Joined September 2021
- Tweets7.2K
- Following1.7K
- Followers10.7K
- Likes7.9K
Pump $0.05 retweeted
THIS SHOULDN'T WORK.
My Grok Bot didn't take a single trade for the first 2.5 hours.
By 9am it had turned $280 into $3,412.
I gave it one prompt focused on not blowing the stack and went to sleep.
I didn't loosen a single rule.
I didn't override a single decision.
The only thing I touched was Ctrl+V.
At midnight the notification said: 1,112 pairs scanned, 0 traded. "Filter killed everything that failed the rules." The first trade came around 1:30am, 8% of the stack.
Here's what the desk actually did under strict RM:
→ SCOUT scanned 10,214 pairs on Pump.fun and Raydium
→ FILTER killed 98% (mint, LP, holders, volume, dev wallet)
→ ANALYST scored the 204 survivors, anything under 0.6 died
→ EXECUTOR entered at 8% of the stack, every single time
→ RISK cut losers at -6% and trailed winners after +12%
→ LOGGER wrote the reason for every single move
38 trades.
26 green. 12 red.
Biggest single win: +$810.
Biggest single loss: -$37.
Zero trades broke the position size.
Zero trades ran past the stop.
$280 → $388 → $1,395 → $2,942 → $3,412
The exact prompt I used:
Build me a fully autonomous Solana memecoin trading desk that prioritizes capital preservation. Create 6 specialized agents with hard handoffs (Scout, Filter, Analyst, Executor, Risk, Logger).
Scout scans new pairs on Pump.fun and Raydium in real time.
Filter must kill anything that fails: mint not revoked, LP not locked, top 10 holders >20%, volume under $50k last hour, dev wallet connected to previous rugs.
Analyst scores every survivor from 0 to 1. Under 0.6 = no trade.
Executor can only trade what passed every filter. Maximum 8% of current balance per trade. Never more.
Risk sets hard stop at -6% and trails winners only after +12%. No averaging down. No revenge trades.
Log the reason behind every trade and every rejection.
Build a clean live terminal with balance, agent activity, and equity curve.
Paper first, then live. Run overnight and give me the full recap in the morning. No code from me.
I pasted it.
I went to bed.
I woke up to $3,412 and the stack still intact.
Full agent configs and terminal setup are below ↓
Bookmark this before you open another chart tonight.
Pump $0.05 retweeted
🚀 Series: Build Your Portfolio During the Downtrend
So today I'll share my portfolio plan with #DCA price zones, strong buy zones, avoid chasing prices & TP1 - TP2.
The reason why I chose these tokens is because I want to diversify across different categories:
1/ Bluechips: $BTC, $ETH, $SOL, $BNB, $SUI
2/ RWA: $ONDO, $SYRUP
3/ Yield/RWA: $ENA
4/ Perps: $DYDX, $GMX, $HYPE
5/ Robotics: $PEAQ, $ROBO
6/ Meme: $PEPE
I allocated most of my capital to bluechips, followed by RWA, Perps, etc.
but my allocation to $PEPE is relatively higher (still within my risk tolerance — meaning I can still sleep well if $PEPE goes to $0).
I want higher returns, so I think the risk on $PEPE is worth taking.
With these $PEPE #DCA zones & TP targets, I think a 10x return is achievable in the next bull run. For example, allocating $5K to potentially make $50K
(If lose $5K & I still holding bluechips & other safer bags).
I have already deployed ~50% of my total budget.
Now I'm waiting for $BTC to drop into the $48K–55K range before deploying another ~30%.
The remaining allocation:
🔸 15% for weekly #DCA
🔸 15% reserved for sub-$48K BTC
If $BTC never drops below $48K before the end of next year, I'll deploy the remaining 15% for other bluechips.
Wish me luck! If you like this, pls gimme a repost & quote.
---
Disclaimer: HRHR project, don't all-in, just spend around ~1%-2% for your portfolio.
Series build your portfolio - Project Hunt Daily!
