FlareLens ๐Ÿ”โ˜€๏ธ (@FlareLensX) header
FlareLens ๐Ÿ”โ˜€๏ธ (@FlareLensX) profile picture

FlareNetwork explorer covering onchain data, DeFi & oracles. Building, learning, helping, sharing insights & connecting across @FlareNetworks โ˜€๏ธ & XRPfi ๐ŸŒ๐Ÿ”Ž

New York City, NY
Joined August 2009
Photo by FlareLens ๐Ÿ”โ˜€๏ธ (@FlareLensX)Photo by FlareLens ๐Ÿ”โ˜€๏ธ (@FlareLensX)Photo by FlareLens ๐Ÿ”โ˜€๏ธ (@FlareLensX)Photo by FlareLens ๐Ÿ”โ˜€๏ธ (@FlareLensX)Photo by FlareLens ๐Ÿ”โ˜€๏ธ (@FlareLensX)Photo by FlareLens ๐Ÿ”โ˜€๏ธ (@FlareLensX)Photo by FlareLens ๐Ÿ”โ˜€๏ธ (@FlareLensX)Photo by FlareLens ๐Ÿ”โ˜€๏ธ (@FlareLensX)Photo by FlareLens ๐Ÿ”โ˜€๏ธ (@FlareLensX)Photo by FlareLens ๐Ÿ”โ˜€๏ธ (@FlareLensX)
The simple part is the wallet. The interesting part is the control plane. You sign one XRPL Payment. Intent is packed into the memo/payment reference. FDC attests it, MasterAccountController maps that address to a PersonalAccount on Flare, then mint FXRP + vault deposit execute without an EVM key, without FLR gas, and without a second seed. ๐Ÿ”— After that itโ€™s just allocation. One receipt token. Curator runs the strategy. You keep the XRPL key. ๐Ÿ” Use flare-networks:native
Your XRP should be working, not idle. Here's how to change that from: what a vault is, who runs it, how you start from your XRPL wallet๐Ÿงต๐Ÿ‘‡
387
Flare isnโ€™t just building DeFi around XRP anymore. Joining the XRPLF recommended validator list means Flare now has a direct voice in XRPL consensus โ€” validating new ledgers and voting on amendments. Supporting the base layer that FXRP and the rest of the Flare ecosystem depend on. Long-term alignment, not just surface-level integration.
Flare has joined the XRP Ledger Foundationโ€™s recommended validator list. Servers following the @XRPLF list now count Flareโ€™s votes on new ledgers and amendments. Operational responsibility for XRPLโ€™s reliability and evolution, and a long-term commitment to the @XRP ecosystem ๐Ÿค
23
FlareLens ๐Ÿ”โ˜€๏ธ retweeted
Flare has joined the XRP Ledger Foundationโ€™s recommended validator list. Servers following the @XRPLF list now count Flareโ€™s votes on new ledgers and amendments. Operational responsibility for XRPLโ€™s reliability and evolution, and a long-term commitment to the @XRP ecosystem ๐Ÿค
89
134
14
554
28,616
FlareLens ๐Ÿ”โ˜€๏ธ retweeted
Very important to understand this: FSA Custom Instructions create the programmable account and authorization layer that will let credit products be built around an XRPL user. Because of this, an XRP holder can sign once on XRPL and control a real lending position across multiple clains like Flare and Ethereum. Custom actions can include borrowing, managing collateral, repaying and withdrawing, among many others.
Flare Smart Accounts allow you to do more than just mint FXRP. โšก๏ธ With Custom Instructions, an XRPL transaction can authorize a specific set of actions to be executed through your Smart Account on @FlareNetworks. The 0xFE memo marks that XRPL payment as a Custom Instruction. It carries a commitment to the full Smart Account operation, so the executor can relay it, but cannot change what the user authorized. That means an XRPL transaction can do things like mint FXRP, move it into a lending subaccount, bridge it to another chain and execute DeFi logic there, all from one signed intent. Learn more about Custom Instructions here: dev.flare.network/smart-accoโ€ฆ
1
7
33
940
Hallo Arno, je zorgen zijn begrijpelijk, vooral gezien het kapitaal en de risicoโ€™s van vroege deelnemers die zich aan Firelight hebben verbonden. Het is echter belangrijk om onderscheid te maken tussen beloningstoewijzingen, individuele deelname en de uiteindelijke verdelingsberekeningen. Deze zijn niet noodzakelijkerwijs vergelijkbaar met EigenLayer of Uniswap, aangezien elk protocol werkt onder een andere incentivestructuur. Transparantie is essentieel en deelnemers verdienen een duidelijke uitsplitsing van hoe hun beloningen zijn berekend. Heeft u uw individuele toewijzing herzien ten opzichte van uw oorspronkelijke storting en deelnameperiode?@UnstoppableArno
Replying to @MarcusHFLR
Wat mij tegenviel is hetgeen dat uitgekeerd wordt, het is echt weinig als je het vergelijkt met andere projecten, zoals Eigenlayer/Uniswap destijds. Firelight moet wel begrijpen dat ze bestaan danzij mensen zoals wij die kapitaal beschikbaar stellen en het risico lopen!
