Belgian citizen loving art, history, music and to travel. Senior Relationship Manager @belnet_be and @BNIX_BE Tweets are my own opinion!
Bruxelles, Belgique
Joined December 2013
- Tweets928
- Following390
- Followers207
- Likes49.9K
Pinned Tweet
35 years after discovering “Blue Lines” (1991), seeing @MassiveAttackUK live again @forestnational was pure joy. “Unfinished Sympathy” and Shara Nelson’s voice hooked me from day one. Some music never loses its power #MassiveAttack #Concert #Brussels – at Brussels, Belgium
Frederic Libotte retweeted
Following the devastating tragedy that occurred in 1989 at Cleveland Elementary School in Stockton, where five children lost their lives and more than thirty were injured, Michael Jackson decided to take action away from the public spotlight.
Moved by the community’s grief, the artist helped cover the victims’ funeral costs to ease the burden on their families.
Shortly afterward, the King of Pop visited the school in person to spend time with the children, survivors, and teachers as they were in the midst of the healing process. Seeing the biggest star on the planet walking the hallways of their school felt surreal to the children, bringing back smiles and hope to classrooms that had been plunged into fear.
That act of kindness stands as a testament to Michael Jackson’s charitable commitment to children struck by tragedy.
Frederic Libotte retweeted
Eight of the twelve jurors were parents.
One female juror’s sister had been r*ped as a child.
Another female juror had two nieces who had suffered sexual molestation.
The 79-year-old juror was a grandparent to a registered sex offender.
Michael Jackson is an important historical figure. In some respects, the most.
A biopic about him, if well directed, & well played, should be the most anticipated. Audience score for #MichaelMovie was 97%, highest ever.
Awards, if critical & not hypothetical should be down to one question: is any movie more important?
In reality, award circuits, and, media narratives, are stuck in a loop that expired 20 years ago.
FBI, LAPD, 20 different child services departments secretly wiretapped, scoured and dug into Michael Jackson for 13 long years. They stacked up 600 pages of forensic methodologies. Secret surveillance crossed state & international jurisdictions. Over a decade long marathon investigation racked up absolutely ZERO evidence of criminal conduct.
Officially, the FBI & other agencies only stopped going after Michael Jackson after the Santa Barbara county court took up the case in 2005. For 14 weeks, 140 witnesses were cross examined. The final jury was made up of 8 women and 4 men, age ranges from 20 to 79 years. They included a civil engineer with a graduate degree, a computer programmer, a physical therapist, and a UPS delivery driver who noted he had previously delivered packages to Jackson's Neverland Ranch. Jurors also included a supervisor for the Department of Social Services, an educational service aide, a student nurse and a 79-year-old great-grandmother.
Eight of the twelve jurors were parents.
One female juror’s sister had been r*ped as a child.
Another female juror had two nieces who had suffered sexual molestation.
The 79-year-old juror was a grandparent to a registered sex offender.
7 of the jurors were white, 4 were Hispanic, 1 was Asian. Race heavily influenced the public discourse surrounding the trial, and caused public skepticism because there is a historical precedent of jury prejudice against racial minorities.
Jury demographics sparked significant national discussion because there was ZERO black representation on the final 12-person panel.
Media coverage was relentless, and heavily prejudiced. Unprecedented public spectacle lasted 14 weeks. 140 witnesses testified. On June 13 2005, all 10 criminal counts and 4 misdemeanors were thrown out in court.
Verdict: Michael Jackson was NOT GUILTY.
In the past 20 years, several researchers including @DrJoeVogel, @jin_chohan and @RuckerJael, have exposed the unethical background of the allegations. Case should never have gone to court.
But: the final verdict has not stopped the allegation industrial complex from continuing to churn out even more films, documentaries and headlines falsifying the records.
Despite the campaign of hate, the biopic pushed past prejudiced rotten tomato ratings and media skepticism, past Bohemian Rhapsody, past Oppenheimer, to become the first biographical film of any kind in history to make over one billion dollars at the box office.
