#JeremyBamber is innocent Do you want to know the only reason everybody doesn't know that? I'll tell you. It's because it takes a lot of time researching the case to be absolutely certain about that undeniable fact. So the vast majority of people don't bother. They just believe what they've been told is the truth and naively trust in the courts' decisions. In a way I can understand that. The truth about this case and indeed the entire UK justice system is terrifying. And ignorance is bliss as they say. So you need to ask yourself if you're brave enough to learn the REAL truth? Watching, reading and listening to the information at these links will take you in the region of 11 hours. More if, like me, you watch, read and listen multiple times. But by the end of it you will have serious doubts about his guilt. Then I can then send you more compelling evidence that proves he is 100% innocent. Just ask. youtube.com/watch?v=yLoZhczo… (Whitehouse farm murders part 1 - Emma Kenny) youtube.com/watch?v=VLvxbb2N… (Whitehouse farm murders part 2 - Emma Kenny) youtube.com/watch?v=nNiG4zbP… (Shocking New Evidence - Emma Kenny) newyorker.com/magazine/2024/… (The New Yorker article by @HeidilBlake) newyorker.com/blood-relative… (Six part podcast - The New Yorker - @HeidilBlake ) If you think it looks like a lot to get through and is a bit off-putting, just ask yourself if you're happy being deceived? #UKMiscarriageOfJustice

🚨🚨🚨New Guardian Article 🚨🚨🚨 Sue Carney-Gannon has concluded that the patterns on the clothing and body of Caffell point to suicide. “In my opinion, if Sheila Caffell took her own life using the rifle, as the defence for Jeremy Bamber assert, then this explains the distribution of blood on her nightdress and right arm,” she writes in her report. “In my opinion, these findings are accounted for by her having taken her own life with the rifle; blood from the wound under her chin running down the upper right front of her clothing and splashing on to her right forearm, then veering to her right side as her body and arms fell.” theguardian.com/uk-news/ng-i…

That is Bonnett literally updating the log he started when West relayed the 3.26 call he received from Nevill. That log of West's is conveniently "lost". If it was the one call the "Message passed to CD by the son of Mr Bamber..." would be at the top of the 3.26 log not added later with a line space after the initial information. This is what happened. Pay attention. I will say this only once. 3.26 Nevill phoned the police station. West started a log and correctly timed it at 3.26 (this log is now "lost") He relayed what he was being told to Bonnett who started his log correctly timed at 3.26. Nevill told West his DAUGHTER had gone BERSERK and had one of his guns. (Nevill had previously phoned Jeremy to tell him his SISTER had gone CRAZY and had the gun, which as we know Jeremy relayed that information to West 10 minutes after Nevill's call). Anyway, Bonnett proceeds to record everything West is relaying to him from what Nevill is saying and what he records makes perfect sense. (Daughter - Berserk - My Guns). No paraphrasing or changing family relationships or multiplying of guns or changing ownership of said guns. All perfectly recorded with no assumptions necessary. Nevill in his distress wrongly told West his daughter was 26 years of age which Bonnett records on his log just as West would have done. Following that call a despatch is sent to the farm at 3.35am. During the time Nevill was on the phone to West, Jeremy had tried calling his father back but couldn't get through so at 3.36 he phones the police. West answers and starts a log correctly timed at 3.36. He records exactly what Jeremy says and updates Bonnett who adds to his 3.26 log he started earlier when Nevill called and noted the message about the collection of guns below what he had previous written, (leaving a line space for clarity) which West had recorded on the reverse of his 3.36 log. Jeremy in his distress mistakenly told West his sister was 27 and West records it on his log. Sheila was actually 28. Do you think it's likely that one caller would report her as being two different ages during the course of a brief call? At 3.37 there is a document (attached) that records Jeremy is still on the phone with West. If you believe the one call nonsense you have to believe Jeremy was still chatting away to the police 11 minutes after he phoned at 3.26 and 2 minutes after police were rushing to the scene. To believe Nevill phoned at 3.26 all you have to do is to make one assumption. That is the 3.26 log of his call has been "lost". To believe Nevill did not phone you need a calculator to add up the number of assumptions you need to make. You have to assume West made a mistake with the time. You have to assume Bonnett thought it a good idea to assume, because Jeremy was Nevill's son, Sheila must be Nevill's daughter. A correct assumption as it happens but why the need to make it when recording a very important incident? You have to assume Bonnett wanted to show his command of the English language was such that when he was told the word CRAZY he wanted to display his expertise by recording the word BERSERK instead because... ? well it's close enough. You have to assume Bonnett thought it a bit boring to record just one gun being involved so added a little excitement to his shift by multiplying the number. And changing ownership of said guns in the process because.... ? well why not? You have to assume Bonnett thought 27 sounded a bit old for Sheila so recorded her as being 26. He knew women liked to be thought of as being younger than they were so, being a nice gentleman, he thought he would do her a favour and knock a year off. Need I go on? Are you finally going to concede you have been wrong all along and admit Jeremy Bamber is obviously 100% factually innocent? Or are you going to continue to act like the "she's guilty" lot in the Lucy Letby case and cling to your confirmation bias?