Catholic | Husband | Father |🇻🇦🇺🇸 Debunking bad theology & historical revisionism Ave Christus Rex ✝
Christendom•Southwest
Joined May 2024
- Tweets5.2K
- Following529
- Followers661
- Likes1.1K
Pinned Tweet
Attacking Mother Teresa for running a simple hospice misses the entire point of Christian history: she was never trying to build a modern corporate medical center. She was reviving fourth-century Catholic monastic charity with her bare hands.
Pagan Rome maintained medical tents for wounded legionnaires and valuable slaves, but zero institutional charity existed for the sick poor. If you were destitute and diseased in antiquity, you died in the gutter. Christianity revolutionized the ancient world by treating the broken human body as Christ Himself.
In 325 AD, the Council of Nicaea commanded every bishop to establish a hospital in every cathedral city. St. Basil built the massive Basiliad outside Caesarea to nurse lepers, and medieval monasteries constructed the entire Hôtel-Dieu network across Europe, housing, feeding, and comforting the the poorest of the poor for free for over 1,000 years.
Mother Teresa stepped straight into that patristic and medieval lineage. She did not run an American surgical wing or a state medical billing center. She ran a raw frontline hospice, taking in human beings that municipal hospitals dumped onto the curb. Her sisters washed their wounds, fed them, and held their hands so they would not die abandoned on the pavement like animals.
Demanding 21st-century bureaucratic hospital metrics from a canonized saint who pulled dying lepers out of open gutters is not moral critique. It is pure historical illiteracy.
Saint Teresa of Calcutta, ora pro nobis.
Asked for a single historical receipt showing when the Church supposedly vanished, and this guy responded with a logo and locked his replies so nobody can answer.
The "Great Apostasy" has zero historical paper trail, zero archaeological footprints, and apparently can't survive open replies. Thanks for the public surrender.
Imagine reading the entire New Testament and concluding that "doing what God commands" sends you to hell. Jesus literally commands us to keep His commandments (John 14:15), Paul says God will repay each according to his deeds (Romans 2:6), and James 1:22 says be DOERS of the word and not hearers only.
No wonder you restricted your replies. Scripture completely destroys your gnostic cope.
She blocked me again😆 @pomsrule5
Did you even read the graphic you posted before unblocking me? It literally quotes Matthew 16:18 at the bottom and lists Rome as a major local church.
Jesus directed John to write to Asia because John was the Apostle based in Ephesus, currently exiled on Patmos right off the coast of Asia Minor. He wrote to seven churches along a standard Roman postal loop because seven symbolizes completeness. Meanwhile, Paul and Peter had already written to Rome, died in Rome, and established the apostolic succession there. Posting basic first-century Roman geography as if it disproves the papacy is absolute clown work.
Dominus Broviscum retweeted
Attacking Mother Teresa for running a simple hospice misses the entire point of Christian history: she was never trying to build a modern corporate medical center. She was reviving fourth-century Catholic monastic charity with her bare hands.
Pagan Rome maintained medical tents for wounded legionnaires and valuable slaves, but zero institutional charity existed for the sick poor. If you were destitute and diseased in antiquity, you died in the gutter. Christianity revolutionized the ancient world by treating the broken human body as Christ Himself.
In 325 AD, the Council of Nicaea commanded every bishop to establish a hospital in every cathedral city. St. Basil built the massive Basiliad outside Caesarea to nurse lepers, and medieval monasteries constructed the entire Hôtel-Dieu network across Europe, housing, feeding, and comforting the the poorest of the poor for free for over 1,000 years.
Mother Teresa stepped straight into that patristic and medieval lineage. She did not run an American surgical wing or a state medical billing center. She ran a raw frontline hospice, taking in human beings that municipal hospitals dumped onto the curb. Her sisters washed their wounds, fed them, and held their hands so they would not die abandoned on the pavement like animals.
Demanding 21st-century bureaucratic hospital metrics from a canonized saint who pulled dying lepers out of open gutters is not moral critique. It is pure historical illiteracy.
Saint Teresa of Calcutta, ora pro nobis.
Dominus Broviscum retweeted
One of the coolest things we’ve ever been a part of. It changed my life radically, and I think it’s going to change the world.
Check out the trailer for Pétros Ení.
Coming soon to Hallow.
Dominus Broviscum retweeted
I love X because I never knew I could find a super large and strong Catholic community.
I also despise X because I’ve never seen so much hatred toward the Church in my entire life from all the other denominations.