The Golden Globes has made a controversial decision not to consider the biopic as a musical. This week, Critics Choice Association's named debut actor Jaafar Jackson the recipient of the Actor Award.
Jaafar previously won Best Actor at the 2026 Astra Midseason Movie Awards over nominees like Ryan Gosling and Ralph Fiennes.
If the Oscars follow, it will be a surprise, but not because Jaafar has any real competition. These days, even faceless bots with zero followers are driving hateful commentary on posts about Michael Jackson.
Jaafar’s recent public appearances glow with increasing confidence reminiscent of Michael Jackson himself.
His future is bright.
Part 2 biopic, SuperMax, Tiger Woods biopic and many more will cement Jaafar’s rise. He is the actor to watch.
Will the Oscars & Golden Globe rise to the occasion? Time is ticking.
Frederic Libotte retweeted
On Monday night, with the glass still being swept up from the latest événements, French viewers were offered a spectacle almost as compelling as the riots.
A young, blonde, radical left-wing woman appeared on France’s La Grande Confrontation TV show and gave a performance mixing, in equal parts, conviction, narcissism, privilege, contempt and, at best, a highly selective grasp of history. And all delivered from a face of transfixing beauty.
Her name is Lola-Fleur Whittaker. She is 23, and a Sciences Po student who stood for Mélenchon’s La France Insoumise in the Paris municipals this spring.
Facing shopkeepers in the TV studio, whose premises had been looted, she excused the rioters and condescendingly explained to the traders: “Vos boutiques, c’est bien mignon.” Literally: oh your shops, how sweet.
✍️ Sean Thomas
Article | spectator.com/article/lola-f…
Frederic Libotte retweeted
Woke French student mocked owners who lost stores in riots - then her jet-set life was revealed: 'Your little shops, that's cute' trib.al/oauq4yb
Frederic Libotte retweeted
Ici, vous avez Lola-Fleur, militante LFI issue d’un milieu privilégié (père cadre supérieur diplômé de HEC), qui aime publier de jolies photos Instagram dans des destinations de rêve. En face, une entrepreneuse arrivée du Congo à l’âge de 9 ans, qui a grandi dans la précarité.
Frederic Libotte retweeted
Cette romantisation obsessionnelle de la criminalité m’écœure. Cette manie de trouver à chaque crime une excuse sociologique, comme si la misère conférait au criminel une quelconque noblesse, relève d’une véritable complaisance morale. C’est vraiment un fléau universel.
Frederic Libotte retweeted
"le militantisme pacifiste ne marche pas. Nelson Mandela a appelé à prendre les armes à un moment donné."
Quelle folie. Le genre de bêtises qu'on entend chez les sympathisants libertaires en ce moment.
L'ANC gagne enfin dans les années 1980 avec la grève, la désobéissance civile non violente, le boycott et la manifestation. Quand Mandela négocie en 1994, aucune de ses positions de force ne repose sur la guerre civile. Il avait pour lui le nombre, le travail et la moralité.
Quand dans les années 1960 son groupe choisit la violence, ils se font écraser. Ça a été une décision qui a repoussé de décennies entières l'issue de la lutte.
Ce ne sont pas des idées à manier avec approximation. Non, Mandela n'aurait pas justifié les pillages d'hier. Il aurait été avec les manifestants et regretté les erreurs telles qu'articulées dans cet extrait vidéo.
L'histoire mérite mieux que les mensonges de l'ultra-gauche, en quête de mythes justifiant ses turpitudes.
Par ailleurs, ce n'est pas un détail non plus, mais il faut être sacrément méprisant des victimes de l'apartheid pour les comparer avec la France de 2026. Le racisme des faux vertueux.
Frederic Libotte retweeted
Prenez le temps d'écouter @CarolineFourest.
C'est un ordre.
