🤷‍♀️🤦‍♀️

England, United Kingdom
Joined August 2012
Who Rules? 💛 retweeted
Labour, this party is now the government, is this ethical🧐 👇👇👇👇 Experian built Labour a database of over 1 million new mums. The data came from Emma's Diary - a pregnancy advice site that sold names, addresses and kids' ages without telling mums it would go to a political party. 😳🤦 ICO fined them £140,000. Labour used it to target mums in marginal seats before the 2017 election. A million women. One fine. Almost no press.
20
544
11
1,213
16,640
Who Rules? 💛 retweeted
Jeffrey A Tucker
@jeffreytucker12h
Look at this. The date is a typo. By January 15, 2021, injury reports were so beyond the worst-case scenario that the contractor could not keep up. NO ONE SAID ANYTHING! We have all the names of people who knew! This is from a data dump from @ICANdecide s3.documentcloud.org/documen…
18
168
10
429
8,618
Who Rules? 💛 retweeted
The Woman of the Day is the Anglo-Saxon noblewoman Godgifu of West Mercia, the only woman to remain a landholder in Britain after those robbing Normans swept in and stole everything that wasn’t nailed down (and quite a few things that were). Of course you’ve heard of her. You’ve heard of the Godiva Procession which was instituted in 1678 by Coventry Fair to commemorate the legendary ride by the Lady. Taking pity on the people of Coventry suffering grievously under her husband's oppressive taxation, she called his bluff that he would repeal the taxes if she would strip naked and ride through the streets of the town, clothed only in her long hair. She only agreed on the condition that everyone stayed indoors and shut their windows, but a tailor known ever afterwards as Peeping Tom disobeyed and was struck blind. Allegedly. It was all bunkum. Absolute bunkum. Lady Godiva’s real name was Godgifu. She married Leofric, Earl of Mercia, but both she and her husband were major philanthropists and among the most munificent of the Anglo-Saxon nobility until the Norman Conquest in 1066 (and those robbing Normans came along, etc). In Anglo-Saxon times, in laws dated around 1008 AD, women enjoyed full property rights, from peasant to nobility. They could own land, farms, houses. Upon marriage, a husband was legally required to give his wife a Morgengifu (Morning Gift): land, money, or goods, which remained her independent property that she could sell, give away, or manage as she chose. Women wrote their own wills and left property to whomever they chose including children, servants, or religious institutions, and they didn’t need their husband's permission. All that stopped after 1066. The new feudal system tied land ownership to military service, something women were barred from providing. Women became the chattels (property) of their husbands if they were married, or their fathers if they were not, a legal state known as coverture. Still, I’m sure the Normans thought they were being progressive and inclusive, two words I’ve come to loathe. But I digress. Godgifu survived the death of her husband and was mentioned in the Domesday Book, one of the few Anglo-Saxons and the only woman to remain a major landholder after the Conquest. Godgifu certainly would have ridden a horse but not in protest and certainly not minus her clothes. Still, the idea of it proved quite a crowd pleaser at Coventry Fair in 1678, even though the first fake Lady Godiva was actually a lad. Yes, I know. Some things just don’t change. In the intervening years, the myth was spiced up by the Puritans to prove a moral point but dampened down by other Protestants to make it fit for delicate ears. Never forget: the objectification of women is eternal, along with its fraternal twin, misogyny. The two generally go hand in hand. Despite several attempts to shut down the procession — in 1845, the Mayor got fed up with the crowds jostling to get a better view of her, expostulating, “It’s a disgrace”, and in 1854, the Bishop of Worcester protested against “a Birmingham whore being paraded through the streets as Lady Godiva” — it continued as a annual event until the 1960s. Godgifu’s date of birth is unknown but she died in her mid-fifties in 1067 after the Norman Conquest of 1066. The Domesday Book of 1086 notes that the lands formerly held by her had passed to others. Men of course. Chattels are property, and property cannot own property. Married women finally achieved independent taxation in their own right in 1990. Prior to that, their husbands were responsible for paying tax on their income unless she obtained his signature and consent to claim her own single person's allowance and pay tax on her own earnings. Her unearned income — such as investment or savings interest — still legally belonged to him. And of course, the "marital rape exemption" — the legal assumption that a wife could not withhold sexual consent from her husband under the marriage contract — was not formally abolished in English law until 1991. 935 years. It only took 935 years in this country to demolish the legal status and definition of Woman as Property, and despite the Supreme Court ruling, we still find ourselves having to dismantle the definition of Woman as a feeling — with political parties, Civil Service departments, with trade unions, charities, retailers, and with sporting bodies. I know many of us are tired of fighting the same old battles but keep going, sisters. “We woman suffragists have a great mission — the greatest mission the world has ever known. It is to free half the human race, and through that freedom to save the rest.” Emmeline Pankhurst, 17 October 1912.