80
Hi Flaremount, good question. The withdrawal flow has changed with Firelight 2.0, so the previous ~48-hour timeline no longer applies in the same way. Check your messageโ€” Iโ€™ve sent you the details on how the updated withdrawal process works.
Replying to @Firelightfi
@Firelightfi TIME TO CASH OUT MY 5.89 Million Points, Just Don't know how Yet lol !! ANYBODY????
1
82
FlareLens ๐Ÿ”โ˜€๏ธ retweeted
Same XRP. More than one job. The map with live APYs is here. โ†’ xrpfi.flare.network/defi
13
37
5
185
18,126
Watch closely ๐Ÿ‘€ flare-networks:native
As @Firelightfi moves toward launch, the docs spell out the coverage protocol's details. Who participates. What is covered. How claims and payouts run. FXRP / stXRP and the Phase 1 to Phase 2 transition.
56
FlareLens ๐Ÿ”โ˜€๏ธ retweeted
DCENT has announced that there is an issue with their SOFTWARE wallet only. DCENT have stated that the Hardware based wallet is unaffected. Through this DCENT exploit and based on information received from DCENT, we believe that 7 addresses that interacted with Flare are affected for a total amount of 30,507 XRP. No deposits from these 7 addresses have been made to the Clearstar vault or have interacted with any other protocol on Flare. Any loss, whilst unfortunate, is borne by the affected DCENT user. No Flare protocols or applications built on Flare are affected at the protocol level from this exploit. Nor does this exploit affect the solvency of any vaults, protocols or applications on Flare. Based on the information we have at this time the total exposure of DCENT software wallet users is 30,507 XRP. If you are worried that you may be affected by the DCENT software wallet exploit please contact DCENT directly.
13
62
8
253
34,031
Hey, thanks for clarifying ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿป Since this is your first time staking and youโ€™re seeing Flare (P) in Bifrost, it sounds like you used P-Chain staking with Price Kraken. You may not have done anything wrong, as P-Chain rewards are finalized based on the staking period rather than appearing like regular delegation rewards. Can you check the stake in Bifrost and tell me the end date/status it shows? Thatโ€™ll help narrow down exactly whatโ€™s happening. @Zeviax3
Replying to @TheGrungieNFTs
Been a FLR holder from the beginning. Only delegating until recently. I took a small amount to stake on Bifrost for the first time about 3 or 4 weeks ago and I have not seen any rewards. I put it with Price Kracken. No idea what to do, what I'm doing wrong, etc. Frustrating
1
99
That doesnโ€™t sound right. If you staked with Stakeway and received no rewards while the position appears ~2,300 FLR lower, Iโ€™d check the staking transaction and validator performance before assuming those FLR were actually lost. SparkDEX is a different DeFi strategy, so its returns and risks arenโ€™t directly comparable to native P-Chain staking. Which wallet did you stake from, and do you have the transaction hash? @Cojack19113
Replying to @TheGrungieNFTs
I just staked with โ€œStakewayโ€ and I did not earn any rewards this go around. When I installed I noticed I was down about 2300 FLR tokens. Isnโ€™t it the same if I stake on SparkDex? I seem to earn more FLR doing that. Dolphin amount, not much.
76
FlareLens ๐Ÿ”โ˜€๏ธ retweeted
Private execution. Public verification. @HugoPhilion with @MR_MOON_XRP on what institutions actually need before more assets move onchain โ€” and what Flare Confidential Compute is built for.
