Pinned Tweet
1/7 â¨We think of war in terms of space: terrain, borders, positions.
Robert R. Leonhard argues the decisive dimension is actually time.
In Fighting by Minutes, he breaks time in war into four parts. A thread đ§ľ
Notes by Dehran retweeted
My 2025 in books, via @goodreads.
How is your 2026 Reading Challenge going on ?
2025 in books, via Goodreads đ
From doctrine and drones to systems thinking and persuasion: 15 Books.đ
Advanced Land Warfare, Maneuver Warfare Handbook, War Transformed, Swarm Troopers, The Weapon Wizards, Praxis Tacticum, Be Water, My Friend, Thinking in Systems, Surrounded by Idiots, Why Is Sex Fun?, Khajuraho- Temples of love, The Coming Wave, Talk Like TED & Creative Thinking, Civil Military Fusion.
Attaching my Goodreads âYear in Booksâ shelf screenshot for the record.â
Notes by Dehran retweeted
Leonhard's four temporal aspects, plus the lessons added on training, readiness, the cognitive minute and the electromagnetic fight.
Save it for later.
Credit for value additions -
@KTB_500 @TrentTelenko @Telos_of_War @TimOnPoint @alcal74
Notes by Dehran retweeted
Closing the loop;
Summary of all the important points from comments and reposts.
Save it for later đ
Leonhard's four temporal aspects, plus the lessons added on training, readiness, the cognitive minute and the electromagnetic fight.
Save it for later.
Credit for value additions -
@KTB_500 @TrentTelenko @Telos_of_War @TimOnPoint @alcal74
Notes by Dehran retweeted
Didn't expect this to take off.
Thanks to everyone sharing it.
Which of the four aspects do you think matters most: duration, frequency, sequence or opportunity?
Drop your pick below.
Next thread is coming soon.
Notes by Dehran retweeted
7/7â¨The lesson: manage all four together.
Good sequencing and high tempo create opportunities.
Seizing opportunities shapes how long the war lasts.
Space is where war happens. Time is how it's won.
Notes by Dehran retweeted
6/7
â¨4ď¸âŁ Opportunity: windows that close.
Moments of real enemy vulnerability are brief and unpredictable.
You can't schedule them.
You can only be organised to spot them and strike before they shut.
Notes by Dehran retweeted
5/7 â¨
3ď¸âŁ Sequence: what comes first.
Order of events matter.
The general that masterâs sequential perception understands first, second, third and fourth order consequences of his actions has advantage over his opponent because he has reasoned the most probable sequence of events.
Notes by Dehran retweeted
4/7â¨
2ď¸âŁ Frequency: how often you act.
This is tempo.
If you act faster and more often than your opponent, they spend the war reacting instead of acting.
Notes by Dehran retweeted
3/7
1ď¸âŁ Duration: how long the war lasts.
Short wars reward speed and readiness.
Long wars reward depth, resources and endurance.
A smart side tries to stretch or compress the war to fit its strengths.
Notes by Dehran retweeted
2/7
â¨Why time?
Lost ground can be retaken.
Lost troops can be replaced.
A lost hour is gone for good, for both sides. Time is the one resource in war you can never recover.
Notes by Dehran retweeted
1/7 â¨We think of war in terms of space: terrain, borders, positions.
Robert R. Leonhard argues the decisive dimension is actually time.
In Fighting by Minutes, he breaks time in war into four parts. A thread đ§ľ
Notes by Dehran retweeted
As I said yesterday, the post below is my favorite sort of post on X. Iâm going to apply it to my own domain of study.
Time is the one resource in war that cannot be recovered. Lost ground can be retaken and lost resources replaced; a lost hour is gone for both sides forever. Duration, frequency, sequence, and opportunity must be managed together â space is only where the fight happens, time is how it is won. Time is the primary constraint.
Yet not every minute carries the same weight. The decisive resource is what I call the cognitive minute: the finite human attention that still sets usable tempo, sequence, and the recognition of fleeting opportunity. When that attention is spent on repetitive coordination, routine state-keeping, or manually sequencing already-understood actions, the force is consuming its cognitive priority on menial continuity. Opportunities close and the tempo of the fight slows to the rate of human attention.
