Andreu Orell (@AndreuOrell) header
Andreu Orell (@AndreuOrell) profile picture

High energy

Spain
Joined June 2010
Photo by Andreu Orell (@AndreuOrell)Photo by Andreu Orell (@AndreuOrell)Photo by Andreu Orell (@AndreuOrell)Photo by Andreu Orell (@AndreuOrell)Photo by Andreu Orell (@AndreuOrell)Photo by Andreu Orell (@AndreuOrell)Photo by Andreu Orell (@AndreuOrell)Photo by Andreu Orell (@AndreuOrell)Photo by Andreu Orell (@AndreuOrell)Photo by Andreu Orell (@AndreuOrell)
En España, con ese tiempo y alto número de participantes no estaría ni en el top 25%.
Wiz Khalifa ran the Diplo’s Run Club 5K on Sunday. Pretty quick time! He said it was his first 5K race ever. 📸 @shafikworldwide / @diplosrunclub
5
4,200
Andreu Orell retweeted
Many people take more pleasure in seeing a rich person lose their fortune than in seeing a poor person acquire one.
43
106
12
1,322
19,423
Andreu Orell retweeted
🔴 Cada semana los Servicios de Urgencias de los hospitales de las principales ciudades reciben pacientes sin ningún vínculo con España que han sido diagnosticados de una enfermedad grave en sus país y que directamente desde el aeropuerto cogen un taxi o solicitan una ambulancia. (1/10)
704
8,203
1,097
14,656
2,265,984
Mens sana in corpore sano
2
327
Andreu Orell retweeted
Parte de la crisis de fertilidad brutal que estamos viviendo es que pasamos demasiado tiempo educando sobre el tema de como hacer para no quedarse embarazado y muy poco explicando lo difícil que es concebir.
27
38
4
313
34,435
Puedo decir que tengo el mismo bebe parque que David Guetta
A day in my life in Ibiza 🏝️❤️‍🔥
2
3
110
76,992
Andreu Orell retweeted
France. A father defends his shop. His only source of income to feed his wife and children. They mock him. They beat him. They destroy everything. These are not criminals, they are terrorists. Europe is dying.
6,128
35,572
2,506
146,732
5,392,242
Una historia en dos partes, no saben ni nada los de Eli Lilly
3
1
75
9,086
EU innovation Vs. US innovation
77
423
61
4,372
90,026
Andreu Orell retweeted
this is how you know culture is shifting rapidly. things that would have been considered unthinkable a generation ago are now happening at warp speed.
This quoted post is unavailable.
43
34
2
1,193
95,154
¿Cómo sería la población de España en un mundo en el que la inmigración neta a España desde 1995 a 2026 hubiera sido cero en vez de la observada? Para calcular este escenario, tomo la estructura de población de 1995 y asumo que la fecundidad y mortalidad por edad hubieran sido las mismas que hemos observado. Esta hipótesis no es necesariamente realista, pero sí me parece que nos da unos resultados sobre los que podemos empezar a pensar. Cada lector puede, mentalmente, ajustar la fecundidad hacia arriba (por ejemplo, con menos inmigración el precio de la vivienda sería más bajo con casi total probabilidad) o hacia abajo (ciertos grupos de inmigrantes tienen fecundidad más alta que la media). Particularmente, no creo que haga mucha diferencia en la práctica lo que uno asuma sobre la fecundidad: unos cientos de miles de personas en una dirección o la otra a lo sumo. No hace falta ajustar la mortalidad: calculo tasas por edad y no creo que estas fueran diferentes en mi escenario. Lo que más me sorprende es que la inmigración ha generado una subida de la población con respecto al escenario base de 11,1 millones (los inmigrantes y sus hijos nacidos en España), pero el porcentaje de población de 15 a 64 años apenas ha cambiado: tenemos un 66,3% en ese tramo frente al 64,2% en el escenario base. Y ese cambio de 64,2% a 66,3% no solo no resuelve nada, sino que empeora las cosas. Dado que tenemos un Estado del bienestar altamente redistributivo y la mayoría de la inmigración ha sido de baja cualificación (que son personas con valor presente descontado negativo para el presupuesto público, sí, también en equilibrio general), casi seguro que hemos empeorado la sostenibilidad de las cuentas públicas en el largo plazo. Hemos cambiado España de manera muy profunda y lo hemos hecho sin pensar mucho en las consecuencias.
112
767
103
2,846
332,413
Ni Frank Underwood
🔴 #URGENTE | Muere Maricarmen 14 días después de ser desahuciada de su casa de Madrid Sigue la última hora aquí: elespanol.com/espana/politic…
1
9
457
Andreu Orell retweeted
just a coupla dudes havin fun writing code completely unaware they’re about to abolish the concept of labor for an entire generation of attractive women
Instagram turns 16 today
306
13,518
195
185,592
2,684,292
Son potentes los secundarios de Factorial
This quoted post is unavailable.
