In the cases of Rebecca Mose and Peter Oyan, critical facts were quietly acknowledged yet never confronted. Take Rebecca Mose. It was not disputed that she was born HIV positive to an HIV-positive mother. It was not disputed that she was enrolled in care at AMPATH. It was not disputed that she later tested HIV negative. More importantly, it was not disputed that senior AMPATH professors convened, reviewed her case, and confirmed her HIV-negative status. Those are not media claims. They are verified and established medical facts. What was carefully avoided is the ethical question that follows: If a patient is repeatedly confirmed HIV negative by specialists, should she remain on lifelong ARVs? Would that not constitute maleficence—causing harm through unnecessary treatment? ARVs are not vitamins. They carry metabolic, hepatic, renal, and long-term systemic effects. Continuing them in a confirmed HIV-negative patient violates basic principles of clinical ethics. TV47 argues she should not have been removed from care by NASCOP or any authority. But medicine is not governed by sentiment or fear—it is governed by current evidence. When evidence changes, care must change. Ignoring facts is not professionalism; it is a deliberate attempt [a futile one] to mislead the public and silence what JESUS has done. #BloodOfJesusHealsHIV youtube.com/live/R8efzMPqZSE…