LisaMacD 🇨🇦☮️⚖️ retweeted
Everyone is singing in English, then Canadian singer Bryan Adams comes along and starts singing in Italian. You can see how delighted Luciano Pavarotti is, with a huge smile on his face. He seems genuinely impressed and deeply appreciative of the respect Bryan is showing, and you can even see him bowing at the end of the song.
There’s something I can learn from this. If everyone showed love and respect for one another, the world would be a much better place.
Music video by Luciano Pavarotti, Bryan Adams performing "O Sole Mio" (Live).
LisaMacD 🇨🇦☮️⚖️ retweeted
Albania is about to have the first successful revolution in like 40 years and it’s not in the news because there’s no Africans or Arabs to blame
LisaMacD 🇨🇦☮️⚖️ retweeted
Replying to @CincinnatiNews_
The guy who runs the 🇨🇦 steel plant is a Trump buddy.
LisaMacD 🇨🇦☮️⚖️ retweeted
*BRILLIANT*
The French made a short film about what could happen after all immigrants would follow the ‘_white, angry old man’s_’ advice to go back where they came from.*
LisaMacD 🇨🇦☮️⚖️ retweeted
The US unexpectedly invited Russia to a G20 meeting yesterday, causing outrage among European leaders.
In response to why they were invited, Trump said "we like getting along with everybody".
Except Canada. Or Spain. Or Denmark, Italy, the UK, most of Europe, South Korea...🧐
LisaMacD 🇨🇦☮️⚖️ retweeted
Aquarium project at Royalmount complex ‘on hold’ ctvnews.ca/montreal/article/…
LisaMacD 🇨🇦☮️⚖️ retweeted
Someone just pointed out that—almost unbelievably—this is real footage from a fight in which the Canada goose ultimately prevailed over the eagle: youtube.com/watch?v=yIjaxrQB…
If this isn't a metaphor for US trade policy, I don't know what is.
LisaMacD 🇨🇦☮️⚖️ retweeted
I just checked who covered the historic mass funeral of 112 Palestinians in Gaza killed by Israel.
CNN? Nowhere.
MSNBC? Silent.
Fox News? Crickets.
BBC? Radio silence.
112 bodies. One mass funeral. Zero Western media coverage.
Journalism didn’t die. It just decided some mass funerals aren’t newsworthy.
LisaMacD 🇨🇦☮️⚖️ retweeted
Donald Trump told Americans they'd receive DOGE cheques. Never happened.
He told them he'd end Income Tax and provide Tariff cheques. Never happened.
In fact, instead, he's has driven up their cost of living, spiked gas prices, threatened and alienated America's top friends, passed a huge deficit budget, like massive, and added to their debt in a significant fashion.
He and his pals get rich while he absolutely screws over the rest of America.
The worst, his base, who are harmed by this the most, cheer him on.
LisaMacD 🇨🇦☮️⚖️ retweeted
Donald Trump would see Canada lose $100 to make the United States $1.
Those that argue that's "America First" and what he should do forget that when it comes at the expense of the relationship with your top ally and top partner, that will have consequences.
He lies, cheats, scams, renegs, and makes things up constantly.
It's clear there is no "negotiating"
He says he loves Canadians, yet his actions say otherwise. He has done nothing but attempt to harm us, threaten us, and try to penalize us.
Again, that isn't America First, it's America Only. There is a big difference....
Again, sure, that's fine. But those in Canada that are worshipping him for this? Wow.
LisaMacD 🇨🇦☮️⚖️ retweeted
Dear @ScottJenningsKY
Let's talk cows.
Canada’s dairy system is not simply a tariff wall designed to keep American milk out. It is a supply-management system designed to keep production roughly aligned with demand, stabilize farm income and preserve a viable network of family-owned farms. Imports are allowed in significant negotiated quantities at low or zero tariffs; the very high tariffs people hear about generally apply only after those agreed import quotas have been filled.
The United States protects its farmers too, often much more extensively, but it uses different mechanisms. American taxpayers support agriculture through crop insurance subsidies, income and price-support programs, disaster payments, commodity programs and direct government payments. Dairy farmers have access to federally supported margin-protection and insurance programs. The U.S. also restricts imports in sensitive sectors. Sugar is an especially obvious example: the United States uses tariff-rate quotas that limit how much foreign sugar can enter at low tariffs, precisely to protect domestic producers and prices. USDA explicitly describes this system.
So there is a real hypocrisy in attacking Canada as a protectionist outlier. Canada essentially says to its dairy farmers: we will control production and imports so you can earn a reasonably predictable income from the market. The United States more often says to its farmers: we will expose you more directly to the market, but protect your income through subsidies, federally supported insurance, price and commodity programs, and, where politically important, import restrictions. In 2026 alone, USDA forecasts federal Dairy Margin Coverage payments, while its broader farm programs continue to provide income, commodity and insurance support.