16
107
10
299
3,473
Who Rules? 💛 retweeted
NO BACKDOOR DIGITAL ID: Freeze One Login Public opposition stopped the Government’s proposed national Digital ID scheme. But GOV UK One Login continues to expand across 250+ government services, functions and processes – including obligations people must fulfil, rather than merely optional “services”. We are calling for an immediate freeze on further expansion, a proper independent review and a legal guarantee that nobody will be forced – or financially pressured – to use it. BE AN ACTION TAKER: togetherdeclaration.org/camp…
78
1
154
1,978
Who Rules? 💛 retweeted
Tiger with only an internship and no field experience
18
52
4
749
89,653
Who Rules? 💛 retweeted
🚨🇬🇧 I might not be a rocket scientist, but something isn't adding up. The deeper I dig into PCS, NGOs and lobbying networks, the harder it is to believe the Civil Service Code is always being upheld. It demands honesty, objectivity and political impartiality and forbids civil servants from obstructing agreed government policy. Who's checking? Who's investigating? Who's being held accountable? Read the rules yourself: gov.uk/government/publicatio…
9
91
3
211
2,125
Who Rules? 💛 retweeted
There are pensioners in the U.K. who live in small flats who pay £2,345 for Council Tax

They are paying for County council, District council and Parish council They already paid 5% Stamp Duty in the £10,000s to buy the house  In the words of this particular pensioner ‘This country is a complete f-ing rip off’ The ONLY solution is to build your own pension by investing in assets
11
19
129
9,621
Who Rules? 💛 retweeted
🚨 WARNING: SOMETHING EXTREMELY BAD JUST HAPPENED A U.S. startup has successfully produced the FIRST REAL LAB-GROWN GOLD. And its process already beat CERN’s gold production by 10X. And they are not stopping there. Their model says a future 1 GW fusion plant could produce around 2 TONNES OF GOLD PER YEAR. This changes everything: For thousands of years, gold had one advantage nobody could replicate: SCARCITY. New supply could only come from finding more deposits, building more mines and pulling more metal out of the ground. Now technology is attacking that assumption directly. And we have already seen what happens when technology destroys a scarcity premium. DIAMONDS. Lab-grown diamonds entered the market: - Production scaled. - Prices collapsed. Natural diamonds suddenly had to compete with something chemically almost identical that could be produced at a fraction of the cost. Gold could now be facing the same problem. But this could be much bigger: Gold is not just jewelry. Central banks hold it. Governments hold it. ETFs hold it. Investors use it as a store of value. And entire reserve strategies depend on one assumption: YOU CANNOT JUST MANUFACTURE MORE GOLD. That assumption is now being challenged. And here is the part almost nobody understands: Marathon is not talking about building factories that exist only to make gold. Gold could become a BY-PRODUCT OF FUSION ENERGY. The reactor generates energy. It also generates neutrons. Those neutrons can convert mercury into gold. And the gold itself could help make fusion plants more profitable. Now connect the dots: More fusion plants → more gold production → more gold revenue → better fusion economics → even more reactors Gold supply has always been limited by GEOLOGY. If fusion scales, it becomes limited by REACTOR CAPACITY. And markets will NOT wait until tonnes of lab-grown gold are sitting inside vaults. They will price the expectation first. That is exactly how the diamond repricing started. And if fusion gold becomes commercially viable at scale... THE GOLD MARKET WILL NEVER BE THE SAME AGAIN. Remember, I’ve been trading markets for over 15 years. When I see the next major shift developing, I’ll post it here publicly like I always do. Turn notifications on. If you’re not following yet, you’ll understand why that was a mistake later.
