Buy the dip 😬 retweeted
Daniel, al segundo 23 le pregunto al ex ministro Velasco:
📌”¿Por qué usted cree que la fiscal Patiño no ha investigado”
📌 Velasco literalmente: “Hay una banda criminal gigantesca, que tiene que tener mucho poder, y que estuvo evidentemente en el gobierno. Eso hay que reconocerlo”.
Es exactamente lo que dijo.
Durante la entrevista por lo menos otras dos veces admite que el saqueo a la UNGRD ocurrió y fue enorme.
Buy the dip 😬 retweeted
María Jimena Duzán escribe hoy una columna en la que olvida mencionar que celebró en el Movistar Arena el triunfo de Petro como presidente en el 2022, como cualquier militante, y eso que ya en SEMANA habíamos publicado los “Petrovideos”. Ella votó por Petro. Luego lo defendió sin decoro alguno y nos atacó a quienes lo denunciamos durante 4 años y lo seguimos denunciando.
Tampoco pone de presente María Jimena en su columna en la que se aplaude, que en representación de Petro y su Gobierno podrido, fue negociadora en la mesa con los terroristas del ELN.
Cositas que no se olvidan. Pero se le abona que haya saltado de ese barco infestado de corrupción, ladrones y criminales de todo tipo, llamado Gobierno Petro.
Buy the dip 😬 retweeted
Replying to @scott_colom
This is why so many Republicans i know and moderates like me voted for you. You seem to actually be a Mississippian, not a DC person. The most hard-core Republican i know (my business partner at our law firm) changed his vote from a wrote in to you because you came to talk to people at the Trump Rally. You treated people who disagreed with you as humans that just should be talked to. Do that in DC for us and you'll stay in tge Senate forever in my book.
Buy the dip 😬 retweeted
Congratulations -- this would be a major result if it holds.
I’ve spent a fair amount of time on this problem myself. A positive resolution essentially means quantum algorithms can be classically simulated in polynomial time on most inputs on big class of problems.
PS. I recently obtained a partial (quasipolynomial-time) result with AI and was polishing the draft; since the problem is now claimed to be solved, I’ll just release the raw AI draft here: paatai.github.io/ai-proofs/a…
Today Physical Superintelligence PBC is announcing a proof of the Aaronson-Ambainis conjecture, one of the central open problems in quantum complexity, with major implications for quantum computing speedup.
psi.inc/research/aaronson-am…
Thread 👇
Buy the dip 😬 retweeted
🇨🇦🇺🇦 "You cannot rain missiles down on Ukrainian cities and then send your youth teams to Alberta to play hockey as if you belong to the civilized world.
No Russian or Belarusian teams at the World Junior Championship. Not under your flag. Not under a neutral flag. Not under any pretense. Period."
Buy the dip 😬 retweeted
Unos hinchas viendo el partido del Fleetwood Town vs Arsenal disfrazados de futbolistas Colombianos de los 90. 😭🇨🇴
Buy the dip 😬 retweeted
“No somos un país que goce de los beneficios de un proceso de paz (…) el Acuerdo de Paz no es un modelo para el mundo”: Mauricio Gaona, embajador de Colombia ante la ONU, en el Consejo de Seguridad de Naciones Unidas que renovó el mandato de la Misión de Verificación del Acuerdo de Paz hasta octubre de 2027.
En esta votación se excluyó la veeduría sobre la implementación de la Reforma Rural Integral de las labores de esa organización.
Buy the dip 😬 retweeted
SALUD DE LOS MAESTROS, EL CONTRATO QUE NINGÚN GOBIERNO QUISO ACABAR: Durante diez años denuncié lo que ocurría en la Fiduprevisora con los contratos del FOMAG. Iba a las licitaciones y siempre ganaban los mismos. Las comisiones para la Fiduprevisora eran asquerosamente altas, mientras los maestros enfermos no recibían sus medicamentos.
Todos lo sabían: Fecode, el Ministerio de Educación y el FOMAG. Pero a nadie le interesaba que ese contrato terminara, porque, aunque era un monopolio, engordaba las cuentas de los mismos de siempre.
