Jay retweeted
Even if Russell Brand wasn't guilty of r*pe, I'd still be happy with his conviction and whatever sentence he gets on the grounds of it being justice for his childhood dog.
I mean, he wrote the below extract himself. As if he thought people would think: "Oh that's mean, but what a refreshingly honest chap he is!"
If he could do this to a defenceless animal and laugh about it years later, it tells you a lot about his treatment of those around him who he saw as vulnerable.
What an evil prick. Fuck him.
Jay retweeted
You don’t get to put cocaine up your nose AND rail about the tragic death last night of little Elliot English (6) in Crumlin Hospital.
Jay retweeted
On November 7th, 1917, the Bolsheviks seized power Russia, promising “peace, land and bread” to the people. Over the next 74 years the people were starved, killed by death squads, thrown in work camps and gulags, and other things unrelated to “peace, land and bread”.
Jay retweeted
Kellie-Jay Keen has been changed by the UK police for saying: “If we want to save this country [the UK], we have to remove Islam from every single place of authority.”
I believe she is correct to say this.
It seems that somebody found her claim offensive.
So what? Unless there is some rationally objective justifiable theory of offence, pretty much anybody can find anything offensive, but that's the price one pays for living in a (relatively) free society.
The British anti-Islam activist Kellie-Jay Keen has been charged by police following Islamophobic posts on X.
Keen revealed the news in a video posted on her social media, claiming she is due in court on December 4 over a "grossly offensive" X post about Islam.
Keen is known for her anti-Muslim rants and conspiracy theories including that Islam is taking over the UK.
At the far-right Unite The Kingdom rally in London last May she said: “If we want to save this country, we have to remove Islam from every single place of authority.”
Jay retweeted
The Irish Times's Conor Gallagher uses Mark Malone of H&CC as a source for his reporting on political extremism.
Mark Malone is an open anarchist who has no professional qualifications to qualify as an extremism expert. He employs no methodology that can provide reliable data to develop any useful models of extremism for the Irish scene and when challenged by me, he was unable to identify basic social network analysis methods employed by extremism experts.
He is a radically-partisan activist posing as an expert whose 'methods' amount to guilt by association of people he dislikes - and spends an inordinate amount of time fighting with and abusing - on social media.
In other words, Conor Gallagher is coming to bat for a lecturer who faked his credentials below because he platforms another guy who also pretends to be an expert in the field of extremism and misinformation - that is, he's hip-deep in the "culture war battles" he speaks of. Felle was a darling of the national media because he gave partisan and activist journalists a sheen of credibility for their agenda-driven pieces.
The only thing "exhausting" is Conor Gallagher trying to pretend legitimate dismay about academic credential fraud is a "culture war" issue. Very poor deflection.
👇👇👇
Jay retweeted
if you ever wondered what the opposite of farm stands where you take a dozen eggs and leave $5 in the jam jar is:
it's needing anti-vehicle barriers to keep people from murdering people in christmas markets.
Jay retweeted
Yesterday, I made the mistake of daring to suggest that certain situations carry risks worth contemplating before putting yourself in them.
I was referring to the Russell Brand case, in which one of his victims found herself in a vulnerable situation with a man she thought she knew because of his celebrity.
The response? That the real lesson is that men shouldn’t rape women.
Well, of course they shouldn’t. But does anyone seriously imagine we’ll ever live in a world where a small minority of predatory men don’t exist? There has never been such a society, and there never will be.
As a man, I also find the implication that all men are potential rapists, given the opportunity, deeply insulting. The overwhelming majority of men regard rape as one of the most heinous crimes imaginable and would never dream of committing it.
We can introduce tougher sentences and launch endless educational initiatives. And I’m certainly not arguing against teaching children about consent. But the uncomfortable truth is that genuinely predatory individuals are unlikely to be deterred by moral exhortations about behaviour they already know is wrong.
There are many factors that create a Russell Brand. And some of those now most vociferously expressing their outrage were among the millions who watched him on television, laughed at his antics and helped make him the seemingly untouchable celebrity he became.
There’s a wider reckoning to be had about celebrity culture, the people who enabled him and the warning signs that were ignored.