Frederic Libotte retweeted
À écouter absolument : Laurent Mathieu face à Pierre-Yves Dermagne sur La Première.
Le socialisme, c’est une conviction inébranlable : avoir raison sur tout, même quand les chiffres ne suivent pas.
Pauvreté, faillites, pouvoir d’achat… Dermagne déroule le récit habituel. Puis vient le moment où un journaliste demande de confronter les slogans à la réalité. Et là, la politique-fiction devient nettement moins confortable.
C’est tout le génie du socialisme : les intentions sont toujours magnifiques, les coupables toujours à droite, les solutions toujours financées par quelqu’un d’autre. Quant aux résultats, il suffit généralement de changer de sujet.
Merci à Laurent Mathieu de rappeler une évidence : les chiffres ne votent pas PS, les faillites ne lisent pas les communiqués et la réalité ne se laisse pas convaincre par un discours d’enfant de 6 ans qui réclame à ses parents toujours plus de cadeaux, mais refuse d’entendre parler de la facture.
Le socialisme promet de changer le monde. Quand les faits résistent, il préfère changer de récit.
C’est là toute la contradiction du socialisme : promettre, distribuer, dénoncer les conséquences… puis s’étonner que quelqu’un demande qui paie et d’où vient l’argent.
Le réel a ce défaut impardonnable : il ne se laisse pas culpabiliser.
À écouter. C’est parfois plus instructif qu’un cours d’économie.
Frederic Libotte retweeted
this tiktok has been on my mind all week, it’s this straight forward and yet guilters continue to be ignorant
Frederic Libotte retweeted
刚宣布的今年诺贝尔和平奖得主纳维·皮莱被挖出更多丑闻：
第一，她本人拒绝出席2010年中国政治犯刘晓波的诺贝尔奖颁奖典礼，也拒绝派人代为出席，当时她任联合国人权专员。
第二，她为什么拒绝，因为要讨好北京当局。她的联合国属下雇员今揭露，皮莱曾把40多名异议人士的名单给了中国当局，以取悦北京。
第三，皮莱曾为臭名昭著的海牙“国际刑事法院”（ICC）的法官，这个极左、反美机构已被美国制裁，今天国务卿卢比奥宣布全面制裁ICC。
第四，皮莱敌视民主国家以色列、偏袒巴勒斯坦甚至哈马斯。她发布调查报告说以色列在加沙“种族灭绝”。这种诋毁与西方左疯、哈马斯们一个口径。以色列人说，对皮莱获奖，纳粹的宣传部长戈培尔会在地下高兴。
第五，皮莱获奖后，公开嘲讽川普总统，说“你们为我鼓掌多了，我就得把这个奖送给川普了”。嘲讽委内瑞拉的反对派领袖获诺奖后与川普分享，调侃亵渎美国总统。一个联合国机构（靠美国纳税人的钱主要供养）的专员（从未经过选举），如此对待美国的民选总统，可见其粗鄙、嚣张。
第六，今年85岁的皮莱是南非的人权律师，她当年反对白人种族歧视，却从不反对曼德拉的继任黑人领袖们明目张胆推行对白人的种族歧视政策（制定了《黑人经济振兴法案》（BEE），专门优惠黑人，制度上歧视白人）。她完全是“双标”。
第七，在曼德拉掌权之后，南非有3000多名白人农场主被黑人杀害，当地人竖起三千个十字架，悼念那些被杀害的白人。皮莱被称为“人权律师”，怎么因为她本人是黑人，就不管“黑杀白”了？怎么不见她为大量白人被杀害而发出正义之声？仅凭这一点，她就是一个“伪人权律师”！
这样的人获颁“诺贝尔和平奖”，是对诺贝尔的嘲讽、对戈培尔的致敬！
“A force de protéger son camp de toute dissonance, cette gauche moralisatrice nourrit les divisions qu’elle prétend combattre.” L’édito @ddemeeus dans lalibre.be/debats/edito/2026…
Frederic Libotte retweeted
Le cancer l’est sioniste et fasciste…
Vraiment LFI vous n’avez plus rien à envier au RN, la même désinformation cynique sur tous les sujets.