Me encontré a la Fiduprevisora en varios contratos jugosos, incluso en el de la UNGRD. No entraré en detalles, pero el poder de la Fiduprevisora es enorme, y denunciarla no fue nada fácil… me costó varias cosas…
Por eso hoy aplaudo la decisión del ministro de Hacienda, @miguel_gomez_m, de acabar con ese saqueo, que incluso ya le ha costado la vida a varios maestros. #Fecode #Fomag #Fidupreprevisora #Saludmaestros
Buy the dip 😬 retweeted
Don @ArgiroCasta888 le compro 10 de esos, me indica precio y número de cuenta por favor.
Buy the dip 😬 retweeted
La propuesta de incrementar impuestos es de @MovSalvacionNal.
NO ES DEL @CeDemocratico .
El futuro de la Patria Milagro no se negocia. La deuda desbordada que heredamos es tan monstruosa que se traga 1 de cada 3 pesos de los ingresos de la nación.
Para salvar las finanzas públicas, generar empleo y reactivar el país, respaldamos la Ley del Rescate Fiscal que es un paquete de medidas valientes que enfrentan los problemas de raíz.
Buy the dip 😬 retweeted
Replying to @AdrianaVeterin
Es que el Presidente me enseñó a ser tigre y no foca 🤷🏻♀️
Buy the dip 😬 retweeted
¿Cómo así que 19% de IVA para la medicina prepagada? Es un servicio de SALUD!! Después del desastre de Petro y Carolina Corcho y el
Zootecnista miles acudieron a la prepagada para asegurar el acceso a la salud y ahora ¿más impuesto? No lo puedo creer. ¿Para cuándo el recorte en el gasto? ¿Eliminar entidades que no sirven para nada? ¿IVA al café? ¿A la avena? ¿A las compras de menos de 200 dólares? ¿Y el recorte verdadero y grande prometido? Repito ¿bien gracias? Y sé que estamos en esta situación por culpa del bandido de Petro, pero NO ES JUSTO QUE LA GENTE SE APRIETE MÁS Y EL GASTO PÚBLICO NO SE RECORTE de manera ejemplar.
Buy the dip 😬 retweeted
As someone who has personally spent $500k / mo+ on Google Ads for years, I can tell you with certainty:
This revenue growth in Search is artificial & extremely unhealthy for Google’s business long term
Search volumes are declining as legacy search is being increasingly cannibalized by non-monetized LLM queries
Google’s response?
Manufacture revenue growth via short-sighted, highly extractive, customer-hostile tactics. I.e. charge advertisers more for lower quality clicks, including clicks they do not want and explicitly did not approve Google to charge them for
A few examples to illustrate:
For all of its history until recently, Google operated on a 2nd price auction model
I.e. if you bid $5 CPC and the next highest bidder bids $1 CPC, Google charged you $1.01 for the click (one penny more than the 2nd highest bidder) rather than the $5 you bid
This was a genius move by Google early on as it incentivizes advertisers to input their true maximum willingness to pay rather than trying to play the game of bidding low and constantly adjusting to try to stay just ahead of the next highest bidder while still not paying too much
However recently, Google silently deprecated the 2nd price auction and began charging advertisers as much as their bid and budget caps allow, regardless of what anyone else is bidding
It’s a short-sighted cash grab at the expense of the long term health of the advertiser ecosystem
Making thing worse, Google also recently nerfed keyword targeting precision
Google previously had precise keyword targeting settings that allowed advertisers pick individual search phrases to bid on, defined down to the character w/ exact match or phrase match targeting
This was one of the core features that made search advertising magic, enabling advertisers to run extremely precise campaigns based on exactly what their target customer typed
But now, even if you bid on a specific term or phrase using the strictest exact
-match targeting settings, Google will show your ad across 1000’s of unrelated keywords, labeling them as as “exact match (close variant)”
The definition of “close variant” means whatever they want it to and changes constantly. The result is advertisers get billed for clicks that are totally irrelevant to their business and that their targeting settings explicitly forbid Google from targeting. Google does it anyway and there’s no ability to turn this off
So now exact match is broad match, and broad match is just meaningless spam
This is all very bad for advertisers, but for Google, it allows them to show your ad and bill you for clicks across 1000x more searches that were previously going unmonetized (mainly because they’re garbage queries no one wants)
