馃帴 YouTube Partner | Streaming Tips & Tech Nerd @ContentDelta 馃幃 Twitch Partner | Horror Variety Streamer @MathManEU 鉁夛笍 [email protected]

Belgium
Joined November 2017
Include

Only show posts containing:

Exclude

Hide posts containing:

Time range
-
Minimum likes
Replying to @RedclawDraws
Nope, this is completely normal. The vocal minority keeps asking but the less vocal core of your community doesn't care. Happened to me with a very hyped game. Played it. Went from 120 AVG at the time to 40 for the play through.
1
45
Replying to @FlashForcePlays
Dear diary, today I did things.
2
38
I'm 35yo > 13 dropped out of high school > 15 started working > 18 shop manager > 22 training and recruitment manager > 24 started high school > 26 started uni > 30 master in maths > 34 PhD cryptography Don't let someone else's timeline define success. Make your own.
im 17yo >9 i started investing >10 i started coding >14 i did research @ harvard >14 i started college >15 i interned at vc firms and startups >16 i exited my first startup > 16 i finished highschool >17 ai doctor - 3k patients, fortune 10 ceo, openai, advisors
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Pymander Health's founder claims an "ai doctor" with 3k patients, but the company's terms state its AI "is not a licensed doctor" and features do not "make diagnoses." Its policy page says the company is "working with lawmakers to create" a license for AI doctors. pymanderhealth.com/terms pymanderhealth.com/policy
10
255
Replying to @cutecalicottv
The Hyper X Quadcast is NOT it. My recommendation: Rode Podmic XLR/USB is 150-200. If you can swing a little extra budget, go for the Rode Podmic XLR, 75-100, and the Rode Streamer X Audio Interface, 200.
41
Replying to @JesseCox
Do you want to learn why YouTube can never do Content Detection accurately? Or why your password is only safe because "Trust me bro"?
32
Replying to @VALORANTde
@VALORANTde, are those my only two options? 馃憖馃憖
60
Barry Eppes retweeted
馃毃 Announcement: I am looking for 100 channels to implement my 2027 YouTube playbook with! Today, we officially open up applications for my next Accelerator cohort. The program behind some of the fastest growing youtube channels in the world. In October we will take 50-100 creators and give them: - 8 weeks of intense training (all live with me) - 30+ hours of material - Our full playbook to dominate any niche - Our ideation system for million view videos - Personalized strategy support to build their plan - Personalized feedback and execution help We鈥檝e grown channels from 1k views a video to 500k+ $100/month to $10,000/month (in months) Had multiple creators post 5m+ videos DURING the cohorts. Even some 10m+. Look at the endless testimonials on the site (from real channels you can look up haha) Applications open today (link below). Apply and if we think we can grow your channel, I鈥檒l reach out personally. Only about 10% of applications get into the program. We prioritize student results over everything. It's not affordable for everyone, so I鈥檒l also be giving away a free scholarship (funded by me)! Just RT and like this post and I鈥檒l pick a winner on Monday. Can鈥檛 wait to see the next group of creators go through our program and dominate 2027. 鉂わ笍
45
165
12
467
64,482
Being a parent: Hard. Having a whole cinema for yourself cause you have to go while your child is in school: Priceless
5
91
Barry Eppes retweeted
馃挭馃徎
What do I keep telling you all? Business email in your About Me!
1
4
151
Replying to @ContentDelta
Probably the best advice you ever gave me was this. I have had so many opportunities come my way because I put my email in my about me/bio
1
1
37
What do I keep telling you all? Business email in your About Me!
Content Creators, please please please put your email somewhere...
3
1
1
5
463
Replying to @epictightpants
Saaaame. Almost makes me want to stream it. (Will NEVER happen xD)
1
2
32
Alternatively, Living Wage per hour + 20% split with another 20-30% based on performance.
1
23
Replying to @Level_Photo
Base salary of 2-3x minimum wage per hour based on experience plus 10% of revenue with performance bonuses.
1
1
39
Replying to @Poochkip
Pooch! Pooch! This is Twitter! Not Google! We can't help you!
30
Barry Eppes retweeted
For anyone who is still unsure on why @AitumTV made the move we have to take a free product and make it paid then I would urge you to read this. I have been extremely transparent here regarding the decisions we made and what forced our action. My job now on the back of this is to make Aitum and Stream Tools the best it can be for our new paying customers and show them their support and investment in us was not misplaced. Trust is earned and while some people feel our action broke that trust we will be working to show them this wasn't the case and we have creators best interested at heart.
Replying to @ContentDelta
