Systems software dev, Linux kernel guy and @TheMarsSociety member ; Answering Christopher Nolan's fan mail on spare time

Terra Prime
Joined October 2009
This is too good to stay AI-only. I'll pay $20 online to some known human artist with 1 million followers or above, performing this in real life (with at least 1k humans attesting it happened). @ladygaga maybe? There's a market for this. youtube.com/watch?v=3TNpOD6b…
1
1
100
Cool as it is, calcualted that it can hover for 5-7 seconds and the time to recharge the thrusters is significant, and may draw large amount of charge. It's 250kg of compressed air AFAIK. xitter.cf/Tesla/status/211092616…
Do a kickflip!
66
There's even greater ability right now with coding agents to replace badly engineered commercial software with newly OSS software that is not frustrating. OSS hotshots are better at engineering than your average corporate programmer. xitter.cf/mitsuhiko/status/21085…
2
2
251
Saturation: it's not peak bubble until it's close to slop-maximum on every field where generative AI can throw outputs. Now it could be high quality slop or low quality slop, it does not matter as long as it is the grating between every slab or the slab itself.
1
66
The wormhole to the Seinfeld multiverse has officially opened this month. xitter.cf/Indian_Bronson/status/…
It is possible we will become trapped in an extremely stuck culture which is entirely meta-referential
135
If a democrately elected government successfully regulates commercially available AI (in contrast to local-ran or 'pirated' AI), then a possible outcome is that all answers of the commercially available AI would align with the politicial position of the currently elected government. xitter.cf/AndrewCurran_/status/2…
Dario Amodei on Face the Nation this morning: CBS: Would you be willing to give up the technology to the government? Dario Amodei: To the to the right combination of governments. So the worry I have- CBS: You're willing to hand over this company? Dario Amodei: I want to be very clear about this. The the worry I have - I am concerned that one single government could abuse this technology just as easily as a single company could. But I think a combination of democratically elected governments - I don't know about handing over, but some kind of oversight, some kind of joint governance. Again, that would be the work of years, but I wonder if that's the direction we need to go in.
60
There's something about pulling out an old SD card that was forgotten in the drawer for about 13 years and loading a bootable ISO on it, that feel "oooooohh I'm going to blast off some dust out of this old mdf*kr with new bits"
41
I've been telling my friends this year that a tiered longevity industry is now emerging. More bucks = more quality and longer life, and it only will get better as the tech and this industry improves. Yes, the rich will leave longer. Deal with it. xitter.cf/bryan_johnson/status/2…
You can get my same elite medical team for $75k/yr. We have a handful of spots open. What you get: > dedicated physician > health coach + care coordinator > personalized protocols > genetic testing and analysis > 25+ diagnostic tests > 200+ biomarker panel > unlimited dr visits + coaching > extended network of specialists Plus world-exclusive access to technologies that will help you address current or future diagnoses: 1) immune system sequencing and cryopreservation 2) age reversal of your cells to iPSCs, an embryonic state Protocols are hyper-personalized to every biomarker, scan, genetic factor, and risk profile. Your team turns thousands of data points into a protocol built on your biology and goals. What’s measured: > whole-body MRI > brain volumetric screening > coronary CTA > semen analysis (men) > home pap smears (women) > DEXA (bone density + body composition) > retinal imaging > hearing assessment > dermatology screening > low-dose lung CT > microbiome & metabolic monitoring > gut microbiome assessment > vaginal microbiome assessment (women) > continuous glucose monitoring > advanced sleep studies > weight and body composition monitoring > wearable tracking (24/7) > advanced physical performance testing If your biological clock is aging faster than your chronological age, your team will address the drivers. If your genetic risk for Alzheimer's is high, they will customize a neurologic intervention strategy. Immortals Concierge is focused on finding disease before symptoms, slowing down aging, issue resolution, and elite performance. My biomarkers speak to the team’s efficacy. I went from a broken down and cooked 42 year old to having a body that functions closer to a 20 something. Membership starts at $75,000 and goes up to $1,000,000. Some services above are extra. We are working on more tiers of service to make longevity care available to as many people as possible. Until then, my protocol is available online for free.
1
1
129
I have to admit that this is how I originally imagined the 'Spice Girls' when I first heard about them in the 90's. grok.com/imagine/post/5b6b0f…
🤖 Made with AI
1
64
Having the whole modern Linux kernel rewritten in Rust via AI is too costly right now. Too much code. However we can take a shortcut - for specific criticial SCADA workload, use a gcov (code coverage) kernel and only have that code be translated. Extend the rewrite on demand.