This is how you grow revenue atop declining search volumes
Lastly, and perhaps most egregiously, Google quietly stopped respecting budget caps by a factor of 2x. For example campaigns we’ve been running for years with $1000 daily budget caps suddenly began spending $2000+ per day
And the extra spend is entirely on the garbage keywords Google arbitrarily throws in as “exact match (close variants)” which have no value to our business, but can’t be turned off
Google offers no refunds nor any recourse for overspend or spend on keywords you explicitly did not target
These are not the actions of a healthy business. These are the actions of company whose core business is in decline but desperately needs to pump quarterly earnings so Wall Street will continue to fund insane capex while hopefully looking through their rapidly deteriorating negative free cash flow
Google operated a benevolent monopoly for the better part of 25 yrs
Meaning the value Google captured from Search was but a small fraction of the value it created, and that spread produced a potential energy that justified expectations of high earnings growth far, far into the future
This is now no longer the case
At the alter of AI capex, Google is sacrificing the golden goose
Q2 was an amazing quarter, with our AI investments redefining what’s possible across every part of our business.
Alphabet revenue grew 24% YoY and Google Cloud accelerated to 82% growth. We saw exciting momentum across the board from Search to YouTube to the Gemini app (which reached 950M monthly active users). Our model APIs are processing 22B tokens/min (up from 16B+ last quarter) driven by our workhorse Flash models. We’re also seeing great adoption of Gemini Enterprise, used by 90% of the Fortune 100, as well as strong demand for our security solutions.
Outstanding results and momentum, and such an exciting moment—thanks to all of our partners and employees around the world! 🙌 About to hop on the call!
Buy the dip 😬 retweeted
What a comeback.
We will need time to properly understand it. But I think this was a 20th century politician who, at the very last possible moment, figured out how to run a 21st century campaign. After his first round loss, Lula started carrying a smartphone for the first time in his life, brought in younger aides who knew how to run a real digital operation, and finally was able to create some excitement in one of the world’s most terminally online countries. The net result was 3 million more people who turned out to vote, fewer spoiled ballots, votes from third-party candidates, and some repented bolsonaristas as well.
Flávio Bolsonaro challenged the results, but he faces an extremely difficult battle. The margin of victory, more than 4 million votes, was too large to be explained by the delay in polling stations closing or any other abnormalities. Big Brazilian power brokers, including the so-called Centrão, are dutifully accepting the result. The Bolsonaros will ask the White House for support, but it’s important that the vast majority of Latin American leaders, including those on the right like Keiko Fujimori and José Antonio Kast, quickly recognized Lula’s victory. They concluded this is over, and the Trump administration may do the same.
For Lula, the good news is that he won, and the bad news is that he won. He ran up a big bill to help make this happen: More than $60 billion in extra spending, welfare payments, debt forgiveness and other fiscal largesse. This in a country with real interest rates above 8% and a debt burden forecast to reach 83% of GDP this year, up a whopping 12 percentage points in Lula’s term. Markets are hemorrhaging in the hours after his victory, and they may get worse until Lula details his plans to cut spending. Lula also faces the most conservative Congress on record, a skeptical business community, and consumers who are struggling under huge debts as well.
But look, Lula would rather deal with those problems than the alternative. He will be the man who defined an entire half-century of Brazilian history, from the metalworkers’ strike he led as a labor union leader in 1979 to the end of his fourth term in 2030. A truly epic story that is still being written, and may yet bring more surprises.
--
For more, including reactions from @DaniCamp0 and Alessandra Ribeiro:
americasquarterly.org/articl…


































