🇺🇸 retweeted
Nan kad akò bilateral ki genyen ant gouvènman Ayiti ak gouvènman Salvadò a, yon operasyon konjwen ki te reyini Polis Nasyonal Dayiti, Fòs Lame Dayiti (FAd’H), Task Force la, ak Fòs Espesyal Salvadò yo reyisi pran kontwòl Estad Sylvio Cator a epi mete l an sekirite. Pandan operasyon an, nou te dekouvri plizyè zo tèt moun anndan estad la.
Kounye a, nou pral tabli yon baz operasyonèl nan estad la pou n ka kontinye avanse pi fon nan teritwa gang yo kontwole.
Kounye a, se nou ki gen avantaj sou teren an.
Mwen mande tout manm gang yo avèk anpil fèmte pou yo kite zòn nan anvan ofansiv la kòmanse.
Moun ki chwazi rete pou konbat fòs nou yo ap oblije sibi konsekans yo.
🇺🇸 retweeted
Get in losers we are stopping the Department of the Interior from implementing its dogshit strategic plan to sell public land to well connected developers and investment companies (which is where returning it to the states will lead).
🇺🇸 retweeted
Hey @HeinzTweets CEO, why do Europeans get the best-quality ketchup while Americans go without?
We tried to bring your superior European recipe (real sugar, incredible taste) to the U.S. Instead, you're pushing "Simply Heinz" — but it just doesn't taste as good.
Heinz is a great American brand. Why are you giving Europe a higher-quality product than the one you offer to your own home country?
Stop forcing us to look elsewhere for a replacement. Do the right thing for American diners. 🇺🇸🍅
🇺🇸 retweeted
The Interior Department is drawing up lists of public land for AI data centers.
This is unnecessary, an inappropriate use of our natural heritage, and should be opposed by all conservatives.
BLM state directors got three days in September to name parcels that could host data centers, and at least 15 proposals for data centers and related infrastructure, covering more than 17,000 acres, are pending across six Western states. Developers want land near transmission, and a USGS report this summer found about 91 million acres of BLM land, nearly the size of Montana, within 10 miles of a high-voltage line.
We support building data centers responsibly, but our standard asks four things of them:
1) no net cost to ratepayers
2) no net water burden
3) protect valuable land
4) put communities first
Putting them on open public land fails the last two. Ranchers graze that land, hunters and campers use it, and federal law directs BLM to manage it for all of them. A solar lease on public land comes with reclamation requirements, so the ground can be restored when the panels come down. A data center campus is a permanent industrial site, and once it goes up, that ground is gone for good.
ACC spent this year fighting for permitting reform because America needs to build faster. Shortcuts like this one undercut that case and hand ammunition to everyone who would rather nothing get built at all.
Better land, including federal land, already exists. The Energy Department is partnering on a privately funded campus of more than $100 billion at the Paducah Site in Kentucky, a former uranium enrichment plant, with cleanup continuing alongside it.
Brownfields, Superfund sites, and retired coal plants come with roads, substations, and transmission already in place, and building there puts land that needs cleanup back to work.
Public land should stay public and working for the people who use it, and a decision this permanent deserves more than a three-day list.
🇺🇸 retweeted
NOT ONE ACRE
Trump administration to pursue public land sales and a decrease in federal ownership eastidahonews.com/2026/11/tr…
🇺🇸 retweeted
Public lands provide 1000x more value to our nation than any sell-off would bring.
Public lands were not created for one-time disposal to fund the government.
The backlash from this will be substantial. And it should be.
NEWS: The Trump administration is officially planning to sell off public lands.
The Interior Department publicly laid out a strategy to reduce the amount of federal lands by selling property to states, tribes, and local governments.
washingtonsun.com/energy-env…
🇺🇸 retweeted
It is my opinion that you cannot be an America first conservative while supporting a public land sale. Remember, transfers to states are in many cases a backdoor sale to avoid a PR nightmare, & recreation/access is severely limited on many state lands even in lib states like CO:
We are seeking information from the Administration on this proposal.
Our office was not consulted on this. Last year, I stopped the sale of lands in the One Big Beautiful Bill.
I will not allow ONE ACRE of Montana land to be sold.
thehill.com/policy/energy-en…
🇺🇸 retweeted
If the Trump administration is trying to lose the American people permanently, this is it.
Trump administration to pursue public land sales and a decrease in federal ownership eastidahonews.com/2026/11/tr…
🇺🇸 retweeted
Happy Veterans Day!🦾 #NeverAVictim
🤖 Made with AI
Replying to @HackingButLegal
From: @JtotheAY
Delivered via: X direct message
11/11/26
To: Jackie Singh (@HackingButLegal)
Re: FORMAL CEASE AND DESIST: Defamation Per Se and Telecommunications Harassment Under Ohio Law. Demand for Retraction and Preservation of Evidence.
Ms. Singh,
This letter is formal notice that your public statements about me are false, defamatory per se, and actionable under Ohio law. I demand that you immediately retract them and stop all further publication.