Vous ne passerez pas.
🎀 Ruban rose : que signifie-t-il et pourquoi je ne le porterai pas durant ce mois d'octobre ?
La lutte contre le cancer ne doit pas être du vernis rose.
Nous ne voulons pas un "Octobre rose", mais un Octobre colère.
Explications 👇🏻
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Ça n’est pas 2M mais 62k cas par an.
Ce qui fait le taux le plus élevé, car les protocoles de détections sont parmi les plus rigoureux au monde.
Et SURTOUT: le taux de survie est de l’ordre de 88%.
Plus on dépiste, plus on trouve d’occurence. Mais en France, on en guérit.
cancer.fr/professionnels…
Frederic Libotte retweeted
Three years ago, on 7 October, my worldview changed—not so much because of the atrocities committed by Hamas (what else would you expect from a genocidal terrorist group?), but because of the shocking response to those atrocities from many of my “progressive” friends: from apologetics and denial to outright jubilation.
That day, I was jolted out of my complacency and woke up to the poisonous ideology that had quietly taken hold across large swathes of the Left and academia.
My forthcoming book, The Betrayal of the Enlightenment (@PitchstoneBooks), reconstructs how self-proclaimed progressives, of all people, could have arrived at this point.
Frederic Libotte retweeted
✅Crowd nonstop cheered Michael Jackson at World Music Awards
❌Media said they booed
✅Invincible debuted No1 in 13 countries and went double platinum in 8 weeks
❌Media said it flopped
✅Biopic became highest-grossing film of 2026 and 1st biopic ever to cross one billion-dollar
❌Media focused on other films
❌Rotten tomatoes said 27%, lowest ever
✅Audience score said a whopping 97%, highest ever
✅Jury verdict said: Not Guilty
❌Media keeps recycling allegations & making new mockumentaries
Just because you read it
Don’t make it factual.
Be careful what you read.
The lie becomes the truth.
Frederic Libotte retweeted
Ich hatte immer wieder vorgerechnet, dass die #Hamas-Zahl von ca. 73.000 in #Gaza getöteten falsch ist und das mit Quellen und Fakten ausführlich belegt. Ich kam damals auf eine reale Zahl von 50.000 Getöteten (abgezogen waren die auf natürlichem Wege gestorbenen Personen).
Sofort kamen die Israelhasser und drehten durch.
Die Zahl der getöteten Zivilisten habe ich auf in etwa 25.000 bis maximal 30.000 beziffert. Eine Quote von 1:1 von Terrorist zu Zivilist, was in einem urbanen Krieg dieser Art eine unglaubliche niedrige Quote ist. 1:7 bis 1:19 sind je nach Kriegsgebiet leider normal.
Meine Rechnung belegt also, dass #Israel die Zivilisten schützt und nur die Terrorgruppe angreift.
Ich habe ebenso klar gesagt, dass die Behauptung, die Mehrheit der durch Israel Getöteten seien Frauen und Kinder, eine dreiste antisemitische Lüge ist.
Nun hat die Hamas selbst Zahlen veröffentlicht und diese Zahlen bestätigen erschreckend perfekt, dass ich mit JEDEM Wort und mit JEDER Zahl Recht hatte.
- Die echte Zahl der Getöteten (Terroristen + Zivilisten) liegt aktuell bei ca. 53.000.
- Die Mehrheit der Getöteten sind Männer im wehrfähigen Alter
- Es gibt nahezu keine Hungertoten
- Die Quote Terrorist zu Zivilist ist 1:1
Dies sind keine Zahlen Israels. Das sind die offiziellen Zahlen des Hamas-Gesundheitsministeriums mit detaillierter Aufschlüsselung aller Todesursachen und Beschreibung der Opfer.