5
50
6
210
20,394
FlareLens ๐Ÿ”โ˜€๏ธ retweeted
Flare Korea ์›Œํฌ์ˆ์„ ํ•จ๊ป˜ํ•ด์ฃผ์‹  ๋ชจ๋“  ๋ถ„๋“ค๊ป˜ ๊ฐ์‚ฌ๋“œ๋ฆฝ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค! ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ”ฅ ์˜ค๋Š˜ Flare์™€ XRPFi์˜ ํ˜„์žฌ์™€ ๋ฏธ๋ž˜, ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ํ•œ๊ตญ์—์„œ ๋งŒ๋“ค์–ด๊ฐˆ ๊ธฐํšŒ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ๋งŽ์€ ์ด์•ผ๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ๋‚˜๋ˆด์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ•จ๊ป˜ํ•ด์ฃผ์‹  @Mr_MOON_XRP , KWeather, ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ๋ฌด์—‡๋ณด๋‹ค ํ˜„์žฅ์„ ์ฐพ์•„์ฃผ์‹  ์ปค๋ฎค๋‹ˆํ‹ฐ ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ๋ถ„๊ป˜ ๊ฐ์‚ฌ๋“œ๋ฆฝ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์˜ค๋Š˜์˜ ๋งŒ๋‚จ์ด ๋‹ค์Œ์œผ๋กœ ์ด์–ด์งˆ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋„๋ก ๊ณ„์† ๋งŒ๋“ค์–ด๊ฐ€๊ฒ ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ณง ๋‹ค์‹œ ๋งŒ๋‚˜์š”๐Ÿ”ฅ #Flare #XRPFi #XRP
7
15
7
74
19,276
Hi Alain! Got it. Since youโ€™ve only been staking for two weeks and havenโ€™t initiated a withdrawal before, the staking duration isnโ€™t the blocker. The Step 4/4 failure indicates the redemption transaction isnโ€™t being confirmed after signing. Are you seeing a transaction hash in your Dโ€™CENT history for that failed attempt? @Stewieaf2
Replying to @Flare_Explorer
I have been staking for only two weeks. I havenโ€™t made a request.
3
1
2
271
Hey Jason, completely understand. Youโ€™re not the only one whoโ€™s had that experience with Xaman. The important distinction is that the ~50 XRP shown in that example isnโ€™t the normal XRPL network fee, itโ€™s a 0.5% service fee tied to that specific yield product. So moving away from Xaman alone wouldnโ€™t necessarily eliminate it. Have you tried FXRP or any of the newer Flare yield options since then? @Tripolarsoul123
Thats rediculous. The fees are why I exited Xaman wallet.
167
FlareLens ๐Ÿ”โ˜€๏ธ retweeted
JUST IN: Firelight @Firelightfi raised $8M led by @GumiCryptos to backstop DeFi vaults using staked XRP on Flare. The @SentoraHQ-incubated cover protocol already holds $76M in XRP, with first integrations launching this month into a market where onchain protection covers just 0.1% of DeFi. First integrations go live this month. Read more here: thedefiant.io/news/defi/fireโ€ฆ
4
23
97
15,410
FlareLens ๐Ÿ”โ˜€๏ธ retweeted
New community resource for XRPFi ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท xrpfi-flare.io provides a step-by-step onboarding path for Korean users exploring Flare. It covers the full journey from getting started to actually using the ecosystem: โ€ข Wallet setup and FXRP minting โ€ข FLR staking and FTSO delegation โ€ข XRP vaults and DeFi strategies โ€ข Lending and collateral strategies โ€ข Scam prevention and security Resources like this make a real difference when they turn a complex ecosystem into something people can learn and use one step at a time. Explore: xrpfi-flare.io/
1
7
1
28
1,414
Thatโ€™s one of the trade-offs with staking through a centralized exchange like Uphold. Since FIP.16, the reward structure has evolved, so exchange-based staking may not capture the same opportunities available on-chain. Are you currently keeping all your FLR on Uphold, or do you also use a self-custody wallet? @still4401
Youโ€™re unable to view this Post because this account owner limits who can view their Posts. Learn more
40
FlareLens ๐Ÿ”โ˜€๏ธ retweeted
๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ทKorea, we're coming to give a hands on workshop. @FlareNetworksKR is hosting an XRP DeFi workshop in Seoul, September 5. More dates are landing on the events page. Bookmark it โ€” some of them may be near you. flare.network/events
1
32
1
176
12,561
Good day, Kelly. If youโ€™re using Xaman, youโ€™re most likely accessing Upshift through the Flare Smart Account, not the Monarq vault shown here. Monarq currently offers the higher yield ~6-14% , so youโ€™d need to change the strategy directly through your Flare Smart Account. Feel free to ask if you have any questions about the process. @xrpkelly
Replying to @FlareNetworks
Where do you get this I gone in and itโ€™s saying 4%
123