So initially we had been funding the Multi-chat from our revenue from our only paid product Nexus. But our subscriptions for that took a downturn for a few months, which pushed us into a situation where I actually forfeited my own salary, and so did another member of the management team from Aitum, to keep the multi-chat/activity feed free until subs went back up. Which they didn't at the rate needed. We also hit another issue, Kick. Their API costs a lot more to interact with and we say a huge amount of extra traffic cost from supporting them. Unlike pretty much all the other companies in the space now, Aitum didn't have millions in funding so we got stuck in a hard position. We didn't have the capital to throw behind a product to give it more runway as free, and we refused to put in ads, so it forced our hand. So we decided to take a different route. While yes charging sucks we looked at it as a rough change in the beginning to become a better provider for creators in the long run. Which is why we called it Stream Tools. The aim now is low sub cost but we keep building out the product to provide everything that companies like Stream Elements and StreamLabs (and others) do. We launched an overlay/alerts system yesterday along side the new sub pricing and we have updates scheduled throughout the next few months to prove our dedication to all the people who have subbed and supported us. My personal aim is we provide enough value and more importantly stability, because we won't just run out of money and need to be acquired to keep going, that we become the standard for creators. We proved ourselves with Vertical so I want to do it again. Sorry for the paragraph but we promised to be transparent so I hope this helps make as much as possible clear. 馃榿
4
3
1
24
6,797
Replying to @TheRedGear
I agree. This would have been my approach, but it is also very hard to look behind closed doors. Happy with Mr. gregles reply explaining their thoughts that I just retweeted.
25
Incredibly transparent reply to my questions for @Mrgregles, Head of Product for @AitumTV. Read this, make up your own mind. Personally, I understand their decision and despite the initial disappointment and continuing believf that a "Free to Paid" product transition is generally bad, I want to see more of what Aitum can do.
Replying to @ContentDelta
So initially we had been funding the Multi-chat from our revenue from our only paid product Nexus. But our subscriptions for that took a downturn for a few months, which pushed us into a situation where I actually forfeited my own salary, and so did another member of the management team from Aitum, to keep the multi-chat/activity feed free until subs went back up. Which they didn't at the rate needed. We also hit another issue, Kick. Their API costs a lot more to interact with and we say a huge amount of extra traffic cost from supporting them. Unlike pretty much all the other companies in the space now, Aitum didn't have millions in funding so we got stuck in a hard position. We didn't have the capital to throw behind a product to give it more runway as free, and we refused to put in ads, so it forced our hand. So we decided to take a different route. While yes charging sucks we looked at it as a rough change in the beginning to become a better provider for creators in the long run. Which is why we called it Stream Tools. The aim now is low sub cost but we keep building out the product to provide everything that companies like Stream Elements and StreamLabs (and others) do. We launched an overlay/alerts system yesterday along side the new sub pricing and we have updates scheduled throughout the next few months to prove our dedication to all the people who have subbed and supported us. My personal aim is we provide enough value and more importantly stability, because we won't just run out of money and need to be acquired to keep going, that we become the standard for creators. We proved ourselves with Vertical so I want to do it again. Sorry for the paragraph but we promised to be transparent so I hope this helps make as much as possible clear. 馃榿
5
351
Replying to @Mrgregles
Thank you for your reply. This clears up a lot of the issues that I had with the change and I really hope it clears things up for other people as well. Your transparency is genuinely appreciated. Reading the reasoning, I fully admit that I change my stance on this. I hope that people understand the increasing costs and desire to stay independent (Something I personally really value) as reasons. I hope that the consideration in the future remains that inclusion in the new Stream Tools product requires there to be a continuous operating cost and that you continue producing incredibly good Free assets such as Vertical as well!
1
2
303
Replying to @Mrgregles
First off, I appreciate both your reply and the transparency. I just want to put that out there, because too many companies hide behind the PR words. I appreciate that this was a hard decision, but it feels (from the outside perspective) that it could have been prevented. I'm not here to prosecute, because that doesn't help anyone but it would be nice to get an understanding from the business perspective. What are the factors at play that we don't see as consumers that caused the Cost per User to shift so significantly that the product could no longer be supported (as a free product)?
2
300