i see you, dumbass
the ass of dumbery
Joined March 2022
- Tweets13.4K
- Following1.5K
- Followers2.6K
- Likes7.1K
Pinned Tweet
Trump is not wise. Trump is not virtuous.
He is not playing 4d chess. He makes semi random decisions based on who appeals to his ego the best.
Trump identified an underserved market to exploit and he's done it well.
all seeing eye of dumbass retweeted
@BarackObama You have increased discretionary spending by 25% annually and amassed over $4 trillion in debt. T-E-A on.wsj.com/onsY3b
all seeing eye of dumbass retweeted
Um George Washington would like to have a word from his grave!! He explicitly warned the American people against the negative impact that opposing political parties could have on the country. During his presidency he witnessed the rise of the Jeffersonian-Republican party in opposition to the Federalists and worried that future political squabbles would undermine the concept of popular sovereignty in the United States.
" However [political parties] may now and then answer popular ends, they are likely in the course of time and things, to become potent engines, by which cunning, ambitious, and unprincipled men will be enabled to subvert the power of the people and to usurp for themselves the reins of government, destroying afterwards the very engines which have lifted them to unjust dominion. "
George Washington’s FAREWELL ADDRESS | SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 17, 1796
This quoted post is unavailable.
all seeing eye of dumbass retweeted
The X algorithm is completely fucked up.
Thomas Massie gets 5.2 million views, 194,000 likes, 30,000 reposts, and 7,100 comments.
Meanwhile, Dave Portnoy, a jew who makes money getting young people hooked on gambling, gets 3 million views for some meaningless bullshit.
Massie gets 22 TIMES more likes, 117 TIMES (!!!) more reposts, and 24 TIMES more comments, but ONLY 1.7 TIMES as many views.
Apparently, X would rather push degeneracy and gambling culture onto young people than give genuine political dissent the reach its engagement deserves.
What a fucking joke.
all seeing eye of dumbass retweeted
Here is the link to the full video from part two of how to stay healthy, a.k.a. avoiding the medical system whenever possible. And why I say this.
live.childrenshealthdefense.…
all seeing eye of dumbass retweeted
WARREN BUFFETT ONCE SAID NOBODY KNOWS WHAT THE STOCK MARKET WILL DO NEXT
"Nobody knows what the market is going to do tomorrow, next week, next month. But they spend all their time talking about it because it's easy to talk about, but it has no value."
Instead, he said the opportunities come from other people's mistakes.
"What gives you opportunities is other people doing dumb things."
He said the world is overwhelmingly short-term focused, and that's "made to order for anybody that's trying to think about what you do that should work over 5 or 10 or 20 years."
He also said a great buying opportunity will come again.
"It could be next week, it could be 5 years off, but it won't be 50 years off. We will be bombarded with offerings that we'll be glad we have the cash for."
"I would love to be born today and go out with not too much money and hopefully turn it into a lot of money."
Found this so relevant given the extreme sell off today, when nothing has fundamentally changed with most of these companies!
all seeing eye of dumbass retweeted
Trump offered Americans $5,000 to re-elect Republicans and 2024 Trump voters still stayed home.
That’s how bad it is, but they still don’t get it.
all seeing eye of dumbass retweeted
Brian Cole Jr. Trial: Circumstantial Evidence Cannot Deny Someone Their Constitutional Right to Counsel of Their Choosing
1. The FBI began investigating a CIA officer. They performed a gait analysis on her that could not rule her out. They administered a polygraph that indicated deception regarding whether she planted the pipe bombs. The polygraph interviewer noted that her answers explaining why she failed seemed rehearsed.
2. The FBI ruled the CIA officer out based on a single piece of circumstantial evidence: a time-stamped video that merely contained the voice of the officer. That video, which was recorded on an iPhone 7, appears to have been transferred to an iPhone 12 and provided to the FBI with consent from the iPhone 12. Because the video cannot directly show the presence of the CIA officer, the video itself constitutes circumstantial evidence.
3. The defense seeks to present an alternate-perpetrator case based on the same evidence the FBI developed against the CIA officer. A voice heard on video, timestamped or not, cannot establish presence, leaving the FBI’s investigation incomplete. The defense is seeking the circumstantial evidence surrounding the video, much of which the FBI never obtained—such as acquiring video from the home where the officer is heard on the recording.
4. To avoid providing this material, the prosecution is seeking to remove Brian Cole Jr.’s constitutional right to an attorney of his choosing. Based on circumstantial evidence alone, they claim that no one could possibly believe the CIA officer is innocent; therefore, the lawyers are acting against Cole’s best interests.
To establish this idea, they present a derivative file that merely contains a voice, which cannot, in itself, imply presence. Knowing that the video itself is wholly inadequate to establish innocence, they have introduced additional circumstantial evidence, such as a text from the officer saying they were “coming home!” that occurred 24 minutes before the officer actually drove off.
5. On one hand, the prosecution wants to use circumstantial evidence to bolster their chief piece of circumstantial evidence. On the other hand, they seek to deny the defense that same body of circumstantial evidence from which they are drawing. If that body of circumstantial evidence demonstrated the officer’s innocence, then why not provide it to the lawyers?
The prosecution claims that Litson is acting against Cole’s interests so that they can bolster their civil defamation case. But if the circumstantial evidence shows that the officer is innocent, how would that bolster the civil case? The fact is that this body of evidence cannot act asymmetrically. It will either weaken both the civil and criminal cases, or strengthen both the civil and criminal cases. Apparently, the DOJ is not willing to let the evidence speak for itself—and that is likely because it cannot speak for itself.
all seeing eye of dumbass retweeted
For those complaining in my comments, I want you to explain why you support the Iran War but you don't like John Bolton. Speak slowly and clearly.
all seeing eye of dumbass retweeted
When you get cancer from Glyphosate thank Susie Wiles
and she did it for a bag of money i mean how evil can you be?
Calley Means Says Susie Wiles Pushed for Glyphosate Getting Liability Protection
MEANS: “Susie called Bobby's office and said, ‘We're not discussing this’ … and it was announced the next day.”
ROGAN: “How is that possible that something that's known to give people cancer gets liability protection?”
MEANS: “It's indefensible.”
all seeing eye of dumbass retweeted
It was a surreal moment at Brian Cole Jr court hearing on Wednesday. I even had to ask @RobGouveiaEsq if my ears had deceived me. Prosecutors openly stated they expected interference - from both @CIA and @CapitolPolice - in discovery requests by the defense. I mean … we already knew who we were up against in this fight, but that was a shocking admission.
I’ve told you for a solid year that the pipe bomb event was a “multi-agency conspiracy.” Can you count how many we’re up to thus far?
all seeing eye of dumbass retweeted
Not codifying DOGE was the biggest uniparty indicator.
Why stop the cash flow for your enemies while you are in power if they aren't really your enemies?
