patient. Our secondary responsibility is to identify the offending agent. There is absolutely no justification of introducing another agent, in this case a flu vaccine, which carries a risk of harm and contributes nothing to the success of the operation.
Some of the more common side effects of flu vaccines are fever (11-16%) and less commonly, a rash (1%). There is also an non-zero risk of severe allergic reactions and high-grade fevers which can develop over the course of minutes.
What if a child under anesthesia receives a vaccine and develops a rash and/or fever? Is it from the antibiotic that the surgeon requested? Is it from the narcotic? The anxiolytic? The barbiturate?
Anesthetic gases can also (rarely) trigger a life threatening response called Malignant Hyperthermia which commonly presents as a high fever. Without subsequent testing we cannot know which agent was responsible. Most commonly the testing is never done and the childâs record will forever reflect the possibility that some or all of the drugs which were used are responsible for their reaction. This makes future anesthetic care significantly more challenging and will require the use of alternatives which may not be necessary.
Advocating for a flu vaccine while a child is anesthetized reflects the pervasive yet inaccurate attitude among the medical establishment that vaccines are perfectly safe. I simply cannot believe that my mentors would have ever supported this initiative when I was a resident there. Close your eyes indeed.
LeVosgien LVHLS retweeted
đš SCANDALE : lâEtat veut nous obliger Ă PAYER LA POLICE pour quâelle contienne une manif dâantifĂȘtes menaçants !
On marche sur la tĂȘte dans ce pays !
Les mĂȘmes groupes extrĂ©mistes qui organisent le SACCAGE de la France depuis des semaines menacent une nouvelle fois une fĂȘte du Canon Français.
Nous venons de recevoir un courrier du commissariat de Biarritz agissant sur instruction du sous-prĂ©fet qui nous rĂ©clame de PAYER lâencadrement par la police dâun rassemblement dâantifĂȘtes jugĂ©e susceptible de dĂ©raper en violence comme ces derniers jours !
LâEtat pense que ces groupes risquent de perpĂ©trer des violences donc ça serait Ă NOUS de payer les moyens dĂ©ployĂ©s pour les contenir ??!!
Câest le monde Ă lâenvers !!
Nous payons comme il se doit une sĂ©curitĂ© privĂ©e Ă chaque Ă©vĂšnement pour sĂ©curiser lâaccĂšs et le bon dĂ©roulement de nos banquets.
Et nous payons comme tout le monde des IMPĂTS pour ĂȘtre protĂ©gĂ©s des dĂ©linquants.
Il faut maintenant payer lâEtat EN PLUS pour que la police fasse son travail ?!
On est devenu un pays failli du tiers monde ou quoi ?!
On va tous devoir payer lâEtat pour quâil nous protĂšge contre les dĂ©linquants ?!
à tous ceux qui ont vu ou subi les destructions et agressions de ces derniers jours organisées par une mouvance bien identifiée :
LâEtat peut un jour vous demander de PAYER pour vous protĂ©ger de ces dĂ©linquants !
1 MILLIARD DâEUROS de dĂ©gĂąts le week-end dernier : la facture nâĂ©tait pas assez lourde ? Il faut quâon paye leur service dâordre maintenant ?
@NunezLaurent @EmmanuelMacron
LeVosgien LVHLS retweeted
Les amis, le 8 octobre, sans bruit, le Conseil dâĂtat a confirmĂ© que les parents nâont ni Ă consentir, ni mĂȘme Ă ĂȘtre prĂ©venus des sĂ©ances dâĂ©ducation Ă lâintimitĂ© de leurs enfants.
Ce nâest pas un dĂ©tail administratif : câest la plus vieille tentation du pouvoir, et nous la documentons de Platon Ă aujourdâhui. Lisez, vĂ©rifiez, partagez, et faites circuler autour de vous, surtout auprĂšs des parents. #PourNosEnfants #PIC
Ă lire et Ă voir :
- « Qui Ă©lĂšve vos enfants ? » (Politoscope) : politoscope.fr/qui-eleve-vosâŠ
- Pour aller plus loin, « EVARS : Ă©duquer au sexe, câest lâĂ©teindre », tribune dâAlain Delannoy (Politoscope) : politoscope.fr/evars-eduquerâŠ
LeVosgien LVHLS retweeted
ăæé·ăćŹăăă
æ°ăăçćŸăăăŻæŻé±ăźăăă«æé·ăźć ±ćăăăŠăăăă
äžćčŽä»„äžç”ăŁăŠăăææèȘèș«ăźć€ćăäŒăăŠăăăă
èȘćăźæé·ăćŹăăăŠăă€ăć
±æăăăăȘăăźă§ăăăă
æć°ćĄć„ć©ă«ć°œăăă
ăăźćăłăèžă«ă5ćčŽćŸă10ćčŽćŸăæé·ăăç¶ăăŸăăă
LeVosgien LVHLS retweeted
Replying to @Giorgioaki
I soliti perfidi inglesi. SolidarietĂ a Vittorio Rangeloni.
LeVosgien LVHLS retweeted
You should be ashamed of such comments.
The Americans came as colonizers not as liberators. Without de Gaulle, France would have been occupied like Germany.
And after de Gaulle left power in 1969, his successors invited more and more the Americans to be the real rulers in France.
What you see on this picture us the result of 5 decades of American globalism in France. The destruction of education, of social togetherness, the lack of integration of foreigners are direct consequences of American soft power and money.
Please, keep your nonsense for yourself.
So
LeVosgien LVHLS retweeted
To every American, and to everyone watching France burn from abroad:
Do not blame the French people for this.
We never asked for it. We never voted for it. And the one time we were clearly asked, we said no.
Here are the numbers your media won't show you.
70% of the French say there are too many immigrants in France today.
79% want a tougher immigration policy.
77% disapprove of the government's record on immigration.
