Andy Borrie retweeted
There now follows a party election broadcast by the Count Binface Party, And if I do say so myself, it's a banger. #VoteBinface #Clacton
Andy Borrie retweeted
Esta es de las imágenes más bonitas del Mundial. Marc Cucurella celebra el título con su hijo Mateo, que tiene una condición de autismo.
Normalmente, Mateo no puede asistir a los partidos de su padre, pues le afecta el ruido de los estadios. Marc prometió que llevaría a Mateo al estadio solo si pasaban a la final. Y así fue. Lo logró ubicar en un palco insonorizado para que puediera ver desde allí a su padre coronarse como campeón del mundo. Luego, levantó la Copa en la cancha con él.
Mateo, un Campeón más❤️
Andy Borrie retweeted
Norway bans scorekeeping for kids under 13. No national champs. No rankings.
Result: 93% participation. 3 straight Winter Olympic medal tables.
What if "winning" in youth sport means getting them to come back next week?
New piece in @meer_magazine → meer.com/en/106075-why-norwa…
#youthsports #sportparenting #coaching
Andy Borrie retweeted
Norway consistently wins the most medals at the Winter Olympic Games, with a population of just 5.6 million people.
A big part of their success is how they treat youth sports—and it’s the opposite of what we do in the US. Here’s what we can learn from Norway:
1. Scorekeeping:
In the US: Youth sports tend to be hyper competitive even at early ages. Leagues almost always keep score.
In Norway: Scorekeeping isn’t even allowed until age 13.
Removing winners and losers keeps the focus on the process not outcomes. It keeps kids engaged longer because it minimizes pressure (and tears) and maximizes fun, learning, and growth. The goal isn’t to win a third grade championship. It’s to love sport and keep playing.
2. Trophies:
In the US: If you give everyone a trophy, you’re creating snowflakes who will never gain a competitive edge.
In Norway: Whenever trophies are awarded, they are handed out to everyone.
If getting a trophy makes young kids feel good, we should give them trophies. Maybe they’ll come back and play again next year!!
As for the creation of snowflakes with no competitive edge—Norway’s athletes are tough as nails and all they do is win.
3. Prioritizing Fun:
In the US: Far too often, the goal is to win.
In Norway: The national philosophy is “joy of sport.”
Youth sports in the US are driven by adults, ego, and money. Youth sports in Norway are driven by fun.
Only half of kids in the US participate in sports. The number one reason they drop out: because they aren’t having fun anymore. In Norway, 93% of kids participate in youth sports. Fun is the foremost goal.
4. Playing Multiple Sports:
In the US: There’s pressure to specialize early and play your best sport year round.
In Norway: Try as many sports as you can before specializing as late as college.
Norway encourages kids to try all types of sport. This reduces injury and burnout and increases all-around athleticism. It also helps promotes match quality, or finding the sport you are best suited for as your body develops, which is impossible if you commit to a single sport too early.
5. Affordability
In the US: There is increasingly a pay-to-play model with high fees for leagues, equipment, and travel. This excludes many kids from playing.
In Norway: It’s a national priority to keep youth sports affordable and therefore accessible for all.
Kids aren’t priced out, which creates opportunities for everyone to participate (and develop into athletes), regardless of their parents’ income level.
We could learn a lot from Norway:
In the US, 70% of kids drop out of youth sports by age 13. This not only diminishes an elite-athlete pipeline, but it also destroys an opportunity for healthy habits and all the character lessons kids can learn from sport.
In Norway, lifelong participation in sport is the norm. The goal isn’t to have the best 9U team. It’s to develop the best athletes. Those are two very different things. And Norway has the gold medals to prove it.
Andy Borrie retweeted
A “new system for a new society” starts with a commitment to proportional representation and the benefits of an alliance-based politics that, because it is agile, establishes a long-term consensus for change” - spot on as ever from @Neal_Compass👇 theguardian.com/commentisfre…
Andy Borrie retweeted
Citizens Advice have written a detailed summary of what the proposed cuts to #DisabilityBenefits are and what they will mean to those affected.
