
Caroline Elsom retweeted
Retail figures are out for September, and as we all could have guessed it doesn’t bode well for Healey
As I reported in the Spectator, they are down across the board 👇
Caroline Elsom retweeted
From @JamesKCraig: The Government can prevent disaster in Wandsworth conservativehome.com/2026/10…
👻My latest in ConHome about why the Prime Minister will be haunted by his own words on raising housing benefits at the Budget.
🎃Read the full report here: ukonward.com/reports/through…
💀(Please forgive the light use of Halloween-based puns...)
From @CarolineElsom Burnham's housing benefit bill is coming back to haunt him conservativehome.com/2026/10…
Caroline Elsom retweeted
From @CarolineElsom Burnham's housing benefit bill is coming back to haunt him conservativehome.com/2026/10…
Caroline Elsom retweeted
Written by the brilliant @CarolineElsom, we suggest the true baseline for spending on housing benefits in the private rented sector and the general needs social rented sector is set to exceed £40 billion by 2030/31, around £7.6 billion higher than the 2026 Spring Forecast indicates.
By the end of the next parliament in 2033/34, it is on course to have more than doubled since 2023/24 if the likely private rented sector uplift occurs.
This is why action matters.
Caroline Elsom retweeted
‼️ A big shout out for Through the Roof, a report published by @ukonward during Conservative Party Conference.
With a foreword by @Helen_Whately, we set out how current estimates for future housing welfare spending are implausibly low and build a more realistic baseline.
Our report then looks at how this higher projected spending can be brought under greater control quickly and without the need for new primary legislation, saving £4.5 billion a year by the end of the next parliament in 2033/34.
ukonward.com/reports/through…
More on why modelling by @OxfordEconomics for @ukonward on options for reforming IHT is far more robust than other numbers doing the rounds from @DanNeidle - and why the upsizing argument is overrated 👇
oxfordeconomics.com/resource…
Caroline Elsom retweeted
🚨 Important from @OxfordEconomics on why they stand fully behind their modelling of the cost of Inheritance Tax reform for @ukonward👇
oxfordeconomics.com/resource…
Caroline Elsom retweeted
My new piece looks at:
-Why Inheritance Tax is a bad tax,
-Why the number of families paying it will double under Labour
-Why so many other countries have abolished it,
-Why it's right to cut it,
-and why critics are wrong about the costs:
neilobrien.co.uk/p/cutting-i…
Caroline Elsom retweeted
A really important blog from @NeilDotObrien on Inheritance Tax👇
My new piece looks at:
-Why Inheritance Tax is a bad tax,
-Why the number of families paying it will double under Labour
-Why so many other countries have abolished it,
-Why it's right to cut it,
-and why critics are wrong about the costs:
neilobrien.co.uk/p/cutting-i…
Caroline Elsom retweeted
Hang on a minute - the idea that @OxfordEconomics are morons who didn't think about this is silly - they have spent months building a full model that aligns with earlier work IFS / Advani did - in contrast, Dan admits his simple model "over-predicts the number of taxpaying estates against HMRC’s outturn by about 1.6 times, and tax liabilities by about 1.45 times"
I know Oxford Economics are drafting a more detailed reply - this rapidly-written criticism of work by a v v serious group of economists is itself WAY off beam.
Caroline Elsom retweeted
IMPORTANT There’s been some debate today about the modelling conducted for @ukonward by @OxfordEconomics costing different reforms to Inheritance Tax - particularly from @DanNeidle.
Dan has been typically courteous, but we disagree with his assessment.
Oxford Economics response tonight is as follows:
“There are different possible methodological approaches. We have followed an approach that aligns closely with previous research by the IFS, as was acknowledged by the report’s author. Our back-testing indicated that the model performed very well in predicting the number of estates paying IHT and IHT liabilities historically.”
Caroline Elsom retweeted
Our latest report, commissioned by @ukonward, assesses the implications of reforms to IHT, showing how they can bring the number of liable estates closer to levels seen in the past and examining the trade-offs linked to these reforms.
Read more: oxfordeconomics.com/resource…
Well worth reading Simon's foreword on just how much the double tax trap from IHT has grown - and is set to get worse under new pensions savings rules from next year 👇
🚨By 2029, 1 in 12 estates will be paying IHT, which is more than TRIPLE the proportion of estates than in 2009.
Today @ukonward publishes modelling we commissioned from @OxfordEconomics for reform of this hated tax, as @KemiBadenoch pledges action.
👀 ukonward.com/reports/assessi…
NEW report for @ukonward from @OxfordEconomics on the implications of inheritance tax reform options, with foreword from @SirSimonClarke.
It shows a £500k threshold (£1m per couple) and full primary residence exemption could reduce estates liable by 59%.
ukonward.com/reports/assessi…
About to start in 5 mins!! Grab your seat now
Parks and Prosperity: How to create, protect and restore access to nature
@kittyraethomp @MegTreth @VictoriaAtkins @johnflesher90 @CarolineElsom
Really looking forward to getting stuck in with this powerhouse panel with @CforWomenUK at 12:45 in the @ukonward Marquee at #CPC with @joymorrissey @baronesscash @lara_e_brown and @MaeveHalligan
Also coming up: a fascinating @ukonward debate on true equality, with a fantastic group of guests @joymorrissey @baronesscash @lara_e_brown @CarolineElsom and @MaeveHalligan
IPPR at Conservative Party Conference #cpc26
Starting soon! London at a Crossroads: Compete or Decline
👉@JamesCleverly
👉Shivani Menon
👉@londonchamber
👉@harry_qp
👉@SebastianEPayne
🕐11.30 – 12.30
📍Onward Marquee, Birmingham ICC
Caroline Elsom retweeted
Sensible welfare reform means cutting long-term dependency and taking pressure off our NHS.
That’s why the @Conservatives want to move long-term fit note assessments away from GPs and into the hands of occupational health professionals.
Thanks to @ukonward for hosting.


