83% want foreign criminals and long-term unemployed foreigners sent home.
And no, it's not just the old. 69% of French 18 to 24 year olds support suspending legal immigration for three years.
This is not a fringe. This is the French people.
In 2005, we were asked if we wanted the European Constitution. 55% voted no. Three years later, our politicians passed the same text under another name, through parliament, without ever asking us again.
That is modern France in one sentence. The people say no. The elites do it anyway.
So who is responsible? The politicians who lied to us. A class of leaders formed in the same schools, the same forums, the same networks, loyal to each other before they are loyal to their nations.
In 2017, at Harvard, Klaus Schwab, founder of the World Economic Forum, bragged about his Young Global Leaders program in four words: "We penetrate the cabinets." He added that it was true in France. Emmanuel Macron was one of his Young Global Leaders.
It's the same project in Brussels with Ursula von der Leyen and in Paris with Macron. Borders treated as an obstacle. Nations treated as relics. The people treated as a problem to be managed.
What you are watching in France is not the French people failing. It is the end of the globalist project, an abject, quasi-communist dream of a world run by unelected planners. It is collapsing everywhere in Europe at once, and the West has to cut this cancer out before it takes the rest of the body with it.
The peoples of Europe don't want this. They never did.
So when you see our town halls burning, don't say "the French chose this."
The French never chose this.
They were forced into it.
If you're French and you agree, repost this so the world hears it from us.
If you're American, look at us carefully. Then choose differently on November 3rd.
LeVosgien LVHLS retweeted
Comment peut-on écrire ce livre sans dénoncer l'argent donné à Zelenski et pire demander à continuer ?
Moi pas comprendre
LeVosgien LVHLS retweeted
The 1977 case against Roman Polanski comes to mind. The famous Hollywood director was 43 years old when he was accused of six counts of raping a 13 year-old girl. Long before the days of #MeToo, the evidence was staggering and the accusations heavy, and included: "unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor, rape by use of drugs, perversion, sodomy, a lewd and lascivious act upon a child under 14"⊠This sort of case could be â and SHOULD be â career-ending if proven true.
And it was true â Polanski did not deny having sex with the girl. He instead offered a plea, saying that while he did have sex with the underaged child, he did not drug her nor commit sodomy on her, hoping to lessen the charges against him. Polanski posted bail, and walked free. When he learned the judge was going to reject his plea and he might have to serve some serious time for his crime, Roman Polanski fled the country, leaving America and heading for Paris, France. Heâs stayed there ever since, never again enterting America and avoiding countries that might extradite him. Polanski went on to direct many famous movies, such as the Acadamy Award winning The Pianist starring Adrien Brody.
There has been a lot of attempts over the years to rebuild Polanskiâs reputation in Hollywood and rehabilate his broken image. One particularly infamous letter in support of him had a LOT of famous names signed on â Natalie Portman, for example. Darren Arronofsky. Woody Allen (of course!) and Harrison Ford, Monty Pythonâs Terry Gilliam⊠Monica Belucci, Martin Scorcese, Sam Mendes, the list is endless. Some of these names are disappointing. Others surprising due to the bare faced hypocrisy â Asia Argento being one of the actresses famous for bringing #MeToo to light, having accused Weinstein of abusing her. But when itâs a rapist you know and are fond of personally its different, isnât it?
Many stars have come to Polanskiâs aid in open letters and opinion pieces. Saying it is time to âforgive himâ. Why such double standards? There was no forgiveness for others accused in the #MeToo era but being 89 years old and a beloved director, different rules seem to apply for Mr. Polanski. Itâs why I cannot take Hollywoodâs virtue signalling regarding abuse cases seriously at all.
LeVosgien LVHLS retweeted
Il n'y a qu'une seule matiĂšre de notre droit qui tue les justiciables. C'est celle oĂč l'on a laissĂ© l'un des acteurs sans aucun contrĂŽle.
Depuis 8 ans je dois suivre le cerceuil d'un client ou de son enfant.
Il n'y a qu'un mot ABSTANZA.
PAS UN ENFANT DE +
PAS UN CERCEUIL DE +
LeVosgien LVHLS retweeted
Un militant de lâUNI sauvagement agressĂ© Ă Tours, des violences de lâextrĂȘme gauche revendiquĂ©es sur Telegram sur la boucle Antifas Squad.
Et toujours aucune réponse du Parquet à nos signalements.
âŒïžNous avons besoin de votre mobilisation pour mettre la pression et faire cesser lâimpunitĂ© de lâextrĂȘme gauche.
@louiselzeu @BaptisteGi27283 @GuilhemCarayon
LeVosgien LVHLS retweeted
âĄïž « Câest une forfaiture, câest une trahison ! »
âŒïž « Nous avons aujourdâhui un Richard Ferrand qui, tranquillement installĂ© au Conseil constitutionnel, ose dire, comme Fabius et DebrĂ©, quâon ne peut pas consulter le peuple de France pour rĂ©viser la Constitution. Câest une forfaiture, câest une trahison ! Et le pire de tout, câest que câest un ensevelissement de lâesprit et de la lettre de notre Constitution, avec lâaval de nos Ă©lites depuis 40 ans. Les gens regardent passer le train et se rĂ©veillent maintenant en octobre 2026, Ă huit mois de la prĂ©sidentielle. Câest bien tard, mais jâespĂšre quâil y a un rĂ©veil ! »
Réécouter lâĂ©mission đyoutu.be/F-O6uecl6u8
đŁïž @GBenhessa Ă©trille Richard Ferrand et accuse le Conseil constitutionnel de confisquer la souverainetĂ© populaire en Ă©cartant le recours Ă lâarticle 11 pour rĂ©viser la Constitution.


































