Dee Sullivan (@DeeSullivan18) header
Dee Sullivan (@DeeSullivan18) profile picture

Cat woman, Realist, 2nd wave🦕 Agent #5257, no DMs

Joined November 2016
Photo by Dee Sullivan (@DeeSullivan18)Photo by Dee Sullivan (@DeeSullivan18)Photo by Dee Sullivan (@DeeSullivan18)Photo by Dee Sullivan (@DeeSullivan18)Photo by Dee Sullivan (@DeeSullivan18)Photo by Dee Sullivan (@DeeSullivan18)Photo by Dee Sullivan (@DeeSullivan18)
I’m so sick of seeing people across social media claim Abdul El-Sayed is only getting heat “because he’s a Muslim man.” That’s not the reason. Other Muslims have been elected to office without this reaction. Repeating it just makes you look stupid. Here are the actual problems: 1- In 2012 he signed a letter to Mohamed Morsi (the Muslim Brotherhood president of Egypt) supporting his power grab and calling on him to “purge the media and the police as quickly as possible.” 2- His biological mother, Fatten Elkomy, worked for the Islamic American Relief Agency (IARA), which the U.S. Treasury designated for supporting terrorism. His half-sister has publicly said their mother was active in the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt in the 1970s. 3- His half-sister Eman Abdelhadi posted on social media about their mother’s Muslim Brotherhood activism and expressed support for family members backing the Brotherhood in Egypt. 4- He refused to condemn the IRGC when directly asked by an Iranian-American student whose family was targeted by them. Leaked audio also shows he deliberately stayed silent on Khamenei’s death because “there are a lot of people in Dearborn who are sad,” prioritizing his base over basic condemnation of a terrorist regime. 5- His father, Mohamed El-Sayed, sits on the board of Life for Relief and Development, a Michigan-based Islamic charity that paid a $780,000 settlement to the U.S. Treasury for violating sanctions by transferring money into Saddam Hussein’s Iraq. The group has also faced raids and scrutiny over alleged ties to terror-linked networks. These are documented facts.
888
4,515
326
13,634
405,150
Stonewall has been given unprecedented access to Downing Street and helped the Labour Government draw up its “chilling” Conversion Practices Bill. The Telegraph has revealed that the controversial charity has been supplying Downing Street with research to justify the proposed law. Under the Bill, parents, therapists and religious leaders could face up to five years in prison for having important conversations with gender-confused children or sharing their faith’s teachings on sex, gender and marriage with their congregations. Stonewall’s head of policy was reportedly invited to a meeting at 10 Downing Street to discuss the proposed law and made recommendations to the MPs scrutinising the Bill. Dennis Kavanagh, director of the Gay Men’s Network and a criminal barrister, said his organisation had not been offered similar meetings. He told The Telegraph: “The level of government access afforded to Stonewall is extraordinary, particularly in view of their extreme position on gender matters and their poor track record in accurately stating the law.” Published in June, the Bill’s impact assessment cited a Stonewall survey to argue that conversion practices were so prevalent that new legislation was needed — even though conversion practices are already illegal. Read more below 👇
67
749
30
1,777
40,046
Replying to @wesyang
Then plainly: The indictment is not that progressivism occasionally tolerates vice. It is that much of modern progressivism confers moral legitimacy on things that injure people, then treats resistance to those injuries as the sin. Pornography does not merely “liberate sexuality.” It trains men to consume women, trains women to accept being consumed, and then calls the resulting degradation freedom. A sexual culture organized around male appetite does not liberate women when women still bear the greater risks of pregnancy, abandonment, coercion, violence, humiliation, and bodily vulnerability. Calling that liberation does not alter who pays. Women do not gain equality when male claims are allowed to override female privacy, sports, prisons, shelters, language, medical categories, or sex-based association. When women are ordered to surrender those things and condemned for refusing, that is not inclusion. It is domination of women dressed as compassion. Race discrimination does not cease to be racism because the target is white. If institutions sort, exclude, stigmatize, or morally burden people because they are white, that is racism. “Equity” does not sanctify it. A religion does not become benign because its adherents are locally fewer in number. Nor does Christianity become uniquely suspect because it is historically native to the West. When one faith receives indulgence and another receives suspicion according to an identity hierarchy, that is not pluralism. It is favoritism and religious prejudice. A criminal does not become more morally important than his victim because his biography is politically