312
168
40
833
185,133
Who Rules? 💛 retweeted
The HMRC letter to the better off and the access to bank accounts to remove money is deeply sinister. Across all areas of economic policy, this Government basically says that to do well is to have them come for you.
33
109
5
813
17,156
Who Rules? 💛 retweeted
Tesco “Rosedene Farms” branding conjures up the impression a cosy British orchard. The apples are from France. This is farmwashing: packaging designed to make imported food look local and dupe shoppers into thinking they’re buying British.
46
303
5
928
17,377
Who Rules? 💛 retweeted
There is no way HMRC will make mistakes with or abuse these powers. There is no way 100s or 1000s will unfairly have money taken from their accounts, and then face a state refusing to accept it made a mistake. Thankfully, nothing in British history suggests this will happen.
24
40
2
167
8,812
– at Swanley, South East
234
275
37
4,749
89,323
Who Rules? 💛 retweeted
61
238
8
1,199
57,179
Who Rules? 💛 retweeted
Ugly scenes in Hampstead right now. It’s all kicking off
214
461
65
3,982
220,401
Who Rules? 💛 retweeted
Love this. The💰is still in the wallet. Finally we get some ground truth around how hard php2shell is to exploit. The amount of bullshit flying around from vendors capitalizing on the moment is staggering, And the alert fatigue they’re creating is really going to hurt when a mass exploitable RCE emerges. We still haven’t seen a production site hacked via #php2shell at Wordfence.
Someone has created a vulnerable PHP website, loaded it with a Bitcoin wallet, and challenged the Internet to hack into it and they can keep the Bitcoin. It has a running timer to show if the PHP exploitability was over-hyped. stealmybitcoin.com/
10
14
6
167
116,300
Who Rules? 💛 retweeted
UNN
@UnityNewsNet16h
Raw Milk BANNED in many countries nearly impossible to get. Decent meat UNAFFORDABLE for most. Massive industrialised farming full of chemicals. Folic Acid being added without anyone knowing. Flouride in the water supply as well as other toxins. We will investigate!
11
108
4
268
3,365
Who Rules? 💛 retweeted
HMRC does not have a general free-standing power to demand a complete list of all your assets (or a full statement of assets and liabilities) outside checking your tax position under formal information powers, or in specific enquiry/settlement scenarios. However, if you fail to provide this information voluntarily, an enquiry would not be surprising. It’s quite inappropriate.
🚨 IN FULL - HMRC letter to wealthy Britons : "I hope we can build an open and productive working relationship" 🤡
24
52
3
508
41,700
Who Rules? 💛 retweeted
Someone has created a vulnerable PHP website, loaded it with a Bitcoin wallet, and challenged the Internet to hack into it and they can keep the Bitcoin. It has a running timer to show if the PHP exploitability was over-hyped. stealmybitcoin.com/
159
420
131
5,893
1,954,576
Who Rules? 💛 retweeted
I don’t have £2 million in assets, and I don’t earn £200k a year. I’m quite short on both counts. So the HMRC wealth audit doesn’t impact me. Yet. But it signals a clear intention. A lack of respect for the individual. What is yours is only yours until the government decides they want it to fund further welfare expansion. Property rights only exist in this country as long as your holdings are meagre enough to escape the fiscal Eye of Sauron. They will come for it all.
118
418
12
3,127
71,791