Automation does not solve this challenge. In many cases it creates additional cognitive debt for the commander and operator â now they are coordinating at a distance while trying to keep up with the speed of electronic process. It is an impossible ask.
But this is also why AI and autonomy have become the central practical solution â computational challenges require computational solutions. They are the tools available for moving continuity of already-authorized action off continuous human presence, so that the cognitive minute is no longer spent on menial coordination. The objective is not more autonomous platforms for their own sake. It is to keep the larger operational process coherent without requiring humans to maintain every transition. Only then does additional speed free, rather than further consume, the human attention that time itself requires.
That effort requires care. If autonomy is applied by making every endpoint more capable while leaving the work of keeping the larger operation coherent with people, the volume of menial coordination simply increases. Cognitive priority is preserved only when routine continuity is removed from the human domain while authorship of intent, constraints, and the decision to change the plan remains there. Without that boundary, the current focus on AI and autonomy risks accelerating the consumption of the resource it is supposed to protect.
Notes by Dehran retweeted
3/5 Leading Forward Means Trusting the Staff
Jack Watling in âThe Arms of the Futureâ shows how Israeli brigade/divisional commanders push forward while chiefs of staff run HQsâleadership at the front, management in depth, all as one support system for the force.
#FutureWar #LandWarfare #Leadership
Notes by Dehran retweeted
Bonus Insight : On the decisive value of a good general staff
Scharnhorstâs view that âwithout a well-organized general staff no army can be well led. A poorly organized and slightly trained army with a good general staff will accomplish more than a good army with a poor general staffâ directly echoes the idea that the staff system, not the individual commander, is the true lever of effectiveness.
Notes by Dehran retweeted
5/5 Staff Size Can Kill Decision-Making
In âAdvanced Landwarfareâ, Jim Storr notes how modern HQs have ballooned in rank and numbers, slowing decisions and filtering reality from the commander.
Smaller, faster, better-trained staffs beat bloated hierarchies.
#CommandAndControl #MilitaryReform #WarStudies
Notes by Dehran retweeted
4/5 Distributed Mission Command > Single Hero HQ
John F. Antal in âNext War â Reimagining How We Fightâ describes mesh command posts and distributed mission command: small, networked nodes that keep command alive even when one node diesâstaff as a resilient, battlefield-wide system.
#MissionCommand #FutureWar #MDO
Notes by Dehran retweeted
2/5 Command vs Control Isnât Semantics
B.A. Friedman in âOn Operations: Operational Art and Military Disciplinesâ draws a sharp line: command is what the commander does; control is what the staff doesâmaking staff design and training a strategic choice, not admin trivia.
#OperationalArt #StaffWork #MilitaryStrategy
Notes by Dehran retweeted
1/5 Commanders Donât Win Wars. Staffs Do.
John A. Warden III in The Air Campaign: Planning for Combat argues that the true âcenter of gravityâ in modern war is the staff system that keeps operations on track, not the lone genius commander.
#MilitaryLeadership #CommandAndControl #FutureWar
My 2025 in books, via @goodreads.
How is your 2026 Reading Challenge going on ?
2025 in books, via Goodreads đ
From doctrine and drones to systems thinking and persuasion: 15 Books.đ
Advanced Land Warfare, Maneuver Warfare Handbook, War Transformed, Swarm Troopers, The Weapon Wizards, Praxis Tacticum, Be Water, My Friend, Thinking in Systems, Surrounded by Idiots, Why Is Sex Fun?, Khajuraho- Temples of love, The Coming Wave, Talk Like TED & Creative Thinking, Civil Military Fusion.
Attaching my Goodreads âYear in Booksâ shelf screenshot for the record.â
Notes by Dehran retweeted
Read more old books.
Most books go out of print in a few years, while some survive decades, and a few even centuries.
They last because theyâre timeless, not trendy.
Those who understood us centuries ago still have valuable lessons to teach us.





