There’s also a glaring irony here. Some of the progressives rightly appalled by Brand’s behaviour seem remarkably reluctant to discuss the risks associated with immigration from certain countries. The Economist recently found that Afghan nationals were convicted of sexual offences at seven times the British rate, even after adjusting for age and sex. Other groups were also disproportionately represented. These are uncomfortable facts, but surely anyone genuinely concerned about violence against women should be prepared to confront them.
Ultimately, I believe in individual freedom. Adults are entitled to make their own decisions about whom they sleep with. And if someone commits rape, the responsibility lies entirely with the rapist.
But surely we should also be able to discuss personal safety without being accused of blaming victims?
If you’re contemplating a one-night stand with a celebrity whose entire public persona revolves around sexual excess, and whom you don’t actually know beyond what you’ve seen on television, I’d suggest there’s nothing unreasonable about stopping to consider the risks.
Recognising that predators exist isn’t excusing their behaviour. It’s recognising reality. And pretending those risks don’t exist, or can be wished away, won’t make anyone safer.
There are many lessons to be learned from the Russell Brand conviction, but surely one of them has to be that women should be very wary about putting themselves in vulnerable positions with men they don’t know.
As we’ve seen from other trials, the risk isn’t negligible even with men women know well, including their husbands.
I’m not victim-blaming here. Brand is solely responsible for his criminal behaviour. But there is an important distinction between blaming someone for what happens to them and encouraging people to recognise potential dangers.
The problem with celebrity is that it can create a false sense of familiarity. You might have watched someone on television for years, followed their every move on social media and feel as though you know them intimately. But you know only the persona they’ve chosen to present to the world. You know virtually nothing about their private character, their motives or how they might behave when nobody else is watching.
I also don’t understand why charming and charismatic men don’t sometimes raise red flags for women more generally.
That might sound like a perverse thing to say. But if a man is particularly adept at turning on the charm, especially when his motives are obvious, that ought to be a warning sign rather than necessarily something attractive.
There are plenty of good, decent, respectful men who are pretty awkward around women they’re attracted to, precisely because they respect them and don’t want to say or do the wrong thing.
Conversely, men who are supremely confident, entirely at ease making prolonged eye contact and have perfected the art of flirting don’t necessarily make the best lovers or life partners. Charm is not the same thing as character.
Again, I’m not victim-blaming. But anyone with daughters should be telling them that they might love a celebrity’s public persona, think they’re the greatest thing since sliced bread and fantasise about meeting them.
But if they ever do meet one of their idols, they should treat them exactly as they would any other human being. Fame is not a character reference. And they shouldn’t place their trust in someone until they genuinely know them.
And if someone they’ve only just met is trying to rush them into sexual activity, they shouldn’t mistake that for flattery or affection. It’s far more likely to be motivated by that person’s own single-minded and selfish desires.
None of this excuses the behaviour of predatory men. The responsibility for sexual assault lies entirely with the perpetrator. But teaching young women to recognise danger, to be sceptical of charm and to understand that celebrity is no guarantee of decency seems to me an entirely sensible lesson to draw from this dreadful case.
Jay retweeted
A list that Ireland should be on, but we are not.
BREAKING:
The European Commission announced today which countries are under “migratory pressure” and will be able to send away some of their asylum seekers to other EU states under the “migrant relocation quotas” created by the EU’s new Migration Pact. The countries are:
🇪🇸 Spain
🇮🇹 Italy
🇬🇷 Greece
🇨🇾 Cyprus
These 4 countries will be able to put asylum seekers into a “Solidarity Pool” for 2027 from which migrants will then be relocated in other EU states.
The size of the Solidarity Pool was decided today but the information about it is being kept secret for now.
6 countries were classified as facing a “significant migratory situation” and will be allowed to request from exemptions of receiving quota migrants. Those 6 countries are:
🇵🇱 Poland
🇨🇿 Czechia
🇭🇷 Croatia
🇦🇹 Austria
🇧🇬 Bulgaria
🇪🇪 Estonia
To receive an exemption, the country’s request has to pass a QMV vote (Qualified Majority Voting) in the Council of the European Union.
Countries which are forced to take part in the Solidarity Pool will either have to take in the number of quota migrants assigned to them by the EU, pay EUR 21 000 for every quota migrant they refuse to receive or send significant resources to help the 4 countries under migratory pressure to handle the situation.
