Realize my old school is showing, but whatever happened to respecting your elders? Manners? Sticks and stones meaning talk is only words and words are only noise?

Why is it elected officials do absolutely NOTHING for the first 75% of their term, but when up for re-election, they promise the moon and the stars and people fall for it. Every. Single. Time. Vote on past actions not future promises.

Post sec.gov filings and in which state or country both are registered for both North East Offshore LLC and South Fork Class B Member LLC including articles of incorporation, any -k filings, etc, please identify any high ranking officer listed in sec.gov filings that dumped shares before the project was pulled. Please also look for individuals that overlap between these two companies also with ties to Eversource, Aquarian, or any state or federal government employees and their spouses.

@grok please explain the history of offshore wind in CT. Be sure to include Orsted and Eversource and all wholly owned subsidiaries that had a financial stake in offshore wind. For good measure, include the links to Eversources annual report raving about offshore wind investments. Also provide how much money, both dollar amount and percentage of profit loss on this project by company and how those losses were recouped.

This is what passes for journalism these days? A claim of “8 in 10” in the first paragraph, but sample size of 602 (out of 2m+ voters) is buried much further down in the article. And of course it’s behind a paywall. Typical. Here’s a radical solution to this matter. Create a separate fund. Either fund it solely on private donations or if they want to take another slice of the Rainy Day Fund, take the total dollar amount of the slice they want and hand everyone that champions this fiscally irresponsible move a 20 year coupon booklet with their required monthly payment. If people really want to contribute their own money, who are we to stop them? But should those that don’t want to contribute be forced to? Except it’s not just their money, or just ours. Twenty year bonds taken today will be due when our kids are adults, probably even parents. These bonds become their taxes. Taxes don’t historically go down over time.

Birds of a feather

Cough…. Cayman Islands? …..cough

Here’s that drop in crime CT leadership LOVES to talk about. Only thing dropping is age of the offenders. And consequences for their actions.

CT has quite the conundrum. They cannot claim “we didn’t know”. No plausible deniability to be had. So either CT does -nothing, allows votes to be counted that should not be and the election is invalidated, with a federal investigation to follow. -plays dumb and tries the “we didn’t know” line, also with a federal investigation to follow. The 1986 SAVE most commonly refers to the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) program, which the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 (IRCA, also called the Simpson-Rodino Act, Public Law 99-603) made mandatory. uscis.gov SAVE is an intergovernmental verification system (originally run by the Immigration and Naturalization Service, now by USCIS) that lets federal, state, and local agencies check the immigration status of noncitizen applicants for certain public benefits. Its purpose was to prevent ineligible noncitizens from receiving federally funded entitlements such as AFDC (now TANF), Medicaid, food stamps (SNAP), unemployment insurance, and certain housing and education aid. uk.practicallaw.thomsonreute… Origins and 1986 mandate INS ran SAVE as a pilot in the early-to-mid 1980s (formalized around 1984) in several states. Agencies could query an INS database of alien records by name, A-number, and other identifiers. Primary (automated) checks were followed by secondary (manual) review when records did not match or were incomplete. gao.gov Section 121 of IRCA required INS to make a nationwide verification system available by October 1, 1987, and required participating agencies to use it by October 1, 1988 (with possible waivers if an alternative was equally effective or the cost was not justified). States received 100% federal reimbursement for implementation costs. Applicants had to declare satisfactory immigration status in writing under penalty of perjury. oui.doleta.gov Implementation rolled out in phases, starting with unemployment insurance in some states and expanding to other programs. Not every state used the automated system immediately; some received waivers and used mail-based secondary verification instead. oui.doleta.gov How it works (then and now) An agency submits identifying information (name, date of birth, and an enumerator such as an A-number, I-94 number, or later an SSN). SAVE queries government databases and returns a status (for example, lawful permanent resident, asylee, refugee, or “institute secondary verification”). It does not decide eligibility; the benefit agency does that using SAVE results plus program rules. Later laws (PRWORA 1996, IIRIRA 1996, REAL ID Act, Affordable Care Act, and others) expanded the programs and purposes for which SAVE can be used, including certain licenses and, more recently, some voter-related checks. uscis.gov SAVE is distinct from E-Verify, which employers use for work authorization. Other 1986 “SAVE” references • Save for the U.S.A. Year: Public Law 99-202 (H.J. Res. 436, enacted December 23, 1985) designated 1986 as “Save for the U.S.A. Year.” It asked the President to launch a “Buy Back America” campaign encouraging purchases of U.S. savings bonds to reduce reliance on foreign borrowing amid large deficits and the U.S. becoming a net debtor nation. congress.gov • National Save American Industry and Jobs Day: June 21, 1986, was designated by Public Law 99-347 to highlight U.S. manufacturing. President Reagan issued a proclamation. reaganlibrary.gov • Save Your Vision Week (first week of March 1986) was a recurring observance, not unique to that year. The immigration SAVE program is the lasting, operational system tied directly to 1986 legislation and is the usual meaning of “the 1986 SAVE.” It remains in use today, with updates to technology, data sources, and authorized uses.

Noticing a theme here. The FIRST debate is AFTER early voting begins. Hearing regarding FOIA requests is AFTER the election. A change from staying in 2020 election fraud just doesn’t happen to now it rarely happens, but lists won’t be checked to confirm this “rare” occurrence can’t happen. A truly transparent administration should want all records to be released in advance of the election, and debates to occur before election.

The greatest sound in the world.