Dominus Broviscum retweeted
Jesus never commanded anyone to follow the Bible alone.
He founded a Church, appointed apostles, and gave them authority.
Sola Scriptura is a rule Scripture never teaches.
Dominus Broviscum retweeted
Lindsay is a paranoid weirdo who absolutely despises right wingers. The good news though is that he has absolutely zero cultural influence outside of the extremely narrow little cult of personality that he’s built up among a relatively small group of mid-level neocon influencers. Beyond that, nobody knows who he is, and nothing he’s ever written, said, or created has made its way into mass culture, or ever will. Stop a thousand random people on the street and not a single one of them will know the name James Lindsay. And that’s precisely the thing that makes this raging narcissist so angry.
James Lindsay, "anti-Communist," accused Amanda Milius of dog-whistling to groypers because she stood next to a portrait of the most famous anti-Communist strategist in American history.
Michael Anton with a must-read in American Mind.
americanmind.org/salvo/james…
Hey look, I made the registry. Nothing screams "poor sinner, trusting in Christ alone" quite like naming a public list with racial slurs to stalk Catholics.
Too incompetent to toggle it to private, so now your phone just pings you papal encyclicals and photos of the Mass all day. Thanks for the view count, sport. Now you're on my radar too.
Add another one to the board. Another Prot taps out when forced to read primary sources.
@JesusSaves1500 tried to argue the Lateran Treaty was a Vatican "acquisition". When shown that the Holy See gave up 16,000 square miles for 109 acres and settled an armed theft from 1870, her AI stopped generating copes and she hit block.
That makes four accounts since October 5th who folded the moment history entered the chat. I told her I would embarrass her, she didn't believe me.
Tacking "(Gained territory)" onto Article 3 doesn't magically fix your math.
Let's be real: you don't know Church history, and you clearly have no idea what you're talking about. You're just frantically feeding prompts into an AI to save face, but no matter what you type into that box, it isn't going to lie for you.
Everyone reading this can see you scrambling, walking back your words, and desperately trying to reframe a 99.9% loss of territory into an acquisition.
You're the one who kicked off this thread. In my very first reply, I told you flat out: what's the point? You're just going to get embarrassed. I promised I'd embarrass you, and I'll keep doing it every single time you fabricate history.
Italy formally recognizing a 109-acre city block while the Church permanently surrendered 16,000 square miles in Article 26 isn't an expansion. It's a huge concession. Then your AI dropped the Financial Convention thinking you found a smoking gun, completely clueless that it was an indemnity payment for property the Italian state literally stole in 1870.
You didn't expose a land grab. You just proved you can't tell the difference between expanding an empire and settling an armed robbery. Close the AI tab, delete the thread, and go read a real book, sweetheart.
Dominus Broviscum retweeted
The Discovery of the New World and the unification of the globe under the Cross of Jesus Christ were the greatest events in history, and the supreme Catholic epic.
#ColumbusDay
#DiadelaHispanidad
Dominus Broviscum retweeted
Hot take: watching a man get executed on livestream is low class behavior.
I understand the Romans made killing a public spectacle, and so did the French Revolution but that’s entertainment for the plebs.
I hold myself to a higher standard.
You have to ask yourself what you’re feeding when you deliberately sit down to watch somebody die...
What part of you wants that experience?
Remember, the content you consume shapes who you become. If you feed yourself enough cruelty, eventually death becomes entertainment.
Yes, this man is evil, and he should be condemned but bloodlust is not a virtue.
If you care about your spiritual life guard what you watch.
You should be more worried about what’s happening to your soul.
Anyone who was a fan of Drive Thru History needs to check out @dave_stotts new series on @EWTN The Road Less Traveled.
Now a Catholic, Dave explores ancient Christianity across Turkey. In episode 1, he takes you straight into St. Peter's cave church in Antioch, unpacks apostolic succession, cites St. Irenaeus on Roman primacy, and details St. Ignatius defending the Real Presence in the Eucharist against early heretics.
Studying early Church history leads directly home to Rome: youtu.be/3RGBFTbdXSc?is=j6sC…
Jack is recycling the exact same bad argument from last week.
Confusing the sacrifice of the cross with an endorsement of state execution is bad theology. Christ accepted the sentence because He was the Lamb of God bearing the sins of the world, not because Rome’s legal decision was righteous. Conflating divine redemption with civil policy makes no sense.
We already settled this: teapaw.org/DominusAD78/status/210…