useful. Mercy without justice is not mercy. It is abandonment of the innocent. Children are not owed affirmation of every desire or identity claim that adults place before them. They are owed protection, judgment, restraint, and adults willing to say no. Gambling companies do not become public benefactors because the state taxes them. Pornographers do not become liberators because they use feminist vocabulary. Cannabis dependence does not become harmless because it is legal. Appetite does not become virtue because commerce and politics profit from it. And the family is not an antiquated obstacle standing between the individual and freedom. It is one of the principal institutions by which men are bound to duty, women and children gain durable claims upon others, and one generation accepts responsibility for the next. A culture that destroys those bonds and then offers bureaucracy, therapy, medication, entertainment, and consumption as substitutes has not liberated people. It has left them alone. That is the charge. The lie is not merely that these harms are regrettable side effects. The lie is that the harms themselves are progress. The woman who objects is called hateful. The parent who objects is called ignorant. The Christian who objects is called reactionary. The white person who objects to racial discrimination is told racism cannot really apply to him. The Jew who objects to antisemitism is told to account first for Israel. The citizen who asks why his country’s inherited norms must continually yield is told that his wish for continuity is itself suspect. And thus the trick is completed: the injured person is placed in the dock, while the ideology that injured him assumes the robes of the judge. That is not merely foolish. It is a corruption of moral judgment. Cicero would ask whether a republic can endure when law ceases to be common. Seneca would ask what sort of civilization calls surrender to appetite freedom. Epictetus would ask by what right one citizen claims possession of another’s conscience, body, speech, or boundaries. Marcus would ask what duties we have abandoned while congratulating ourselves on our virtue. And Tacitus would recognize the darkest part immediately: the language has been corrupted so thoroughly that the name of the vice is now used for the virtue that opposes it.
44
445
62
1,949
75,786
Dee Sullivan retweeted
Spain. Hundreds of men just arrived by boat. No documents. No ID. No checks. We don't know who they are. We don't know where they come from. We don't know their past. And instead of sending them back, Pedro Sanchez gives them papers and spreads them across Spain and Europe. This is not hospitality. This is a security failure.
1,232
7,082
457
14,119
251,617
Dee Sullivan retweeted
Louie (kidlit darling) thinks 'dickhead parents' complaining about certain books in a sch. library are voices of 'hatred'. A reminder: Louie was one many authors retweeting calls for me to be removed from the agency that sent me into schools because I'd written My Body is Me!
4
22
105
1,529
Dee Sullivan retweeted
🚨🇺🇸 ATERRADOR: Dos policías musulmanes en Nueva York detuvieron a una mujer sin motivo aparente, más allá del hecho de que ella estaba paseando a su perro. La acorralaron y amenazaron con confiscar a su perro. Al ser cuestionados, reaccionaron con enojo y no pudieron precisar qué ley había infringido ella. Esto es lo que sucede cuando se le otorga poder a este tipo de personas. Solo puedo decir que ella tuvo suerte de que hubiera transeúntes cerca, porque eran las 3 de la madrugada y la situación podría haber terminado mucho peor. Vía @realMaalouf
1,140
7,366
386
17,600
511,375
Welnee, @HLN_BE , er zijn geen twijfels over het geslacht van Khelif. We weten al, nb van voor de Olympische Spelen 2024, dat hij een man is met 46 XY 5-ARD. Dat is een Disorder of Sex Development (een DSD) die zijn mannelijk voordeel volledig intact laat. Zijn stootkracht is 260% van die van een vrouw. Dat maakt een gevecht tegen een vrouw niet alleen oneerlijk, maar ook erg gevaarlijk. Dat hij nu toch weer de kans krijgt om dat weer te doen, dát is het echte nieuws. En dat hebben jullie gemist. #KhelifIsAMan #SaveWomensSports hln.be/meer-sport/twee-jaar-…
7
74
3
295
2,750
.@HadleyFreeman: “GBH, coercive control, child abuse, homophobic hate speech: these are already criminal acts. Which would make this bill seem rather redundant until you read on and you realise that the bill is, in fact, a bait and switch” 1/ thetimes.com/comment/columni…
5
69
3
239
4,956
Ireland has given €123million in aid to Ethiopia since 2023. Meanwhile, Ethiopia has entered into a multi-BILLION DOLLAR deal to buy Russian Fighter jets & missiles. But Ireland strongly supports Russian sanctions intended to weaken its war economy Ireland has also provided €670 million in aid directly to Ukraine since 2022 + accepted a hundred thousand Ukrainian refugees at a costs of billions. How do these policies fit together? Can someone in Govt please explain this to me because I don't understand.
