PLEASE HELP IDENTIFY WOMEN ABUSER ON TFL
This man physically beat and put a young women in the hospital with bleeding injuries on the Jubilee Line between London bridge and Southwark station on 1st November 2026 at 6:10 PM
He name is Tyler, please help identify for police to find
M retweeted
.@British_Airways ABSOLUTELY disgusted. Boarded my flight from MIA to LHR and my seat for my 8 hour flight is urine-soaked. you could smell it before you even got to my seat and the staff said there is nothing they can do, not even any extra blankets, only a tiny hand sanitiser
M retweeted
I must know 79 people here on this platform who can sign and share this today and get us to the first milestone of 10,000 signatures!! "Women should not have to see the words woman, girl, mother, and pregnant woman disappear or become secondary." #XX
petition.parliament.uk/petit…
Mad how Axel Rudakubana's genocidal ancestry has no bearing on his Welsh Choirboyness, even though his parents moved here right before his birth, but I'm completely responsible for Transatlantic slavery 500 years ago.
M retweeted
A wander in London yesterday. Stood in the third world looking towards the developed world. I took my brother, his wife and their two teenage sons on a lovely tour of London. They live in a beautiful house, in a beautiful village in the countryside in England. I thought it would be interesting to take them for a walk along the whole length of Whitechapel Road. They were shocked. Sure, they knew it wouldn’t be an English location, but they were shocked that it is only Muslim. Most women wore full burqas. There are almost zero white people and zero people who aren’t Muslim and very committed Muslims at that. There is zero diversity. There is full diversity in the way the Labour Party mean it though: the eradication of white people. Whitechapel has always been a melting pot of different cultures, but now it is only Muslim. No other culture exists there. I took my brother and his family to many beautiful places across London, but I did think it was necessary to take them here. I think everyone from England should walk this street and realise what is coming to their towns and villages very soon as the Muslim Home Secretary works as hard and fast as possible to import millions more Muslims who hate us and our way of life. Anyway, it was a lovely sunny day and we saw lots of wonderful places that white British people created.
M retweeted
Imagine being THIS stupid. Federal agents are trying to apprehend a pedophile, and this clown thinks his job is to physically block them. Congratulations, genius. You’re not a hero, you’re an obstacle to law enforcement. 🤡
M retweeted
It’s nice to know that no matter which side of the political spectrum you’re on, we’ve all managed to come together in our shared hatred for Alastair Campbell.
Perhaps it could be a new British value?
Why Alastair Campbell has any sort of platform in this country after Iraq is a damning indictment on us as a nation.
British troops dead. Hundreds of thousands killed. And yet some people still want to listen to him.
Campbell and Blair were the worst thing to happen to Britain in half a century.
M retweeted
After the deadly train crash in Spain, people of all ages and sizes rushed to hospitals to donate blood. But Spaniards have noticed one group is missing.
Migrants make up 20% of the population, yet they’re nowhere to be seen.
So much for solidarity.
M retweeted
We had a black President for 8 years and not a single redneck, Republican or white supremacist took a shot at him.
The Left has a very different view of what the word tolerance means.
M retweeted
This apology from disability charity Scope, for cancelling my choir’s London Marathon performance because of my gender-critical views, is required to stay on its website for seven days.
Today is Day 6.
Women don’t always get the apologies they deserve. So I’d be grateful if you could help make sure this one is seen by sharing it over the next 24 hours (link below). 🙏
Thanks again to @SpeechUnion for supporting my legal case and helping secure this apology.
🚨London 2026. Full burqa driving the 88 bus to Parliament Hill Fields.
She can barely see the road.
She can barely be identified in an emergency. And she has a double-decker full of strangers whose lives depend on her reaction time.
Passengers don’t get a vote on whether they want a faceless driver. They just have to hope nothing goes wrong.
If your religious practice requires completely covering your face and restricting your vision, you are free to do that in your private life.
You are not free to do it while operating a public vehicle that weighs several tons and carries dozens of people.
This is not “diversity.” This is a safety failure dressed up as tolerance.
And everyone on that bus is paying for it.
M retweeted
I’ve had some criticism for publishing this man’s picture. As I’ve had with similar stories.
Apparently, reporting on someone’s publicly stated views and activities is now considered ‘outing’ them.
But these men have already ‘outed’ themselves.
They’ve published their own names, photographs and details of their activities online. For anyone to see.
And when information about their profession or place of work is also publicly available, it hardly takes a detective to join the dots.
I haven’t gone digging into their private lives or uncovered some great secret. I’ve reported information they’ve chosen to make public.
But here’s the more important point. These are stories of legitimate public interest.
In this case, a man publicly announced plans to organise a group to turn up at a parkrun event to give people he calls ‘transphobes’ a fright.
In other words, to give women campaigning for fairness in female sport a fright.
I recognise he may not be aware that many of these women have already experienced abuse, threats and intimidation. But that doesn’t make his plans any less newsworthy.
I also understand this man is employed as a science teacher. Which, if correct, raises further questions about his judgement.
As a journalist, my job is to report the facts accurately and give people the opportunity to respond. He was offered the chance to comment. He didn’t take it.
Suggesting that legitimate public-interest reporting is somehow unethical is just another way of trying to silence journalists.
Are we supposed to anonymise people who have already publicly identified themselves to protect their ‘feelings’? Or simply not report the story?
This is how you create a chilling effect on journalism.
And that should concern anyone who believes in a free press.
The purpose of journalism isn’t to protect people from scrutiny. It’s to report matters of public interest - even when the people involved would rather we didn’t.
That’s how a free press works.
Read story below 👇






