You can see that Labour Ministers are lying both about their purpose and their devastating effects
#TakingThePIP
citizensadvice.org.uk/policy…
Andy Borrie retweeted
Damning report by @CitizensAdvice on #UKGov’s brutal #DisabilityBenefits cuts in #PathwaysToWork = #PathwaysToPoverty for 400K #disabled people. Gov’s OBR stats are “flawed”⬇️
#UC #WCA #PIP #LCWRA #UCMIGRATION #ESA #JSA #UCHEALTH #DisabilityRights #UK
citizensadvice.org.uk/policy…

ALT Cover page of a report by Citizens Advice titled “Pathways to Poverty: How planned cuts to disability benefits will impact the people we support.” The page features the Citizens Advice logo and the date May 2025. Subtitle reads: “This report explores the impact of the government’s proposed cuts to disability benefits on the people Citizens Advice supports. It highlights the scale of the cuts, the groups most affected, and the potential consequences for poverty and hardship.” Full document link: https://assets.ctfassets.net/mfz4nbgura3g/1pboZluAZyi1OC0edSS3cM/d840a0baba49119004cd3a5711b25684/Pathways_to_Poverty__How_planned_cuts_to_disability_benefits_will_impact_the_people_we_support.pdf
Andy Borrie retweeted
DWP PIP appeals are now taking over a year – leaving disabled people in limbo thecanary.co/uk/analysis/202… 'Its ok, it's backdated if you win' They say....which is great but in the meantime how do people survive? And what if you don't win? You are left with huge debt. Cruel by design – at Plympton, England
Andy Borrie retweeted
New @mmhpi research warns that government’s planned PIP reforms will have a “catastrophic impact” on people’s finances and mental health, and could drive people out of the workplace.
It says "A system which was already doing a poor job of understanding how mental health problems affect... The planned changes will double down on that failure"
Read the press release here... moneyandmentalhealth.org/pre… and the full detailed report PDF moneyandmentalhealth.org/wp-…
Andy Borrie retweeted
WTF nonsense is this? "Benefit claimants could get more time to find support before welfare cuts."
Where the hell are they supposed to "find new support"?
thetimes.com/article/c8077a3…
Andy Borrie retweeted
Proposed disability support cuts will hit 3 million people.
We must pause: withdraw the cuts, consult disabled people, & redesign the system with their consent.
There's no need for cuts - taxing the wealthiest is the way forward, not slashing support for the most vulnerable.
Andy Borrie retweeted
Dear Labour MP.
If you are going to be voting for or against changes to #disabilitybenefits that could devastate the lives of an estimated million-plus people, I’d like to think three minutes of your time is a fair exchange.
It has been reported that 100 Labour MPs have signed a letter about their concerns regarding the disability benefit cuts, in particular the cut in amount for new claimants to LCWRA (aka: health element) of Universal Credit. This worries me, because this part of the cuts is, in many ways, one of the least important, not least because changes to eligibility rules will mean that, from 2028, very few will be able to claim it anyway.
The benefit system for the disabled and long-term sick is ridiculously complicated, and I ask you to spend just three minutes of your time reading this post, which explains why the eligibility changes to PIP are far more worrying than the cut in amount paid through LCWRA UC.
I’ll start with Personal Independence Payment (PIP). The changes to eligibility for PIP will mean that an estimated 87% of people who currently claim the lower rate of the Daily Living Element will no longer be able to claim it from their first reassessment after November 2026. These figures come from the DWP itself. This is a cut to our income of approximately £300 a month.
This means that people who can’t cook a meal from scratch, can’t wash certain parts of their body, can’t use the toilet without assistance, and can’t cut up the food on their plate will most likely be shut out of PIP. And any illness or disability that effects us in that way most likely means there are many other issues of a similar nature which affect our daily routine – they just aren’t on the form.
However, what comes next is the real killer (literally). Many people who claim PIP also claim the health element of Universal Credit. But under the new proposals, the Work Capability Assessment to decide whether or not we qualify for that element of UC is being scrapped in 2028. Instead, people will need to have the Daily Living Element of PIP in order to claim it – but, because of the changes to eligibility most people will no longer be able to claim that element of PIP, and therefore won’t be able to claim the health element of UC. In other words, the government is making PIP much harder to get, and then using it to decide if people can claim the LCWRA element of Universal Credit. It’s like playing a game with loaded dice. Disabled people don’t stand a chance.