Two countries have refused to take part in the entire new migrant relocation system and its fines. Those two countries are:
🇭🇺 Hungary
🇸🇰 Slovakia
Jay retweeted
TERRIFYING: Thousands of Shia Muslims marched in Dearborn demanding Sharia in Michigan and rejecting American law.
Now that they have a Muslim senator, they will become more emboldened than ever.
This will not end well.
Jay retweeted
BREAKING:
The European Commission announced today which countries are under “migratory pressure” and will be able to send away some of their asylum seekers to other EU states under the “migrant relocation quotas” created by the EU’s new Migration Pact. The countries are:
🇪🇸 Spain
🇮🇹 Italy
🇬🇷 Greece
🇨🇾 Cyprus
These 4 countries will be able to put asylum seekers into a “Solidarity Pool” for 2027 from which migrants will then be relocated in other EU states.
The size of the Solidarity Pool was decided today but the information about it is being kept secret for now.
6 countries were classified as facing a “significant migratory situation” and will be allowed to request from exemptions of receiving quota migrants. Those 6 countries are:
🇵🇱 Poland
🇨🇿 Czechia
🇭🇷 Croatia
🇦🇹 Austria
🇧🇬 Bulgaria
🇪🇪 Estonia
To receive an exemption, the country’s request has to pass a QMV vote (Qualified Majority Voting) in the Council of the European Union.
Countries which are forced to take part in the Solidarity Pool will either have to take in the number of quota migrants assigned to them by the EU, pay EUR 21 000 for every quota migrant they refuse to receive or send significant resources to help the 4 countries under migratory pressure to handle the situation.
Two countries have refused to take part in the entire new migrant relocation system and its fines. Those two countries are:
🇭🇺 Hungary
🇸🇰 Slovakia
Jay retweeted
Seriously. Wouldn't you be pure sick of these fkers? Martin Corry's bunker be too good for them.
MATT TREACY finds Tom Felle was styling himself as a Doctor a year before he claimed his PhD was awarded. The media expert on ‘disinformation’ who RTÉ says faked his doctoral qualifications, is an assessor for Coimisiún na Meán, opining often on immigration.
gript.ie/the-expert-on-disin…
Jay retweeted
The same commission that has broadcasters forced into apologies and all along a total Imposter in their midst 😂😂😂😂 shambolic
No surprise here. A so-called expert on disinformation and 'fake news' has been falsely claiming to have a doctorate from a distinguished English university.
This lad seemingly was appointed as an expert assessor for the media regulator Coimisiún na Meán.
You couldn’t make this shit up!
rte.ie/news/primetime/2026/1…
Jay retweeted
He's one of the only TDs calling out the state. A real statesman. Imagine if we had 100 more with courage and integrity. Roll on 2029 - or sooner. But we need good people to put names in.
1/
🔹Kudos to @kenoflynnTD & credit where credit is due.
🔹Deputy Ken O'Flynn did what so many others in that House would not do. He stood up, named names & told the truth. He didn't hide behind procedure. He didn't water it down.
🔹O’Flynn laid it out in full: the holsters from a saddlery, the faulty ammunition, the gun parts, the €20 million helicopters that never flew, the DPP deciding not to prosecute.
🔹That took guts & it took decency. The Horkan family will know who stood for them.
🔹But there is one crucial piece that even O'Flynn didn't get to fully spell out & it makes his call for an inquiry even more urgent:
🔹Drew Harris didn't just fail to apologise to the Horkan family. He lied to them.
🔹He told a grieving family there were no issues with the holster their son was wearing when he was killed.
Jay retweeted
Stop yanking your dog’s neck if they stop to sniff something on *their* walk!
It’s likely one of the very few points of their day when they get new stimulation - let them have 5 seconds of your precious, precious time to sniff something without having their head pulled off.
Jay retweeted
Helen McEntee, Ireland's 🇮🇪 Minister for Foreign Affairs, proudly poses with Francesca Albanese.
Remember when the UN Special Rapporteur called Hamas's rapes a "fabrication"?
How about when she called Israel the “enemy of humanity”?
This isn't solidarity with Palestinians. It's whitewashing a woman who demonizes the only Jewish state.








