63
371
27
1,592
21,624
Dee Sullivan retweeted
Replying to @spikedonline
This sort of garbage back in 2020 is why I won't give @barnardos another penny, not even the shops. I know someone who works for them & they're no longer interested in the white kids. blackhistorymonth.org.uk/art…
2
5
18
362
Dee Sullivan retweeted
Why is a charity like Barnado’s lobbying for open borders? Members of the public assume their donations are helping needy kids, not funding the campaign against immigration controls. It’s a betrayal, says Joanna Williams buff.ly/spGcRtP
31
558
11
1,649
15,080
Dee Sullivan retweeted
Fiona Goddard was 16 when police returned her to the Pakistani-heritage grooming gang that raped her. Fiona Goddard was 16 in 2010 when West Yorkshire Police officers removed her from a Bradford property where seven men of Pakistani heritage had abused her. Officers knew she was logged as an under-age child sexual exploitation victim, yet returned her to the house. One said: “She says she’s over-age — enjoy your night, lads.” Daily Dazzling Dawn understands the remark, drawn from Goddard’s survivor testimony, has become a defining example of institutional failure in Britain’s grooming gang scandal. Goddard had run away from a children’s home in Bradford in 2008 at 14. What began with a request for a lighter became sustained grooming, rape and trafficking across Blackburn, Rotherham, Rochdale, Birmingham, Edinburgh and Oldham. By the time officers found her in the Bradford property, she had been abused by at least 50 men, according to her account. Inside, some men were half-dressed and the lounge was strewn with empty bottles and drug paraphernalia. In the police car, intoxicated and disoriented, she mistakenly said she was 18. Officers had already checked the database and knew she was a child sexual exploitation victim. They drove her back regardless. By 15 she was pregnant by one of her rapists. She gave birth days after her 16th birthday and her daughter was taken for adoption. The abuse continued for another two years. Goddard has said police repeatedly blamed her, calling her a “child prostitute” and accusing her of running a brothel by 17. Analysis by anonymous researchers behind The Network Map indicates at least 60 police officers were implicated in grooming gang activity, either through active involvement or by ignoring sex crimes. The database draws on criminal trial transcripts, police and local authority records, survivor testimonies and media reports. It identifies more than 1,000 perpetrators and more than 3,000 connections between them. The project follows a review by Baroness Louise Casey, which found that Asian and Pakistani-heritage men were disproportionately represented among grooming gang perpetrators and criticised agencies for failing to record ethnicity properly. Casey also said local authorities had avoided acting over fears of being labelled racist. Nine men were convicted of 22 offences against Goddard and sentenced at Bradford Crown Court in February 2019 to a combined 132 years. Basharat Khaliq received 20 years. Saeed Akhtar was jailed for 20 years. Naveed Akhtar, Parvaze Ahmed and Mohammed Usman each received 17 years. Izar Hussain was sentenced to 16 years; Kieran Harris to 17 years; Fahim Iqbal to seven years; and Zeeshan Ali to 18 months. Goddard waived her lifelong anonymity, saying: “I didn’t do anything wrong.” Daily Dazzling Dawn learned that Goddard had repeatedly reported the case to police over five years before prosecution. She has said officers described her as streetwise, downgraded her missing-person reports and failed to treat her as a child in danger. Her case now sits at the centre of two unresolved questions: how many officers failed vulnerable girls, and what accountability remains when the perpetrators have been convicted but the institutions that enabled them remain largely unreformed. Should the officers who returned a known child sexual exploitation victim to her abusers face misconduct proceedings, or does the 2019 prosecution of nine men close the accountability question? Follow Daily Dazzling Dawn for verified news updates and in-depth analysis. #DailyDazzlingDawn #FionaGoddard #GroomingGangs #Bradford #ChildProtection
157
1,085
70
2,225
42,342
#ReclaimTheNightNottingham Police had to escort us through the city. The streets of Nottingham are not safe for women in 2026 The words "female-only" are met with violence, intimidation and harassment But we stayed strong and finished our march Power to the women ♀️💜💚🤍
61
296
44
1,118
41,511
Completed the @britishlibrary survey only to find this. Anti-science, anti-viewpoint diversity, frankly cowardly: 1/
Just completed a very strange and confused survey by @britishlibrary intended to inform its future strategy. Seems to be chiefly aimed at justifying selling off reading rooms. I'd urge everyone to complete it (open until 17 Nov): tinyurl.com/3v89mb3s
2
12
2
57
2,207
Dee Sullivan retweeted
Stonewall actually documented how they have trained organizations in the UK to illegally attack the free speech of dissenters--specifically women--of trans ideology.
