CEO, CirroLytix | AI & Data Science Leader | Responsible AI, Policy & Social Impact

Philippines
Joined July 2010
You can fact-check a lie. But can you stop the machinery making it go viral? Disinformation is amplified by algorithms, coordinated networks, and paid influence operations. So regulate the reach and not the truth.
1
6
Our paper with @docligot and fellow co-authors, “Governing Reach, Not Truth,” is included in UP CIDS’ Philippine Strategic Outlook 2030. We make the case for tackling manipulation without policing speech. Read p. 144: cids.up.edu.ph/up-monograph/… #Disinformation #DigitalGovernance
1
2
41
The Philippines can have a strong semiconductor industry and still rely on technologies it does not control. The issue is exposure: which chips, tools, or components are hardest to replace if access is cut? Which dependency would hurt us most? #ai #semiconductor #geoeconomics
Agree or disagree? The Philippines has real semiconductor capability but limited control over critical technologies it depends on. The issue isn’t making everything locally. It’s deciding what to build, diversify, or secure through trusted partners. Where’s the line? #ai
9
AI security is bigger than cyberattacks. It includes scams, deepfakes, online abuse and exploitation, misinformation, and AI-enabled threats to critical systems. A single central agency can’t see all of that first. Can those closest to the harm act fast enough before it spreads?
Agree or disagree? AI security shouldn’t sit only with military or law enforcement. The risks cut across platforms, businesses, schools, communities & critical infrastructure. Should the PH centralize AI security or coordinate it through a whole-of-society model?
9
AI-enabled harm is scaling across scams, TFGBV, OSAEC, and radicalization. For the Philippines, the challenge is coordination across platforms, law enforcement, child protection, finance, schools, and security. Can our institutions move as fast as the harm does?
Agree or disagree? High social media use creates a large attack surface, while weak privacy practices give attackers more to exploit. AI makes scams, impersonation & social engineering easier to scale. Where should protection begin: individuals, platforms, or institutions?
1
12
What should Filipinos gain from Pax Silica? Jobs, skills, local suppliers, research, and startups. We must negotiate for those outcomes. A theme in our AI & Geoeconomics roundtable, and the focus of my Aug 24 Monday Circle talk: turning strategic importance into local capability.
1
53
Pax Silica should be judged by what the Philippines keeps and not by the size of the investment announcement. The real test: what local capability, supplier growth, know-how, IP, and bargaining power remain here 5–10 years later? #ai #geoeconomics
Agree or disagree? Pax Silica isn’t just about how much investment comes in, but about what the Philippines gets to own, learn, build, and retain. Jobs matter. But so do patent ownership, tech transfer, and access to higher-value capabilities. What would make the deal equitable?
23
Pax Silica can look like a win on paper and still be a weak deal for the Philippines. We need clear asks on local capability, tech transfer, Filipino suppliers, and risk sharing, backed by technical evidence. What are the 5–10 outcomes we refuse to leave to chance?
Agree or disagree? Pax Silica is still being defined. That means the Philippines still has room to shape the deal & not just accept it. But political will isn’t enough. Without clear objectives and technical evidence, ambition may never become execution. What should come first?
1
30
The Pax Silica debate should no longer be about whether resource demand is large. It should be about whether the Philippines has credible scenarios, thresholds, and safeguards for managing that demand. #PaxSilica #AI #Geoeconomics #AIPolicy #TechPolicy #IndustrialPolicy
Agree or disagree? Pax Silica’s water and power risks matter, but can we assess them seriously without knowing projected demand? Without credible estimates, it’s hard to judge trade-offs, test infrastructure readiness, or know who carries the risk if assumptions are wrong.
34
By the time we fix every semiconductor bottleneck, the higher-value work may already be elsewhere. The smart move is sequencing: build no-regret capabilities now while bigger reforms continue. What semiconductor capabilities become much harder to acquire if we wait another 3 yrs?
Agree or disagree? Should the Philippines move into advanced packaging & photonics before every governance gap is fixed? Waiting lowers execution risk. But waiting too long may mean the investment, talent, and supply-chain window moves elsewhere. Move early or fix first?
13
If major semiconductor investors get incentives, infrastructure, and policy support, the Philippines should be clear about the return. Every major deal should come with a capability plan: Filipino skills, suppliers, technology, and ownership. What should we require in return?
Agree or disagree? More semiconductor investment doesn’t automatically mean more Philippine value. Should we prioritize domestic capability, IP, ownership & enforceable returns, even if that means smaller or slower deals? The real question: what do we actually keep?
25
What if our biggest semiconductor opportunity is hiding in plain sight? Many chip firms already know the Philippines through BPO and shared services. How do we turn that access into deeper capability, investment, and leverage before others do? #ai #semiconductors #geoeconomics
Agree or disagree? The Philippines may already have a semiconductor advantage hiding in plain sight: BPO and shared-services relationships with global chip firms. Can those ties become a bridge into higher-value semiconductor work or are we overestimating the connection?
1
33
The Philippines has decades in semiconductors. But if Malaysia and Vietnam keep moving faster into higher-value segments, history alone won’t protect our leverage. What capability are we building now that makes the Philippines harder to replace? #ai #geoeconomics
Agree or disagree? The Philippines has decades of semiconductor experience. But tenure alone doesn’t guarantee leverage. As Malaysia and Vietnam move into higher-value activities, our bargaining power depends on whether we move up too. Is the window narrowing?
28
Everyone is talking about automation and agentic AI. But many enterprises are still getting the basics of digitization right. There’s no single starting line for AI. The better question: What should we modernize next and what business problem will it actually solve?
1
1
1
46
What if Philippine BPO survives AI, but Filipinos still capture too little of the upside? Foreign investment and jobs matter. So does owning more of the clients, tools, processes, and decisions behind the work. Will we keep delivering, or move up the value chain?
Hard truth: PH BPO may keep the jobs but lose the value. AI is moving the money to IP, platforms, data & client relationships: assets most Filipino BPOs don't own. Foreign capital built this industry. Can it also cap it? Own more? Or stay integrated? #ai #itbpm #bpo
11
Philippine BPO may have an AI coordination problem. Some capabilities are hard to build firm by firm: shared standards, workforce pathways, governance, labor-market intelligence. What should the sector build together before fragmentation becomes a disadvantage? #ai #bpo #itbpm
Agree or disagree? BPO’s AI transition may be too big for firms to solve alone. Should the Philippines treat it as a sector-wide repositioning, with industry associations building shared capabilities, while firms compete on execution? One of 31 statements from our expert panel
1
13
The Philippines built its BPO edge on world-class execution. AI is shifting value upstream. Are we building people and firms clients will trust to redesign the work, or just training them to use the tools that redesign it for them? #ai #bpo #itbpm #futureofwork
Agree or disagree? As AI automates more routine work, BPO value may shift from executing processes to designing, owning & improving them. Should PH BPO move up the value chain from task execution to process design? One of 31 statements from our expert panel. #ai #bpo #itbpm
27