And perhaps the most bizarre thing is that the mobility element of PIP won’t act as a passport to UC in the same way. So, even if we can only walk one metre, we still won’t be classed as disabled enough to claim the LCRWA/health element of UC.
So, after losing PIP of £300 a month, we will also lose £400+ a month through our inability to claim the health element of UC. That’s £700+ a month we have lost. The change to the amount of health element of UC that some of you are concerned about is going to be unimportant for most people because they won’t be able to claim it anyway.
And we’re talking of 1.3 MILLION people.
What’s more, various members of the government keep repeating the lie that these changes will get disabled people into work. THIS IS NOT TRUE. PIP is NOT an out-of-work benefit. It is money to compensate us for the extra expenditure that our disabilities cost us. If we lose PIP, we lose our independence. If we lose our independence we CAN’T work at all. Many use their PIP to ALLOW them to work. And the knock-on effects could be severe. If people lose money, they can’t afford to eat well, thus making their conditions worse. Poverty is going to cause even more mental health issues than there already are. All of this puts extra strain on the NHS and councils. It is a false economy to cut disability benefits in this way.
The change to PIP is not only shutting people out of that benefit, but also out of the health element of UC. It’s a double blow. One blow we might be able to deal with, but the second will, quite literally, be a killer.
That’s approximately £8400 a year many of us are losing, or, to put it another way, it’s 28 times the amount that pensioners are losing because of the changes to Winter Fuel Allowance.
We fully understand how ridiculously complicated the disability benefits system is (and I haven’t even mentioned carer’s allowance that some people will also lose), but it’s ESSENTIAL that you know the basics of it as outlined above before you vote.
Over the course of two days, every Labour MP on X will be tagged/mentioned in a post containing the above explainer. It has been a long process putting that list of close to 400 X handles together, but if just one of you has read the above and now understands the system better, and why the disabled community is so frightened, then it has, of course, been worth it. If nothing else, please don’t get taken in by the lies that this will get people back into work. That will not happen. Even if people DO get to do some part-time work, it won’t make up for all the money they are losing. The only effect the cuts will have is the destruction of peoples lives due to a condition or illness that they have no control over.
Thank you for your time.
#benefits #benefitcuts #disability #disabled #mentalhealthawareness #mentalhealth #pip #illness #universalcredit #arthritis #disabilitybenefits #labour #Starmer
@pamela_nash
@SharonHodgsonMP
@damienegan
@justinmadders
@Labour_Carlisle
@RuthCadbury
@vickyfoxcroft
@E_TLabour
@SarahCoombesWB
@SarahEdwardsTam
@NSLabour
@RichardBurgon
@steveracemp
@NazShahBfd
@harpreetkuppal
@HattonLloyd
@ChelFulhamBen
@LilianGreenwood
@Sureena4WNE
@NeilForPoole
@DavidBSampson
@JoPlattLeigh
@Andrew_Lewin_
@LFarnz
@david4lcs
@LeePitcherMP
@JanetDaby
@GW_YoungLabour
@chriswardmp
@ChrisMcDonaldMP
@ThurrockJen
@darrenpjones
@BeaversLorraine
@BayoAlaba
@LukePollard
@Perran4CRH
@ChrisMurrayMP
@Sarah_Hall81
@jamesmurray_ldn
@GoAndrCoop
@AllisonCGardner
@annaturley
@marykfoy
@Christian4BuryS
@KarlTurnerMP
@FeryalClark
@alangemmell
@josephpowell
@KateOsamor
@JohannaBaxter
Andy Borrie retweeted
This letter, in today’s Times, stopped me in my tracks.
The assisted dying Bill will affect all of society, in ways that have barely been considered.
Andy Borrie retweeted
Dear UK Media:
No, Disabled People Aren’t Getting Free BMWs — And Here’s the Truth You Keep Ignoring
By Emma Dolan Horlock
(Chronically ill, slightly sarcastic, and extremely tired of correcting you)
A thread 🧵
Andy Borrie retweeted
Down to Westminster tomorrow for the Assisted Dying debate. The evidence is increasingly clear that the bill is a threat to vulnerable people. Almost half of those who opt for AD in Oregon do so because they fear ‘being a burden’. The bill is illiberal and inhumane.
