Currently, I'm planning to publish a series called "Project Hunt Daily".
I already shared many research posts before, but never turned them into a real series.
I think this will be a great way to record my #DCA journey & look back at it again in the uptrend.
Last time I shared a post to buy $DYDX at $0.09, now $DYDX is trading around ~0.176. It's nearly 2x profit!
$PEAQ I bought around ~0.018, now it’s trading around ~0.034. $PEAQ is still so far from its #ATH at $0.75.
So today, I'll share my research about @peaq:
💠 Fundamental
💠 Purchasing strategy
💠 Target profit
1/ PEAQ is a Layer-1 Substrate blockchain for Robots/Machine Economy
PEAQ supports machine IDs, verification, storage, smart contracts/EVM, staking & network economics powered by $PEAQ.
Project is categorized under #robotics, #depin, #RWA, #layer1. These are strong narratives, with #robotics & #depin potentially becoming major market narratives during 2028-2029.
Peaq's advantage lies in its specialized positioning for real-world machines and devices, rather than just being a generic smart-contract chain. (kind of similar to $ROBO @FabricFND, you can read more details in my research post below)
Listed on @BithumbOfficial , @binance Alpha, @bitget with 24h trading volume around ~22.2M.
Funding: $PEAQ has raised totally ~43.5M including ICO ~20M, 2024 ~15M, 2022 ~6M, Seed ~2.5M.
Notable investors: Borderless Capital, Generative Ventures, Animoca Brands, NGC Ventures, The Spartan Group, Fundamental Labs, HashKey Capital, DWF Labs, GSR.
While this represents a significant advantage for networking, it also implies that the investor token unlock schedule requires close monitoring.
🚀 Tokenomics:
Circulating supply: 2.18B $PEAQ
Total supply: 4.41B $PEAQ
Market cap: $72.5M
FDV: $146.8M
Unlocking Pressure: from May 29 to the end of 2026, the unlocked supply will increase from 2.19B to 2.84B $PEAQ!
From 2027 onwards, the unlocking process will still continue but at a gradually decreasing pace.
2/ Purchasing strategy & TP
#DCA zone: $0.02-0.032 ; aggressive: $0.012 - $0.018
TP1: $0.10–$0.18
TP2: $0.25–$0.45
$PEAQ is a project with long-term upside, strong backers, a hyped social community & a clear narrative around #robotics machine economy.
The reasonable average buying zone is $0.025 - $0.035, optimal #DCA zone should be $0.018-$0.025 & strong buying zone is $0.012-0.018.
If holding until 2029, reasonable partial TP1 is $0.08-0.12 ; TP2 $0.18-$0.25 ; TP3 $0.35-0.5.
The ATH price is $0.75, so you can keep around ~30% as a "moon-bag", meaning nearly 25x from now!
---
Disclaimer: HRHR project, don't all-in, just spend around ~1%-2% for your portfolio.
If you like this, pls gimme a repost & quote.
Pump $0.05 retweeted
HE LOST $5 MILLION ON THE WORLD CUP
SPAIN beat Argentina 1-0 and became the World Cup Champions last night. Unfortunately, gud.hl, who had $5.2M bet on Argentina, lost EVERYTHING.
He had bet almost the entirety of his Hyperliquid PnL on Argentina. Will he make it back?
Pump $0.05 retweeted
Might you think you missed $HYPE after the ATH? But the leverage play is only getting started
$bullHYPE offers a protocol-native way to still gain leveraged exposure to further $HYPE appreciation through @0xHypezion structural token model on HyperEVM.
It operates as the junior tranche within unified collateral pool, designed to absorb volatility and downside risk through the Stability Pool rebalancing logic:
• When the system Coverage Ratio (CR) drops below the threshold due to $HYPE price declines, the Stability Pool automatically burns $hzUSD and issues/transfers $bullHYPE to restore system balance.
• This mechanism socializes losses across $bullHYPE holders via controlled dilution rather than individual liquidations.