Both countries protect agriculture. They just write the cheque differently.
And that matters to the family farm. Canada’s system was designed in part to prevent the boom-and-bust cycle in which oversupply collapses milk prices, smaller farmers fail, and increasingly large operations buy them out. Supply management gives a farmer greater certainty that producing milk efficiently can provide a viable living without having to become an enormous industrial-scale operation merely to survive the next price collapse.
That does not make Canada’s system perfect. Quota is expensive and can make it difficult for new farmers to enter. But portraying Canadian dairy protection as some extraordinary trade offence while the United States protects its own farmers with quotas, tariffs, subsidies, insurance and government support is fundamentally misleading.
Canada protects a relatively small number of agricultural sectors openly through supply management. The United States protects agriculture through an enormous, less visible architecture of federal programs and selective trade barriers. Calling one “protectionism” while pretending the other is “free trade” is the hypocrisy.
Hope next time you will fact check yourself.
Sincerely
Glen
LisaMacD 🇨🇦☮️⚖️ retweeted
Canada’s boreal forest — the source of much of the wildfire smoke drifting into the U.S. — isn’t like our managed forests in the lower 48.
It’s the largest intact forest ecosystem on Earth: roughly 1.3 billion acres (about 78 times larger than Alaska’s Tongass, our biggest national forest, and 7 times larger than all 154 U.S. National Forests combined). It stretches in an almost continuous belt from the Yukon to Newfoundland.
Why can’t they just do controlled burns like we do here?
Because most of it is remote, roadless wilderness.
• Less than 9% of Canada’s population lives in the boreal region.
• Less than 1% of the forest itself is developed.
• Vast areas have no roads and are only accessible by aircraft or winter roads.
You can’t send crews in to do prescribed burns across a billion+ acres of inaccessible terrain the way we can in populated areas near roads and communities in the U.S. Wildfire has been nature’s primary management tool in these ecosystems for thousands of years.
Smoke reaching the Northeast isn’t new either. It happened in 1950, 1988, 1995, 2002, 2017, 2021, 2023, 2025, and now 2026. Weather (especially upper-level wind patterns) determines where the smoke goes, not just where the fires are burning.
Blaming Canada’s government for “not controlling” these fires is political theater. The scale and inaccessibility make large-scale suppression or prevention across that wilderness fundamentally different — and in many places, practically impossible — from managing forests near U.S. population centers.
Nature runs that forest. Politicians don’t. Let’s stop pretending otherwise.
The “oldest ally” line is doing a lot of work to hide a pretty basic double standard.
The US hit Canada with 25 to 35 percent tariffs, citing fentanyl as the reason, despite Canada accounting for a sliver of a percent of fentanyl seized at the border. That’s not how you treat an ally. That’s how you treat a target.
Canada responded with targeted, dollar-for-dollar countermeasures, then pulled most of them back by September 2025 in good faith while talks continued. That’s not some rogue act of aggression. That’s exactly what sovereign countries with leverage are supposed to do when a trading partner starts swinging tariffs at them for a manufactured pretext.
As for “only Canada and China retaliated,” that’s true, and it’s not the own the US thinks it is. Most other countries didn’t retaliate because they didn’t have the leverage to. The EU was fully prepared to hit back on over 100 billion in US exports and only backed off after cutting a deal that included 600 billion in US investment commitments. Japan, the UK, South Korea, they all negotiated from a position where retaliation wasn’t realistic. Canada and China retaliated because they could.
Being an ally was never supposed to mean you sit there and take unilateral tariffs with no response. NORAD partner. Largest bilateral trading relationship in the world. Integrated auto supply chains. None of that stopped the US from treating Canada like a national security threat under Section 232. You don’t get to invoke a decades old friendship as a shield while breaking the terms of that friendship yourself.
Only TWO countries retaliated against the U.S. over tariffs: China and Canada.
Canada is one of America’s closest allies. It’s time for them to start acting like it.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Multiple countries beyond China and Canada, including the EU, Mexico, India, Turkey, Russia, and the UK, have imposed retaliatory tariffs against the US. trade.gov/feature-articl… wita.org/atp-research/h…
LisaMacD 🇨🇦☮️⚖️ retweeted
Opinion: My friend does not have to die montrealgazette.com/opinion/…
LisaMacD 🇨🇦☮️⚖️ retweeted
Replying to @EricRSammons @SohrabAhmari
We don’t count the amount of words as though Mathematics it be.
We read the words of the Pope, Vicar of Christ, with an open heart and understanding of the depth of his message. If you don’t understand the first time, read it until you do.
LisaMacD 🇨🇦☮️⚖️ retweeted
THIS DATE IN HISTORY: The city @Montreal was founded on May 14, 1642 by Paul de Chomedey, sieur (lord) de Maisonneuve