141
La maldición de la disciplina es que todos los días parecen iguales. La maldición de la indisciplina es que todos los años parecen iguales.
11
821
19
5,670
89,249
Andreu Orell retweeted
Nadie cuidará de mi hijo Kapital 26.09.26
251
513
138
2,575
437,304
Andreu Orell retweeted
Timeline cleanse until the Meta Connect event starts Muse
9
38
5
675
63,801
Muse audio/video es la feature que da con la tecla para que todo el esfuerzo y el mundo VR/AR de Meta tenga sentido. Es la plataforma y el caso de uso que Zuck estaba buscando desesperadamente para dejar atrás su dependencia en iOS/Android.
Replying to @finkd
Muse, your personal agent, now has voice and real-time video. You can have long conversations and Muse will work in the background and get things done for you as you're talking. We're also bringing Muse to glasses so you can talk hands-free throughout the day.
1
3
1,331
Esto me ha parecido muy bueno y estoy muy de acuerdo: “So you take on the world together and carve out your own space in it - together.”
One great benefit to getting married young(er) is you’re both dumb and broke. So you take on the world together and carve out your own space in it - together. Because the dirty little secret is you’re not getting together with one person…you’re marrying the idea of a person who will become 4/5/6 different versions of themselves and you’ve got to choose each other over and over again. Or not. In the end, the non-negotiable/starting point is pretty arbitrary, because both of you are going to change. At least when you’re young you’re dumb (or perhaps smart) enough to just go for it. That gets harder the older you get
1
523
I see this old vid going viral, and as usual the kids are drawing the wrong conclusions, so gather 'round and learn something. Location wasn't silly or unimportant at the time: it was a core consumer app category, arguably more important than photo sharing. If you now assume you'll have a Google/Apple map full of rich location data, it's because of what that generation of apps built. Sam ultimately failed with Loopt because he made two big wrong-way bets: 1. He bet on carriers rather than Apple/Google being who controlled the mobile experience, spending years doing deals with Sprint, Boost, etc. Then the App Store launched (yes, there was no app store for a long time), and he was caught wrong-footed. 2. Loopt's UX concept was too early and wrong. Like Find My or Snap Map now, he assumed users would be constantly sharing their location as a key part of the social experience. But most phones didn't even have GPS, or if they did 3p apps couldn't access location in the background, so the experience sucked. Foursquare and Gowalla (acq. by Facebook) actually imposed work on the user, having them 'check in' to locations, and using 'game mechanics' (for a while the hottest UX paradigm) to want you to be the 'mayor' of your favorite bar. That eventually provided the rich data the social networks needed (and which Facebook and Google eventually rolled out to everyone). Why did Dennis Crowley at Foursquare get it right and Sam wrong? Because Crowley had created Dodgeball, an app that let you check in via text and he understood the right UX. As with Twitter, the initial UX concepts often appear in texting but eventually succeed as a standalone app (consider what that means for AI app Instinct now). Sam has a scene at the Loopt office in my memoir 'Chaos Monkeys' as he was assigned as our mentor during YC (my co-founders were too rattled by his intense style, and I'd go alone). He absolutely saved our ass by doing us a big favor once, something I'm still grateful for. After Loopt's failure, Sam was mostly known for racing his Nissan GT-R up and down El Camino and writing $5k checks as a Sequoia scout. Even some YC founders snickered at PG's characterization of him as a founder comparable to Jobs. Amnesiac tech loves retconning history, considering our present configuration of pixels and people as fated, created by providential men who arrived at the right time with the right idea and rode off into history. Those who lived through it realize that if we rolled the dice 100 times, in very few scenarios did we end up where we are today. The way to cure whatever belief you have in 'great man' theories is to meet the man before the world had deemed him great. There were a lot of Sams running around doing demos like this then. And BTW, that isn't a diner. That's Tres Amigos taqueria in Half Moon Bay. Scoble was the biggest consumer tech influencer of the time, and every consumer founder had to make their pilgrimage there to pitch him since he lived there.
This is Sam Altman at 25 years old, pitching Loopt to a person in a diner It’s strange to watch now because he runs one of the most influential companies in the world The app was a location-sharing app but nobody thinks about it when they think of Sam It got me wondering how many founders are probably in their Loopt era rn? The company they’re working on may not be the one they become known for It might just be the company that teaches them how to sell, hire, raise money, and keep going long enough to find "it" But at the time, it looks like a kid trying to explain a weird location app to a stranger over lunch
53
52
8
1,313
239,295