Geo-liberal Party Of India Official πŸ—½πŸ”° (@GLPOfficial01) header
Geo-liberal Party Of India Official πŸ—½πŸ”° (@GLPOfficial01) profile picture

Free Markets. Austrian Economics. Georgism πŸ”°#LVT. Workers Ownership. Milton Friedman. Thomas Sowell. Hayek. Mises. Ayn Rand. Ambedkarite. Individualism.

Joined November 2024
Photo by Geo-liberal Party Of India Official πŸ—½πŸ”° (@GLPOfficial01)Photo by Geo-liberal Party Of India Official πŸ—½πŸ”° (@GLPOfficial01)Photo by Geo-liberal Party Of India Official πŸ—½πŸ”° (@GLPOfficial01)Photo by Geo-liberal Party Of India Official πŸ—½πŸ”° (@GLPOfficial01)Photo by Geo-liberal Party Of India Official πŸ—½πŸ”° (@GLPOfficial01)Photo by Geo-liberal Party Of India Official πŸ—½πŸ”° (@GLPOfficial01)Photo by Geo-liberal Party Of India Official πŸ—½πŸ”° (@GLPOfficial01)Photo by Geo-liberal Party Of India Official πŸ—½πŸ”° (@GLPOfficial01)Photo by Geo-liberal Party Of India Official πŸ—½πŸ”° (@GLPOfficial01)Photo by Geo-liberal Party Of India Official πŸ—½πŸ”° (@GLPOfficial01)
Geo-liberal Party Of India Official πŸ—½πŸ”° retweeted
A PSA: Capitalism β‰  Cronyism
2
8
1
33
1,356
"Socialists be like: ​"Trickle down economics doesn't work. Which is why I think we should forcibly seize a portion of everyone's earnings, send it up to centralized power, one with a monopoly on force & violence, and hope it trickles back down to us! ​We are so brilliant!!!"
In a capitalist system, wealth doesn’t trickle down, it streams across. Entrepreneurs offer goods and services now, hire workers now, make investments now, pay for resources now. No slow trickling involved!
1
24
The tax system (incentive system) keeps land as expensive as possible and labor as cheap as possible. Blaming billionaires is as wrong as blaming immigrants.
31
You're retarded. I support voluntary workers ownership and private property. People would have choice whether you want cooperatives or private ownership. A choice that one can't get in communism. Also if you're really communist then you would know that it was viewed revisionist
Replying to @GLP4INDIA @grok
Yes it is. It is literally collective ownership of the means of production. It is socialism, the transitional stage to Communism oogedy boogedy. 😱
24
You're retarded. I support voluntary workers ownership and private property. People would have choice whether you want cooperatives or private ownership. A choice that one can't get in communism. Also if you're really communist then you would know that it was viewed revisionist
Replying to @GLP4INDIA
It's collective ownership of the means of production. It is collectivism. Socialism is collectivism.
18
β€œIt is one thing to have free immigration to jobs. It is another thing to have free immigration to welfare. And you cannot have both.” β€” Milton Friedman
21
No, it did not. Communism has killed over 100 million people around the world during peacetime in the 20th century and you retards just want to give it another go because you have not learned a DAMN thing from history.
24
Also market socialism is possible in only theory only. It has no credible success. It failed in Yugoslavia. I would try to implement in one factory, if it works only then i would spread it everywhere otherwise i would continue with free market capitalism.
Replying to @GLP4INDIA
You shared a libertarian meme featuring Javier Milei disparaging collectivism. When I debunked you about capitalism being free market and pointed out socialism can be free market you claim now to have been promoting market socialism. Just admit you were wrong lol.
1
23
Reason it failed was because government intervention in economy and regularly bailing out ineffective and failing cooperatives. Also i want it to implemented voluntarily not forced. There should have been no government subsidies and laws protecting them only then it succeeds.
18
πŸ˜‚. And i was the one who promoted market socialism in the first place. Stop stealing my ideology and stick to your communism.
Replying to @GLP4INDIA @grok
"worker cooperatives can operate under those conditions" Womp womp
1
1
121
So basically true free markets can't exist without private property.
The definition is standard. Capitalism is private ownership of the means of production operated for profit. Markets can exist without it. Market socialism pairs social or cooperative ownership of capital with market prices. Classical free markets require unrestricted private property rights in productive assets and free capital formation. Those two systems are distinct. Pure versions of either remain theoretical.
1
25
Socialist and communist are anti progress.
4
5
40
487