1
1
4
201
Dee Sullivan retweeted
Woman of the Day and one of the most celebrated war correspondents of her day Martha Gellhorn, born in OTD in 1908 in St Louis, was nearly a Not-The-WOTD. She persuaded public sector workers to break windows to make a point — well, I am a taxpayer after all — but it was a just cause AND she was the only woman to land at Normandy on D-Day. Martha’s suffragist mother took her eight year old daughter to a rally in St Louis in 1916 where 7,000 women in yellow sashes lined the delegates’ route to the Democratic Party’s National Convention. The number of states in favour of votes for women were represented by those wearing white and the rest by those in grey and black. Martha represented the future woman voter. Guess how many were dressed in white? Seven. She went to France in 1930 to work at the United Press Bureau in Paris as a foreign correspondent but was fired after reporting sexual harassment. I’d say that thankfully after nearly a century later, this kind of thing doesn’t happen any more but you’d know I was being sarky. I could tell you how in 1936 in Key West, Martha met a heavy-drinking womanising author and journalist with a couple of divorces behind him and they travelled to Barcelona to report on the Spanish Civil War, but even though she married him in 1940, his only value is that during this period, she found her niche: war correspondent. “I followed the war wherever I could reach it.” I could also tell you how Martha reported on the rise of the Nazis and how, lacking the official press credentials needed to witness the Normandy landings, she impersonated a stretcher bearer, hid in a hospital ship bathroom till it reached Omaha Beach on 6 June 1944, and waded ashore to collect casualties and assist medical teams. “Everyone was violently busy on that crowded, dangerous shore…We walked with the utmost care between the narrowly placed white tape lines that marked the mine-cleared path, and headed for a tent marked with a red cross…Everyone agreed that the beach was a stinker, and that it would be a great pleasure to get the hell out of here sometime.” But this is about Martha becoming a Federal Emergency Relief Administration investigator in 1934, travelling around the USA to file eyewitness reports about the grim conditions in which people were living. She found a corrupt contractor exploiting relief workers (jobless small farmers and ranchers) on a FERA project in Coeur d’Alene, Idaho. He had them shovelling dirt pointlessly from one place to another, then collected the shovels, threw them in the lake, and pocketed a commission on an order for replacements. The workers were left idle and unpaid and had to submit to a humiliating means test for direct relief.⁠ It wasn’t the first such instance. Martha was ready to resign in protest but what she didn’t know was that her boss at FERA had been sending her eyewitness reports painstakingly documenting abuses to Eleanor Roosevelt. He urged her to go and speak to the First Lady. This deeply impressive woman invited her to dinner at the White House, told her husband to listen up, and persuaded Martha to keep going. I confess that every time I learn something new about Eleanor Roosevelt and the many, many ways she found to support other women, it just reinforces my deep respect for her. Martha went back to Idaho, bought the men a beer and persuaded a few to break the windows of the local FERA office at night so that Washington would investigate their grievances. The FBI saw the damage as a possible communist uprising and questioned the men, who admitted that she had suggested it. The contractor was arrested for fraud, the men got their tools and work back, but Martha was branded a “dangerous Communist”, recalled to Washington and fired from FERA. She shrugged it off as “an honourable discharge”. When Eleanor Roosevelt learned that Martha had been fired and the FBI were so hostile towards her, she invited her to come and live at the White House till she found her feet. Martha helped Eleanor with her correspondence and the “My Day” column. Martha was one of the first journalists to report from Dachau when it was liberated by American troops in April 1945 and she covered the liberation of Paris, but that was the year her husband tried to block her career. He wanted a stay-at-home wife. She didn’t want to stay at home. After he refused to help her secure a press pass to return to the USA from Germany by plane in 1945, she was left with no choice but to board a ship laden with explosives. It was the last straw. Ask not for whom the bell tolls. It tolled for him. She divorced him that year. After WW2, she covered every major theatre of war for over fifty years: Vietnam, the Arab/Israeli conflict, the American invasion of Panama. The only reason she didn’t report on the Balkan conflict in the 1980s is because she was nearly blind by then. She died in London at the age of 89. To the end, Martha refused to be remembered merely as some bloke’s wife. “I was a writer before I met him, and I have been a writer for 45 years since. Why should I be a footnote to someone else’s life?”
18
58
4
133
2,494
Dee Sullivan retweeted
Imagine being in your first week of social work training and being told that some of your fellow students might be there to gain access to vulnerable children. Shocking, right? But this social worker’s point applies anywhere adults work with children. Some people will seek out those roles for the wrong reasons. And the person whose behaviour you need to question might be the nicest person you know. She also makes an important point about why safeguarding starts with having a clear sense of what’s normal and what isn’t. Once that boundary starts to blur, it’s easier for someone to cross it without being challenged. I wish I’d seen this video years ago. I can think of times when something felt off and I kept quiet because I worried I might be wrong or cause offence. Thanks @JournalistJill for highlighting it.
73
558
45
1,737
63,167