The "but still" part of your comment is the part proponents of FC/S2C/RPM and telepathy count on and never resolve. Reliably controlled testing would, most likely, resolve the "but still." If not, then tests could be set up to resolve questions that arise from the first tests.
Proponents of FC/S2C/RPM and telepathy. If you really want to get our attention, please submit citation information to reliably controlled authorship tests. We're happy to review scientifically rigorous evidence of your claims.
Let's Talk Neurosense: The building blocks of autistic communication (with Katharine Beals) S3E7
neurosense.substack.com/p/th…
Facilitated Communication is Not Science retweeted
“ I have a sense that most, if not all proponents understand on some level what would happen if they participated in such studies. Why else would they so aggressively avoid them?”
Do proponents know what "reliably controlled testing for authorship" means? (Part 2)
facilitatedcommunication.org…
Do proponents know what "reliably controlled testing for authorship" means? (Part 2)
facilitatedcommunication.org…
Proponents want to talk about metaphysical and theological issues before determining who is controlling letter selection via FC/S2C/RPM. There is nothing to debate. Reliably controlled tests to date clearly show facilitator cueing and control over letter selection.
Replying to @FCisnotComm @FCisnotScience
Yeah, that makes sense considering the added layers of metaphysical and theological claims and questions involved compared to the scientific testing of claims through falsifiable methods.
Perhaps w/ the right person/approach, a debate could help inform a wider audience about FC
Facilitated Communication is Not Science retweeted
Most families of people with profound autism wait years for Medicaid waiver services. Learn more: profoundautism.org/about-us/… #ProfoundAutism
Facilitated Communication is Not Science retweeted
It's not a matter of "which voices": All voices should be heard
facilitatedcommunication.org…
Facilitated Communication is Not Science retweeted
Sending this to the principal who nearly fired me, a trainee teacher when NO ONE in their right mind would work there, when I said that learning styles are a myth.
Yet another empirical investigation concludes no validity to VAK learning styles. psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?d…
Facilitated Communication is Not Science retweeted
It's not a matter of "which voices": All voices should be heard
facilitatedcommunication.org…
Facilitated Communication is Not Science retweeted
When evidence, logic, and common sense are all allied against you, all you have left is misrepresentation, straw-man arguments, ad hominem attacks, and false accusations.
And, of course, boatloads of anger and self-deception.
In response to an uptick in misinformation about contributors to our website:
Rather than rely on rumors, may I suggest reading their thoughts about FC/S2C/RPM for yourselves at our website? Here's the link:
facilitatedcommunication.org
Facilitated Communication is Not Science retweeted
It's not a matter of "which voices": All voices should be heard
facilitatedcommunication.org…
In response to an uptick in misinformation about contributors to our website:
Rather than rely on rumors, may I suggest reading their thoughts about FC/S2C/RPM for yourselves at our website? Here's the link:
facilitatedcommunication.org
It's not a matter of "which voices": All voices should be heard
facilitatedcommunication.org…
We've had some comments about the Clever Hans effect and comparing people to horses. Maybe this blog post will help:
facilitatedcommunication.org…
Your willingness to speak publicly about your experiences and about the science behind FC/S2C/RPM (or lack thereof) will pave the way for others to follow. Your perspective is valuable and much appreciated.
Replying to @FCisnotScience
Thought-provoking, thank you for sharing. I will always speak up against pseudoscience regardless of social support. I believe everyone tries their best to strive for science and reality, and speaking up adds valuable public data for making informed decisions.
Thanks for this update. I haven't been able to find any evidence-based studies authored by Powell and she misquotes Bernard Rimland re: ESP as a savant skill.
facilitatedcommunication.org…
I experience this w/speaking out against FC/S2C/RPM as well. People are willing to say "off the record" that these techniques don't work, but are unwilling to take a public stand. They'd rather my colleagues and I take the hits on social media than stand up for what's right.
Jastrow's insights are amazing and insightful. Highly recommended reading.
Yes. Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain...
Replying to @FCisnotScience
And lots of "trust me bro," like Biklen's 90s papers about successful message passing


