Frederic Libotte retweeted
So people keep going back to “Israel invaded the land” and “Israel stole the land” and “Nakba-this” and “Nakba-that” and all sorts of other stories about why they justify Oct 7 and why Israel is in the wrong.
Let’s clear a few things up.
The land that is now Israel was lived in by both Muslims and Jews for a long time. If you want to get technical about who was there first, it was the Jews. How do we know this for a fact? Well, first of all, Jews have been around for about 2000 years longer than Muslims.
Not enough for you?
OK. How about the fact that the word “Israel” is mentioned in the Quran about 43 times. Palestine? Never once.
Jewish people have been around longer than Muslim people have – fact.
Jewish people were living in the place where Israel is much longer than Arabs have – also fact.
In about 1250 BCE, the Jewish people went to what was then called Canaan – where Israel sits today. This is when they escaped slavery in Egypt, and wandered the dessert for 40 years. 1250BCE. About 1860 years before the founding of Islam.
Fast forward to modern times. 1940s. Yes, there were both Arab-Muslims and Jews living on the land that is now called Israel. And yeah, there was fighting. On both sides.
After the Holocaust, the push for the Jewish people to have their own country intensified. During WWII, too many countries turned their backs on Jews. A Jewish homeland would ensure that Jews always had somewhere to go. There could never be another Holocaust, another ethnic cleansing of Jews.
Additionally, the UK was tired of dealing with all the fighting in the British Mandate of Palestine (what Israel was called before it was Israel), and wanted to wash their hands of it.
So what did they do?
They offered to split the land amongst the two groups living there. The Arab-Muslims and the Jews. Sounds fair, right? Each could have their own State, completely autonomous. Pretty good deal, wouldn’t you think?
I think it was a good deal. The Jews thought it was a good deal. Do you know who didn’t think it was a good deal? The Arab-Muslims. Do you know why? Because they didn’t want the Jews to have anything.
So the day after Israel became a nation, the Arabs attacked. 5 Arab nations attacked, in what would be known as the Arab-Israeli war.
Do you know what else it became known as? The Nakba. Nakba for catastrophe. Because they lost. The Arab world says it’s because Arabs were displaced. But they chose to be displaced. Because they chose not to accept their own nation. They left. They ran away. Because they thought the Jews would lose and they'd be able to go back.
The Arabs have been fighting ever since. At some point in time in the 1960s, the Arab-Muslims who were trying to claim Israel as theirs, started to refer to themselves as Palestinians.
Land has been offered. A Palestinian state has been offered. All that the Palestinians had to do, was accept Israel’s right to exist. To stop attacking and trying to destroy them.
Why don’t the Palestinians have their own State?
Because they refuse to. They refuse to acknowledge Israel’s right to exist.
Muslim nations in this world, take up 29.13 million square km.
Israel is 21,671 square km.
Jews have 0.1% of the land that Muslims have.
And according to the Radicalized Muslims, that’s too much.
This isn’t about the land.
This is about Radicalized Muslims not wanting Jews to exist.
Frederic Libotte retweeted
S’approprier pour mieux effacer : le mécanisme est connu.
La Nakba, décrivant d’abord défaite militaire, assimilée à la Shoah. Gaza comparée à Auschwitz ou au ghetto de Varsovie, déjà avant le 7/10. Les musulmans d’Europe présentés comme les « nouveaux Juifs ». Des entreprises et équipes sportives juives de Palestine mandataire brandies comme preuves d’un passé exclusivement arabe. Il n’y aurait pas de temple juif sous l’esplanade des mosquées, dont le nom en arabe reprend l’appellation hébraïque de ce temple (Beit al Maqdis).
Et maintenant, une manifestation le 7 octobre sous le slogan « 3 ans de résistance ». À la date anniversaire du massacre, les victimes juives disparaissent derrière un récit qui transforme leurs bourreaux en résistants.
Voler la mémoire juive, en effacer les Juifs, retourner cette mémoire contre eux.
