Cellframe Social retweeted
“Quantum-safe” is crypto’s favourite label these days…
Three checks before you believe it:
- Can you verify the PQ signature?
- How has the mainnet handled real attacks?
- Can it replace the algorithm without rebuilding everything?
@CellframeSocial breaks it down 👇
How if feels to worry if you should buy more $CELL after the bear market is already over
Cellframe Social retweeted
Quantum vs Silicon will start off slowly. The Google Tensor Processor will dominate low RAM computing (or NPU for non-von Neumann data+process). Quantum will dominate processing in a large number of fields, especially where lookup or RAM dominate.
See also: xitter.cf/WOLF_Financial/status/…
Cellframe Social retweeted
Every proposed Bitcoin quantum migration plan has the same flaw. You have to move your own coins.
Not everyone will. Lost keys cannot.
So the leftovers get frozen, forked away, or stolen.
If a fork can take your bitcoin because you missed a deadline, was it ever really yours?
The quantum fault line rumbles menacingly...
🚨BREAKING: Google demonstrates quantum computing breakthrough, cuts errors 40-fold
Time is running out. Where’s Bitcoin’s roadmap for transitioning to be quantum-resistant?
investing.com/news/stock-mar…
First-generation quantum computers will be kind of shitty at everything EXCEPT HACKING BITCOIN WALLETS
JUST IN: NIC CARTER JUST SAID A QUANTUM "ATOM BOMB" MOMENT IS NEAR AND THAT 1,000,000 #BITCOIN IS NOW AT RISK
"BREAKING ELLIPTIC CURVES WILL ONE OF THE FIRST USES OF A QUANTUM COMPUTER"
WE MAY NOT FIND ABOUT Q-DAY UNTIL "ALL THE OLD SATOSHI COINS ARE HARVESTED"
"YOU DON'T HAVE TO TELL ANYONE. YOU CAN JUST CRACK THE KEYS AND WAIT" 👀
Source: @VentureCoinist
Cellframe Social retweeted
CELLFRAME is the only quantum-native blockchain with advanced DEPIN characteristics
Just a reminder: of all the so-called quantum-resistant projects, the only one that actually delivers real protection at B2B and RWA level is @cellframenet.
Others around there? Maybe decent only for keeping your money under a quantum-resistant mattress
$CELL = Scalable, service-oriented, future-proof - way beyond just surviving Q-Day. Native post-quantum security, enterprise-grade infrastructure, and built for real-world asset tokenization.
If you are a crypto investor, you can inoculate yourself from bullshit post-quantum / security claims by listening to this space
xitter.cf/i/spaces/1vJpPNAoekDJE
Going live for quantum talk
NEW SPACE: TRUST, BUT VERIFY 🔎
“Secure”
“Quantum-safe”
“Audited”
Three claims. Where’s the proof?
@joinFIO @HoudiniSwap @cellframenet + 7 more!
What should users be able to verify themselves & how do we separate working security from impressive-sounding marketing?
Mitigating ECDSA implementation flaws in 2026 is like boarding up your windows against the rain when you're about to be hit by a tsunami
Dr. Joseph Kearney examines whether AI could break ECDSA before Q-Day or challenge ML-DSA. The piece finds AI speeds known attacks. So far it has not crested a paradigm shift. Exponential remains exponential. Quantum hardware is still the ECDSA clock. ECDSA implementation flaws remain the nearer risk.
This is a measured review of the evidence, not a claim of an imminent break.
@Joseph_Kearney @QRLedger
theqrl.org/blog/can-ai-break…
On this: xitter.cf/qrledger/status/211046…
ALT QRL Daily Quantum News card: No new break. Dr. Joseph Kearney examines AI on ECDSA and ML-DSA.
Cellframe Social retweeted
Justin Drake and Vitalik just told the whole crypto industry to go into "bunker mode".
The reason is simple. AI math may break ECDSA, the signature that protects every Bitcoin and Ethereum wallet, before a quantum computer even exists. And the "quantum safe" lattice schemes most chains are betting on may be next.
Only one thing survives that: hash-based signatures. Live today, not on a roadmap. And this could become one of the main topic in blockchain actually after RWA
$NEAR and $Algo picked lattice. $strk accounts still sign with ECDSA. Zcash has no post-quantum signatures at all.
But, Nervos $CKB is already there.
SPHINCS+, pure hash-based, live on mainnet and audited. Your public key stays hidden behind a hash by default. New schemes can be added anytime without a hard fork.
Market cap: around 80M. Listed on Binance and OKX.
Why so cheap? Because this narrative is four days old and the market is looking at bigger names. Nobody has connected the dots yet.
One chain already meets the standard and sooner or later the market has to price that…
In 2018 Aggarwal et al. predicted 2027 as the quantum threat date. Pretty good guess!
Yes. Key 2017-2018 pieces:
Aggarwal et al. (Oct 2017 arXiv, later Ledger): Quantum attacks on Bitcoin... – ECDSA at risk as early as 2027. arxiv.org/abs/1710.10377
Fedorov/Kiktenko/Lvovsky Nature (Nov 2018): Quantum computers put blockchain security at risk. nature.com/articles/d41586-0…
MIT Tech Review (Nov 2017) coverage of the former, plus Mosca et al. Quantum-Proofing the Blockchain whitepaper (Nov 2017).
Cellframe Social retweeted
Everyone is talking quantum, everyone is scared of quantum.
Probably not if you are holding one of these:
$ALGO → Native Falcon-1024 Accounts on Mainnet
$XNT → zk-STARKs + Privacy. Quantum-Safe
$CELL → Multi-Algorithm PQC (Falcon, Dilithium, Kyber)
$QRL → Hash-Based Sigs Since Genesis
$QANX → NIST Dilithium. Mainnet Pending
$ABEL → Lattice Crypto + Privacy
$NAORIS → NIST-Approved PQC. Mainnet Live
$STRK → STARK Proofs + Opt-In Falcon Wallets
$CKB → SPHINCS+ Live on Mainnet. No Fork
$ZEC → Full PQ Transition Targeted 2027
$HBAR → Falcon (FN-DSA) Migration Roadmap
$IOTA → Ed25519 Since 2021. PQC Planned
$XDC → Hybrid ML-DSA + Falcon Roadmap
Any other quantum resistant projects we missed out? 🤔