The defamatory statement
On November 9, 2026, you published the following to nearly 100,000 followers on X, where it has been seen more than 54,000 times (teapaw.org/HackingButLegal/status…):
«"Warning (serious): A bunch of domestic terrorists are operating under the hashtags "eggsalad" and "goldcorp""»
I am one of the people who post under those hashtags. Your statement accuses that identifiable group, and me as part of it, of being "domestic terrorists." Terrorism is a serious felony under Ohio law (R.C. 2909.24) and federal law (18 U.S.C. § 2331(5)). The accusation is false. I have never planned, supported, or taken part in any act of terrorism or violence.
Defamation per se under Ohio law
Under Ohio law, a statement is defamatory when it is a false statement of fact, published to a third party, made with the required degree of fault, that harms the subject's reputation. Falsely accusing someone of an indictable crime involving moral turpitude or infamous punishment is defamation per se. Damages are presumed, so I do not need to prove specific harm to recover.
Your statement is not protected opinion. You labeled it a "Warning (serious)," presented it as fact to warn the public, and offered no facts to back it up. A reasonable reader would take it as a factual claim that the people under those hashtags are terrorists.
You describe yourself as an investigative journalist and threat researcher. Making this accusation with no supporting evidence, to an audience that relies on you for exactly that kind of assessment, shows at least negligence and, I believe, reckless disregard for the truth.
Harassment
Publishing these statements and continuing to target the people associated with these hashtags may also be telecommunications harassment under R.C. 2917.21. Under R.C. 2307.60, anyone injured by a criminal act may bring a civil action for full compensatory damages, punitive damages where authorized, and court costs and attorney's fees. Repeated conduct that causes mental distress may also support a civil stalking protection order under R.C. 2903.214.
Demands
By [date, 7 days out], you must:
1. Permanently delete the post above and every other post, reply, quote-post, or publication, on X or elsewhere, that calls me or the people using these hashtags terrorists or criminals.
2. Publish a clear retraction on X, from the same account and with the same visibility, stating that your accusation was false.
3. Stop making any further false statements about me or the people targeted by your accusation, and stop all harassing conduct directed at us.
4. Confirm in writing that you have done all of the above.
Litigation hold
You are now on notice of a likely legal claim. You must preserve all evidence related to this matter, including posts, deleted posts, drafts, replies, direct messages, analytics, screenshots, and communications with any third party about me or these hashtags. Destroying or altering any of it after this notice may lead to sanctions and an adverse-inference finding in any later lawsuit.
Consequences of non-compliance
If you do not fully comply by the date above, I intend to pursue every civil remedy available under Ohio law without further notice. That includes a defamation action seeking presumed, compensatory, and punitive damages, a civil action under R.C. 2307.60, and injunctive relief.
Nothing in this letter waives any of my rights or remedies, all of which are expressly reserved.
@JtotheAY
6
141
🇺🇸 retweeted
Happy Veterans Day. We are not currently dealing with the public land betrayal they're now attempting but tomorrow we will start. Burgum sucks. So does everyone who helped him.
🇺🇸 retweeted
Saw a man I arrested years ago. Pulled up next to me today while I was driving off duty. He yells out the window “Is that you Joseph?” I looked to the right and recognized him immediately. I said “Yup”. Now here I am thinking this was going to go bad, so I got ready.
When I arrested him he made a few threats. But I also remember telling him I would pray that God would show him another path. I then put a note in his property bag with hopes when his anger subsided, he would read it when he was released. What I wrote on it came from the heart. I saw something in him that he didn’t at the time.
Before the light changed, he said “I remember that note Joseph. It was right on time. God bless you king!.” He drove off. As I made a right turn, I took my hand off my gun and smiled. A seed I planted years ago, had taken root.
It just another reminder that my work was not in vain , and that praying for your enemies, though unnatural, is not about you at times. It’s about God using you as an instrument to change others.
Hegseth should resign - or be relieved by POTUS - here's why.
There is absolutely no doubt.. none whatsoever - he will be impeached for War Crimes in 2027 by a Democrat controlled House. 100% take it to the bank.
Then it goes to the Senate. Vulnerable Republicans up for election in 2028 will either vote no - and be subject to attack for not removing a branded war criminal - or - vote yes - and he will be removed. Then we have a Dept of War with NO secretary and any future secretary being subject to approval of a Democrat controlled senate. The Dept of War will be leaderless for 18 months. We can't have that.
Removing Hegseth now is the right thing to do - it takes him off the chess board. Every move made between now and 2028 by POTUS should be only about getting a Republican elected president in 2028. Keeping Hegseth into next year is going to hurt GOP Senators and the GOP brand moving into a critical 2028 election and will be a reason to alienate moderate voters from the GOP.
3
127
🇺🇸 retweeted
Gold Star family here. I know people like you don’t actually give a damn what we’ve sacrificed or what we have to say unless it confirms your warped narrative, but I’ll say it anyway…
Justice isn’t a political stunt wrapped in hollow promises to military families. Justice is accountability for the lives lost, the failures that cost them, and the families left to carry the consequences for the rest of their lives. It’s making sure our servicemembers have the leadership, resources, and support they deserve before another family gets a knock on the door that destroys their entire world.
I stand with @SecWar Hegseth. And you certainly don’t speak for us.

