• In exchange, $bullHYPE holders receive amplified upside exposure to $HYPE price appreciation and ecosystem growth (HyperEVM activity, staking yield flows, and institutional inflows).
→ Because leverage is structurally derived from the pooled collateral and residual equity dynamics, there are no funding fees or liquidation.
→ The effective leverage ratio is dynamic and adjusts with total $hzUSD supply and collateral health.
→ The result is a perpetual, funding-free leveraged beta on $HYPE that can be held long-term, traded on DEXs, or LPing.
That's why it's worth considering for anyone with real conviction on Hyperliquid.
Pump $0.05 retweeted
➥ High TVL doesn’t always mean a good DeFi product
Imo, this is one of the easiest traps in DeFi atm.
Most people look at TVL and assume the protocol is strong, but TVL only shows how much capital is sitting inside a protocol. It doesn’t tell you whether the product has real users, sustainable revenue, strong retention, or solid risk design.
The main thing I watch:
→ Incentive-driven TVL can disappear fast. If users only come for points, airdrops, or high APY, that capital is usually mercenary. Once rewards slow down, the money leaves.
@blast is the cleanest example imo.
It once reached around $2.2B TVL during the points farming phase, but after the token launch and reward cycle cooled down, TVL dropped massively and active users collapsed. That tells me the initial TVL was more about incentives than real product-market fit.
→ TVL can also move just because asset prices move. If $ETH, $BTC, or native tokens pump, TVL in USD goes up even without new capital entering the protocol. In that case, TVL becomes more of a vanity metric than a real health metric.
→ High TVL doesn’t mean high usage. A protocol can have billions locked but weak fees, low volume, low retention, and very little real economic activity.
This is why I care more about:
– Revenue / fees
– Revenue per TVL
– Trading or lending volume
– DAU and retention
– Utilization rate
– Security history
– Tokenomics sustainability
Btw, TVL can also be manipulated through loop lending, wrapped assets, double counting, or whale deposits. So a large number on @DefiLlama doesn’t automatically mean the product is healthy.
The difference is clear when you compare incentive-heavy protocols with products like @aave, @LidoFinance, or @Uniswap.
They don’t only have TVL. They also have real usage, sticky users, recurring fees, and a clear reason for people to come back even without rewards.
My takeaway:
TVL is useful, but only as the first filter. If TVL is high but revenue, volume, retention, and utilization are weak, I usually treat it as a warning sign.
Pump $0.05 retweeted
We’ve raised $50M led by @dragonflyvc to go all in on RWAs and bring TradFi liquidity on-chain.
Today, we're launching Phase 1 of our RWA rollout to stress-test our infrastructure before bringing 100+ TradFi markets on-chain this summer.
Pump $0.05 retweeted
PUTIN: THE WAR IS COMING TO AN END – IS PEACE FINALLY HERE?
On May 9-10, 2026, Russian President Vladimir Putin declared that the Russia-Ukraine war is “coming to an end.” Speaking to reporters after Russia’s scaled-back Victory Day parade in Moscow
Make your prediction now 👇
Pump $0.05 retweeted
Exactly 4 years ago, LUNA went from $119 to almost $0 and wiped out over $60 billion in market value.
Pump $0.05 retweeted
a16z crypto-backed Gensyn launches Delphi, an AI-settled information markets platform theblock.co/post/398419/a16z…
Pump $0.05 retweeted
Onchain $BTC - The metric you need to know before making decision during downtrend.
I've gone through 2 downtrend since 2017, and one thing I learned: this isn't the time to rush.
The key for success is patience, you must have the best possible position before next uptrend
Sometimes, basics are the best, you don't need to know much, these metrics of onchain $BTC are enough to determine the bottom zone:
1/ Realized price: the "average cost basic" at which all bitcoin were purchased!
Currently it stays around 55K -> compare with historical price, when $BTC drops to below the realized price, it's the most ideal price to all-in your bag.
