The Quality of Money A must read by every Bitcoiner. When economically illiterate dev syndromers like @murchandamus indicate "what is spam?", or when @peterktodd signals that 'more than 21 million Bitcoin is a good thing, despite reeing from Maxi's', and he's not ostracised from Bitcoin conferences forever more etc... ... Even without any code actually changing (clearly for the worse re: v30), they can still negatively impact the quality of Bitcoin as money... All the insane amount of🚩's from bCore send a very clear signal as well, and anyone denying this is fact is utterly delusional. Pro tip: it's a counterfactual claim (all else being equal), not an empirical one. How much of a negative impact, up for debate, but it is still negative. In the very same way that: ... HT: @mises (Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, mises.org/quarterly-journal-…)