šŸ€

Joined September 2010
Cell phone addiction is an absolute thermonuke to the brain and nobody 'takes it seriously' because it is not clear that there is any solution in a world where the revealed preference of everyone across the globe, regardless of income, race, age, any factor whatsoever, would rather be on their phone than do *anything* else. Deciding "I use this too much" and meaningfully altering one's behaviour doesn't seem to have much success for any of the very small minority of people with the sentience or self-reflection to realize how bad it is. Most people seem to think of it as an unproductive habit at most, rather than an addiction. Any attempt to speak seriously about this is met with derision, accusations of pretentiousness. There is no real solution to it. The future of human cognition fifty years down the line is horrifying if you stop and think about it for even a moment.
236
1,630
220
18,780
1,629,565
Replying to @FCisnotScience
@FCisnotScience @FCisnotComm I came across an interview with FC proponent Joe Infranco promoting his book. In the interview, he said he was open to debating someone from ASHA. I wonder if this offer might be open to any FC critic.
2
104
Genetic potential certainly plays a role in something developing into what it is. Environments will help, hinder, provoke and facilitate change.
1
50
This is a good point of response. Still, we cannot ignore the current landscape of young people continuing to grow up under the influence of tech devices and social media. The answer lies in the development.
Replying to @JDaviesPhD
There is an important point here—but also a false dichotomy. Problematic social-media use can produce or amplify inattention, and clinicians absolutely should ask about it before labeling every distracted young person with ADHD. But demonstrating an environmental contribution does not disprove a neurodevelopmental one. The relationship may also be bidirectional: an attentionally vulnerable brain may be especially attracted to rapid-reward digital environments, while those environments may further impair attention. The real clinical question isn’t ā€œADHD or TikTok?ā€ It is: What is producing this particular person’s inattention—and what is maintaining it? Our diagnostic categories are maps. Biology—and environment—are the territory.
9
Indeed. After I was given an ADHD diagnosis a few years ago, I started to wonder what was really true and what was really to blame. I heard from friends and acquaintances who were diagnosed both before and after me, and I couldn't help but wonder about factors of social contagion
TikTok use causes widespread & often cognitively debilitating inattention, especially young people, & then sells users the idea their inattention actually points to a ā€˜Neurodevelopmental’ disorder that has nothing to do with a childhood corrupted by it’s addictive algorithms.
7
This is creepy as hell. I suppose it's easy for people to write this off as a problem of mental illness because accepting the possibility of such a degree of invasiveness from technology / weaponry is a scary thought indeed.
Don’t be deceived. Don’t fear. Always follow your conscience, which is God within you šŸ™šŸ½
3
22
But how many stories do we not hear wherein who are people prone to anxious & obsessive thinking get caught in a loop after loop as a result of this training which taught them to listen to the many thoughts and impressions that seemed like a good idea?
13
It's interesting coming from a religious background where you are taught to "follow the spirit" (i.e., you are trained to listen for the "still small voice") who will give you spiritual promptings (i.e., thoughts and impressions) about any number of things.
1
13
When your hear those thoughts and have those impressions, the next step is to take heed and follow them. It's not hard to find stories of people "following the spirit," and being protected from harm's way or helping someone in need.
9
It's a weird world we live in where people can go crazy. But what is making people go crazy? Magical thinking? Deception? Infiltration? Denial?
41
I've noticed this in past conversations with a few people. I wonder what underlying philosophical / spiritual beliefs are to blame. Is it a misapprehension of what technology is, of what certain technologies or tools are?
A few notes about The Lord of the Rings that people suddenly seem to be misrepresenting: The One Ring is NOT "just a tool" It was infused with the evil of the being that crafted it The only way to deal with it is to completely destroy it youtu.be/WoIgX-i2hSs?t=460
46
I haven't read the Catcher in the Rye, but this review is telling. Phoniness, disillusionment, resistance to the norms of a decaying society—these are is relatable themes. youtu.be/GF64afzlAQ0?si=irup…
48
This quoted post is unavailable.
15
14
476
17,813
Do not disturb mode is a great way to keep the digital flood waters at bay.
29
The amount of fictional stories being generated by AI at this point has me convinced that certain figures would like the lines between fiction and reality to be obscured. Too many weird ideas are being entertained.
26