2/ MVRV (Market Value to Realized Value)
Current: 1.22 -> market is at "fair value" zone, still higher than accumulation zone (<1.0).
Compared with historical data 0.5-0.8 at 2018/2022, $BTC may decline ~18-36% from here to meet the same MVRV levels.
3. SOPR (Spent Output Profit Ratio)
Current: 0.98 -> it shows the slight capitulation but not extreme levels (<0.95). The bottoming SOPR usually remains under 0.95 for a longer period.
4. NUPL (Net Unrealized Profit/Loss)
Current: 0.18 it's still in the "hope" phrase, we need a negative NUPL to see the market fully capitulate.
5. Puell Multiple (miner profitability by comparing daily revenue (USD) against its 365-day moving average.)
current: 0.77 -> Miners are under pressure but haven't reached full capitulation.
History shows that bottoms often forms when it below 0.5.
Bottom line:
Apply to this cycle, $BTC is in the early stage of accumulation but has not reached the full capitulation. It needs time for deeper discount!
Using the metrics above to calculate:
Extremely bear: 38K-44K
Base case: 55K-60K
From my POV 55K-60K I'll start #DCA, under realized price I'll all-in my bag.
--
thanks @coinglass_com for the data & @grok @preditmarket for AI research
Pump $0.05 retweeted
Simple idea how to avoid rsETH-type contagion in DeFi.
You deposit ETH into a pool. Or better, stETH so you keep earning yield.
You're basically restaking your already staked ETH.
Now services like LayerZero's DVN can use that restaked ETH for their security.
Not just bridges but oracles, DA layers, sequencers, anything that needs cryptoeconomic guarantees.
We could call them Actively Validated Services (AVS for short).
Obviously you need Operators who actually run the AVS work using delegated restaked ETH.
They get paid for it with extra fees so stakers earn passive yield on top of staking yield. Aligned incentives.
And because managing all this restaked ETH and picking Operators is really hard work for retail, there could be liquid wrappers.
Like stETH from Lido, but for restaked ETH.
They handle Operator selection for you. We could call them Liquid Restaked Tokens (LRTs).
If an Operator misbehaves or signs a forged signature, we slash that ETH.
Like an insurance fund inside the protocol layer! So no need to for Defi United donations in the future.
I think this could really work.
Pump $0.05 retweeted
April 6th, 3pm GMT.
Final wave of approvals in progress.
Check your wallets: remeko.io/checker
Pump $0.05 retweeted
ParaFi raises $125M for new venture fund
@paraficapital is currently focused on companies navigating stablecoins, tokenization, and institutional onchain finance. The firm already invests in major crypto players, including Anchorage, Bitwise, and Polymarket.
Outside of the recent $125M raise, ParaFi has raised a separate $325M for its ongoing digital asset investment strategies since the beginning of 2025.
ParaFi now holds around $2B in assets under management. Projects that raised investment by ParaFi include: Near, Avalanche, Consensys, Jupiter, etc.
Pump $0.05 retweeted
The crypto market in 2026 is becoming increasingly competitive.
@azeemk, co-founder of @0xMiden, is one of the few sharing a forward-looking perspective for the next cycle.
After ETHDenver, a few things are becoming clear:
+ Liquidity is tightening.
+ Market makers are becoming more cautious.
+ Launching and trading are no longer as easy as before.
The @aave incident made a deeper issue more visible.
When transactions are exposed before execution, anyone can observe and react ahead of time.
This creates an environment where more sophisticated players consistently extract value from others.
That may be part of how crypto has operated, but it also highlights a problem that needs better design solutions rather than placing the blame on users or traders.
➠ This is where @0xMiden becomes relevant.
+ With client-side execution, transactions are processed on the user’s device before being submitted to the network.
+ This reduces how much information is exposed in advance.
+ Less visible intent leads to fairer outcomes and gradually changes how markets function.
2026 could be the year where better system designs begin shaping the next cycle.
The real competition is shifting toward who can build better market architecture.
