Scholar | Leadership Coach | Strategy, history & geopolitics. I read heavy books so you don't have to. 🔑Access to only high-quality thinkers.

Manila City
Joined July 2025
1/7 
We think of war in terms of space: terrain, borders, positions. Robert R. Leonhard argues the decisive dimension is actually time. In Fighting by Minutes, he breaks time in war into four parts. A thread 🧵
3
8
6
17
6,397
Notes by Dehran retweeted
My 2025 in books, via @goodreads. How is your 2026 Reading Challenge going on ?
2025 in books, via Goodreads 📚 From doctrine and drones to systems thinking and persuasion: 15 Books.👇 Advanced Land Warfare, Maneuver Warfare Handbook, War Transformed, Swarm Troopers, The Weapon Wizards, Praxis Tacticum, Be Water, My Friend, Thinking in Systems, Surrounded by Idiots, Why Is Sex Fun?, Khajuraho- Temples of love, The Coming Wave, Talk Like TED & Creative Thinking, Civil Military Fusion. Attaching my Goodreads ‘Year in Books’ shelf screenshot for the record.”
1
4
110
Notes by Dehran retweeted
Leonhard's four temporal aspects, plus the lessons added on training, readiness, the cognitive minute and the electromagnetic fight. Save it for later. Credit for value additions - @KTB_500 @TrentTelenko @Telos_of_War @TimOnPoint @alcal74
3
2
2
6
1,330
Notes by Dehran retweeted
Closing the loop; Summary of all the important points from comments and reposts. Save it for later 👇
Leonhard's four temporal aspects, plus the lessons added on training, readiness, the cognitive minute and the electromagnetic fight. Save it for later. Credit for value additions - @KTB_500 @TrentTelenko @Telos_of_War @TimOnPoint @alcal74
1
1
55
Notes by Dehran retweeted
Didn't expect this to take off. Thanks to everyone sharing it. Which of the four aspects do you think matters most: duration, frequency, sequence or opportunity? Drop your pick below. Next thread is coming soon.
1/7 
We think of war in terms of space: terrain, borders, positions. Robert R. Leonhard argues the decisive dimension is actually time. In Fighting by Minutes, he breaks time in war into four parts. A thread 🧵
2
2
6
208
Notes by Dehran retweeted
7/7
The lesson: manage all four together. Good sequencing and high tempo create opportunities. Seizing opportunities shapes how long the war lasts. Space is where war happens. Time is how it's won.
1
1
4
210
Notes by Dehran retweeted
6/7 
4️⃣ Opportunity: windows that close. Moments of real enemy vulnerability are brief and unpredictable. You can't schedule them. You can only be organised to spot them and strike before they shut.
2
1
5
241
Notes by Dehran retweeted
5/7 
 3️⃣ Sequence: what comes first. Order of events matter. The general that master’s sequential perception understands first, second, third and fourth order consequences of his actions has advantage over his opponent because he has reasoned the most probable sequence of events.
1
1
5
209
Notes by Dehran retweeted
4/7
 2️⃣ Frequency: how often you act. This is tempo. If you act faster and more often than your opponent, they spend the war reacting instead of acting.
1
1
5
255
Notes by Dehran retweeted
3/7 1️⃣ Duration: how long the war lasts. Short wars reward speed and readiness. Long wars reward depth, resources and endurance. A smart side tries to stretch or compress the war to fit its strengths.
1
1
4
273
Notes by Dehran retweeted
2/7 
Why time? Lost ground can be retaken. Lost troops can be replaced. A lost hour is gone for good, for both sides. Time is the one resource in war you can never recover.
1
1
5
355
Notes by Dehran retweeted
1/7 
We think of war in terms of space: terrain, borders, positions. Robert R. Leonhard argues the decisive dimension is actually time. In Fighting by Minutes, he breaks time in war into four parts. A thread 🧵
3
8
6
17
6,397
True that, speed only helps if it frees human attention instead of using it up.
2
34
Replying to @TimOnPoint
Thanks for the best takeaway - Automation alone adds cognitive debt. Autonomy that keeps the whole operation coherent gives the commander back the minutes that matter most.
1
2
33
Notes by Dehran retweeted
As I said yesterday, the post below is my favorite sort of post on X. I’m going to apply it to my own domain of study. Time is the one resource in war that cannot be recovered. Lost ground can be retaken and lost resources replaced; a lost hour is gone for both sides forever. Duration, frequency, sequence, and opportunity must be managed together – space is only where the fight happens, time is how it is won. Time is the primary constraint. Yet not every minute carries the same weight. The decisive resource is what I call the cognitive minute: the finite human attention that still sets usable tempo, sequence, and the recognition of fleeting opportunity. When that attention is spent on repetitive coordination, routine state-keeping, or manually sequencing already-understood actions, the force is consuming its cognitive priority on menial continuity. Opportunities close and the tempo of the fight slows to the rate of human attention. Automation does not solve this challenge. In many cases it creates additional cognitive debt for the commander and operator – now they are coordinating at a distance while trying to keep up with the speed of electronic process. It is an impossible ask. But this is also why AI and autonomy have become the central practical solution – computational challenges require computational solutions. They are the tools available for moving continuity of already-authorized action off continuous human presence, so that the cognitive minute is no longer spent on menial coordination. The objective is not more autonomous platforms for their own sake. It is to keep the larger operational process coherent without requiring humans to maintain every transition. Only then does additional speed free, rather than further consume, the human attention that time itself requires. That effort requires care. If autonomy is applied by making every endpoint more capable while leaving the work of keeping the larger operation coherent with people, the volume of menial coordination simply increases. Cognitive priority is preserved only when routine continuity is removed from the human domain while authorship of intent, constraints, and the decision to change the plan remains there. Without that boundary, the current focus on AI and autonomy risks accelerating the consumption of the resource it is supposed to protect.
1/7 
We think of war in terms of space: terrain, borders, positions. Robert R. Leonhard argues the decisive dimension is actually time. In Fighting by Minutes, he breaks time in war into four parts. A thread 🧵
4
2
1
20
1,020
Replying to @KTB_500
Mindset is Everything.
1
11
Notes by Dehran retweeted
3/5 Leading Forward Means Trusting the Staff Jack Watling in “The Arms of the Future” shows how Israeli brigade/divisional commanders push forward while chiefs of staff run HQs—leadership at the front, management in depth, all as one support system for the force. #FutureWar #LandWarfare #Leadership
1
2
3
164
Notes by Dehran retweeted
Bonus Insight : On the decisive value of a good general staff Scharnhorst’s view that “without a well-organized general staff no army can be well led. A poorly organized and slightly trained army with a good general staff will accomplish more than a good army with a poor general staff” directly echoes the idea that the staff system, not the individual commander, is the true lever of effectiveness.
1
1
62
Notes by Dehran retweeted
5/5 Staff Size Can Kill Decision-Making In “Advanced Landwarfare”, Jim Storr notes how modern HQs have ballooned in rank and numbers, slowing decisions and filtering reality from the commander. Smaller, faster, better-trained staffs beat bloated hierarchies. #CommandAndControl #MilitaryReform #WarStudies
1
1
112