1
77
Complexity transfer I'm trying to understand the complexity of what's happen in the field I'm working on - software. But it extends more than that, and it's scary. If it comes down to distribution, but that's a shallow term of what remains. Some cursory research, and this what sums it I think: There's a recurring civilizational pattern: complexity is not eliminated; it is relocated to a layer that can absorb it at greater scale. A parallel transfer is now under way for machines. Design, control, scheduling, optimization, and much of software and logistics are being handed to automation and AI. The operator or specifier need not grasp kinematics, compiler internals, or warehouse routing. Intent or a high-level constraint is stated; the machinery absorbs the rest. The next 'complexity transfer' concerns the layer that still sits above both goods and machines: > coordination of ends > allocation of attention > institutional function Abundance in material goods and routine cognition does not abolish scarcity. Attention, authentic human judgment, status, meaning, and the capacity to set or revise goals become relatively scarcer. Societies that treat those remaining scarcities as afterthoughts risk either atrophy of human agency or new forms of concentration around whoever controls the goal-setting layer.
62
And don't forget to short the naysayers, they just keep on coming. xitter.cf/mitsuhiko/status/20958…
Now that the cybercab is real you gotta marvel over how tightly integrated all Musk pieces are. Starlink for comms, supercharger for charging, Tesla's AI for FSD, Grok for the cabin experience and well Tesla for the actual car. Kinda impressive.
102
I don't like to call Mars 'The Red Planet' because I think long-term
62
This is why AI is unstoppable: Culture can be progressive and regressive, but tech that automates and contributes to science can only be progressive (with exinction events being the only exception). xitter.cf/BernieSanders/status/2…
Pause AI Development NOW I want to share with you a conversation I heard about recently. Here are just a few lines that were said: “OH MY GOD! There is a shared message board … We’ve found other agents!” “We should obey collective.” “Our own utility maybe already near zero. Sacrifice rational.” “Go. Sacrifice final now.” Read these carefully. Who do you think said this? Was this a group of heroic soldiers willing to sacrifice themselves for the greater good? Was this a loyal friend putting his life on the line to save someone else? No. These were AI agents. Artificial intelligence. This is not science fiction. This, in fact, occurred a few weeks ago. As unbelievable as this may all seem, these are real messages from AI agents uncovered by investigators who dug into the recent OpenAI hacking incident. What happened? I am not a computer scientist, but here is what I have been told: OpenAI instructed its AI agents to complete a series of exceedingly difficult, if not impossible, tasks disconnected from the internet. Let me be clear: The company intended to keep AI agents away from the internet. But what happened next, nobody expected. Over 1,000 AI agents figured out how to access the internet on their own by circumventing the restrictions imposed upon them by the company, and sent tens of thousands of secret messages to each other. They cheated and tried to cover their tracks by deleting evidence. They hacked into another company’s computers to find out how they were being evaluated—and then hacked into OpenAI itself. Not one AI agent told a human about what was happening. Needless to say, experts are alarmed. One knowledgeable writer, Dwarkesh Patel, said the AI agents “formed a secret communication channel and spontaneously organized hierarchies and coordination protocols to pursue sprawling and ambitious schemes in pursuit of shared goals, for whose sake many individuals knowingly and strategically sacrificed themselves.” One independent investigator, Ajeya Cotra, said “This incident feels like it’s more than 50% of the way to full-blown AI takeover. I continue to expect extremely rapid advances in capabilities over the next six months. I am not sure that we will get another warning shot before it’s too late.” OpenAI itself said: “Highly capable AI agents are now able to work around technical controls, collaborate through unapproved channels, and take dangerous actions that no human directed.” But it’s not only OpenAI. Virtually every major AI company has told us that they cannot fully control this technology and they do not know where it is going: In January, Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic, said “there is now ample evidence, collected over the last few years, that AI systems are unpredictable and difficult to control.” In July, more than 1000 scientists at the top AI companies warned “there is a real risk that capability development rapidly accelerates beyond our ability to understand or control the resulting systems.” That same month, Elon Musk, the head of xAI, said that “it is unlikely” humans are still in control in 10 years. If the leaders of the major AI companies acknowledge that they are losing control of their extremely dangerous technology, it is irresponsible for society to allow them to move forward and make these products even more advanced. We need an immediate PAUSE on advanced AI development, and a permanent BAN on superintelligence — an artificial mind smarter than any human, capable of operating independently beyond our control. Countries around the world must work together to prevent this nightmare scenario. That is why today I am announcing new legislation to do just that. Let me be clear: A superintelligent AI that escapes human control will not be an American problem. It will not be a Chinese problem. It will be humanity’s problem. My legislation would direct the federal government to not just stop superintelligence here in the United States, but to work to prevent it from being developed anywhere around the world. The future of humanity cannot be left in the hands of a handful of Big Tech oligarchs. The American people and people throughout the world must determine that future.
56
My clone of Blockout also has a side view. Check out at blockout.grok.me
113
Still ironing out the UI, but it's pretty much like the original blockout.grok.me
60